Serious LGBT Discussion

If you boil the frog down to the bone, on it you'll find it written that any sex outside of marriage in Christianity is a sin. But casual gay sex with a dude? That's like some super sin action. Then again, everybody sins and I guess the key here is to fight and reject sin no matter what it is and not to take that shit with a massive grain field of fucking pride like it's a damn virtue. Faggotry has been in human history since the dawn of Steve and yet every normal society always rebounds itself from that shit. I wonder why.
Personally I don't like the gays all that much. But I'm also sure I'd like them a little bit more if the LGBTQ+Pedophiles And Animal Corpse Fuckers Eventually Mark My Word wouldn't have boiled themselves in radical marxism and now demand affection at the pain of getting canceled and are also out to destroy the nuclear family and rebuild some stupid bullshit in its place. Good luck with that shit.
Sometimes you can meet a gay person who knows all this shit and they agree with it. And I say to these gays God bless you, and God help you.
Why the fuck are you in this thread then, run up out my block or catch a bullet with this autistic christfaggotry you newfag retard
 
Oh yeah? We'll your mom is fat.
1624602505898.png
 
Regardless of wether or not any Christian believes it to be 100% a sin against God - 99% of the ones I know in real life have kept it to themselves. Furthermore, when I ask the gays I know in real life if they have had anyone they know in their lives who have expressed that sentiment openly, directly or indirectly to them... about 90% said no.
Most Christians won't explain their beliefs about homosexuality unless you explicitly ask them. And in this day and age, expressing beliefs that aren't 100% in lock step with the alphabet lobby is dangerous.
 
If you boil the frog down to the bone, on it you'll find it written that any sex outside of marriage in Christianity is a sin. But casual gay sex with a dude? That's like some super sin action. Then again, everybody sins and I guess the key here is to fight and reject sin no matter what it is and not to take that shit with a massive grain field of fucking pride like it's a damn virtue. Faggotry has been in human history since the dawn of Steve and yet every normal society always rebounds itself from that shit. I wonder why.
Personally I don't like the gays all that much. But I'm also sure I'd like them a little bit more if the LGBTQ+Pedophiles And Animal Corpse Fuckers Eventually Mark My Word wouldn't have boiled themselves in radical marxism and now demand affection at the pain of getting canceled and are also out to destroy the nuclear family and rebuild some stupid bullshit in its place. Good luck with that shit.
Sometimes you can meet a gay person who knows all this shit and they agree with it. And I say to these gays God bless you, and God help you.

Why does it matter if you like gays all that much? As long as, you don't harass them then it shouldn't matter.

Also, the creation of the gay identity in the West sorta of explains "taking that shit with a massive grain field of fucking pride like it's a damn virtue"

Most Christians won't explain their beliefs about homosexuality unless you explicitly ask them. And in this day and age, expressing beliefs that aren't 100% in lock step with the alphabet lobby is dangerous.

I feel that a good handful of Christians don't even take their beliefs seriously. Most of the time, their beliefs are mostly therapeutic in nature. Yes, they will say that it's sin, but not with much conviction. But that is a discussion for another thread.


On topic: Can we talk about the Eulenburg Affair and how it lead to the destruction of imperial Germany? Currently, I'm reading Queer Identity and Politics in Weimar Germany. It's an interesting book.
 
If you boil the frog down to the bone, on it you'll find it written that any sex outside of marriage in Christianity is a sin. But casual gay sex with a dude? That's like some super sin action. Then again, everybody sins and I guess the key here is to fight and reject sin no matter what it is and not to take that shit with a massive grain field of fucking pride like it's a damn virtue. Faggotry has been in human history since the dawn of Steve and yet every normal society always rebounds itself from that shit. I wonder why.
Personally I don't like the gays all that much. But I'm also sure I'd like them a little bit more if the LGBTQ+Pedophiles And Animal Corpse Fuckers Eventually Mark My Word wouldn't have boiled themselves in radical marxism and now demand affection at the pain of getting canceled and are also out to destroy the nuclear family and rebuild some stupid bullshit in its place. Good luck with that shit.
Sometimes you can meet a gay person who knows all this shit and they agree with it. And I say to these gays God bless you, and God help you.
Nobody cares about your religious shit.
 
Why does it matter if you like gays all that much? As long as, you don't harass them then it shouldn't matter.
Yeah? Maybe if they'd stop harassing Christians with their marxist bullshit, we'd come to an agreement. I don't like the gays all that much for the sole reason that they try to convince me that sticking your dick into another dude's ass and getting HIV is completely fine. To me that sounds like a meth addict saying that meth is great because it makes you feel good, so that's why it's okay.
This is a very complicated issue and as far as I can tell it's better to split into your party and keep a distance because I don;t really see any way find compromise in this. Thus the no harassment rule sounds good.
I feel that a good handful of Christians don't even take their beliefs seriously. Most of the time, their beliefs are mostly therapeutic in nature. Yes, they will say that it's sin, but not with much conviction. But that is a discussion for another thread.
From my experience most people are secular no mater about what it'd be, religion, politics or whatever. Personally I believe that if people would actually read the Bible and take interest in their faith, there would me much more stronger Christians than not.

Nobody cares about your religious shit.
Nobody would be you, Triple H. Thank's for clearing that up though, I though you were all about me for a second there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody would be you, Triple H. Thank's for clearing that up though, I though you were all about me for a second there.
Jesus also said to love your neighbor as yourself, and he didn't say that didn't apply to gays.

The bible also says you can sell your daughter into slavery and you shouldn't eat shellfish or work on Sundays. I don't see you tardraging about those things
 
Yeah? Maybe if they'd stop harassing Christians with their marxist bullshit, we'd come to an agreement. I don't like the gays all that much for the sole reason that they try to convince me that sticking your dick into another dude's ass and getting HIV is completely fine. To me that sounds like a meth addict saying that meth is great because it makes you feel good, so that's why it's okay.
This is a very complicated issue and as far as I can tell it's better to split into your party and keep a distance because I don;t really see any way find compromise in this. Thus the no harassment rule sounds good.

This is why I can't I be a conservative. I'm too individualist for this mess. Why don't you just ignore them? Also what is there to compromise about? You can't control over people's actions.

From my experience most people are secular no mater about what it'd be, religion, politics or whatever. Personally I believe that if people would actually read the Bible and take interest in their faith, there would me much more stronger Christians than not.

They would require for people to truly want to close to GOD. Most people don't want to. That's why I think that Calvinism is right in some parts.

Nobody cares about your religious shit.

Why don't you just be an adult and ignore him. He's a random on the internet for guy's sake.
 
This is why I can't I be a conservative. I'm too individualist for this mess. Why don't you just ignore them? Also what is there to compromise about? You can't control over people's actions.
Frankly I really just don't care about the gay community, like, literally I'd ignore it completely if it weren't for the lgbtq+++ freaks and their ilk trying to push marxism everywhere and forcing people to accept their bullshit.
They would require for people to truly want to close to GOD. Most people don't want to. That's why I think that Calvinism is right in some parts.
I think Calvinism is the biggest meme in theology, but more of a funny misinterpretation meme by foolish people than some super heresy.
But I do agree that people must choose God and not be indoctrinated into the faith, but this is an education and cultural issue more than anything. Best you can do is take the minimal effort from Calvinism and just trust God got it.
Why don't you just be an adult and ignore him. He's a random on the internet for guy's sake.
That's a good advice for me, actually.
 
They would require for people to truly want to close to GOD. Most people don't want to. That's why I think that Calvinism is right in some parts.
When I wanna be close to God I just take hallucinogens or psychedelics. Closest I've ever come to a truly "religious" experience.

I do agree that the media seems to push heavily the liberal, morality-free "gay agenda." Many faggots (I use that term intentionally) do shill and live that poz-infested lifestyle. It reflects poorly on regular upstanding citizens that just happen to be sexually attracted to their own sex. I am firmly LGB; troons can hang. Queens and troons ruined any masculine image of homosexuality.
 
When I wanna be close to God I just take hallucinogens or psychedelics. Closest I've ever come to a truly "religious" experience.

I do agree that the media seems to push heavily the liberal, morality-free "gay agenda." Many faggots (I use that term intentionally) do shill and live that poz-infested lifestyle. It reflects poorly on regular upstanding citizens that just happen to be sexually attracted to their own sex. I am firmly LGB; troons can hang. Queens and troons ruined any masculine image of homosexuality.

I'm a effeminate faggoty Queen. *snaps fingers * I just love information and gossip more than random sex. I want to say that it's complicated. You should read this article and tell me what you think.


Frankly I really just don't care about the gay community, like, literally I'd ignore it completely if it weren't for the lgbtq+++ freaks and their ilk trying to push marxism everywhere and forcing people to accept their bullshit.

It's not Marxism that they're pushing. Marxism and Communism are on life support. Neoliberalism is the order of the day. LGBTQ +++ freaks are the perfect agents because they're a rootless people, who can move when global corporations say so. Among on things. Marxism is just the face painting, because no one gives a shit about the workers. The more atomized people are, the more the market and companies can grow.
 
It's not Marxism that they're pushing. Marxism and Communism are on life support. Neoliberalism is the order of the day. LGBTQ +++ freaks are the perfect agents because they're a rootless people, who can move when global corporations say so. Among on things. Marxism is just the face painting, because no one gives a shit about the workers. The more atomized people are, the more the market and companies can grow.
It's marxims, which is only in part about the workers and much more about the systemic destruction of a previous system so that a new one can be put in its place. Call it what you want though. I'd say your definition of neoliberalism and amrxism is sound, but it's replace their places.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hermann the German
It's marxims, which is only in part about the workers and much more about the systemic destruction of a previous system so that a new one can be put in its place. Call it what you want though. I'd say your definition of neoliberalism and amrxism is sound, but it's replace their places.

Maybe, they both lead down the same road? Just which flavor root beer you want. I want to say that it's much more complicated about destruction of a previous system. If the masters don't change, did they really destroy the previous system? The result is that the middle class and working class are in worst positions. But that is another thread topic.

@
[IMG alt="Hermann the German"]https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.net/data/avatars/l/50/50289.jpg?1581041363[/IMG]

Hermann the German, did you read the article I posted?​

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Kornula
did you read the article I posted?
I skimmed it. I'm at work.

Essentially "homosexual liberation" should be treated as social/individual "freedom" (open expression of the self) as opposed to simply "the right to fuck and marry other dudes"?

I get it, I just think it kinda generalizes things. I don't feel like I need other people to define why I'm attracted to men and what I want an accepting culture to be like.
 
On topic: Can we talk about the Eulenburg Affair and how it lead to the destruction of imperial Germany? Currently, I'm reading Queer Identity and Politics in Weimar Germany. It's an interesting book.
I'm reading about it now, and holy shit Kaiser Wilhelm II was a lolcow.
  1. Became super-reactionary as a 'Fuck you mom and dad'
  2. Major inferiority complex due to his gimp arm
  3. Went into a major tardrage during the Boxer Rebellion, running around screaming that he was going to take revenge on those dang dirty chinamen
  4. Annoyed ever other nation by sperging out at them
 
Back