- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
Bret Weinstein is not an honest player IMO.
He was strongly for the lockdowns and the masks (still is as far as I know).
There is no evidence one way or the other that the lab leak was accidental or deliberate, but he makes declarative statements that 'it must have been an accident".
He continues to spout nonsense regarding Zoonotic viruses. Bats are literally the worst candidate animal species for a cross species pandemic to emerge from, but he hand waives objections.
He also massively over plays the severity of Covid, is a believer in long Covd and claims the bug is responsible for massive systemic multi organ damage in a significant percentage of the population leaving them crippled for life. This is hysterical nonsense.
On the other hand he's consistently argued in favor of the lab leak hypothesis since around June last year. He's also shown a degree of skepticism regarding the vaccines and has spoken strongly for treatment alternatives.
So take or leave I guess but remember who he is and understand there's always an agenda.
Weinstein is no different from most academics.
They have drawn lines in the sand and loudly agued their position (often obnoxiously).
The difference is he is not afraid of discussing/arguing his point of view with anyone who will have an open conversation.
It will be interesting if gets challenged by someone who specialised in zoonotic viruses, and see if he is able to defend his position.
Bats may not be a plausible species to cross over directly to humans, from our perspective.
But this is where gain of function kicks in .. then the lack of controls, lies and clumsy handling (or coverup) by the Chinese government