The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

There is nothing moral about a forced pregnancy. It is cruel.
The only case in which a forced pregnancy would occur is when a woman was impregnated via rape, which is less than 1℅ of abortions.

Even then it's not immoral to prevent the murder of an innocent human life by its own mother just because she's displeased with the situation.
 
The only case in which a forced pregnancy would occur is when a woman was impregnated via rape, which is less than 1℅ of abortions.

Even then it's not immoral to prevent the murder of an innocent human life by its own mother just because she's displeased with the situation.

Murder and an abortion are not the same thing. You can not murder something that isn't able to live outside of the womb on its own. It's a parasite until the 6th month and even then the odds of premature survival is very poor for the fetus.
 
Murder and an abortion are not the same thing. You can not murder something that isn't able to live outside of the womb on its own. It's a parasite until the 6th month and even then the odds of premature survival is very poor for the fetus.
They're the exact same thing; causing the death of a human life. You merely choose to place more subjective value on bigger, older "clumps of cells". However, murder is the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another, it does not account for arbitrary factors such as the victim's location (in the womb or out), stage of development (fetus, toddler, geriatric), or ability to survive unaided (in a womb, on a machine, etc)

However, technically you're right in a shallow way because the term murder involves a law being broken. Unfortunately there are no laws against killing unborn children, so the act of killing them is not murder exactly. Then, the appropriate term is "killing," not "murdering".

It's just pedantic irrelevant bullshit but I wanted to be as clear and fair as possible by addressing that.

I should point out the obvious though, that legality =/= morality, just because something is legal does not make it moral. There should be laws protecting all innocent human life, it should be considered murder to kill a baby.
 
They're the exact same thing; causing the death of a human life.
Facts over feels.

Screenshot_20210702-001844~2.png
 
Just because it's not illegal doesn't mean it's not immoral. Do you all get your arguments from the same trash bin or what?
It is immoral to force a person to be an incubator against their will.
Pretty sure you just skimmed my post, got triggered, then did the tired old "aCkShUaLlY iTs ThE cOnSeRvAtIvEs WhO vAlUe FeElInGs OvEr FaCtS" thing.

But by all means, kill babies, just don't sugarcoat or deny it.
I'm going to get knocked up and have an abortion just to spite you.
 
It is immoral to force a person to be an incubator against their will.

I'm going to get knocked up and have an abortion just to spite you.
Being an incubator is less immoral than ending a human life.

Please do, maybe you'll die during the procedure (rare as it may be), or be rendered infertile which is not quite as rare.
 
Maybe spread your legs a little less often.
Exactly. Or do so in such a way that you won't get pregnant; it's 2021 and we're (most of us) not mindless apes.

Get sterilized, or go with sterilized partners, or use contraceptives, or go with partners who use contraceptives... If you won't do any of that, or if you won't shut your legs, then you've willingly risked pregnancy and thereby entered into a social contract wherein you'll temporarily accept the responsibility of your actions.

You don't even need to keep the kid once it's born. This is reasonable and in accordance with the non-aggression principle.

Unless you've been raped you have absolutely no reasonable complaints.
 
Exactly. Or do so in such a way that you won't get pregnant; it's 2021 and we're (most of us) not mindless apes.

Get sterilized, or go with sterilized partners, or use contraceptives, or go with partners who use contraceptives... If you won't do any of that, or if you won't shut your legs, then you've willingly risked pregnancy and thereby entered into a social contract wherein you'll temporarily accept the responsibility of your actions.

You don't even need to keep the kid once it's born. This is reasonable and in accordance with the non-aggression principle.

Unless you've been raped you have absolutely no reasonable complaints.
Hi Feetloaf!
 
Hi Feetloaf!
I Googled that and now I'll never eat meatloaf again. Thanks.

That's a valid choice. All choices come with consequences, but you want out of yours; society should not condone this.

If some poor son of a bitch gets you pregnant and you choose to not be an evil hell-bound witch by keeping your baby, then he's stuck that autistic offspring and the responsibility thereof. You can enjoy bleeding him dry for the next couple decades in that case, and he has no say in it.

Society acknowledges the responsibility of men and enforce it strictly, they face the consequences of their actions in full. You, however, do not need to face the consequences of your actions because society is unfair and morally bankrupt.
 
That's a valid choice. All choices come with consequences, but you want out of yours; society should not condone this.

If some poor son of a bitch gets you pregnant and you choose to not be an evil hell-bound witch by keeping your baby, then he's stuck that autistic offspring and the responsibility thereof. You can enjoy bleeding him dry for the next couple decades in that case, and he has no say in it.

Society acknowledges the responsibility of men and enforce it strictly, they face the consequences of their actions in full. You, however, do not need to face the consequences of your actions because society is unfair and morally bankrupt.
Damn the woman if she gives birth, damn the woman if she doesn't.

Can your inceldom glow any harder?
 
Back