Wikipedia articles are basically just a summary of other information sources. If media outlets report on Near having killed himself but don't bother mentioning there being no actual proof, it's not on Wikipedia but the outlets failing to vet their information properly.Wikipedos are arguing about how there's no evidence this byuu fag is even dead, but they want to rules lawyer to justify accusing the Farms of being super guilty of mega murder anyway.
You could of course make a case for social media being proper sources as well, but have fun creating rules that don't make this a fucking nightmare to properly vet (e.g. at what number of upvotes does a Reddit thread become relevant, when is it shilling, etc.?). Their current rules, basically a whitelist, just simplify this by a lot.