Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

ManBunPig spends almost two hours defining various political leaning/ideologies.

Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas. Oh also Vaush doesn't read political literature, especially on ideas he doesn't like, and is open about that fact. Not saying you need to be a Political Science PhD to make videos explaining Political Ideologies and Ideas but still.

EDIT: Okay yep I skipped to the part of the video where he defines Fascism. He just cites Umberto Eco's Ur Fascism and claims that it's hard to define Fascism concretely and says it's vague and that Fascism is like a mental illness. God it's like I'm listening to a Soviet Propaganda piece from Stalin. Fascism has a definition, it has set ideas to it and alike. You'd know it just by reading Fascist authors. It's not that hard. Leftists do this shit all the fucking time, rather than study into their enemy's beliefs and accurately describe them in good faith, they just claim it's a mental illness then make shit up about the beliefs and portraying a strawman instead. In the Soviet Union under Stalin, literally anything that wasn't Marxist was deemed a mental illness for example and the beliefs of these things were always strawmanned hard. Vaush is doing the same shit.
 
Last edited:
Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas. Oh also Vaush doesn't read political literature, especially on ideas he doesn't like, and is open about that fact. Not saying you need to be a Political Science PhD to make videos explaining Political Ideologies and Ideas but still.

EDIT: Okay yep I skipped to the part of the video where he defines Fascism. He just cites Umberto Eco's Ur Fascism and claims that it's hard to define Fascism concretely and says it's vague and that Fascism is like a mental illness. God it's like I'm listening to a Soviet Propaganda piece from Stalin. Fascism has a definition, it has set ideas to it and alike. You'd know it just by reading Fascist authors. It's not that hard. Leftists do this shit all the fucking time, rather than study into their enemy's beliefs and accurately describe them in good faith, they just claim it's a mental illness then make shit up about the beliefs and portraying a strawman instead. In the Soviet Union under Stalin, literally anything that wasn't Marxist was deemed a mental illness for example and the beliefs of these things were always strawmanned hard. Vaush is doing the same shit.
If you read the enemies ideas you might they are human and thus you will feel bad and not kill them. Is basically what Vaush believes
 
If you read the enemies ideas you might they are human and thus you will feel bad and not kill them. Is basically what Vaush believes
I'm pretty decently knowledgeable on Leftism as a whole from Marxism-Leninism to Anarcho-Communism. All it did for me was make me hate leftists more due to how fucking delusional they are and how incompatible their ideas are with reality. In some cases they're so delusional that they acknowledge this but argue that they can change reality to suit their utopian retarded ideas. Like the Soviet Union and the concept of the "New Soviet Man". So nah me reading into the ideas of people I hate has only resulted in me hating them even more.
Does this moron know that history is filled with humans killing other humans and not caring?
Well Vaush is a self-admitted brainlet when it comes to history. It was brought up in this thread prior but Vaush is open that he has a contempt for History since History isn't subjective and you can't just twist it to mean what you wish like Sociology. To be honest Vaush holds anything that requires you to live up to an ideal, isn't subjective or requires you to actually study into it. Like for example he holds open contempt towards theology and believes that if you believe in anything spiritual or religious then you have a mental illness and has mocked it on stream during debates to belittle his opponents because they believe in God or an Afterlife or what have you. Which makes sense on his end because if there is a creator and this isn't all randomness that came from nothing then that means that "Everything is Subjective!" is wrong and Vaush actually has to hold himself to something rather than being a giant hypocrite about everything living in endless hedonism with no discipline.
 
I'm pretty decently knowledgeable on Leftism as a whole from Marxism-Leninism to Anarcho-Communism. All it did for me was make me hate leftists more due to how fucking delusional they are and how incompatible their ideas are with reality. In some cases they're so delusional that they acknowledge this but argue that they can change reality to suit their utopian retarded ideas. Like the Soviet Union and the concept of the "New Soviet Man". So nah me reading into the ideas of people I hate has only resulted in me hating them even more.

Well Vaush is a self-admitted brainlet when it comes to history. It was brought up in this thread prior but Vaush is open that he has a contempt for History since History isn't subjective and you can't just twist it to mean what you wish like Sociology. To be honest Vaush holds anything that requires you to live up to an ideal, isn't subjective or requires you to actually study into it. Like for example he holds open contempt towards theology and believes that if you believe in anything spiritual or religious then you have a mental illness and has mocked it on stream during debates to belittle his opponents because they believe in God or an Afterlife or what have you. Which makes sense on his end because if there is a creator and this isn't all randomness that came from nothing then that means that "Everything is Subjective!" is wrong and Vaush actually has to hold himself to something rather than being a giant hypocrite about everything living in endless hedonism with no discipline.
I'm guessing Vaush has had more than a few harsh words against Religious Communism and Christian Anarchism.
 
It's a lot harder to kill someone if you understand them screaming in pain. At that point, vilification and dehumanization is required for masses to commit atrocities.
Then you haven't visualized that far back. Killing another human being in the distant past didn't carry much moral weight behind it as it did later.

Territory, resources, gutting someone was a causal act akin to a job.
 
I'm guessing Vaush has had more than a few harsh words against Religious Communism and Christian Anarchism.
Yeah he did a whole debate on to a Christian Anarchist, mostly friendly but he repeating /r/atheism tier anti-God arguments. Which there are good arguments for Atheism (Which while good and thought provoking, I just can't accept the idea of Atheism since to me it just makes no fucking sense whenever I think long and hard about it) but Vaush's arguments are just shit you'd hear back in 2008 from dunning-kruger retards like Dawkins where it's a bad argument but worded to sound smart but it falls apart when you apply even basic critical thinking to it.


Skip to 28:30 in the video and Vaush unironically argues that religion leads people down "bad roads" with things like for example if a bad thing happens to you, you use that bad thing as a learning experience and he also jumbles things in like Tarot Cards and Horoscopes to make the idea that bad things happen for a reason and you can learn from them is silly. He even openly states that "The Experts(tm) state that being religious is a flaw in the brain!" and basically implying people who are spiritual/religious are mentally ill. Which again I'd expect this argument from 2008 from some new atheist retard who thinks he's smarter than he actually is.

To be honest though, You cannot be a Christian and be a Leftist. Since Leftism at the end of the day seeks to end hierarchy and create a classless society where everyone is equal. Either through Authoritarianism as a transitional period such as with Marxism-Leninism or jumping straight into it like you would with Anarcho-Communism. Both men such as Karl Marx and Bakunin would both massive Atheists for a reason. You can't want an end to hierarchy as an endgoal while at the same time believing in God, the ultimate hierarchical figure. Doubly so if you're a fucking Anarchist. Heaven in Christianity isn't a Commune where everyone is equal. It's a Kingdom with God as the absolute monarch forever. On top of that a big part of Leftism is Materialism, the denial of the Spiritual. I'm not even Christian myself yet I know enough to know that you can't be a Leftist and be a Christian at the same time since they contradict each other massively.
 
The liberal obsession with psychiatry is truly bizarre. Everything they don't like they just explain away with mental illness (calling fascism a mental illness, using the suffix "phobia" on all their buzzwords, homophobia, transphobia, etc). And it's ironic because they themselves never strike me as poster children of mental health. So many of them are self-admitted mental patients, regularly attending therapy, or doped up on SSRIs or other mind-altering drugs. I couldn't even begin to count the amount of liberals and left-wingers I've seen post a tweet thread about some miscellaneous mental disorder they claim to have and how it effects them in "online spaces" or whatever. That's one thing I don't think I've ever seen a right-winger do.

My point is, you'd think liberals would refrain from using mental illness to belittle people since so many of them only serve to lose if stigma against mental illness increases. Whatever it takes to own the chuds, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Yeah he did a whole debate on to a Christian Anarchist, mostly friendly but he repeating /r/atheism tier anti-God arguments. Which there are good arguments for Atheism (Which while good and thought provoking, I just can't accept the idea of Atheism since to me it just makes no fucking sense whenever I think long and hard about it) but Vaush's arguments are just shit you'd hear back in 2008 from dunning-kruger retards like Dawkins where it's a bad argument but worded to sound smart but it falls apart when you apply even basic critical thinking to it.


Skip to 28:30 in the video and Vaush unironically argues that religion leads people down "bad roads" with things like for example if a bad thing happens to you, you use that bad thing as a learning experience and he also jumbles things in like Tarot Cards and Horoscopes to make the idea that bad things happen for a reason and you can learn from them is silly. He even openly states that "The Experts(tm) state that being religious is a flaw in the brain!" and basically implying people who are spiritual/religious are mentally ill. Which again I'd expect this argument from 2008 from some new atheist retard who thinks he's smarter than he actually is.

To be honest though, You cannot be a Christian and be a Leftist. Since Leftism at the end of the day seeks to end hierarchy and create a classless society where everyone is equal. Either through Authoritarianism as a transitional period such as with Marxism-Leninism or jumping straight into it like you would with Anarcho-Communism. Both men such as Karl Marx and Bakunin would both massive Atheists for a reason. You can't want an end to hierarchy as an endgoal while at the same time believing in God, the ultimate hierarchical figure. Doubly so if you're a fucking Anarchist. Heaven in Christianity isn't a Commune where everyone is equal. It's a Kingdom with God as the absolute monarch forever. On top of that a big part of Leftism is Materialism, the denial of the Spiritual. I'm not even Christian myself yet I know enough to know that you can't be a Leftist and be a Christian at the same time since they contradict each other massively.
But Christianity doesn't allow you to be equal to god and all humans are equal to each other in Christianity so equality is perfectly compatible with Christianity and Christianity is likely the origin of equality as a concept.
 
But Christianity doesn't allow you to be equal to god and all humans are equal to each other in Christianity so equality is perfectly compatible with Christianity and Christianity is likely the origin of equality as a concept.
Yeah but you can't be anti-hierarchy but at the same exact time believe that Jesus is the King of Kings and that you will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. In fact many Christian Theologians have made this point too. It's also why being a Leftist in Christian Denominations like Catholicism is punishable by excommunication. It's incompatible with the religion. Hence why most Leftists themselves are Atheists and are anti-Religion too.
 
Yeah he did a whole debate on to a Christian Anarchist, mostly friendly but he repeating /r/atheism tier anti-God arguments. Which there are good arguments for Atheism (Which while good and thought provoking, I just can't accept the idea of Atheism since to me it just makes no fucking sense whenever I think long and hard about it) but Vaush's arguments are just shit you'd hear back in 2008 from dunning-kruger retards like Dawkins where it's a bad argument but worded to sound smart but it falls apart when you apply even basic critical thinking to it.


Skip to 28:30 in the video and Vaush unironically argues that religion leads people down "bad roads" with things like for example if a bad thing happens to you, you use that bad thing as a learning experience and he also jumbles things in like Tarot Cards and Horoscopes to make the idea that bad things happen for a reason and you can learn from them is silly. He even openly states that "The Experts(tm) state that being religious is a flaw in the brain!" and basically implying people who are spiritual/religious are mentally ill. Which again I'd expect this argument from 2008 from some new atheist retard who thinks he's smarter than he actually is.

To be honest though, You cannot be a Christian and be a Leftist. Since Leftism at the end of the day seeks to end hierarchy and create a classless society where everyone is equal. Either through Authoritarianism as a transitional period such as with Marxism-Leninism or jumping straight into it like you would with Anarcho-Communism. Both men such as Karl Marx and Bakunin would both massive Atheists for a reason. You can't want an end to hierarchy as an endgoal while at the same time believing in God, the ultimate hierarchical figure. Doubly so if you're a fucking Anarchist. Heaven in Christianity isn't a Commune where everyone is equal. It's a Kingdom with God as the absolute monarch forever. On top of that a big part of Leftism is Materialism, the denial of the Spiritual. I'm not even Christian myself yet I know enough to know that you can't be a Leftist and be a Christian at the same time since they contradict each other massively.
I honestly don't see Dawkins as the intellectual authority of anything anymore (if he even was) since people have either moved on from him or he's made some "problematic" statements that have landed him heavy scrutiny.

Like his opinion on children with Down Syndrome. Let's just say plenty of people told him to basically fuck off with that shit.
 
Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas. Oh also Vaush doesn't read political literature, especially on ideas he doesn't like, and is open about that fact. Not saying you need to be a Political Science PhD to make videos explaining Political Ideologies and Ideas but still.

EDIT: Okay yep I skipped to the part of the video where he defines Fascism. He just cites Umberto Eco's Ur Fascism and claims that it's hard to define Fascism concretely and says it's vague and that Fascism is like a mental illness. God it's like I'm listening to a Soviet Propaganda piece from Stalin. Fascism has a definition, it has set ideas to it and alike. You'd know it just by reading Fascist authors. It's not that hard. Leftists do this shit all the fucking time, rather than study into their enemy's beliefs and accurately describe them in good faith, they just claim it's a mental illness then make shit up about the beliefs and portraying a strawman instead. In the Soviet Union under Stalin, literally anything that wasn't Marxist was deemed a mental illness for example and the beliefs of these things were always strawmanned hard. Vaush is doing the same shit.
"Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas." Of course, what else do you expect from self-obsessed ideologues. " it's hard to define Fascism concretely and says it's vague and that Fascism is like a mental illness". It's exactly like what he did in the Count Dankula debate, describing White Supremacist so vaguely it could be applied to anyone who could be considered even slightly racist. Remember, you must broaden the scope of the accusation so you can use it to justify never listening to others, "why would you listen to him, he's a fascist". And besides, is Ur Fascism even a good source anyway?
 
And besides, is Ur Fascism even a good source anyway?
Ur Fascism is literal garbage. If you want to learn about Fascism, there are both old and recent books on Fascism by Fascists themselves that you can easily just find on places like /pol/ from Fascists themselves, they even have reading lists they made in their own general threads. Ur Fascism is literally just "Everything that opposes my leftist views is Fascism". The only "credibility" that Umberto has is that he grew up in Fascist Italy but honestly that's pretty meaningless since just because you grew up under a system, doesn't make you expert on that system. Most people in the US for example don't know that we're a Constitutional Republic and don't really know much about the Constitution and don't really know much about how the system works besides "We vote for some people and those people vote for laws and stuff". So yeah it's pretty dumb.
 
The only "credibility" that Umberto has is that he grew up in Fascist Italy but honestly that's pretty meaningless since just because you grew up under a system, doesn't make you expert on that system
he was also 11 when Fascist Italy ended, so I can't even say he has that going for him
 
Last edited:
Back