- Joined
- Jan 10, 2020
This is the kind of aut hyperspecificity that wikipedo needs, not retarded whinging about a billion genders and race relations. At least this is fun.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2019
Anti-Barney humor - Wikipedia
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
Strange Wilderness
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 30, 2020
As autistic as this page is it used to be worse. I remember back in the day when they included every Barney parody under the sun and all the dumb anti-Barney songs kids used to sing on playgrounds. The page now is "that awkward but nice guy at the office" when it once was "the guy who prances around in his fursuit and makes out with a rainbow dash stuffed animal".Did this really need its own article?Anti-Barney humor - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Damn Chris came so close to having his name on Wikipedia.
Also props to Wikipedia for including this gem:
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
Did this really need its own article?Anti-Barney humor - Wikipedia
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Minor dumb shit. It's almost shit that it is dumb that it isn't on Wikipedia. As with every vehicle, they have an article on the Jeep Wrangler. This is a vehicle mostly known for its propensity for flipping if you sneeze while driving it.
en.wikipedia.org
It contains this line:
"The YJ still had leaf spring suspension similar to that of the CJ – however, the springs were wider, and the first Wrangler sported trackbar suspension links and anti-roll bars for improved handling and safety, making it less easy to flip by untrained or unwary drivers."
So how is this statement remotely intelligible? The article mentions rolling over or flipping nowhere else. So why would it be "less easy to flip" if it weren't already easy to flip? And if one of the main characteristics of the vehicle, as known to normal people, is don't buy this shit because it flips over, why try to hide that fact?
I suppose it could just be terrible writing-by-committee, as wikipedos usually do. I still almost suspect they have shill edits covering up most of this shit, but really incompetent shills, because otherwise, it wouldn't even have the word "flip" in it, even though "Jeep Wrangler" is more or less synonymous with "flip" to normal people.
If you control the "encyclopedia," though, I guess that won't be its legacy. It will be the most unflippable, perfectly reliable vehicle of all time, as said by Suetonius. Or whatever fake historian writes vehicular history.
Jeep Wrangler - Wikipedia
It contains this line:
"The YJ still had leaf spring suspension similar to that of the CJ – however, the springs were wider, and the first Wrangler sported trackbar suspension links and anti-roll bars for improved handling and safety, making it less easy to flip by untrained or unwary drivers."
So how is this statement remotely intelligible? The article mentions rolling over or flipping nowhere else. So why would it be "less easy to flip" if it weren't already easy to flip? And if one of the main characteristics of the vehicle, as known to normal people, is don't buy this shit because it flips over, why try to hide that fact?
I suppose it could just be terrible writing-by-committee, as wikipedos usually do. I still almost suspect they have shill edits covering up most of this shit, but really incompetent shills, because otherwise, it wouldn't even have the word "flip" in it, even though "Jeep Wrangler" is more or less synonymous with "flip" to normal people.
If you control the "encyclopedia," though, I guess that won't be its legacy. It will be the most unflippable, perfectly reliable vehicle of all time, as said by Suetonius. Or whatever fake historian writes vehicular history.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
Category:Fictional balls - Wikipedia
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
No mention of Calvinball? Philistines!Category:Fictional balls - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Wikipedos are arguing about how there's no evidence this byuu fag is even dead, but they want to rules lawyer to justify accusing the Farms of being super guilty of mega murder anyway.
How To Manufacture Credibility:
Talk:Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 2304452
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Hadn't he claimed he was no longer nonbinary? They're misgendering him.View attachment 2304554
higan (emulator) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
None of the articles reported on that, so I guess respecting his actual gender would be against WP:No Original Research.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
Was looking up Macauley Culkin after he showed up on RedLetterMedia to try to figure out how he’s managed to be better adjusted than Wil Wheaton.
And came across this on his page:
Solid burn. But the fact that it’s somehow considered “notable” enough to appear on Wikipedia is already sad, the fact someone wrote an entire article for that is sadder.
And came across this on his page:
Solid burn. But the fact that it’s somehow considered “notable” enough to appear on Wikipedia is already sad, the fact someone wrote an entire article for that is sadder.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
But what makes it dumber is that linking directly to the threads counts as "original research," even though it would be one of the more accurate things to do, at this point.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
That's the thing about Wikipedia, almost all of it is original research. When they pick and choose what to plagiarize from - be it a news site, glorified SPLC fundraising letter, or left wing blog - they are performing the original research that the rules supposedly prevent. All of those are being subject to the 'wiki' interpretation like an original research editor would do.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Well, what makes it stupid is that they're arguing over which news site to cite...When there's hardly an abundance to pick from.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
The Ivermectin wikipedia page (Archive) is being run as the personal fiefdom of a guy called Alexbrn(Archive). Not only is he adamant in retaining his edit privileges over the page, but he becomes incredibly snarky and aggressive about anyone who dares to cite studies disproving his opinion on the drug's effectiveness.
He goes so far as to say that citing studies in medical journals falls afoul of Wikipedia's original research policy.
If you're willing to put up with his tone for the entire length, there are over 10 sub-headings of talk page antics where he wields his janny powers and the art of pilpul against hapless wikipedos even as the NIH, WHO, and Oxford have begun major Ivermectin trials based on the results shown abroad.
He goes so far as to say that citing studies in medical journals falls afoul of Wikipedia's original research policy.
If you're willing to put up with his tone for the entire length, there are over 10 sub-headings of talk page antics where he wields his janny powers and the art of pilpul against hapless wikipedos even as the NIH, WHO, and Oxford have begun major Ivermectin trials based on the results shown abroad.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2015
In Sweden, back in the 70's, a newspaper published a TDS-style piece about the then-current prime minister, portraying him as mentally ill. The PM sued for defamation and was awarded the symbolic sum of 1 SEK for damages.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
