Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[it's called nyotaika]

Vox has published a rebuttal to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's essay. It is exactly as deranged and full of copium as you would expect.

Archive link (full text in spoiler)

"Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's cancel culture screed is a dangerous distraction."​

Spoiler: unhinged reeing

We’re having the wrong conversation.

One of the worst aspects of any cancel culture debate is the tendency to obscure, deny, and dismiss as invalid any actual harm caused by whatever sparked the debate. Frequently, this cycle is tied to transphobia: Prominent public figures who’ve been criticized for making transphobic statements have frequently mounted angry backlashes against “cancel culture” as a way of denigrating their critics.

The latest person to fall into this pattern is the well-known feminist author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.

Earlier this week, Adichie published a lengthy and eloquent takedown of cancel culture on her personal website. In the essay, which has an estimated reading time of 16 minutes, she personally discusses two former students of hers, people who she feels have personally attacked and maligned her as a transphobe.

Though Adichie does not name either of the two former students, one of them appears to be Nigerian writer and queer activist OluTimehin Adegbeye. The other appears to be writer (and Vox Book Club selected author) Akwaeke Emezi, who is nonbinary. Both have spent the past several years criticizing a series of Adichie’s public statements that have seemed to increasingly embrace transphobic ideology and language — a framing Adichie claims is false.

Since 2017, Adichie has drawn criticism from trans activists for seeming to embrace rhetoric championed by trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs), who argue that trans women are not women — and for dismissing her critics when called out. Adichie doesn’t really confront this history in her essay. Instead, she characterizes the two former students as manipulative, and accuses them of using progressive social justice rhetoric to mask motivations that are, respectively, “calculating and insincere,” and “seeking attention and publicity to benefit themselves.”

It’s not precisely clear what prompted Adichie’s essay, though many observers have questioned her motives in choosing to publish it during Pride Month. That timing, along with the letter’s tone, has made Adichie’s post come off as a direct attack against the individual students the essay refers to, even if she does not name them.

Notably, the essay glosses over and decontextualizes criticisms the two former students have made against her, in order to claim that their statements were both personal and “violent.” For example, without directly quoting anyone, Adichie writes that one of the students in question “asked followers to pick up machetes and attack me” — an apparent reference to a January Twitter thread in which Emezi wrote: “I trust that there are other people who will pick up machetes to protect us from the harm transphobes like Adichie & [J.K.] Rowling seek to perpetuate. I, however, will be in my garden with butterflies, trying to figure out how to befriend the neighborhood crows.”

Adichie devotes the final third of her essay to condemning a polarized social media climate, essentially lashing out against cancel culture, which she describes as “obscene.” She writes:


Across social media, this finale to Adichie’s essay has been greeted by many with praise and glee. Though others have expressed reservations because of her attitude toward cancel culture and her minimization of her own words, much of the reception has indeed been positive. The public loves a good takedown, and hers is one of the most savage we’ve had in a while.

It’s also the most pernicious.

In a rush to praise the most quotable parts of Adichie’s cutting essay, many on the left have joined notorious transphobes, TERFs, and their allies, including signatories of the infamous 2020 Harper’s open letter against the concept of cancel culture.

As with that letter, which was signed by several figures who had publicly expressed transphobic views, transphobia has inevitably attached to the conversation around Adichie’s essay. On Twitter, those who say they are boycotting Adichie in response to learning of her transphobia are being harassed. Adegbeye has locked her Twitter account; Emezi’s has been flooded with detractors.

Worst of all, a conversation that should have been about transgender identity has been reframed. Now it’s about how “difference of opinion doesn’t mean hatred” and how social media “amplifies pathological and anti-social tendencies.” Adichie’s essay minimizes and obscures her original actions and speech, and fans of the essay have joined her in that effort. They’re helping to further discredit Adegbeye and Emezi and the message they’ve been trying to amplify.

We’re having the wrong conversation — not the one about cancel culture, but the one about whether one of the most famous feminists in the world is actually transphobic, and what it means for trans women if she is.

Looking at the history of Adichie’s run-ins with the trans community, it’s clear that Adichie, not her critics, placed herself in this position, and that like many people who’ve faced similar callouts by vulnerable communities, she’s now calling out “cancel culture” as a tool of misdirection.

Adichie’s public clashes with trans women and their allies date back to 2017​

Adichie shot onto the global stage in 2006 with the publication of her acclaimed novel Half a Yellow Sun. Since then, she’s been a prominent author and an even more prominent feminist. In 2014, her viral TED talk (which was later published as a book) We Should All Be Feminists drew raves and wound up sampled in Beyonce’s song “Flawless.” Suffice to say, she’s not just a feminist — she’s a prominent feminist voice and, for many people, a crucial entry point to the entire concept of feminism.

In 2017, Adichie sat for an interview where she explained feminism for Britain’s Channel 4 News. In it, she responded to the question, “If you’re a trans woman who grew up as a man ... does that take away from becoming a woman — are you any less of a real woman?” (For the purposes of this argument, let’s set aside the issue with asking this question of a cisgender woman who has no idea what the experience of being a trans woman is like.)

Adichie answered:


Adichie’s point that trans women have very different experiences than cisgender women is well-made and very important. Trans women experience higher rates of sexual assault and domestic violence, homelessness, suicide, and suicide attempts than cisgender women, and they’re more likely to be re-victimized when they seek support. Further, Adichie’s insistence that gender is tied to sociology, not biology, is a crucial distinction in the debate over trans rights — one backed by science.
But Adichie’s response also felt alarmingly aligned with the rhetoric of TERFism. People who buy into TERFism explicitly paint trans women as manipulative straight cisgender men, sexual predators just using a fake identity as “trans women” to get close to cisgender women in order to assault them. Millions of people subscribe to strains of this dangerous belief, including prominent public figures like Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling.

Adichie’s statements shared a number of commonalities with TERFism, starting with the idea that trans women “change — switch gender,” inaccurate phrasing which seems to discount gender dysphoria and the feeling of gender-centered disconnect between one’s brain and one’s body that many trans people experience throughout their lives.


Her depiction of trans women as being born with substantial amounts of male privilege also hewed uncomfortably close to the TERF argument that trans women don’t lose male privilege if they transition. As the transgender actress Laverne Cox has said, “the binary narrative, which suggests that all trans women transition from male privilege, erases a lot of experiences.”

Most especially, Adichie’s refusal to say the oft-uttered words, “trans women are women,” and instead insist that “trans women are trans women” is a phrase that can easily stand in for a denial of trans identity. As Emily Crockett explained for Vox in 2017, “when trans advocates and allies say that ‘trans women are women, they’re not actually trying to say that transgender women are the same as cisgender women (women who aren’t transgender). They’re trying to say that these differences shouldn’t disqualify trans women from the broader category of ‘womanhood.’”

Adichie’s original comments in the interview regarding her wariness about “conflating women’s issues” with “trans women’s issues” made it difficult to tell whether she believes trans women do belong to that broader category of womanhood. Consequently, when trans activists heard Adichie use phrases as loaded as these, they were immediately on alert. Adichie later responded in a Facebook post in which she apologized and called her critics “valid” but also doubled down on much of her rhetoric about male privilege and inherent differences between cisgender women and trans women.

If Adichie had stopped speaking about this issue, the moment might have retained its ambiguity and lack of clarity — though it’s worth noting that, a year later, she seemed to dismiss the entire debate as “trans noise.”

In 2020, Adichie spoke out again, this time in defense of a transphobic manifesto published by J.K. Rowling, and her new comments framed her earlier ones in a much different light.

Rowling’s piece is rife with overt expressions of harmful TERF ideology, depicting trans teens as being merely influenced by Tumblr culture rather than experiencing actual dysphoria, and tying gender to biology despite clear scientific consensus to the contrary. Instead of acknowledging the 50 percent of trans people who experience sexual abuse or assault, Rowling uses her own status as a survivor of domestic violence to explain why she’s so afraid that trans women might be a threat to cisgender women, loudly expressing fear of what might happen “when you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman.”

From start to finish, it is textbook transphobia, published by a woman with incredible cultural influence.

In November 2020 — during Transgender Awareness Week — the Guardian published an interview with Adichie in which she articulated her dislike of cancel culture. Then, out of nowhere, she offered a defense of Rowling’s “perfectly reasonable” piece, calling her “a woman who is progressive, who clearly stands for and believes in diversity,” and decrying the social media outrage against her as “cruel and sad.”

To date, the reaction to Rowling’s manifesto remains one of the clearest examples of a pattern that Adichie’s essay now upholds. From the moment Rowling published her manifesto, much of the conversation around it centered on how left-wing zealots wanted to “cancel” a beloved children’s author — with the result being that the cancel culture backlash frequently obscured the harm at the center of a transphobic argument.

Condemning cancel culture has become a reliable way to obscure transphobia. That has real, harmful consequences for trans people.​

The public support of Rowling’s contemporaries — figures like Adichie and the 58 British public figures who defended Rowling in an open letter last fall — furthers the narrative that anyone who’s upset is just an angry social justice warrior. Meanwhile, trans and nonbinary people like me are left smarting from the damaging impact of her words, which empower other public figures to promote a toxic, deeply regressive argument that denies trans women their humanity.

The idea that Adichie, with all her understanding of the struggles that trans people face, could read Rowling’s words and frame them as part of a “progressive worldview” is maybe the gaslight of all gaslights. I cannot see it as anything but a full embrace of TERFism.

I also find it impossible to interpret her new essay as anything but another iteration of a pattern in which railing against cancel culture becomes a tool to dismiss legitimate arguments about the hateful thing you said and did.

This conversation should be about trans identity. It should be about how awful it is for trans and nonbinary people to see beloved figures like Rowling and Adichie promoting an ideology that insists we’re not really the gender we say we are, that we’re liars and sexual predators, that we’re chasing a social media fad and performing wokeness for leftist clout, that we’re making it all up. It should be about figuring out why women with so much education and so much initial empathy wind up adopting a belief system so dedicated to othering people who are already vulnerable and at-risk.

It should be about how political debates about trans identity negatively impact the mental health of 94 percent of trans teens. It should be about the damage that is done when respected public figures like Adichie and Rowling use their massive influence to air transphobic views under the guise of “perfectly reasonable” debate about whether trans women are women.

It should not be about what a sick burn Adichie delivered.

It is not difficult to write a takedown of cancel culture, or to explain why it’s so painful to be denied a good-faith conversation with people you have a personal relationship with. (Though according to the essay, Adichie apparently disliked and distrusted her two former students from the outset.)

It takes much more courage to grapple with the reason they denied you that interaction. That’s what Adichie should be doing now, instead of extending the pain she caused others to many more of her trans readers.

Adichie’s essay is a distraction. She should not, now, get to own the conversation about the harmful impact of her words and actions.

this fucking endless aggressive hysterics over the gentlest, most mild suggestion of a boundary is so fucking-- like with j.k. who they parrot is a horrifically transphobic terf who literally eats ickle trans babies but when you corner them on what she actually said that was so licherally violent they immediately tap out with "it's not my job to educate you" because the actual comments were the most milquetoast criticisms and the suggestion people should not get fired for misgendering on their own time.

Spoiler: my own dose of reeing

there's a reason so much of the focus is on silencing, deplatforming, and creating false narratives for the freierim eating out of your hand to mindlessly parrot hashtag share. if you actually show a normie what the spark is versus the reaction of the flash mob it forms, bammo, you've made a brand new TERF.

Adichie’s point that trans women have very different experiences than cisgender women is well-made and very important. Trans women experience higher rates of sexual assault and domestic violence, homelessness, suicide, and suicide attempts than cisgender women, and they’re more likely to be re-victimized when they seek support. Further, Adichie’s insistence that gender is tied to sociology, not biology, is a crucial distinction in the debate over trans rights — one backed by science.

no wonder they hid this down under pages of bunch of worthless intro bullshit lmao. her actual, factual entire statement that kicked the whole ma'ampage off is innocuous and trans-aligned if you aren't so fucking poisoned by the twitcourse you're arguing transwomen are literally biological women.

vox is playing dangerous with the cancel-game themselves with that. if anyone has a convincing enough deep-embedded troll account i dare ya to try to get the author canceled over it.

But Adichie’s response also felt alarmingly aligned with the rhetoric of TERFism. People who buy into TERFism explicitly paint trans women as manipulative straight cisgender men, sexual predators just using a fake identity as “trans women” to get close to cisgender women in order to assault them. Millions of people subscribe to strains of this dangerous belief, including prominent public figures like Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling.

Adichie’s statements shared a number of commonalities with TERFism, starting with the idea that trans women “change — switch gender,” inaccurate phrasing which seems to discount gender dysphoria and the feeling of gender-centered disconnect between one’s brain and one’s body that many trans people experience throughout their lives.

soooo basically "she was right, but since being right aligns with all those people we hate who are also right, i will now back-justify that the right thing she said was wrong ackshually because it started a collective fit over it and there is no allowance of troonism ever in any aspect being wrong about a thing. open that door even a crack for people and we'd be hard fucked."

Most especially, Adichie’s refusal to say the oft-uttered words, “trans women are women,” and instead insist that “trans women are trans women” is a phrase that can easily stand in for a denial of trans identity.

women has independent thoughts, refuses to repeat party slogans! sound the alarms!! we got a thoughtcrime!!!

To date, the reaction to Rowling’s manifesto remains one of the clearest examples of a pattern that Adichie’s essay now upholds. From the moment Rowling published her manifesto, much of the conversation around it centered on how left-wing zealots wanted to “cancel” a beloved children’s author — with the result being that the cancel culture backlash frequently obscured the harm at the center of a transphobic argument.

because there was no transphobic argument beyond "if you're going to keep policing language and culture try also policing your own fucking people". that's why most of the reaction was about the ma'ampage and baby-eating accusations. they were wrong, they felt justified enough to scream lies and threaten that licheral violence they class as misgendering and sane people class as those threats they made of committing literal violence, and people thought it was nasty and wrong and crazy and it peaked enough TERFs to run daily mountain excursions.

you have nothing on rowling's essay but the assurance of a flock of outrage-addicted echo-chambered empty-heads perpetuating the mass delusion amongst themselves that it was some sort of TERF manifesto that called for genocide camps and being unable to clarify where, exactly, it was so awful and violent.

It is not difficult to write a takedown of cancel culture, or to explain why it’s so painful to be denied a good-faith conversation with people you have a personal relationship with. (Though according to the essay, Adichie apparently disliked and distrusted

find me one fucking time the cancel cult admitted they went too far, were deceived by their own culting about, and made an effort to repair and replatform their newest hit of righteous outrage. find me one takedown of cancel culture where the response was not a refusal to process it and also cancel the author for good measure. spoiler: you can't.

also perceptive, intelligent woman good at picking up on fake manipulative bitches immediately, news at 11.

The idea that Adichie, with all her understanding of the struggles that trans people face, could read Rowling’s words and frame them as part of a “progressive worldview” is maybe the gaslight of all gaslights. I cannot see it as anything but a full embrace of TERFism.

*rubs hands together* keep spreading that shtuss amongst your acolytes that j.k. rowling is the TERFiest of TERFs. keep devaluing the connection to actual radical feminism and applying it to "anyone who steps outside the party line". when everyone's a TERF, no one will be.

This conversation should be about trans identity. It should be about how awful it is for trans and nonbinary people to see beloved figures like Rowling and Adichie promoting an ideology that insists we’re not really the gender we say we are, that we’re liars and sexual predators, that we’re chasing a social media fad and performing wokeness for leftist clout, that we’re making it all up. It should be about figuring out why women with so much education and so much initial empathy wind up adopting a belief system so dedicated to othering people who are already vulnerable and at-risk.

"this conversation should not be about our lies and perfomative wokeness. it should actually be about our lies, and our performative wokeness,"

also lmao "why do all those intelligent, empathetic women go from being sympathetic to our cause to critical and dismissive of it right after they actually have to interact and deal with us???" TRULY A MYSTERY FOR THE AGES.

It should not be about what a sick burn Adichie delivered.

stay mad matchstick

Condemning cancel culture has become a reliable way to obscure transphobia. That has real, harmful consequences for trans people.

"if you take our way to bully and emotionally abuse people into mute compliance to whatever we want, it will be significantly harder to bully and emotionally abuse people into mute compliance to whatever we want,"

Worst of all, a conversation that should have been about transgender identity has been reframed. Now it’s about how “difference of opinion doesn’t mean hatred” and how social media “amplifies pathological and anti-social tendencies.”

"worst of all, the narrative we'd be able to control has been subsumed by the narrative about how we control narratives,"

anyway avicii melted your fucking asses and your desperate, spiralling attempts at diversion still ain't prove anything about her supposed "transphobia". good thing your audience are narcissists who are only interested in how they can get supply out of this and the gormless brainless little wormtroopers who only know how to desperately intake the loads of whatever daddy woke is circlejerking to about now.

still got some fake bitches assblasted so stay mad forever

galaxy brain: they made it so long and so obsessive about picking apart single sentences for paragraphs because they want to make sure no one actually reads it and just takes the headline that Chimichanga Want Licherally Murder All Troons as granted to droolingly shout at each other for the echoes it makes through their cavernous skulls because if so many people are saying it surely it must be true.

the greatest weapon the trooncult has is those fucking endlessly disseminated mantras. their worst enemy is context and their own words; that's why the "even look not ye must at the orchard of the gendercriticals, for ye will go the fate of maddened ben zoma" is their obsession and most effective tactic.

like my jewish ass has no fucking problem with the gentiles reading up on mein kampf and stormfront. literally the best weapon against neo-nazis is their own words; waving a hand at them and going "come over here and see the virulent and deluded shit these fucking losers actually believe!! and OY, the PROJECTION" means the only acolytes attracted are bottom-of-the-barrel freierim who flail around hitting each other, droning their worthless mantra-memes, and are only dangerous because gun laws in this country are total shit.

anyway, mantras are fucking cancer to brain and the internet is the worst thing that ever happened to the pleb class that used to have proper segregated cults like religion and castes to make them feel good and righteous and justified in attacking non-believers and are now getting sucked up into any fucking cult that has the easiest conversion process and screams the loudest.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

Can you spot the troon? I really don't believe that any MTFs are truly "stealth" and any who do claim to be are just delusional. If even professional models look so aggressively male in everything from facial features to that power stance, there is no way the average troon is fooling anyone.
View attachment 2274009

That dude looks like Garand Thumb.

 

[NoReturn]

Not sure if those are weirdly shaped fake vampire fangs or the world's most fucked up teeth.

Could be both. Could be yaeba.

Found this in the replies --which I'm delighted to report were almost universally derisive of this nonsense-- and I think it's a perfect example of why you should never, ever capitulate to these people.
View attachment 2272965
It's not enough to play into their delusions, it's not enough to use their special names they made up just for themselves to let everyone know how unique they are. Unless you are willing (and somehow able) to mindkill yourself and think thoughts you know to be untrue you're still not doing good enough sweetie

Lol Aja Romano.

Imagine being Chimamanda, a Nigerian women who grew up in poverty during a civil war, became a star student, got degrees from Johns Hopkins and Yale, and won a dozen or so top literary prizes only to be called out on your privilege by a “they/them” cargo freighter:

View attachment 2273961

Jazz Jennings from the futuuuuuuure.

Every anime character that the troons try to idolize seems to identify as a male in a dress.

Well we have Lily from Zombieland Saga. Three guesses who 41%ed, and the first two don't count.

I was going through a mental list and you guys are right. There really aren't that many. I chalk that up to the differences between Japan and the west, though.

Spoiler: Actually trans anime characters off the top of my head

Miyuki, a one-off character from Yu Yu Hakusho

Hana from Tokyo Godfathers

The angels and demons from CLAMP's Wish, but only because they're stated to be sexless unless they choose to be male or female.

 

[Schatzi Katze]

wow perhaps ugly/masc women would not be harassed if y'all didn't break the social contract of only biologically female people using women's restrooms

 

[Mister Rogers]

View attachment 2274294

wow perhaps ugly/masc women would not be harassed if y'all didn't break the social contract of only biologically female people using women's restrooms

This is the sad aspect of trans mania. It used to be that a woman with an unusually manly facial structure or a low voice would still be viewed as a woman, because there was little suspicion of trannies sneaking around with a fetish for tricking straight guys or whatever. I feel bad for those unfortunate girls who may be suspected of being MtFs now.

 

[Der weiße Teufel]

this fucking endless aggressive hysterics over the gentlest, most mild suggestion of a boundary is so fucking-- like with j.k. who they parrot is a horrifically transphobic terf who literally eats ickle trans babies but when you corner them on what she actually said that was so licherally violent they immediately tap out with "it's not my job to educate you" because the actual comments were the most milquetoast criticisms and the suggestion people should not get fired for misgendering on their own time.

The other tactic is to call their essays a "transphobic dogwhistle", so of course ignorant normies might think these are perfectly sensible takes, but if you are trans, you can read between the lines and what they REALLY are saying is that we want all troons dead and that Hitler was right. And you don't have to ask for further explanation or proof, because how DARE you question what the allknowing trans has to say, you bigot?!

 

[Taylor Swift's Ghostwrite]

Can you spot the troon? I really don't believe that any MTFs are truly "stealth" and any who do claim to be are just delusional. If even professional models look so aggressively male in everything from facial features to that power stance, there is no way the average troon is fooling anyone.

The mystical stealth tranny is really just someone who thinks that if nobody points them out that they've fooled everyone. Kind of like a kid who thinks he's managed to sneak around and nobody noticed him, he isn't actually a spy or ninja people are just nicer than he realizes.

The difference of course is that kid doesn't get to go on super special top secret missions.

 

[NynchLiggers]

The mystical stealth tranny is really just someone who thinks that if nobody points them out that they've fooled everyone. Kind of like a kid who thinks he's managed to sneak around and nobody noticed him, he isn't actually a spy or ninja people are just nicer than he realizes.

The difference of course is that kid doesn't get to go on super special top secret missions.

Sorry bongbros, but the only place a tranny can actually fool someone is in the UK.

 

[Monolith]

Could be both. Could be yaeba.
View attachment 2274133

View attachment 2274145

Jazz Jennings from the futuuuuuuure.


I was going through a mental list and you guys are right. There really aren't that many. I chalk that up to the differences between Japan and the west, though.

Spoiler: Actually trans anime characters off the top of my head

View attachment 2274197
Miyuki, a one-off character from Yu Yu Hakusho
View attachment 2274202
Hana from Tokyo Godfathers
View attachment 2274282
The angels and demons from CLAMP's Wish, but only because they're stated to be sexless unless they choose to be male or female.

Even though she's not mentioned much because she acts EXACTLY like the FTMs on this site Togata from Fire Punch.

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

More Chimamanda drama! A prominent Nigerian feminist Sugabelly (she's verified on Twitter and has 27k followers) has seemed to come back from hiatus to drag more TRAs. This is her first tweet since 2021 started.



The link (archive here) is a lengthy reminder about what feminism is, who it's for, and call to arms to fight gender ideology. It's quite good, if I do say so myself. Some highlights:
This is Grade A peaking material.

 

[scathefire]

Abigail/PhilosophyTroon is looking rough

Spoiler: Matti

View attachment 2273491

What the fuck is up with this guy's eyeliner, exactly?

 

[twee]

View attachment 2274733
What the fuck is up with this guy's eyeliner, exactly?

I... I think he tried to do winged liner but made a grave mistake... somewhere. I honestly can't fucking comprehend how.

 

[Chapstick4Lyfe]

galaxy brain: they made it so long and so obsessive about picking apart single sentences for paragraphs because they want to make sure no one actually reads it and just takes the headline that Chimichanga Want Licherally Murder All Troons as granted to droolingly shout at each other for the echoes it makes through their cavernous skulls because if so many people are saying it surely it must be true.

the greatest weapon the trooncult has is those fucking endlessly disseminated mantras. their worst enemy is context and their own words; that's why the "even look not ye must at the orchard of the gendercriticals, for ye will go the fate of maddened ben zoma" is their obsession and most effective tactic.

like my jewish ass has no fucking problem with the gentiles reading up on mein kampf and stormfront. literally the best weapon against neo-nazis is their own words; waving a hand at them and going "come over here and see the virulent and deluded shit these fucking losers actually believe!! and OY, the PROJECTION" means the only acolytes attracted are bottom-of-the-barrel freierim who flail around hitting each other, droning their worthless mantra-memes, and are only dangerous because gun laws in this country are total shit.

anyway, mantras are fucking cancer to brain and the internet is the worst thing that ever happened to the pleb class that used to have proper segregated cults like religion and castes to make them feel good and righteous and justified in attacking non-believers and are now getting sucked up into any fucking cult that has the easiest conversion process and screams the loudest.

It's an obsession with gathering a collection of "gotchas" instead of making a coherent, thoughtful response. Or, god forbid, having an adult conversation about anything. They just want to get their gotcha so they can run to Twitter with it and get their ass pats. They need those hollow ataboys from Internet strangers because they didn't build any real life relationships and those small dopamine hits are all they have.

 

[NoReturn]

I... I think he tried to do winged liner but made a grave mistake... somewhere. I honestly can't fucking comprehend how.

Probably used an eyeliner stamp incorrectly:

 

[it's called nyotaika]

More Chimamanda drama! A prominent Nigerian feminist Sugabelly (she's verified on Twitter and has 27k followers) has seemed to come back from hiatus to drag more TRAs. This is her first tweet since 2021 started.

View attachment 2274676

The link (archive here) is a lengthy reminder about what feminism is, who it's for, and call to arms to fight gender ideology. It's quite good, if I do say so myself. Some highlights:View attachment 2274728View attachment 2274729
This is Grade A peaking material.

what a fucking way to go
(￣ー￣)ゞ

 

[atleast3letterslong]

View attachment 2274082

lmao

I choose to look like Jar Jar binks and chop my penis off to cope.

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Can you spot the troon? I really don't believe that any MTFs are truly "stealth" and any who do claim to be are just delusional. If even professional models look so aggressively male in everything from facial features to that power stance, there is no way the average troon is fooling anyone.
View attachment 2274009
View attachment 2274036

It's the head size. Even in the first picture where they've successfully hidden the lack of waist/hips and the broad shoulders your eyes are immediately drawn to the skull difference. Pro-tip to trannies - never pose next to a woman if you want to pass. The second picture just emphasises on the male fridge build.

 

[Owner of a Lonely Hole]

It's the head size. Even in the first picture where they've successfully hidden the lack of waist/hips and the broad shoulders your eyes are immediately drawn to the skull difference. Pro-tip to trannies - never pose next to a woman if you want to pass. The second picture just emphasises on the male fridge build.

He’s even standing like a man in the second picture. How the fuck did this guy get a modeling gig?

 

[it's called nyotaika]

He’s even standing like a man in the second picture. How the fuck did this guy get a modeling gig?

if your eyes are close enough together, you awaken your third eye and ascend through your etheric tube to the vibrations through the fuller universe. accordance to desire is only natural.

nnnnnnah just kidding you can be the ugliest troon ever and still enter high fashion through the threat that rejection will lead to cancellation.

plus giving uggo troons the validation and belief that they, too as uggo troons can one day be the naomi of their fantasies if only their eyes were close enough is all the publicity and reblogs one needs in this modern world. what, you can denigrate the female models as ugly as you want, but saying that GODDESS is ugly?? what are you, the perpetrator of a gorillion trans suicides???

(also unrelated to any workings of the farms, suddenly any option to format my post and attach images and quotes and such is greyed out for me and idk why. was i too teehee naughty desu? will it be reinstated? no seriously is it locked for a reason or is it happening to everyone pls respond)

 

[Criticallacitirc]

More Chimamanda drama! A prominent Nigerian feminist Sugabelly (she's verified on Twitter and has 27k followers) has seemed to come back from hiatus to drag more TRAs. This is her first tweet since 2021 started.

View attachment 2274676

The link (archive here) is a lengthy reminder about what feminism is, who it's for, and call to arms to fight gender ideology. It's quite good, if I do say so myself. Some highlights:View attachment 2274728View attachment 2274729
This is Grade A peaking material.

Damn she's really letting the punches fly.