Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Lmao you're way too fat and ugly to make a dime on OnlyFans. No one will want to see a fat brood sow with a five head showing off her pendulous udders, and flashing her unwashed cavernous vagina.

You can keep trying to insult my shapely forehead, I'm not intimidated. It just makes you sound immature and brainwashed by old school media.

I look great in hats because I've got a nice shapely forehead. My forehead is also in proportion in real life. I'm not vain on camera, don't need to hide.

There's different kinds of women for different kinds of men. Not all guys like the same thing. Your attempts at body shaming just reveal you're immature.

Some men like their women thick and aren't turned on by thin women. Some like their women super thin. No way is wrong or right, it's just what a man likes.

Same goes for women. Women have all sorts of preferences in what they prefer in men.

I'm not even going to argue with you about the "cavern vagina" comment because it's already been shown on this thread that you lack basic understanding of how the female vagina works after birth. You parrot myths like you were raised by cereal boxes.

View attachment 2279547
View attachment 2279549

Lol, I read this after I typed all that out above.

See what I mean. People have all sorts of different sexual fetishes. Or are just plain curious!

Also, another trend: after years and years and decades of women being told they should look this way or that way to be accepted, people are supportive of women "breaking the mold" and sharing photographs of themselves being comfortable just as they are.

It's become a thing for women to do with their postpartum bodies too.

I'm glad to see women accepting and loving their bodies ad they are, but I also think photographing it to show it off as an "answer" to the glorification of the childless "bikini body" image as the "ideal", which is mass circulated in media, does not help women away from the idea that they have to be sexually objectified.

"Why do women still feel the need to show their bodies publicly, regardless of their body image?" That's the underlying question.

I think The Torah's solution of covering it all up is best.

It doesn't work this way. You can find any kind of erotic materials for free. OnlyFan is there to give sad, socially awkward men some substitute of a relationship.

What do you think of the virtual girlfriend idea?

What do you think of the virtual girlfriend idea?

*virtual holographic girlfriend

 

[White Baby]

You can keep trying to insult my shapely forehead, I'm not intimidated. It just makes you sound immature and brainwashed by old school media.

I look great in hats because I've got a nice shapely forehead. My forehead is also in proportion in real life.

Fivehead.

"Why do women still feel the need to show their bodies publicly, regardless of their body image?" That's the underlying question.

Why is it a question that you feel the need to ask? Are you incapable of being inclusive in your feminism towards women who show their bodies in different ways than you do?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

What do you think of the virtual girlfriend idea?

For me romantic \ intimate relationship is as much, if not more, intellectual experience as it is emotional and physical and I can't imagine having such relationship and experience with an algorithm, no matter how complex it is. Not to mention, I doubt such being (if we get AI advanced enough to call it a "being") we would always operate on different levels of existence therefore it would be difficult to form actual partnership. Facing the same reality and hardships that it brings together, working together to overcome obstacles at us thrown by life, learning the art of compromise and accepting other person's flaws - those are all important parts of a relationship and you can only get them with a flesh and blood person.

EDIT.

Deeply unsatisfying, don't you think?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I don't get why she thinks balding women are good looking. Certain men can make it work but it's all about the shape of the head itself and whether or not they facial hair. Other things to take into consideration is the height of the bald man. Their voice and even overall body shape also play a role.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

I don't get why she thinks balding women are good looking.

Actually it used to be a beauty standard at one point:

During the Middle Ages, a lady’s face was not always her fortune. According to Victoria Sherrow in “For Appearance’s Sake: The Historical Encyclopedia of Good Looks,” breasts were more of a feature, while faces with a 'plain, empty appearance’ were desirable to persuade admirers to look lower down. An open, expansive face was partly achieved by scraping back the hair and hiding it under a hood or veil-which also conformed with the church’s moral policy. However, a high hairline was required to give a lady’s face maximum exposure. Not every woman had a naturally high forehead. So, to raise their beauty rating, Medieval ladies raised their hairlines artificially.

->source

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Actually it used to be a beauty standard at one point:


->source

Wasn't that a Spanish thing though? Also, if your hair is thinning that bad it's usually due to nutrition which we all know was bad back then. I also think Indians like bald women too, but they're also degenerates.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Wasn't that a Spanish thing though?

And French, I think.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

And French, I think.

So probably a Latin thing. Us Germans prefer a woman who can kick ass with the men which usually means an athletic build. Like Brunhild for instance.

 

[ConSluttant]

I've heard of it.

Yeah, as a sexually mature 36 year old woman with sexual intelligence and sexual experience, I probably could make a ton of money selling erotic images of myself on OnlyFans. Yes, the money would be good. I only won't do it on the basis of moral principle.

Since I was a teenager I have been outspoken about my belief that women should not consent to sexual objectification for profit. When I was 18, after I won Ms. Springfield (2003) I was invited to participate in another pageant. I declined the invitation because part of their pageant was a bikini portion. I was interviewed by a magazine and asked why I didn't go to the other pageant. I made a public statement that I am against the use of sexually objectifying girl's bodies for profit.

I was also offered a modeling contract and I turned it down because, even when I was a teenager, I was opposed to the idea that a woman should use her looks to sell it for a profit.

I've held onto this beliefs throughout my adulthood. It's why I cover up my body, never took a job as a Stripper, and I don't support causes that sexually objectify women for profit.

Women have a lot of power in their beauty and bodies, in the sexual parts of themselves they have to offer a man, and to commercialize that part of yourself for money is to give away your power as a woman. Women's sexual parts of themselves is one their major bargaining chips in a relationship.

Righteous women understand that the goal is getting a man to buy the whole cow. While I know my value as a woman is more than just my sexuality, I don't sell samples of my milk.

Too many women selling samples of milk, and men start thinking they don't need to build barns anymore!

So let me get this straight. You didn't mind being objectified by the one pageant WHILE CLOTHED IN A PRETTY DRESS but only declined the other one because they wanted you to wear a pretty swimsuit that you would be objectified in as well?

OK. Got it.

 

[Toasty]

Women's sexual parts of themselves is one their major bargaining chips in a relationship.

Imagine needing "bargaining chips" in a romantic relationship. I usually save those for business deals.

Righteous women understand that the goal is getting a man to buy the whole cow

So righteous women see themselves as livestock to be sold. And she gets mad at us for calling her a cow.
All while condemning patriarchy. Amazing.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

For me romantic \ intimate relationship is as much, if not more, intellectual experience as it is emotional and physical and I can't imagine having such relationship and experience with an algorithm, no matter how complex it is. Not to mention, I doubt such being (if we get AI advanced enough to call it a "being") we would always operate on different levels of existence therefore it would be difficult to form actual partnership. Facing the same reality and hardships that it brings together, working together to overcome obstacles at us thrown by life, learning the art of compromise and accepting other person's flaws - those are all important parts of a relationship and you can only get them with a flesh and blood person.

EDIT.

Deeply unsatisfying, don't you think?

So, you're telling me you wouldn't want a GLaDOS girlfriend?

where blacks can get grants as small ranchers and farmers and very favorite treatment, but it may have been quietly dropped

Relavant:

White Illinois Farmers Sue Over Race-Based Farm Loan Relief Program​

According to the article, in a similar lawsuit such discrimination was deemed illegal by the court. "In a similar lawsuit, Faust v. Vilsack, U.S. District Judge William Griesbach of Green Bay, Wisconsin, issued a temporary restraining order against the USDA program on June 10."

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

So, you're telling me you wouldn't want a GLaDOS girlfriend?

View attachment 2281443

She didn't age well...

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Relavant:

White Illinois Farmers Sue Over Race-Based Farm Loan Relief Program​

According to the article, in a similar lawsuit such discrimination was deemed illegal by the court. "In a similar lawsuit, Faust v. Vilsack, U.S. District Judge William Griesbach of Green Bay, Wisconsin, issued a temporary restraining order against the USDA program on June 10."

Different program, but an interesting read. The program I was talking about was terribly structured. Basically, it was proposed as a land give-away to any old black applicant that came around, not just blacks who already had experience as farm workers or ranchers. Most of these giveaways would fail, and the land will end up being sold. Who'll buy it? Well, the people with the money: big agribusiness consortiums. The whole thing would end up being a massive public land giveaway to big agriculture, to the sure detriment of pretty much everybody. The program would just be the mechanism by which the land would be removed from the public trust and set up for acquisition by Big Ag.

And, as I said before, who actually wants this program? Not the general black population, that's for sure. The black elite don't want to participate, they're already set. The black middle class won't, they have jobs and homes of their own. And the black poor don't want it, at least not the urban poor, because they're not the slightest bit interested in living out in the countryside, farming. Urban blacks are convinced that the countryside outside the cities are chock-full of KKK rednecks lynching every black person they come across. And farming's too much like hard work for the idle black underclass.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

She didn't age well...
View attachment 2281812

She's back to normal!

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

She's back to normal!

Yes, but after her little gender identity crisis all she had to tell me was:

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Yes, but after her little gender identity crisis all she had to tell me was:

Since when is potato a gender?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Since when is potato a gender?

I mean this little FtM:

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I mean this little FtM:

Oh, fuck, I'm embarrassed I didn't get it.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Imagine needing "bargaining chips" in a romantic relationship. I usually save those for business deals.

When you're single and meeting people and you have to tell someone about yourself before they decide whether or not to take it farther with you, you still are using "bargaining chips". This is before any feelings of romance.

I'd say once people fall in love, and then develop a history together, these "bargaining chips" fade to the background.

So righteous women see themselves as livestock to be sold. And she gets mad at us for calling her a cow.
All while condemning patriarchy. Amazing

Not at all, it's just a metaphor.

https://www.academia.edu/40552146/Is_Woman_an_Object_in_The_Torah_A_Rebuttal_to_Ken_Stone

So let me get this straight. You didn't mind being objectified by the one pageant WHILE CLOTHED IN A PRETTY DRESS but only declined the other one because they wanted you to wear a pretty swimsuit that you would be objectified in as well?

OK. Got it.

The one I was in actually judged you mostly on your intellectual/social abilities rather than body image/looks. We had an intense interview in front of a panel of judges where we were required to wear a business suit. Also, we were judged on a "pop" question in front of a stage of 3,000 people. We picked a random question out of a hat and the announcer asked it and we had like 5 seconds to start responding.

There was another girl competing in the pageant with me and I honestly thought she was better looking than me. She was absolutely gorgeous and I thought that I was going to lose to her. She had this beautiful thick flowing hair and was so confident when she talked. She wore these brightly colored business outfits that were fashionable and stunning. She definitely stood out.

But you know what was the reason they told me they chose me? The directors of the pageant told me the judges held me in high regard because of the way I spoke. I scored the highest in the interview in front of the judges and that's what did it for me.

I don't get why she thinks balding women are good looking. Certain men can make it work but it's all about the shape of the head itself and whether or not they facial hair. Other things to take into consideration is the height of the bald man. Their voice and even overall body shape also play a role.

No young woman wants a bald man unless he has the money to compensate for the lack of hair. It's completely unnatural for a young fertile female to be attracted to a bald head because thick and luscious hair on a man is a sign of fertility and vigor.

Actually it used to be a beauty standard at one point:


->source

Just like... taller foreheads

Why were high foreheads once considered a sign of beauty? - New York City Art Museum Tours

This painting portrays Saint Justina of Padua as a Renaissance fashion plate. The pearls, rubies, and emeralds sewn onto her clothing, cap, and hair tie were the mark of an aristocratic lady; her embroidered stomacher (the triangular piece covering chest and stomach) was the height

www.shadyladiestours.com

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Just like... taller foreheads

View attachment 2282309

View attachment 2282311

Why were high foreheads once considered a sign of beauty? - New York City Art Museum Tours

This painting portrays Saint Justina of Padua as a Renaissance fashion plate. The pearls, rubies, and emeralds sewn onto her clothing, cap, and hair tie were the mark of an aristocratic lady; her embroidered stomacher (the triangular piece covering chest and stomach) was the height

www.shadyladiestours.com

Stop thinking you're not an ugly whore just because centuries ago you would've been considered moderately attractive when everyone was an ugly bastard. There's a reason nobody finds a forehead you need a fucking ladder to scale hot anymore.