Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

[Henry Wyatt]

View attachment 2291363

https://archive.ph/lPF1e

She takes a lot of shit from other commie e-girls and troons but a lot of it is behind her back and so it's not always as visible. There's a pretty solid chunk of people who see that she's just monkey branching trend to trend.

>befriend someone who isnt super woke
>NOOOO STOP BEFRIENDING NAHTZEES
every time

 

[Boss Bass]

Really enjoyed dear feeders podcast despite not knowing this person. What a jarring look at titty streamers, it’s like her experiences stopped at 18, every other story is about high school, with the remainder being about MIDDLE SCHOOL.
Burn the internet to the ground.
Obviously the best part is dropping out of college to live at home because of your bunny passing away.

 

[Berrakh]

That SyrenCove slut Greg possibly fucked looks incredibly unpleasant.
anyway the thread is just about Shoe so now of course it gets moved. Makes sense.

 

[CervixHammer]

I just think it's funny seeing the word "beauty" at the top and bottom of Shoe's thread.

 

[LonesomeDud]

I just think it's funny seeing the word "beauty" at the top and bottom of Shoe's thread.
View attachment 2291921

She's not my type of girl, but there's nothing wrong with June's face or body. I just don't like someone who panders to this group of guys that "hate the feminists" so much because women putting themselves first is so fundamentally offensive to a bunch of incels. I would consider myself more egalitarian who thinks certain feminist sects are obnoxious, but I don't automatically ree when a woman identifies as a feminist, because it's just so broad a term. I think being a woman who attacks all women who identify as feminists is no different than being a man who attacks all men who identify themselves as caring about men's rights. In some fundamental ways, I feel like it's betraying your sex for attention from the opposite sex. When a woman says she "hates feminists", just like when a man says he hates "men's rights advocates", it's a big red flag.

If someone doesn't have good same sex friendships, run. Girl who prides herself on "not being like the other girls?" Run.

 

[MediocreMilt]

I just don't like someone who panders to this group of guys that "hate the feminists" so much because women putting themselves first is so fundamentally offensive to a bunch of incels. I would consider myself more egalitarian who thinks certain feminist sects are obnoxious, but I don't automatically ree when a woman identifies as a feminist, because it's just so broad a term.

it's about ethics in journalism tbh fam

 

[LonesomeDud]

it's about ethics in journalism tbh fam

I think I understand what you're saying here. June has no moral compass.

 

[MediocreMilt]

I think I understand what you're saying here. June has no moral compass.

No I'm saying your post has massive NotYourShield energy.

It's ok to shit on something/someone without making sure everybody knows you're a good boy who isn't shitting on some other sacred cow.

 

[LonesomeDud]

No I'm saying your post has massive NotYourShield energy.

It's ok to shit on something/someone without making sure everybody knows you're a good boy who isn't shitting on some other sacred cow.

I don't understand what #notyourshield means in this context.

It's weird for a woman to shit on other women just for believing in some unorganized concept with no dogma. Hating women for believing loosely in a concept of women's rights in a way that appeals to men is just weird. It's an aesthetic masquerading as something more than it is, as opposed to all the trad wife stuff on YouTube that's more openly shallow, and at least to me, a lot more attractive.

 

[Berrakh]

You’re both right. June is a dumb guinea.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

No problem with the thread being moved here. "Beauty Parlor" is just another word(s) for Basic Bitch.

 

[deangusmacteard]

No I'm saying your post has massive NotYourShield energy.

It's ok to shit on something/someone without making sure everybody knows you're a good boy who isn't shitting on some other sacred cow.

Very much this. @LonesomeDud let the hate flow through you.

I don't understand what #notyourshield means in this context.

It's weird for a woman to shit on other women just for believing in some unorganized concept with no dogma. Hating women for believing loosely in a concept of women's rights in a way that appeals to men is just weird. It's an aesthetic masquerading as something more than it is, as opposed to all the trad wife stuff on YouTube that's more openly shallow, and at least to me, a lot more attractive.

It is possible to creatively reimagine every major civilization-level question if you get all multidimensional on it, but that's often not helpful or worthwhile.

Many people, for instance, have different opinions on abortion depending on whether the context is moral, ethical, legal, constitutional, social, theological, spiritual or purely political. It is entirely possible - and, honestly, preferable to serious people - to boil down those positions to a binary "pro-choice" or "pro-life" for practical purposes while still remaining a nuanced human being.

There are dozens of different strains and definitions of feminism, and hundreds/thousands of distinct perspectives in the broader conversation. None of them are relevant except for the definition that everybody uses, which (if we're going to nuancebro about it) is intersectional radical feminism as marketed by corporations through mass media.

That's why the majority of women across America and across the planet do not believe in "feminism", even if they are technically "feminist" according to outdated, generalized definitions.

It is perfectly normal and decent and just to simply say that feminism is cancer. You don't have to dance around it.

I just think it's funny seeing the word "beauty" at the top and bottom of Shoe's thread.
View attachment 2291921

Big gay take. Shoe is a perfectly serviceable female with 3 years until - according to the best data science has to offer - she becomes semi-objectively worthless.

She's got a symmetrical face, unblemished skin, healthy-looking hair, straight teeth and an hourglass figure. I wouldn't hit that, but it's nonsense to say she doesn't qualify as beautiful.

 

[Lady of the House]

This woman is now thirty and has never held a real job other than embarrassing herself on the internet. She's reaching Sapphire Crimson Claw levels.

I'm glad this was moved to beauty parlour, because female perspective in regards to June is important just to understand how pathetic she is. What's next for her?

 

[Plank]

i guess it's because her only claim to fame (and lolcow status) now is being an attention seeking girl on the internet
nobody talks about her politics anymore, not even herself. now everybody just talks about her looks, sex life, wigs, mental state, age, relationships, etc, and i guess that's more fitting for beauty parlour than internet famous

From the few videos of her I've watched and the rare times I clicked on some tweet by her, it is painfully obvious that, unless I missed it, there are no books in her room.

There is only so long a audience can be sustained by hot takes and snark. It is like eating nothing but candy and potato chips. One will eventually get sick of them and seek out some real food.

The looks are obviously fading.
The videos on how crazy the SJW/leftist activists are is now mainstream.
Her clout chasing isn't really gaining her much.

Two and a half millennium of political thought isn't impossible for someone who is 30 to gain a reasonable ability to do reasonably well in the online political discourse, but it isn't something that is going to happen anytime soon even if she started immediately. Even the lowest tier political and social commentators have vastly more hard knowledge of the source material than she does.

If not that, then getting married or continue to fade into the 'I use to be cool and hip' unmarried wine aunt persona.

 

[Lady of the House]

From the few videos of her I've watched and the rare times I clicked on some tweet by her, it is painfully obvious that, unless I missed it, there are no books in her room.

There is only so long a audience can be sustained by hot takes and snark. It is like eating nothing but candy and potato chips. One will eventually get sick of them and seek out some real food.

The looks are obviously fading.
The videos on how crazy the SJW/leftist activists are is now mainstream.
Her clout chasing isn't really gaining her much.

Two and a half millennium of political thought isn't impossible for someone who is 30 to gain a reasonable ability to do reasonably well in the online political discourse, but it isn't something that is going to happen anytime soon even if she started immediately. Even the lowest tier political and social commentators have vastly more hard knowledge of the source material than she does.

If not that, then getting married or continue to fade into the 'I use to be cool and hip' unmarried wine aunt persona.

Lindsey Ellis is older than her yet does much better in the market because she abandoned her "cool girl" persona that appealed to men back in the day and nobody watches her for her looks (at least I hope they don't). She's also not insecure about her age or constantly attacking other women, which is a one up on June. I can't believe I'm complimenting Lindsey, but she's someone in June's circle who is doing much better with what she has. June has nothing to stand on.

 

[JelloJerk]

She's got a symmetrical face, unblemished skin, healthy-looking hair, straight teeth and an hourglass figure. I wouldn't hit that, but it's nonsense to say she doesn't qualify as beautiful.

Well her hair is a wig, but I think her biggest issue is that she tries to go for the OnlyFans e-girl look now which is usually used by girls that are 10 years younger than her, so when she does it you can tell that she's way older than the other girls, and to my brain that translates to "Something is really wrong here"/uncanny valley vibes. It borderline creeps me out lol.

Skinwalker indeed.

 

[Berrakh]

I just think it's a mistake for women to need male validation just like it's bad for men to need female validation. You're basically putting your self-esteem in the hands of people who don't really get who you are and have a real conflict of interest in what you should be.

 

[justhereforments]

So, June mocked women at their thirties, when she was 26, so we mock her about this.
At least that's better. I thought we had more 4chan trolls, the ones who see value in a woman only of she can get pregnant.
Optimistic

Women who can't get pregnant still have value. Women who choose not to have children and then end up terminally child-less do not have value.

 

[Random Dyke]

I just think it's a mistake for women to need male validation just like it's bad for men to need female validation. You're basically putting your self-esteem in the hands of people who don't really get who you are and have a real conflict of interest in what you should be.

It's sadly one of the curses the Internet has given us. Millions want to be special, just like their favorite social media icons. But how do you stand out from the others? Flash your tits, create some questionable thumbnails, have retarded takes, or do anything and everything that will draw others towards you. The more followers/subscribers/friends you have, the godlier you are. No more would you be bullied in school, oh no. Your bullies would eat literal shit just for a single ounce of your clout.

None of these people-- June included-- want to accept that there's a possibility that they will die and eventually be forgotten. If being remembered means having your 22-year-old nude body on the Internet for the rest of its lifespan, then that's what people will do.

Women who can't get pregnant still have value. Women who choose not to have children and then end up terminally child-less do not have value.

What about those who can get pregnant but have health complications (such as PCOS) that could jeopardize the baby? What about those who are addicted to a dangerous substance such as heroin?

Just because somebody can get pregnant doesn't mean they should get pregnant.

If that were the case, we'd surely have no issue with furfags reproducing and increasing the size of their autistic community.

 

[Dread First]

Women who can't get pregnant still have value. Women who choose not to have children and then end up terminally child-less do not have value.

Poe's Law, you strike again. And here I thought the Onision thread was a honeypot for spergs. Using shoe0nhead to judge all voluntarily childless women is like using Lucas Werner to judge all childless men: you're literally referring to the exception as the actual rule.

You do realise that having children is a two-person endeavour, right? If women who choose to not have children despite being able to do so have no value, then men who choose to not procreate are just as worthless. However, we have clear examples of men who made the conscious decision to not reproduce, and yet their lives are far from worthless.

If Richard Stallman had a kid when he was in his late 20s/early 30s, he would've never had the time to dedicate working in the MIT AI laboratory, which in and of itself, was the birthplace of so many milestones in technological innovation (i.e. Incompatible Timesharing System, Emacs, the GNU Project and every piece of software licensed under the GPL that's used in a commercial setting like the Linux kernel, etc).

I'm not saying that every barren spinster who chose to not have children is a mind along the likes of RMS, but the point is that time not spent raising children is time that could be spent on endeavours that benefit society in some way. Shoe's life is only worthless because she chooses to prioritise attention-seeking over contributing to society. Any child born to her would invariably come out fucked up psychologically because they never had stable role models to anchor themselves with.

If Shoe actually did have children, she'd still be a worthless human being because we have a woman who hasn't aged beyond 16 mentally responsible for human lives that can't take care of themselves. Why the fuck would anyone want Shoe to have kids in the first place?