Philosophy on Trannies and Faggots and what links them to Darwinism and Overpopulation

[Epic Fail Man]

First Let's ask ourselves this:

WHY ARE THERE SO MANY FUCKING TRANNIES NOW?

And more importantly:

WHY ARE THERE SO MANY FUCKING TRANNIES IN THE DEVELOPED WORLD?

Are you starting to get the picture?


For centuries in our communities whether it be from upper class royals or stinky peasants, family and children meant power. As a royal, more children will mean extending your family's reach on power and continuing the royal blood of kings and queens and emperors alike. As a peasant the more children you had the more people you had working in your farm and more things to trade for goats and appliances. Also, if you have an argument with a neighboring peasant community, you'd have more people to beat the shit out of them.


Now in the developed world we have different problems with different solutions. We worry about getting insurance, paying rent, getting a raise, saving for property, etc.

Here's the thing, in a lot of big cities the cost of living is so high having a child would make you homeless and be detrimental to your success.
Where do you find most of the trannies?

Thanks to the population density and large import of immigration in cities like NYC, LA, Seattle, Toronto the cost of living is barely livable. All Millennials and Gen-Zs worry about now is "how do i fucking pay rent this month while saving". Almost no one thinks of having children, why? because they are barely making ends meat and as a natural instinct they are focused on survival and having a child will threaten their survival and the chance of their child to succeed in this mad place they live in is too low making the risk too high.

Now, In some places in South America, Africa, India(edit: India is stupid and degenerate it doesn't belong in this category), and even shit European places like Latvia and Romania. They are still, in varying degrees, living in Peasantopia. Family still means a lot. If you have an hijo maybe he will jump the barb wire and get some American dollars back to the family. If you have an hija maybe a rich American will come to swipe her up and give the whole family a sponsorship. People may live in shit conditions but most of them have their own property and having a child brings more reward than risk.


Now let's get to the important part. Darwinism:

We as humans are a weird hybrid of a pact animal and a hive species, we are kind of like half-bee half-dog, you get the point. We have a tendency to prioritize our own pact, usually our own family and will instinctively do anything to protect your family and its interest. sometimes the pact extends. to a tribe, county, state, country... This is were we thin the lines between a pact animal and a hive-minded individual. we get to foreign affairs, international unions. We start behaving like ants. Millions of people who never speak to each other helping and collaborating to serve the interest of our colony and for the long run our "species".


What are trannies and fags doing to contribute to Darwinism?

In a community were there is not much of a benefit to reproduce people tend to lose their heterosexual instinct which is linked to their reproductive instinct (I think) but retain their sexual instinct. So men start fucking men and woman start fucking woman, what's the point? Not going to have kids might as well have a little fun. This is a fair balance for a society that balances out the population of a civilization if the population is a bit too dense. It's better than people instinctively killing each other to control the population.

Trannies in the other hand is an EXTREME solution to overpopulation, almost as a last resort. I don't remember who said it, but some famous woman who is supposedly a "rational thinker" of some sort said that when men start pretending to be woman in a civilization is usually when its in the crisps of falling. I agree. The emergence of Transgenders and its promotion is the result of a failing civilization. People are going ballistic cutting their dicks off and jumping off balconies, and our collective state of mind, mostly the governments collective state of mind is like "please, do more of this we need to make the 41% an 81% to reduce the population back to normal levels" while the trannies and, to a lesser extent incel gay anime porn fans and consoomers go mad on their state of living and failing society.

In the poorer countries and communities what's the point of being gay or trans, they need more people to promote their culture and send more people over to bring them cash. And when you see a poor country evolving and becoming less like a peasant country like Poland, you begin to see an emergence in gay activists and crossdressers. This is an ongoing trend.

Detractors and nuisance.

Unfortunately for every healthy colony of ants there's that one ant with the parasitic mushroom that fucks shit up and ruins everyone's day.

And our human race has these too, and in terms of people who have been led to live their lives to not reproduce and off themselves they, for whatever defective reason, go against the grain,

Spoiler: Examples

Conclusion:

I think with this philosophy we should encourage the trannies to do what they have to do and finish the job and bully the detractors.

It will also be nice if everyone that becomes trans and disgusting goes to their own containment zone and leaves everyone else alone.



Am I wrong? I haven't heard anything yet to convince me otherwise.

 

[Exigent Circumcisions]

TLDR fucking based tho.

 

[Just Dont]

Based af.

 

[Haim Arlosoroff]

centauries

​

Where do you find most of the trannies?

Where the social pressures are both least against; the places where high trust, familial collectivism, and moralism are near-categorically not to be found. And where the social pressures are the greatest for: where the hard problems of surviving in increasingly dense human hive-cities and avoiding the subscription-based resource selling schemes (rent, membership fees for online stores, and eventually self-driving electric car taxis being the only way to affordably travel) are side-stepped and dealt with only on a surface symptomatic level. Where the "you will own nothing and be happy" rentals of eventual both friendly and carnal companions squeeze out the last of your humanity. Where the eventual Spenglarian Winter sets in and the population cease all attempts at self-perpetuation at every conceivable level.

Intelligence and sterility are allied in old families, old peoples, and old cultures, not merely because in each microcosm the overstrained and fettered animal-element is eating up the plant element, but also because the waking-consciousness assumes that being is normally regulated by causality. That which the man of intelligence, most significantly and characteristically, labels as "natural impulse" or "life-force", he not only knows, but also values, causally, giving it the place amongst his other needs that his judgment assigns to it. When the ordinary thought of a highly cultivated people begins to regard "having children" as a question of pros and cons, the great turning-point has come. For Nature knows nothing of pro and con. Everywhere, wherever life is actual, reigns an inward organic logic, an "it", a drive, that is utterly independent of waking-being, with its causal linkages, and indeed not even observed by it. The abundant proliferation of primitive peoples is a natural phenomenon, which is not even thought about, still less judged as to its utility or the reverse. When reasons have to be put forward at all in a question of life, life itself has become questionable. At that point begins prudent limitation of the number of births. In the classical world the practice was deplored by Polybius as the ruin of Greece, and yet even at his date it had long been established in the great cities; in subsequent Roman times it became appallingly general. At first explained by the economic misery of the times, very soon it ceased to explain itself at all. And at that point, too, in Buddhist India as in Babylon, in Rome as in our own cities, a man's choice of the woman who is to be, not mother of his children as amongst peasants and primitives, but his own "companion for life", becomes a problem of mentalities. The Ibsen marriage appears, the "higher spiritual affinity" in which both parties are "free"—free, that is, as intelligences, free from the plantlike urge of the blood to continue itself, and it becomes possible for a Shaw to say "that unless Woman repudiates her womanliness, her duty to her husband, to her children, to society, to the law, and to everyone but herself, she cannot emancipate herself." The primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of "mutual understanding". ...
At this level all civilizations enter upon a stage, which lasts for centuries, of appalling depopulation. The whole pyramid of cultural man vanishes. It crumbles from the summit, first the world-cities, then the provincial forms, and finally the land itself, whose best blood has incontinently poured into the towns, merely to bolster them up awhile. At the last, only the primitive blood remains, alive, but robbed of its strongest and most promising elements. This residue is the fellah type.

If anything has demonstrated the fact that causality has nothing to do with history, it is the familiar "decline" of the classical, which accomplished itself long before the irruption of Germanic migrants. The Imperium enjoyed the completest peace; it was rich and highly developed; it was well organized; and it possessed in its emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius a series of rulers such as the Caesarism of no other civilization can show. And yet the population dwindled, quickly and wholesale. The desperate marriage-and-children laws of Augustus—amongst them the Lex de maritandis ordinibus, which dismayed Roman society more than the destruction of Varus's legions—the wholesale adoptions, the incessant plantation of soldiers of barbarian origin to fill the depleted country-side, the immense food-charities of Nerva and Trajan for the children of poor parents—nothing availed to check the process.

-The Decline Of The West Vol. II, Oswald Spengler & Alfred A. Knopf, 1928, pp. 104–06

Trannies are the lowest energy adaption of an increasingly worsening issue, they are present in many civilizations during their going under. Rome and ancient Greece are the most famous but the Near East, India, and China had their times too. They were and are always slowly accepted and culturally integrated, because questioning the deeper social failures of civil organization is always in the histories too much of a deeper and more dangerous dive than to pretend to have no idea why they came culturally upon us in such a quick time span.

Unfortunately they represent the failures of intergenerational economic enfranchisement to provide a path for the top 90-95% towards earning a house, spouse, 2.5 kids, and other personal accomplishments. As such, dealing with the surface layer is to only mitigate the underlying shift toward complete collapse civilizationally. Worse, the more generations the collapse is withheld from the greater the social tyranny used both within and without the failing society. This is known as the Spenglerian Winter, which we have not yet entered but is one in which all social constructs factor into your survival and success more than nature does. This leads to a feedback loop where the civilization's unspoken faults maximize, such as the insular Chinese Empires, the Population-Gobbling Roman Empires, or even during the Mahajanapadas period of Gautama Buddha. It is this time that we are in, where the civilization is maximally confused about its social consensuses, the spoken romantic ideals versus the quiet traditional practices, and only agrees on the need for total and complete reconciliation.

Whatever the upheaval of nature or bloodshed required. In the name of Anti-Racism or Nationalism, the cost will be gladly paid.

This is the fate of all High Cultures who live out natural lifespans. The cultural centralization unpreventable once the post-1970s industrial shifts to China began, creating inevitable class war between the working class and the upper financier class. This battle will complete itself with one side losing and the other side emerging as the primary cultural author of a new America. Trannies are merely a meme of the bankers fighting against another Occupy Wall St which cannot happen if the Left and Right of the base society fight among themselves.

Like organisms, all High Cultures die. Their final centuries are as Museums, which fossilize and canonize their special arts/sciences/other forms with high intellect but no soul, or creative essence. Fossils which imitate natural culture in but a cruel parody which will survive High Cultures but which will not carry the Culture’s nuance or aesthetic sense or sense of the sacred with them. Oswald Spengler argued, in his 1921 book, that the constraints of other High Cultures also apply to Western culture. Over the course of only a few more decades from today, money would expand to exhaust all possibilities and democracy would hollow out and fossilize the Western world, killing its essence as it spins out its final cultural forms. Only blood is stronger than money: Power politics will emerge more blatantly and finally the High Culture will collapse, leaving behind its artifacts for future cultures to appropriate (although not to deeply appreciate).

Hyperreality, a heraldic sign of the fossilization of the High Culture, refers to a replica of something that never actually existed, or an image that is more real than the thing it’s supposed to represent. Social realities which represent our limited understanding of natural reality. The hyperreal suggests stories and images curated to be “ideal”, which elicit even more from a person than their supposed source material would in nature. Pseudo-events are staged occurrences built to create press coverage for public interest reasons. The hyperreal becomes as society progresses, by pseudo-evolutionary social engagement or disregard, much more engaging than the real can ever be. Pornography and professional sports are populated by superhumans. Curated lawns parody nature. The mundane is histrionic in reality tv programming. Retail stores employ “facing” to look perpetually full. Our world is full of deliberate, curated signals that signify half-truths and non-truths about the actual physical reality of supposedly readable situations. Social Media is the ultimate expression of the horrifying addiction and cultural deadening of the Hyperreality on every human civilization it has ever emerged in. At least prior to the Tranny, potentially the herald of the greatest hyperreality if you think about it, within their grotesqueness lies a truth most willingly lie to themselves about. What is a women if she bears no children? Nothing more than a homosexual or a cross-dresser. You may as well be gay to date a woman while plotting to never have kids. That is the only real difference between a trans-woman ideally and a woman ideally. The Tranny is the Hyperreal parody of modern woman in the eyes of men.

TL;DR: Trannies appear where modernity drowns the working man who sputters and flails socially in any way he can.

We as humans are a weird hybrid of a pact animal and a hive species, we are kind of like half-bee half-dog, you get the point. We have a tendency to prioritize our own pact, usually our own family and will instinctively do anything to protect your family and its interest. sometimes the pact extends. to a tribe, county, state, country... This is were we thin the lines between a pact animal and a hive-minded individual. we get to foreign affairs, international unions. We start behaving like ants. Millions of people who never speak to each other helping and collaborating to serve the interest of our colony and for the long run our "species".

The social pact between banker and worker is dead. To sacrifice for the collective as an ant does is the very height of national cuckoldry. Ben Shapiro's supporters will of course disagree on the grounds that hyper-individualism need not acknowledge reality but instead their more engaging fantasy of living according to the metaphysics and morals of Capitalism regardless. Sexless monks who want us all to join in their cultural suicide pact against America reasserting itself.

Either America becomes something new in governmental and cultural form which owes no structure to the current nation or it devolves into a more terrible despotism then seems possible because the cultural force of American liberty is already dead and we are playing in the ruins. Oswald Spengler referred to the denial of this as the cowardice of optimism. The logic is subtle. If one is an optimist, then the pressing problems of the era will be overcome, and there is need for substantial reform and change. Therefore one does not have to fight for social and political change. Therefore Spengler argued that psychologically it takes much more courage to be a pessimist for that obliges the moral person to fight for change and reform which often has negative consequences for the reformer. The optimist has a free ride so to speak. Climate Change is an example. If we are optimistic that our society will develop new technology to ameliorate the consequences of Global Warming, then we do not have to fight for changes today. The optimist avoids this burden.

In a community were there is not much of a benefit to reproduce people tend to lose their heterosexual instinct which is linked to their reproductive instinct (I think) but retain their sexual instinct. So men start fucking men and woman start fucking woman, what's the point? Not going to have kids might as well have a little fun. This is a fair balance for a society that balances out the population of a civilization if the population is a bit too dense. It's better than people instinctively killing each other to control the population.

I completely disagree. In every civilization, because Trannies are a sign and symptom of the lower classes collapsing socially, the allowance of Trannies leads to ever greater social collapse and class warfare as conditions progress not less. If the social instinct was to decisively solve the underlying issues of there not being a healthy benefit to reproducing, rather than indecisively falling back into decadency and substituting one's sexual instincts, then the bloodshed would have purpose. Africa is overpopulated, it will continue to ship its people at half the rate of its growth into the west so that both continue to grow until there is a collapse. This is your balance for society, this is just another midwit choice which will not blowback for decades and so it is not worth thinking about. As per usual, the idiots and the people who can see more than a moment into the future agree where the Mass Man in the middle disagrees.

Blood for the Blood God. Every Human, not American, is Illegal. To kill an infidel, the Pope has said, is not murder; it is the path to Heaven.

Trannies in the other hand is an EXTREME solution to overpopulation, almost as a last resort. I don't remember who said it, but some famous woman who is supposedly a "rational thinker" of some sort said that when men start pretending to be woman in a civilization is usually when its in the crisps of falling. I agree.

Camille Paglia is a rational thinker in the Sargon of Akkad sense, but not someone I would call rational. Her views on legalizing Child Pornography are not rational.

It will also be nice if everyone that becomes trans and disgusting goes to their own containment zone and leaves everyone else alone.

The population of the whole overpopulated world descend upon you, their ways will make even the grocery store confusing and sad. Everything you love will be declared racist to accommodate them. All those who would have stood beside you and helped you have become just as strange and disgusting as the masses drowning all exceptions to global averages. I make a different bed, and each of us is going to have to lie in his. If we are to lose as all civilizations did, I will be contented that I opposed the compromising optimism which is mere cowardice, can you say the same?

 

[Epic Fail Man]

they are present in many civilizations during their going under. Rome and ancient Greece are the most famous but the Near East, India, and China had their times too.

I was going to mention Rome, Greece and looking back at it I don't know why I mentioned India as one of the non gay areas. They are completely degenerate full of trannies and shit eating humans, I would rate it the worst place on to live and the most Hellish civilization on earth.

I also wanted to mention Pompeii because it is a perfect example of a fallen civilization besides India. Everyone was into weird sex fetishes and ass fucking before they all turned to stone.

I completely disagree. In every civilization, because Trannies are a sign and symptom of the lower classes collapsing socially, the allowance of Trannies leads to ever greater social collapse and class warfare as conditions progress not less. If the social instinct was to decisively solve the underlying issues of there not being a healthy benefit to reproducing, rather than indecisively falling back into decadency and substituting one's sexual instincts, then the bloodshed would have purpose. Africa is overpopulated, it will continue to ship its people at half the rate of its growth into the west so that both continue to grow until there is a collapse. This is your balance for society, this is just another midwit choice which will not blowback for decades and so it is not worth thinking about. As per usual, the idiots and the people who can see more than a moment into the future agree where the Mass Man in the middle disagrees.

I am looking at this in a more naturalistic and evolutionarily lens than societal. Animals and other organisms do weird things that enhance their survival in their ecosystem. For example some bees will learn to attach to a hornet and vibrate to burn it to death, there are bugs that their existence is a decoy of another species or object. And when things change animals adapt. A pact of cayotes that adapt to eating trash even though its not good for them it prolongs their survival more than not eating, wild animals in cities learn to beg to humans for food and becomes a natural instinct.

The reason why I mentioned Darwinism is that I think Trannies are an extreme form of "anti-bodies" in our body of a society. It's like an allergic reaction or a blister or a heat rash. It's a reaction to a problem that is unpleasant, and even though it is trying to solve an issue it is creating other issues in the process.

I believe that Trannies are a symptom, but a symptom like an allergic reaction is. We have to many people and failing programs in our society, trannies pop up like blisters trying to reduce the population by not reproducing and offing themselves while promoting their lifestyle for more to "sacrifice" themselves for the population.

 

[Tranimal Farm]

Most based argument for trans separatism I've seen yet

 

[Haim Arlosoroff]

I am looking at this in a more naturalistic and evolutionarily lens than societal. Animals and other organisms do weird things that enhance their survival in their ecosystem. For example some bees will learn to attach to a hornet and vibrate to burn it to death, there are bugs that their existence is a decoy of another species or object. And when things change animals adapt. A pact of cayotes that adapt to eating trash even though its not good for them it prolongs their survival more than not eating, wild animals in cities learn to beg to humans for food and becomes a natural instinct.

Yes, throughout history man in a sufficiently dense and trust-less society, where the societial bonds broke and were ignored thereafter, acts like pseudo-women. Centuries later, the rot becomes so thorough it is seen only as the cultural bedrock of being civilized such as the Emperor Elagabalus (ruled June 218 – March 222) who apparently delighted in being called Hierocles's, an ex-slave and chariot driver from Rhodes, mistress, wife, and queen. The emperor reportedly wore makeup and wigs, preferred to be called a lady and not a lord, and offered vast sums to any physician who could provide him with a vagina. Transgenderism has always become accepted in society, worry not.

I just wish to alleviate man from a status you yourself compare to coyotes eating trash, it hurts that society is hurting itself. A capitalism, which requires humanity do weird things to enhance their survival in what becomes an alien ecosystem to their default instincts, is not better than socialism. Everyday the arguments for capitalism grow less and less if the end result is trannies, bug protein burgers, and concrete pods under not a dystopia of socialism, but under a lack of it. If humanity becomes the end creature of "I have no mouth and I must scream" in the artificial nature of hyper-capitalism and dense urban hives then what is the point of restraining ourselves from Socialism?

It never stops at trannies, and the allowance of trannies alleviates no-one by the end. By the 2040-2050, this will become apparent to you who imagines blinders as lenses. It may seem novel, transgenderism, but it is just a familiar sign from history. It matters not that you've surmised the reason it happens, it will happen and it need not if for once we heeded the information you deduced and worked to lighten the mutilation of man which begins historically with transgenders.

The reason why I mentioned Darwinism is that I think Trannies are an extreme form of "anti-bodies" in our body of a society. It's like an allergic reaction or a blister or a heat rash. It's a reaction to a problem that is unpleasant, and even though it is trying to solve an issue it is creating other issues in the process.

The Societial AIDS which created the tranny from imperfectly healthy people will not be stopped by an immune response, it never does in any of the civilizations it spawns. The forces you are thinking about aren't correct, you're thinking the anti-bodys relieve the disease, but they only fail further. The culture dies from the underlying disease, your trannies fail to even remotely offset it.

Those who are smart grow sterile, and those who retain their fertility grow stupider and stupider as bloodlines thin first in the cities, then in the countryside, and finally in the surrounding barbarian lands beside the great civilization. All to feed the maw of a civilization which grows less and less focused and sane until finally the rest of the world burn it to the ground.

I believe that Trannies are a symptom, but a symptom like an allergic reaction is. We have to many people and failing programs in our society, trannies pop up like blisters trying to reduce the population by not reproducing and offing themselves while promoting their lifestyle for more to "sacrifice" themselves for the population.

What are the programs in our society, are they the natural product of Capitalism or Government? Do small businesses create the conditions spawning trannies, or just oligarchic big business capitalism? What is the prognosis, and can anything be done?

 

[abacussedout]

What are the programs in our society, are they the natural product of Capitalism or Government? Do small businesses create the conditions spawning trannies, or just oligarchic big business capitalism? What is the prognosis, and can anything be done?

Small businesses usually can't afford trannies. Small businesses typically need normal people to carry their own weight without causing drama because margins are so thin. As has been said, an abundance of resources is a prerequisite to this movement. This is why diversity/inclusion/equity programs--or even HR at all--are a later stage development in a business. Look at when a business starts developing a reputation as "a safe place to work during your transition." It's (usually) after certain revenue targets are met.

It has nothing to with capitalism and is more communistic in the sense that the leaders are deciding that the normies will carry the burden of the trannies in the name of equity (burden meaning the increased cost of medical insurance because you're adding extra services for trannies, bending PTO rules for trannies to deal with whatever trannies do in all their days off, the general drag on morale from having to work with someone that demands so much attention and special treatment, bathrooms etc., is difficult to look at and difficult to listen to, will likely be promoted above anyone else for the sake of diversity regardless of performance thus removing several motivators from other workers, the list goes on...). If the market was truly allowed to do its thing no one could afford trannies.

A brutal 30s style depression would have an immense impact in this regard.

 

[Haim Arlosoroff]

Small businesses usually can't afford trannies. Small businesses typically need normal people to carry their own weight without causing drama because margins are so thin. As has been said, an abundance of resources is a prerequisite to this movement. This is why diversity/inclusion/equity programs--or even HR at all--are a later stage development in a business. Look at when a business starts developing a reputation as "a safe place to work during your transition." It's (usually) after certain revenue targets are met.

Exactly, as trannies are normalized they crave institutions to support and nurture them. Corporations have to do more for marginalized sexualities. Universities have to be cleansed ideologically from dissenting opinions. Journalists have to stop speaking truth to power and start supporting LGBTQ+ corporate partnerships. The Federal Government has to queer everything.

As those forces grow and, in the name of modernity's moral framework, begin to work together, then who is left outside the tent of this new affiliation? Everyone who lost during COVID. Straight people didn't get extra money and assistance, whites didn't get extra money and assistance, Christians were arrested everywhere they stood up in the anglosphere except in America where there are still enough faithful, and Men didn't get extra money and assistance for being men. Small businesses similarly are not to be empowered by either the New Normal or by Transgenderism because they are not useful to the system. Trannies are going to be the faithful and the martyrs to the Great Reset.

Small Businesses are going to die in the name of Transgenderism, and nobody is going to understand why. In the coming decades, financial capital and corporations are going to grow ever more powerful and the common man and his business are going to disappear entirely beneath the birthing of the new liberalism of libertine hopeless live-day-by-day peonism. We will not be able to own anything, and we will be outvoted economically and politically by these new 'men'.

It has nothing to with capitalism and is more communistic in the sense that the leaders are deciding that the normies will carry the burden of the trannies in the name of equity (burden meaning the increased cost of medical insurance because you're adding extra services for trannies, bending PTO rules for trannies to deal with whatever trannies do in all their days off, the general drag on morale from having to work with someone that demands so much attention and special treatment, bathrooms etc., is difficult to look at and difficult to listen to, will likely be promoted above anyone else for the sake of diversity regardless of performance thus removing several motivators from other workers, the list goes on...). If the market was truly allowed to do its thing no one could afford trannies.

Society can't. That's why it has to brutalize its lowest paid employees in order to make ends meet, lying about the number of hours worked to ensure no benefits must be paid. That's why corporations get bailouts, or banks. That's why foreign labor, done in America or elsewhere, is needed to produce mundane simple goods. The externalities of the American Empire are only beginning. The cost will grow and the hatred of the world will be evenly matched by the desperation to join the American Economy. All while the American citizenry are diminished generation by generation until, as in Rome, a form of universal citizenship will be introduced to offset the decline and keep the party going for the elites.

Once it fails centuries from now, the whole thing will have been wished to never have happened. But the cost will be paid until the Hard Power of the American Government fails and the cost cannot be dumped elsewhere. Spenglerian Winter is a cruel Bitch!

A brutal 30s style depression would have an immense impact in this regard.

 

[07.]

I love it.

 

[White Trash Motorsport]

I don’t think the two can be compared, the percentage of gays in the population has stayed consistent whereas the troonplosion, though still statistically small, is a weird and complex social clusterfuck. That said, they are linked.
Back in the old days it was just the LGB with a small number of HSTSs campaigning for equal treatment under law. Because of legal inequality they existed in a demi monde that also included a lot of fetishists and weirdos. What we have now is the end result of a rights movement that’s achieved it’s original goals, so has moved onto something else on the periphery to keep its gravy train chugging along. To do this has required making the ‘trans’ umbrella so wide it’s more like an awning that any minor degenerate or social cripple can huddle underneath, so we have the troonplosion. I’d like to see some stats on how it breaks down, but I suspect the number of HSTSs, like the boring gays, has stayed stable and the big increase is in AGPs who are basically weird straight men who previously would have stayed old fashioned closeted trannys, autistic lesbian girls, and common or garden narcs who see it as a way of being oh-so special and inflicting their toxic narcery on people. Add social media bubbles and middle class postmodern theoretical wokery to the mix, and you have the contemporary QUILTBAG movement. Nobody in it lacks rights, what they want is special rights that only apply to their personal choice of decadence and degeneracy and fuck anybody else that might get screwed over by it.
That’s why troons get away with acting like a bunch of shits towards lesbians and gay men are now seen as part of the oppressor class. It’s only by literally rolling this turd in glitter, keeping up with the emotional blackmail, and adding a dollop of crass commercialisation, that the movement manages to keep any momentum and therefore cash rolling in. It won’t last in the long term, it’s too fractured and fucked up for that.
What is in the long term? Unintended consequences. Theres already angry, mainly female, detransitioners building up in numbers, and as troons make legal gains their actual social acceptance will drop because most people won’t like being forced by law to play along with their obviously deranged fantasy.
As for Darwinism, it’s been mooted that gays, being people who generally don’t breed, do perform a useful function in a primitive society. They can get on with stuff that the baby wrangling heteros don’t have time for, also there’s just not enough of them to make a difference to the level of population. Historically troons are an even smaller percentage than gays, they’re just a blip that has served little to no useful function,

 

[Jan Ciągwa]

Homosexualism and degeneracy by itself has little to do with societal collapse. Ancient Greece treated women like breeding cattle, Sparta was so gay even other Greeks were making fun of them and somehow they spawned Alexander the Great who conquered almost everything worth conquering at the time; they didn't lost until Romans arrived to conquer and defang them. Romans themselves conquered all there was worth to conquer and did fine despite 2 plagues which killed a substantial percentage of the population and Christianity, which was a radical element destabilizing society at the time. Western Roman Empire didn't collapse until the Huns ran over it; Eastern Empire didn't collapse until the Crusades looted Constantinopole many times and broke it's spine enough to make easy pickings for the Ottoman Turks 400 years later.

Trannies are just the current fashion; give it 20 years or so and people will engage in some other degeneracy. The rise of trannydom was spurned by the equal rights movement; women have equal legal rights as men, but a lot of unspoken societal priviledges. You never hit a woman, you're the breadwinned if you're the husband, kids almost always go to women in a divorce and almost always it's the man who pays alimony. Women get lower prison sentences than men for the same crimes, on average. Women are allowed to cry and bitch while men are shunned for that, which results in higher suicide rates in men than in women. If you check out low-tier office jobs, it's usually women who do them while men do the more stressful & dangerous jobs - compare lethal workplace accident statistics. What I'm trying to convey is that being treated as a woman pays off and allows for more than being treated as a man, which is the reason why so many people troon out. It's just an social optimization for them. The same goes for homosexuals and minority groups, you have people claiming to be homosexual, or a member of the black community despite not passing the brown paper bag test, or a disabled person despite their disability being something that's impossible to prove (like fibromyalgia) because it gives them unspoken advantages which they intent to abuse to the fullest.

We live in the digital age and trends spread lightning-fast, so you see globohomo trends in previously conservative Catholic all-white countries like Poland rising because it's an easy way to be noticed in the Internet and make connections.

In general, the more dense a population is, the more useful people-skills and social status are. This means sociopaths and clout-chasers have more opportunities to thrive. As for the kids stuff, there's a lot of pressure to raise useful members of society since you no longer have the option to assign some useless 3rd son to mindless farm work. People also have TV, Internet and a ton of other ways to pass downtime instead of kids, so less people want to bother with raising kids because frankly, raising kids is fucking horrible sometimes and it's a 20+ year investment that has no guarantee of paying off. Raise a kid only for him to tell you he hates you and lives off you in his 30s - that's a parent's nightmare.

 

[Noir drag freak]

I like where you're going with this idea. But I wouldn't make the assumption that all homosexuality and transsexual are the same. The concept of homosexuality and transsexualism vary by era and location. I like the idea that the forms of homosexuals arise due to cultural needs and burdens. So I agree with Haim, that sexual deviancy is typically a sign that the a culture is stagnating and dying. I would also argue that it's probably a sign that there is probably low social mobility along with sex segregation.

Cultures that have ‘third genders’ don’t prove transgenderism is either ubiquitous or progressive

When homophobic cultures are embracing transgenderism, we need to question its so-called "progressiveness."

www.feministcurrent.com

 

[Ser Prize]

Yes, throughout history man in a sufficiently dense and trust-less society, where the societial bonds broke and were ignored thereafter, acts like pseudo-women. Centuries later, the rot becomes so thorough it is seen only as the cultural bedrock of being civilized such as the Emperor Elagabalus (ruled June 218 – March 222) who apparently delighted in being called Hierocles's, an ex-slave and chariot driver from Rhodes, mistress, wife, and queen. The emperor reportedly wore makeup and wigs, preferred to be called a lady and not a lord, and offered vast sums to any physician who could provide him with a vagina. Transgenderism has always become accepted in society, worry not.

I just wish to alleviate man from a status you yourself compare to coyotes eating trash, it hurts that society is hurting itself. A capitalism, which requires humanity do weird things to enhance their survival in what becomes an alien ecosystem to their default instincts, is not better than socialism. Everyday the arguments for capitalism grow less and less if the end result is trannies, bug protein burgers, and concrete pods under not a dystopia of socialism, but under a lack of it. If humanity becomes the end creature of "I have no mouth and I must scream" in the artificial nature of hyper-capitalism and dense urban hives then what is the point of restraining ourselves from Socialism?

It never stops at trannies, and the allowance of trannies alleviates no-one by the end. By the 2040-2050, this will become apparent to you who imagines blinders as lenses. It may seem novel, transgenderism, but it is just a familiar sign from history. It matters not that you've surmised the reason it happens, it will happen and it need not if for once we heeded the information you deduced and worked to lighten the mutilation of man which begins historically with transgenders.


The Societial AIDS which created the tranny from imperfectly healthy people will not be stopped by an immune response, it never does in any of the civilizations it spawns. The forces you are thinking about aren't correct, you're thinking the anti-bodys relieve the disease, but they only fail further. The culture dies from the underlying disease, your trannies fail to even remotely offset it.

Those who are smart grow sterile, and those who retain their fertility grow stupider and stupider as bloodlines thin first in the cities, then in the countryside, and finally in the surrounding barbarian lands beside the great civilization. All to feed the maw of a civilization which grows less and less focused and sane until finally the rest of the world burn it to the ground.


What are the programs in our society, are they the natural product of Capitalism or Government? Do small businesses create the conditions spawning trannies, or just oligarchic big business capitalism? What is the prognosis, and can anything be done?

While I agree with you on the whole I think you misrepresent Capitalism. What America has now and has had for at least a good 50 years is some weird half socialism mishmash. I don't like pulling a "NO TRUE CAPITALISM" thing but it really fails to be capitalism at all if you neuter people's ability to compete. That's all capitalism is, in essence: competition.

 

[Haim Arlosoroff]

While I agree with you on the whole I think you misrepresent Capitalism. What America has now and has had for at least a good 50 years is some weird half socialism mishmash. I don't like pulling a "NO TRUE CAPITALISM" thing but it really fails to be capitalism at all if you neuter people's ability to compete. That's all capitalism is, in essence: competition.

I wonder if when capitalism selects success after success, they breed out the rest of humanity in their stellar ability to capitalism harder than anyone else, and you notice the level of rat-like soyboy neurotic mess who succeed at the rat maze of capitalism in their autism and strange morals, then you will see my point. It has changed people, it has centralized the world culturally beneath one nation's economy, and it genetically will pick winners. Humanity and capitalism today resemble a feedback loop reducing humanity and the market towards no where good. The self-organization picks winners in humanity too. It makes us compete for resources too, and if it was decentralized and many many small businesses then I would relax.

However I wonder, what if a good 50 years as some weird half socialism was the result of the rich bribing law-makers? The ungodly hybrid of crony capitalism was from capitalism's winners yesterday rigging the game so that they could win tomorrow too even though the cultures changed, the technologies have changed, and the resources have changed yet yesterday's winners rigged it so they could still be the rich families two or three generations later? What if America rotted into crony capitalism because it generated a rich upper class who then rotted the system into such a state that the lower classes rebelled against capitalism? What if, America's economy failed as a closed system?

But instead of worrying about such a question, we're instead consuming product and then getting excited for next product? What if additional rules were needed to fix the system but we just said platitudes against communism instead and stopped thinking about it?

I don't know, I just want a more decentralized world so I can live according to my values and I'm given Globohomo by the World Economic Forum.