Who controls the media?

I don't know how it is the USA, but here they get round the clock taxpayer funded protection. When I taught at a jewish school, I would get frisked and my bag checked simply for approaching the jewish school. It might not make a big splash at the news, but there is no shortage of state resources expended to prevent this specifically.
I’ve had that happen to me but the school was very paranoid about shooters.
I agree, but in the hierarchy of moral culpability, the deceivers retain primary position, while the deceived have a secondary one. The fact that you seem to want to focus solely on the secondary group is demonstrative.
I agree on this point. I have very little trust in other countries, specifically those in the Middle East. I don’t hate Israel but I don’t trust them and I do think they take advantage of social justice.

That being said, I find blaming decentralized groups of people, in this case the Jews as asinine.* The amount of coordination needed isn’t possible with decentralized groups and not all Jews are in agreement, and some really really hate each other. The tension between some of the social conservatives and the standard Hollywoodesque Jews is quite palpable.

On the hierarchy of blame I put our politicians on the very top for being sell outs. Just because a country is rich and pays us lots of money it doesn’t mean they’re our friends, case in point the fact that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia keeps funding terrorism against the west. The same applies to Israel and any oil rich nation.

*Edit likewise I think it’s foolish to think that all Muslims, Christians, etc coordinate together because there isn’t a singular centralized Muslim or Christian organization.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Gog & Magog
View attachment 2282514



I don't know how it is the USA, but here they get round the clock taxpayer funded protection. When I taught at a jewish school, I would get frisked and my bag checked simply for approaching the jewish school. It might not make a big splash at the news, but there is no shortage of state resources expended to prevent this specifically.

I've never experienced that kind of security at any other school, not even the ones filled with criminals that you couldn't drive to for the 50/50 chance of having your tires slashed.

My hunch says that some kind of similar law enforcement advantages are in place in the USA and other european countries.


I agree, but in the hierarchy of moral culpability, the deceivers retain primary position, while the deceived have a secondary one. The fact that you seem to want to focus solely on the secondary group is demonstrative.
You have protection in Jewish institutions so they won't have the next Hypercacher, but for the average shlomo walking down the street doesn't get you a private security guard and you can google videos of Jewish people being attacked by darkies despite Youtube pulling those down.

I think the "decievers" are rich people, but there's not a lot you can do against those, sort of banning media alltogether. I can say they are bad but that's pretty pointless overall. However having the average person actually come into his own conclusions about issues is at least theoretically a far more feasable idea, especially with how easy coming into information is nowdays (even with internet censorship).
 
You have protection in Jewish institutions so they won't have the next Hypercacher, but for the average shlomo walking down the street doesn't get you a private security guard
How does this change who controls the media?

I find blaming decentralized groups of people asinine
What is decentralised by the fact that media is controlled by a group with common characteristic?

It's always better to be precise than vague. "Jews" is a lot more precise (particularly by virtue of being a small group) than "rich people".

Of course we can get more precise by saying "rich jews".

But is it accurate? I've gone couple of rounds back and forth with @wtfNeedSignUp on a number of related topics.

In this thread he wants us to ignore that these rich people share a certain trait, in the stonetoss thread he wanted people to believe USS Liberty was an honest mistake, that there was nothing odd about the dancing israelis and that israel is mostly a victim if its surrounding and not a serious player in their area if geopolitics.

As a result I'm left with this: he presumably isn't rich. So if he's there running defense for the rich jews as a non-rich one, doesn't that mean that saying "rich jews" would be more imprecise rather than more precise?

--

And people need to get over the "not all" idea for any group. When you talk about big topics, you have to do so in sweeping statements or you trip over the minutiae. If there is a newspaper in Dakota that is owned by a Swedish man, it doesn't change who controls the media.
 
Barely, for example in global warming news there is no talk about rich people flying private jets or lighting up their private mansions, there is however no shortage of "eat the bugs/live in a pod" media against the common man.
The media barely blames rich people more than jews? LOL, I want whatever you're smoking.
Here's your "no-talk" and the "barely less talk":
1624301263800.png
1624301345545.png
 
The politicians. Republican and Democrat. lmao. They love money, gifts, power, and will do anything to keep getting it. They get the media to distract the public while they do shady shit oveseas. Meddling in civil wars, hindering democracy, keeping violent dictators as pets, and discarding them when they cause too much trouble.
 
This is a thinly veiled excuse to share a video that had me laughing pretty hard.
Interesting fact: the presenter who is in the last frame of the first video is Jean-Marc Morandini. He's a huge closeted fag. A few years ago, on a french forum (hardware.fr) we found out that he had created a fake production company that would do castings calls for a "mature" reality tv show, they were always looking for young males around 18 who weren't shy and ok with nudity. It turns out that there was no tv show in production but he managed to have several hard drives and folders full of pictures and videos of young men, some were underaged. Some media outlet got wind of it and published a news story about it, the police decided to intervene but they fucked up the investigation so Morandini was never charged for his scam and the alleged pedo stuff.
 
Interesting fact: the presenter who is in the last frame of the first video is Jean-Marc Morandini. He's a huge closeted fag. A few years ago, on a french forum (hardware.fr) we found out that he had created a fake production company that would do castings calls for a "mature" reality tv show, they were always looking for young males around 18 who weren't shy and ok with nudity. It turns out that there was no tv show in production but he managed to have several hard drives and folders full of pictures and videos of young men, some were underaged. Some media outlet got wind of it and published a news story about it, the police decided to intervene but they fucked up the investigation so Morandini was never charged for his scam and the alleged pedo stuff.
I wonder who protected him. Qui? Qui?
 
How does this change who controls the media?


What is decentralised by the fact that media is controlled by a group with common characteristic?

It's always better to be precise than vague. "Jews" is a lot more precise (particularly by virtue of being a small group) than "rich people".

Of course we can get more precise by saying "rich jews".

But is it accurate? I've gone couple of rounds back and forth with @wtfNeedSignUp on a number of related topics.

In this thread he wants us to ignore that these rich people share a certain trait, in the stonetoss thread he wanted people to believe USS Liberty was an honest mistake, that there was nothing odd about the dancing israelis and that israel is mostly a victim if its surrounding and not a serious player in their area if geopolitics.

As a result I'm left with this: he presumably isn't rich. So if he's there running defense for the rich jews as a non-rich one, doesn't that mean that saying "rich jews" would be more imprecise rather than more precise?

--

And people need to get over the "not all" idea for any group. When you talk about big topics, you have to do so in sweeping statements or you trip over the minutiae. If there is a newspaper in Dakota that is owned by a Swedish man, it doesn't change who controls the media.
If you want me to pull some card out of my ass to prove Jews don't control the media then I'm sorry to disappoint, I can only give examples of how the "vision" of western media does and will hurt Jews.

Also the "common characteristic" is a load of shit. You have regular christians and muslims, multiple government and corporations run by non-jews with their own control of the media that are ignored. You just come from the initial assumption that it's jews because it suits your worldview, how are you any different than a sjw saying the white men controls everything to abuse minorities? Especially that you use the argument that me pointing how insane all the theories and the logical consequences of events makes you more right, because it gives a proof I'm a culprit in them.

The horseshoe theory might be a tired centrist trope, but the "jews control everything" trope is just a recoloring of Critical Race Theory so christians can pretend their community is not completely retarded and it's the evil jew's fault that their famliy and friends consistenly vote for the same faggots who makes things worse.
 
If you want me to pull some card out of my ass to prove Jews don't control the media then I'm sorry to disappoint

You didn't disappoint. I know I get into these topics with fervor. There is part of me that wants to be proven wrong.

If in the future there is any evidence that they don't, I'd be happy to look at it and if warranted amend my views. I am guided by a thirst to have and spread truth.

how are you any different than a sjw saying the white men controls everything to abuse minorities?
I am right
 
But I'm confused. Who is he talking about? Who controls the media?
Media one tool they use to condition "little people" to be pod-dwelling, bug-eating, cybernetic serfs.
It began with the town crier, then the printing press which was made to free the voice of the people, eventually journals and newspapers dominated the press. Then industrialization and electrification brought first the radio and then the Television. Finally with the computer and the internet, the AI filters have completely shut the door to the free search for information where once you could browse a library privately for informing yourself. 1/6 brings with it a new enabling act, which will monitor and list you for inquiring where "good & moral people" shouldn't. Centralized and monitored, our ability to form our own opinions are now going to be governed by a need for a small clique of people to feel safe.

I wonder who protected him. Qui? Qui?
Very specific interested parties. I believe there is a 65,000-word treatise written on the subject in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther?
 
The politicians. Republican and Democrat. lmao. They love money, gifts, power, and will do anything to keep getting it. They get the media to distract the public while they do shady shit oveseas. Meddling in civil wars, hindering democracy, keeping violent dictators as pets, and discarding them when they cause too much trouble.
That reminds me of that old SNL clip "Mediaopoly" who's still relevant.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pigtoad
Back