- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)
- Thread starter Pointless Pedant
- Start date
Brother Wind
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2017
Are you fucking American? Jesus Christ yes we voted you nimrod. Its a goddamn amendment. All the states vote on that. Jesus fucking hell I am so angry that someone had to actually ask that. You should go read Dobsons thread, I think Stone Toss here might actually, somehow, be a bit too high brow for you.
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
state legislatures vote on amendments, not people, and most people don't vote for the legislatures. not that it matters because the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865, but just saying...
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
Anyone delusional enough to think that someone will assassinate Biden for threatening citizens who have issues with the federal government are about as dumb as people wishing Trump would die from COVID, a virus that ended up getting him bed-ridden for only three days.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
They'd also be delusional to assume they'd let Biden outside for a period longer than 10-20 minutes around the highly secured White House grounds. He likely gets less outside time than his remaining pet does.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
I would like to take a minute and alert you fags to the fact that there is a blog called "stonetoss is an idiot".
I check antifastonetoss from time to time and most new comics get a blogpost on why stonetoss is a dumb dumb. I thought I'd explain, as it's hard to tell from its name.
Normally I glance over this and it's some screeching that is barely related to the comic. This one in particular though, I thought was of a very special kind of retarded that I wanted to share it with you.
I sometimes remember to Tweet blog news and updates on my Twitter. I sometimes take other people’s money when they subscribe to my Patreon
Comic Name: Powder Keg
Description: Disclaimer: The above cartoon is intended to be enjoyed as a work of comedy and political expression and does NOT represent incitement to, or endorsement of, any form of violence or insurrectionary activity either in real life or in Minecraft.
Mouseover: Funny how no one says that to the Taliban.
Image Name: second-amendment-john-f-kennedy-stonetoss-political-cartoon.png
Amogus: Second panel, a glare in the corner of the windshield frame.
Originally Published: 6/24/2021
What The Comic Is: A gay caricature offers a smug rhetorical to a Gadsden flag-shirt wearing gun owner, asking him what his second amendment could do against the government’s jet planes and nukes. The second panel shows United States President JFK as he rides in the back of the car he was assassinated in.
What StoneToss Actually Thinks: Presidents have been assassinated before, therefore gun owners can fight the military.
Why It’s Fucking Stupid: God damn it. You know, I try not to make posts covering the most recent StoneToss comic because I’m trying to work my way through a massive backlog of old shit, but the guy just can’t not say something egregiously stupid and force my hand. So here we are.
StoneToss is a big proponent of the second amendment, or the “right to bear arms” and has made roughly a dozen or so comics before where he plays into this fantasy of gun owners standing up to tyrannical governments (be them the British during the revolutionary war or some strawman version of the modern day). Second amendments adherents will argue that we need high powered automatic weapons “incase the government goes rogue”, as this is (depending on who you ask) part of the reason the second amendment was drafted in the first place: to allow citizens to arm themselves for protection against what included their own government. The common argument against this (as seen in the comic) is that the the USA’s military has equipment and power far eclipsing any guns civilians have access to. StoneToss has grappled with this argument before, always doing incredibly poorly at it, and this time is no different.
StoneToss tries to zero in on a presidential assassination, in this case JFK, though really any assassination would’ve worked (and by ‘worked’ I mean ‘failed’). As you might have already learned, John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States and served from January 1961 until November 1963, when he died at the hand (or, well, the bullet) of sharpshooter Lee Harvey Oswald. And it’s true, sure. Oswald was just a guy who went into a building and shot the President of the United States. But what does this have to do with the argument that gun owners could battle against the US Government? Absolutely fucking nothing.
JFK was the last US President to ever be assassinated, and it was through a pure lapse of logistics (or perhaps more to do with the fact it was assumed no one would be stupid enough to actually shoot the President, or maybe you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that it was all an inside job by the CIA). Oswald did not battle against the might of the US military to reach Kennedy, like some kind of end-stage boss battle in a fucking FPS game. These days the security of the President is taken so seriously that most people with plans to harm the political leader don’t make it within ten miles of the el presidente’s location before being picked up and arrested. And even if you did manage to kill the President, what exactly does this prove? That guns can kill someone if you shoot them? Wow, what a brilliant conclusion. I guess without the President, the US military’s nukes and jet planes suddenly stop working, like some kind of domino effect when you take out the head vampire. Somehow I think there’s a slight difference between shooting at an unarmored, unprotected man in a car who doesn’t know you’re there and shooting at a heavily armored military vehicle equipped with top of the line anti-life technology that is being piloted by a group of fully trained soldiers who already know your exact location thanks to heat mapping done by drones that are so high in the sky you can’t even see them. I mean, this is just a hypothetical anyways because if this scenario were real, you wouldn’t even see the armored vehicle full of soldiers driving towards you because you’d have already been terraformed by the tactical bombing.
But alright, alright. We don’t need to go into a big imaginary scenario where the US military attacks its own citizens. We’ve been down that road before and frankly the answer is always: There is no previous comparison (the revolutionary war, JFK assassination) that stacks up anywhere close to today’s power disparity that exists between the US military and anyone/everyone else. If we imagine a world where the entirety of the US military suddenly turns on the population, we’re fucked. No local LARPer militia or “I watch lots of military training videos on YouTube” heroes are going to stop them. the argument “but what about the Middle East!” is often employed when trying to find examples of an ‘undergeared’ militia fending off the US military, even StoneToss calls upon it by mentioning the Taliban. Well, let’s talk about that for a minute. What kind of weapons does the Taliban have? Military weapons. Where did they get them? From the US military, either directly or indirectly (many weapons and equipment were taken after government militaries abandoned them, this is due in large part to Middle Eastern militaries and their incredibly poor leadership, as they promote based entirely on loyalty rather than any other qualification). So by bringing up the Taliban, StoneToss is arguing that the US military’s equipment can be defeated, but only by a force that is using the US military’s equipment. Fucking genius. This is ignoring the sheer logistical issues the US faces when doing war in the Middle East, and that they would not be facing any of these massive problems if invading their own soil, making their war machine dozens of times more efficient and severely hampering the ability to “hide in the hills” ala Middle Eastern terrorist cells.
“OH YA THE ARMY HAS NUKE??? K WELL WHAT BOUT…. UHHH…. WHAT BOUT…. WHAT BOUT BRITISH ARMY IN THE 1700’S?”
“Did the British army in the 1700’s have nuclear weapons?”
<StoneToss offers no reply or acknowledgement, he is too busy making a comic about molesting kids>
I find the military analysis of high quality. Why indeed do people defend the second amendment?
What use are your guns going to be when the US military can just Nuke the US when it wants to invade the US?
I check antifastonetoss from time to time and most new comics get a blogpost on why stonetoss is a dumb dumb. I thought I'd explain, as it's hard to tell from its name.
Normally I glance over this and it's some screeching that is barely related to the comic. This one in particular though, I thought was of a very special kind of retarded that I wanted to share it with you.
StoneToss: Episode 86
JUNE 24, 2021~ STONETOSSISANIDIOTI sometimes remember to Tweet blog news and updates on my Twitter. I sometimes take other people’s money when they subscribe to my Patreon
Comic Name: Powder Keg
Description: Disclaimer: The above cartoon is intended to be enjoyed as a work of comedy and political expression and does NOT represent incitement to, or endorsement of, any form of violence or insurrectionary activity either in real life or in Minecraft.
Mouseover: Funny how no one says that to the Taliban.
Image Name: second-amendment-john-f-kennedy-stonetoss-political-cartoon.png
Amogus: Second panel, a glare in the corner of the windshield frame.
Originally Published: 6/24/2021
What The Comic Is: A gay caricature offers a smug rhetorical to a Gadsden flag-shirt wearing gun owner, asking him what his second amendment could do against the government’s jet planes and nukes. The second panel shows United States President JFK as he rides in the back of the car he was assassinated in.
What StoneToss Actually Thinks: Presidents have been assassinated before, therefore gun owners can fight the military.
Why It’s Fucking Stupid: God damn it. You know, I try not to make posts covering the most recent StoneToss comic because I’m trying to work my way through a massive backlog of old shit, but the guy just can’t not say something egregiously stupid and force my hand. So here we are.
StoneToss is a big proponent of the second amendment, or the “right to bear arms” and has made roughly a dozen or so comics before where he plays into this fantasy of gun owners standing up to tyrannical governments (be them the British during the revolutionary war or some strawman version of the modern day). Second amendments adherents will argue that we need high powered automatic weapons “incase the government goes rogue”, as this is (depending on who you ask) part of the reason the second amendment was drafted in the first place: to allow citizens to arm themselves for protection against what included their own government. The common argument against this (as seen in the comic) is that the the USA’s military has equipment and power far eclipsing any guns civilians have access to. StoneToss has grappled with this argument before, always doing incredibly poorly at it, and this time is no different.
StoneToss tries to zero in on a presidential assassination, in this case JFK, though really any assassination would’ve worked (and by ‘worked’ I mean ‘failed’). As you might have already learned, John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States and served from January 1961 until November 1963, when he died at the hand (or, well, the bullet) of sharpshooter Lee Harvey Oswald. And it’s true, sure. Oswald was just a guy who went into a building and shot the President of the United States. But what does this have to do with the argument that gun owners could battle against the US Government? Absolutely fucking nothing.
JFK was the last US President to ever be assassinated, and it was through a pure lapse of logistics (or perhaps more to do with the fact it was assumed no one would be stupid enough to actually shoot the President, or maybe you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that it was all an inside job by the CIA). Oswald did not battle against the might of the US military to reach Kennedy, like some kind of end-stage boss battle in a fucking FPS game. These days the security of the President is taken so seriously that most people with plans to harm the political leader don’t make it within ten miles of the el presidente’s location before being picked up and arrested. And even if you did manage to kill the President, what exactly does this prove? That guns can kill someone if you shoot them? Wow, what a brilliant conclusion. I guess without the President, the US military’s nukes and jet planes suddenly stop working, like some kind of domino effect when you take out the head vampire. Somehow I think there’s a slight difference between shooting at an unarmored, unprotected man in a car who doesn’t know you’re there and shooting at a heavily armored military vehicle equipped with top of the line anti-life technology that is being piloted by a group of fully trained soldiers who already know your exact location thanks to heat mapping done by drones that are so high in the sky you can’t even see them. I mean, this is just a hypothetical anyways because if this scenario were real, you wouldn’t even see the armored vehicle full of soldiers driving towards you because you’d have already been terraformed by the tactical bombing.
But alright, alright. We don’t need to go into a big imaginary scenario where the US military attacks its own citizens. We’ve been down that road before and frankly the answer is always: There is no previous comparison (the revolutionary war, JFK assassination) that stacks up anywhere close to today’s power disparity that exists between the US military and anyone/everyone else. If we imagine a world where the entirety of the US military suddenly turns on the population, we’re fucked. No local LARPer militia or “I watch lots of military training videos on YouTube” heroes are going to stop them. the argument “but what about the Middle East!” is often employed when trying to find examples of an ‘undergeared’ militia fending off the US military, even StoneToss calls upon it by mentioning the Taliban. Well, let’s talk about that for a minute. What kind of weapons does the Taliban have? Military weapons. Where did they get them? From the US military, either directly or indirectly (many weapons and equipment were taken after government militaries abandoned them, this is due in large part to Middle Eastern militaries and their incredibly poor leadership, as they promote based entirely on loyalty rather than any other qualification). So by bringing up the Taliban, StoneToss is arguing that the US military’s equipment can be defeated, but only by a force that is using the US military’s equipment. Fucking genius. This is ignoring the sheer logistical issues the US faces when doing war in the Middle East, and that they would not be facing any of these massive problems if invading their own soil, making their war machine dozens of times more efficient and severely hampering the ability to “hide in the hills” ala Middle Eastern terrorist cells.
“OH YA THE ARMY HAS NUKE??? K WELL WHAT BOUT…. UHHH…. WHAT BOUT…. WHAT BOUT BRITISH ARMY IN THE 1700’S?”
“Did the British army in the 1700’s have nuclear weapons?”
<StoneToss offers no reply or acknowledgement, he is too busy making a comic about molesting kids>
I find the military analysis of high quality. Why indeed do people defend the second amendment?
What use are your guns going to be when the US military can just Nuke the US when it wants to invade the US?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
Sure you can start nuking your own country but that's if you don't care about having a country afterward. Nukes & F15's don't occupy positions and no army is big enough to occupy every position in a large country.
Also you are attacking your own army infrastructure, if an army breaks its own country it will literally be reduced to sticks and stones at some point, Nukes & F15's have a ridiculously high maintenance requirements you know. Its nowhere near as simple as 'Army has X & Y so it wins'. You are making the same mistake you are accusing the comic of: oversimplification.
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Nukes are a horrible idea for attacking a land you want to keep.
Also we have real life examples of inferiorly armed forces making life hell for superiorly armed forces. A hot Civil War in America would be a shit show for everyone involved and would create massive casualties on both sides and wanting one is foolish, however it is just as foolish for the Left to think that they would just Roflstomp their way through it..and probably increases the likely hood of it occurring because it makes them look like utter retards.
Also we have real life examples of inferiorly armed forces making life hell for superiorly armed forces. A hot Civil War in America would be a shit show for everyone involved and would create massive casualties on both sides and wanting one is foolish, however it is just as foolish for the Left to think that they would just Roflstomp their way through it..and probably increases the likely hood of it occurring because it makes them look like utter retards.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic about the dumbness of the stonetossisanidiot guy, who completely missed the point of the comic. It wasn't that gun nuts, or Second Amendment enthusiasts, depending on how you look at it, actually feel that they could personally take on the entire military, but that the people who actually run that military are not themselves invulnerable.
The second panel is literally entirely a joke, but the idea is just because the military can crush you as an individual does not mean you are entirely powerless if you choose to shed a few scruples and do a little homework.
The fact is that an armed populace is considerably more dangerous to try to push around, and you should question any regime that tries to change your armed populace into an unarmed one.
This suggests no actions in Minecraft or anywhere else.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
You need to appreciate the amount of autism in both trying to give a "rational" reply (while completely missing the point) and documenting the amogus features in the comic strip.I would like to take a minute and alert you fags to the fact that there is a blog called "stonetoss is an idiot".
I check antifastonetoss from time to time and most new comics get a blogpost on why stonetoss is a dumb dumb. I thought I'd explain, as it's hard to tell from its name.
Normally I glance over this and it's some screeching that is barely related to the comic. This one in particular though, I thought was of a very special kind of retarded that I wanted to share it with you.
StoneToss: Episode 86
JUNE 24, 2021~ STONETOSSISANIDIOT
I sometimes remember to Tweet blog news and updates on my Twitter. I sometimes take other people’s money when they subscribe to my Patreon
Comic Name: Powder Keg
Description: Disclaimer: The above cartoon is intended to be enjoyed as a work of comedy and political expression and does NOT represent incitement to, or endorsement of, any form of violence or insurrectionary activity either in real life or in Minecraft.
Mouseover: Funny how no one says that to the Taliban.
Image Name: second-amendment-john-f-kennedy-stonetoss-political-cartoon.png
Amogus: Second panel, a glare in the corner of the windshield frame.
Originally Published: 6/24/2021
What The Comic Is: A gay caricature offers a smug rhetorical to a Gadsden flag-shirt wearing gun owner, asking him what his second amendment could do against the government’s jet planes and nukes. The second panel shows United States President JFK as he rides in the back of the car he was assassinated in.
What StoneToss Actually Thinks: Presidents have been assassinated before, therefore gun owners can fight the military.
Why It’s Fucking Stupid: God damn it. You know, I try not to make posts covering the most recent StoneToss comic because I’m trying to work my way through a massive backlog of old shit, but the guy just can’t not say something egregiously stupid and force my hand. So here we are.
StoneToss is a big proponent of the second amendment, or the “right to bear arms” and has made roughly a dozen or so comics before where he plays into this fantasy of gun owners standing up to tyrannical governments (be them the British during the revolutionary war or some strawman version of the modern day). Second amendments adherents will argue that we need high powered automatic weapons “incase the government goes rogue”, as this is (depending on who you ask) part of the reason the second amendment was drafted in the first place: to allow citizens to arm themselves for protection against what included their own government. The common argument against this (as seen in the comic) is that the the USA’s military has equipment and power far eclipsing any guns civilians have access to. StoneToss has grappled with this argument before, always doing incredibly poorly at it, and this time is no different.
StoneToss tries to zero in on a presidential assassination, in this case JFK, though really any assassination would’ve worked (and by ‘worked’ I mean ‘failed’). As you might have already learned, John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States and served from January 1961 until November 1963, when he died at the hand (or, well, the bullet) of sharpshooter Lee Harvey Oswald. And it’s true, sure. Oswald was just a guy who went into a building and shot the President of the United States. But what does this have to do with the argument that gun owners could battle against the US Government? Absolutely fucking nothing.
JFK was the last US President to ever be assassinated, and it was through a pure lapse of logistics (or perhaps more to do with the fact it was assumed no one would be stupid enough to actually shoot the President, or maybe you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that it was all an inside job by the CIA). Oswald did not battle against the might of the US military to reach Kennedy, like some kind of end-stage boss battle in a fucking FPS game. These days the security of the President is taken so seriously that most people with plans to harm the political leader don’t make it within ten miles of the el presidente’s location before being picked up and arrested. And even if you did manage to kill the President, what exactly does this prove? That guns can kill someone if you shoot them? Wow, what a brilliant conclusion. I guess without the President, the US military’s nukes and jet planes suddenly stop working, like some kind of domino effect when you take out the head vampire. Somehow I think there’s a slight difference between shooting at an unarmored, unprotected man in a car who doesn’t know you’re there and shooting at a heavily armored military vehicle equipped with top of the line anti-life technology that is being piloted by a group of fully trained soldiers who already know your exact location thanks to heat mapping done by drones that are so high in the sky you can’t even see them. I mean, this is just a hypothetical anyways because if this scenario were real, you wouldn’t even see the armored vehicle full of soldiers driving towards you because you’d have already been terraformed by the tactical bombing.
But alright, alright. We don’t need to go into a big imaginary scenario where the US military attacks its own citizens. We’ve been down that road before and frankly the answer is always: There is no previous comparison (the revolutionary war, JFK assassination) that stacks up anywhere close to today’s power disparity that exists between the US military and anyone/everyone else. If we imagine a world where the entirety of the US military suddenly turns on the population, we’re fucked. No local LARPer militia or “I watch lots of military training videos on YouTube” heroes are going to stop them. the argument “but what about the Middle East!” is often employed when trying to find examples of an ‘undergeared’ militia fending off the US military, even StoneToss calls upon it by mentioning the Taliban. Well, let’s talk about that for a minute. What kind of weapons does the Taliban have? Military weapons. Where did they get them? From the US military, either directly or indirectly (many weapons and equipment were taken after government militaries abandoned them, this is due in large part to Middle Eastern militaries and their incredibly poor leadership, as they promote based entirely on loyalty rather than any other qualification). So by bringing up the Taliban, StoneToss is arguing that the US military’s equipment can be defeated, but only by a force that is using the US military’s equipment. Fucking genius. This is ignoring the sheer logistical issues the US faces when doing war in the Middle East, and that they would not be facing any of these massive problems if invading their own soil, making their war machine dozens of times more efficient and severely hampering the ability to “hide in the hills” ala Middle Eastern terrorist cells.
“OH YA THE ARMY HAS NUKE??? K WELL WHAT BOUT…. UHHH…. WHAT BOUT…. WHAT BOUT BRITISH ARMY IN THE 1700’S?”
“Did the British army in the 1700’s have nuclear weapons?”
<StoneToss offers no reply or acknowledgement, he is too busy making a comic about molesting kids>
I find the military analysis of high quality. Why indeed do people defend the second amendment?
What use are your guns going to be when the US military can just Nuke the US when it wants to invade the US?
View attachment 2294674
Also wonder if stonetoss saw the "no one is happy" quote and had a strip with multiple smiles.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
I wonder why the left suddenly forgot about the Vietnam War. I don't recall fighter planes or nukes in the hands of the Viet Cong.
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
Very possible, so hard to tell these days. Poe's Law and all that.
Extremists like to forget inconvenient things like history, biology and physics.
round robin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2020
Lefties tell on themselves when they call gadsdens retarded for thinking they can take on the feds. Regardless of the fact that feds would never be stupid enough to nuke their own citizenry just to get rid of a few seditionists, the problem lies in the fact that lefties don't think that a government that would be willing to nuke its own citizens would be inherently worth toppling. Telling people that the government would rather glass its entire country than lose their power doesn't really help dissuade people from wanting to revolt.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
Antifastonetoss just keeps on winning. This time a scathing critique of stonetoss art style
ddlloo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2018
I love how many own goals they upvote.
0 0
--- .... / --.. . .-. ---
Forum Staff
🐕🦺 Animal Control 🐕🦺
💬 Off-Topic Mod 💬
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
How are they so bad at comic edits that they can't even keep which direction you're supposed to read their textwall dialogue consistent?
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
Note, this isn't even an original comic, it's an edit of some other comic artist.
I mean they literally needed this to edit and couldn't have drawn it themselves. Let that sink in.
I mean they literally needed this to edit and couldn't have drawn it themselves. Let that sink in.
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
Always remember: 41% of trans people "identify" as inanimate objects too.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I always wonder what right wing arguments leftists regard as "good" considering they even think RINOs are satan incarnate.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2020
None. These people don't want debate or have open minds. They just want to be right and have power over how others think and live.