- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Implying the majority on that list wasn’t trash also. At least RLM is entertaining trash.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Implying the majority on that list wasn’t trash also. At least RLM is entertaining trash.
They can call themselves trash, but lets be honest here....
Half in the Bag and Best of the Worst are way better shows than everything else on that list.
Rich moreso than Mike is better at dumping nostalgiaboner shows that have gotten terrible remakes/sequels/prequels/shit. He was perfectly fine with never doing a single nuTrek re:view ever again. For Mike, it feels to me that this is one of the only legit things he can't let go and unless he'd be willing to do a 10 hour long Plinkett for a single season of nuTrek that was airing or rope Jay or Josh or Jack, who don't care about the property, into sitting down with him, he has to get Rich involved somehow. And they are besties, so why would Rich say no to Mike's pain.> Hollywood keeps insisting on remaking nostalgic properties
> Remakes end up as complete trash
> Rich and Mike have a cry between themselves about the state of modern Star Trek
> Rich Evans was able to leave behind a nostalgic property from his youth, that was already trash and forgettable
> Why can't you leave other properties behind?
I can't quite connect the dots on this one.![]()
Honestly, The Picard Plinkett review was underwhelming. Picard had way more wrong with it than even ST: D. First of all, SIR Patrick Stewart outright sucked as the character that got him knighted in the first place, shitty French accent scene aside. Remember when Plinkett made cracks at how Marina Sirtis forgot how to play Troi? The same thing happened with Patrick Stewart. Even Old Man Picard in All Good Things had manic energy and passion. Which matters when the whole draw is to see his final performance.Rich moreso than Mike is better at dumping nostalgiaboner shows that have gotten terrible remakes/sequels/prequels/shit. He was perfectly fine with never doing a single nuTrek re:view ever again. For Mike, it feels to me that this is one of the only legit things he can't let go and unless he'd be willing to do a 10 hour long Plinkett for a single season of nuTrek that was airing or rope Jay or Josh or Jack, who don't care about the property, into sitting down with him, he has to get Rich involved somehow. And they are besties, so why would Rich say no to Mike's pain.
I think the issue with the Picard review is that Mike already talked in length with Rich about how bad the other episodes were.Honestly, The Picard Plinkett review was underwhelming. Picard had way more wrong with it than even ST: D. First of all, SIR Patrick Stewart outright sucked as the character that got him knighted in the first place, shitty French accent scene aside. Remember when Plinkett made cracks at how Marina Sirtis forgot how to play Troi? The same thing happened with Patrick Stewart. Even Old Man Picard in All Good Things had manic energy and passion. Which matters when the whole draw is to see his final performance.
The premise itself is just discount Firefly, but the ensemble cast melt into the background by lacking the charm to cover up their scoundrel characters. Which is bad since they're supposed to carry on in later seasons since no one should expect Stewart to be in the next season, which makes putting Picard into the body of an old man android ridiculous from a production standpoint. They had the perfect excuse to recast and then didn't. It also somehow managed to flanderize Seven of Nine even though no one asked for her to come back in the first place.
The episode order is also messed up which we can see in the first Riker & Troi episode. It actually makes more narrative sense to move that episode to the first one to explain why the Rikers can't help and to build up Picard's relationship to Dahj/Soji/whoever. That way, there's some emotional impact to Dahj's death in the real episode 1. Not that it would fix season 1 as it's fundamentally broken, but at least try to get the pieces in the right order.
There is that, but it needed to be compiled into a Plinkett video format like the TPM review. The consequences of the Star Wars Plinkett reviews aside, those reviews did put together the general complaints about TPM into a 70 minute review.I think the issue with the Picard review is that Mike already talked in length with Rich about how bad the other episodes were.
Honestly I think the Picard Plinkett video happened because Rich dropped Picard halfway through and Mike was really pissed off. So it probably wasn't intending to be a plinkett video from the beginningThere is that, but it needed to be compiled into a Plinkett video format like the TPM review. The consequences of the Star Wars Plinkett reviews aside, those reviews did put together the general complaints about TPM into a 70 review.
To be fair, old man Picard was played by a man in his prime. Not a tired old man like the old man playing old man Picard now.The same thing happened with Patrick Stewart. Even Old Man Picard in All Good Things had manic energy and passion
Except he managed to play that role in Logan well.To be fair, old man Picard was played by a man in his prime. Not a tired old man like the old man playing old man Picard now.
I haven't seen it and don't know much about X-Men beyond the cartoon and Capcom games but doesn't he just sit and lay down all the time lol
But so is everything else on the Ballot.
Since I can't find the specific scene itself, I'll just link the RLM review of the episode. As one example, I refer to the scene where the Romulan Senator berates and challenges Picard to a sword fight. Picard gives out a mealy-mouth response of how he tried to help them and says "The Federation failed you all." The Senator wasn't having any of that and then demands satisfaction and Picard throws his sword down in protest. How was Picard not in character? Well, if you were acting like a belligerent ass, he has no problem cussing you out, or making threats, veiled or otherwise. Why? Pacing and leading. What's he doing in Picard? The exact opposite. In fact, it's worse because Picard is trying to appease whoever is berating him at that moment. The show is filled with Picard getting yelled at by someone and instead of using his persuasion skills to calm the situation down, he just sits and takes it. That's a fundamental failure of Picard's character and diplomacy in general. Stewart is not in character, ergo he is performing badly.I don't think Stewart had a bad performance in ST: Picard, the show is great on a technical level.
It's just that Alex Kurtzman and Akiva Goldsman are the main writers and they blow dick.
Rich moreso than Mike is better at dumping nostalgiaboner shows that have gotten terrible remakes/sequels/prequels/shit.