Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

hey dave! keep pounding that keyboard with your insane, redundant delusions about me laced with projections of your sick pedophilic, zoophilic and coprophilic fantasies, you pathetic, daddy dependent useless man with delusions of intellect and redeeming social worth. I don't read any of it, but your father will one day have it all spoon fed to him, mister true transsexual who will never get rid of the dick he hates.
You quoted and yelled at yourself in this post. lol You should take a break from the internet. Joe Biden has better cognitive ability than you, of late. 😆
 
You have Just A Butt on your ignore list and are still talking to/about him.
In pc he is not on ignore. and is acting a fool. i allowed him that in PC.

Now do see the point made. Get that you nor I can dispute the work of a world famous professional. We neither have the clout to do so.

I do get that you can not fix stupid but you can prove them wrong and to be stupid.

And to continue to attack someone that citations prove to be correct is as infantile as Toms assertions of pseudoscience. and His constant iteration that It is debunked when the science clearly states sexually dimorphic clusters.

So unless i click a link butt will not be addressed in public forums but do see that the link is to a famous doctor and that idiot degrades the validity to assume his own bias.
 
In pc he is not on ignore. and is acting a fool. i allowed him that in PC.

Now do see the point made. Get that you nor I can dispute the work of a world famous professional. We neither have the clout to do so.

I do get that you can not fix stupid but you can prove them wrong and to be stupid.

And to continue to attack someone that citations prove to be correct is as infantile as Toms assertions of pseudoscience. and His constant iteration that It is debunked when the science clearly states sexually dimorphic clusters.

So unless i click a link butt will not be addressed in public forums but do see that the link is to a famous doctor and that idiot degrades the validity to assume his own bias.

I thought you were my friend
 
The fact that he is a world famous professional does not make him infallible. Plenty of things that were accepted as scientific fact over the years have been disproven.
Well fucking said. The world of medical science is constantly evolving and changing. What was an irrefutable fact at one point can be dissected and reassessed later on. It's kind of like how people toted how vaping was totally healthy when in reality it hasn't been around nearly long enough to study long term effects.
 
I thought you were my friend
I hold no grudge with anyone and yes i will be friends. But you should be able to see the wording and know what i am saying.
Well fucking said. The world of medical science is constantly evolving and changing. What was an irrefutable fact at one point can be dissected and reassessed later on. It's kind of like how people toted how vaping was totally healthy when in reality it hasn't been around nearly long enough to study long term effects.
PEER REVIEWED CONFIRMED and yes but it is added too. Not that you get that several peer reviews have happened. and all ended the same...... that is what you are calling reassessed.
 
The fact that he is a world famous professional does not make him infallible. Plenty of things that were accepted as scientific fact over the years have been disproven.
MORON the last contact with this Doctor was April 2020 and the same thing was confirmed. Do get you are not a scientist you are not in the know how it all works. peer review `12 years later confirmed the same results..

See you like tom keep thinking peer reviewed confirmed science can be disproven when it can't
 
MORON the last contact with this Doctor was April 2020 and the same thing was confirmed. Do get you are not a scientist you are not in the know how it all works. peer review `12 years later confirmed the same results..

See you like tom keep thinking peer reviewed confirmed science can be disproven when it can't
So you resort to name calling when you cannot refute what I say. Not very scientific. And you are raising science to the level of religious dogma when you maintain it can't be questioned.
Face it- you like what he has to say and hold it dear. Science has nothing to do with it.
 
Hey @Dee Price do you know how long trepanation lasted? 7000 years. It had a 78% survival chance and involved someone drilling a hole into your skull to do everything from relieving pressure to releasing 'demons'. So regardless of the passage of time, 20 years or otherwise, there is always the possibility of change; that is the only constance in anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lemmiwinks
Hey @Dee Price do you know how long trepanation lasted? 7000 years. It had a 78% survival chance and involved someone drilling a hole into your skull to do everything from relieving pressure to releasing 'demons'. So regardless of the passage of time, 20 years or otherwise, there is always the possibility of change; that is the only constance in anything.
No peer review is confirmation. And there is no such thing as a demon. So that is not the same as science. They also used to think life just popped into thin air. but we shown it is from eggs to small for the eye to see. and that was in the 1800's and is still true today.

Science is more than belief. it is more than superstitious idiots drilling holes in peoples heads for idiotic reasons.

Do get the last peer review was not long ago just 9 years back and showed the identical evidence. that just over a year ago that same information was talked about and added too.

By the way no trans NO GAY!!!! do get that fact? IF tarns is a mental illness so is being GAY! some of the same clusters are in orientation as in identity except one the BSTc.

So do get there is no changing the fact that this cluster is gender and causes gender identity. So you can not explain it away.
 
So you resort to name calling when you cannot refute what I say. Not very scientific. And you are raising science to the level of religious dogma when you maintain it can't be questioned.
Face it- you like what he has to say and hold it dear. Science has nothing to do with it.
everything you say is idiocy No i am not. there is no religious dogma idiot I am Atheist science is fact and is studied I have proven the science and even Sneasel told you that at AMB you old one foot in the grave man. You are as old as tom and just as senile.

And not you can not question a medical professional seeing as you are not a peer. That is what i said you fucking moron.
 
everything you say is idiocy No i am not. there is no religious dogma idiot I am Atheist science is fact and is studied I have proven the science and even Sneasel told you that at AMB you old one foot in the grave man. You are as old as tom and just as senile.

And not you can not question a medical professional seeing as you are not a peer. That is what i said you fucking moron.
Yes Dave, I can question it. And is that mess supposed to be English? And again Dave, you are 4 years younger than I am . Calling me old as an insult is really a bit of a stretch.
 
This thread was much more interesting when it was about Tom.
I've seen behavior like this before on the site. I forget where exactly, might've been some shit Invisible Crane was up to.

Basically, this is "cow posting in their own thread," except they pick another thread to be the proxy thread and post incessantly there so that people won't make fun of them for posting in their own thread.
 
They also used to think life just popped into thin air.
What?

Al-Ghazali, who was a jurist and theologian in 10th century Persia, said that conception takes place when ”the sperm enters the ovaries, mixes with the ovum and acquires potential of life”. Given that you're an atheist I'm assuming that you believe the Bible was written without divine inspiration - in which case, why does it call Onan's sperm ”seed”?
 
Back