View attachment 2307770
I'm currently procrastinating but I'm conveniently curious about this test. Half because I'm unsure how the questions can variate from "do you like men or women sexually, yes, no, or both" and half because I'm wondering how the patently "asexual" Louis answered to not even get marked as asexual on this stupid thing.
View attachment 2307777
First thing I'm wondering is why this is a five point scale, especially given the timespan of two entire weeks. Many of these questions are expressly sexual in nature save for those pertaining to emotional intimacy. I'm guessing it's for people who are experimenting with their sexuality, but they're all phrased around fantasy and desire rather than actions. I then thought of something. Dollars to doughnuts Louis marked questions related to empathy, loyalty, and compassion as "never," which counteracted him marking all the questions pertaining to sexual encounters as "often," hence why he's more towards the middle of the chart.
View attachment 2307780
My end result via picking exclusively heterosexual options and the most extreme answers thereof returned a "96.4% heterosexual" rating. I'm unsure where the missing 3.6 percent went, but beyond that oddity, it's the expected result given my answers. My next theory, however, is to see if I can copy Louis's results by giving "often" to questions related to sexual engagements with either sex but "never" to questions related to, you know, being compassionate to a partner. The intent is to emulate a sex-obsessed sociopath, but that's just the role I'm putting myself into, I'm certain it's not reflective of Louis in any capacity. My target will be, obviously, 64% in the "homosexual" and "heterosexual" category.
View attachment 2307784
Get ready to jump up from your seat in surprise, because when I answer as if men and women are nothing but walking sex dolls to be used and thrown away, acting like social engagement is abhorrent to my very being, I get a score nearly identical to Louis, away by just 7%. I have no reason not to believe it's only off because Louis gave the weaker responses with some of his answers.
The real question is, does this really count as a punchline when it's completely predictable?