Why is it that when someone has one deviant interest, they tend to have more than one? - As in, how furries also have a higher chance of being trannies.

Blue Screen of Death

A fatal exception has occurred
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
There's absolutely zero way I've been the only person to think this, it's almost like it's some kind of law of physics or some shit.

Is it a mental illness issue?
Is it a problem of being terminally online, as many of these types are?
Is it because having an interest like that leaves your mind open to more fucked up shit?

I'm genuinely curious about this. It seems that if you're not at least a somewhat well-adjusted person, you're completely off the rails and are into all sorts of wacky shit.
 
That just follows when you seek pleasure before the salvation of your immortal soul. Doesn't stop at one thing.

Problem illustrated:
thrills.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
I'd also say it comes from having disconnection from the world and society that is around you. There is a reason why people say "go outside"; not because "they're the establishment" or an ultra conformity agenda bullshit thing going on or whatever, but because you need to meet different people and understand human complexity, and find that you have a niche in the world outside, or make one.

For example, weeaboos and their ass end of an ouroburos of self contained subculture. I don't know what goes on in their heads, but I grew up when anime made its waves into the States and thought it was just natural that people adopted things into the culture of the US. It is true that it was adopted to an extent, but without me respecting both where it came from and knowing that it has to be its own unique boundless human inspiration and branch off to be its own thing when it touched this soil, I'd be but another purist ass weeaboo following the trends thinking that "only Japan can make anime" while probably sucking the dick of KickVic/SJWdom and doing something baseless and stupidly ignorant as all weeaboos do.

If anything I'd say that deviancy comes from "idle hands"- If the people don't have anything to strive and self motivate for, and to find purpose in, they will get shiftless and aimless.
 
I think the term paraphillia and studies about it probably reveal more about the topic, as there is the common link between various paraphilias that criminologists do quickly bring to attention when profiling monsters.
Correct. For example, scatophilia is represented particularly strongly in people who were sexually abused as children, so from that we can extrapolate that something really fucked happened to Nick Bate to turn him into the monster he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
I've had a theory about this and you have given me a chance to express it.

Imagine sexual interests as a series of rings encompassing each other. The smaller center rings are normal accepted things, so straight vanilla would be dead center with something like vanilla gays being the next ring out. The outer rings would consist of shit like pedos, zooaphiles, etc.

Generally speaking, you traverse from one ring to the next. A vanilla straight dude doesn't just wake up and think, ok I'm a pedo now. You first dabble in the other rings. Jumping from one to the next isn't a huge hurdle. This in part explains the deviance rabbit hole where people end up in the deep shit if they keep pursuing more new sexual experiences.

Vice versa, once you are in an outer ring you will have no issues going back into the central rings. After all you already crossed that line before. I think this partially explains why, for example, you see gays overrepresented in pedophiles. A man who stays in the closet and sees any homosexual desires as too degenerate will certainly see any pedo desires as too far. However someone all the way out in the pedo ring won't have that issue, so pedos will be more accepting of any gay thoughts than the normal population.

So basically if you're ok with one taboo that means you are implicitly ok with taboos on par or lesser to that first one. Of course there are exceptions, but I think its a good general rule.
 

Why is it that when someone has one deviant interest, they tend to have more than one?​

Because deviance is a choice they make when they cannot succeed directly playing by the hetrosexual game. If being gay is genetic then this whole thing seems very confusing, why do these deviancies cluster? However, paraphilia has been argued to be a learned behavior ranging from too many stronger boys growing up leading to mixed feelings of emasculation or inferiority which spiraled to childhood trauma which in humiliation they choose to cope and internalize. Its an aspect of their character to be the weaker effeminate, its part of their sexuality that they were molested as its easier to process if its not a bad thing but something they did to themselves by wanting it.

Is it a mental illness issue?
It is a learned behavior which alongside Dorian Gray syndrome, such as with Baked Alaska and Chaggot, presents as a form of cope for not being able to compete in the realms of bravery and strength so they compensate with dysmorphophobia or fixations on arrested development. Why do you think Baked is so confrontational one second yet flighty the next or Chaggot couldn't cope with thinking his 13 year old fuck-buddy was an evil thing?

A lot more of homosexuality is masculine sexuality unrestrained by femininity than hetrosexual men want to admit. However then there is the Standard Fuck Party people. "I'm not really worried about getting anything.. else.. right now cause I want to have fun right now and I don't want to have to worry about it" Which modern society can pretend are just like you and I but once you make a choice to be like that, its a matter of boredom fighting disgust reflex until you sexualize your disgust reflex and then - along with coping from your emasculation during your childhood - you just learn to chase degeneracy in order to "be carefree" and dependent-on-society. They often talk amongst themselves about disgusting society in order to further normalize their behavior, but only carefully and never explicitly.

You would be amazed by the percentage of their LGBTQQIP2SAA/LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA culture which is just trying to disgust society while confusing sexuality with childishness. And its all learned behavior which we culturally indulge them in.

Is it a problem of being terminally online, as many of these types are?
The internet is a place where they can cluster more easily, but clustering together and feeling acceptance is what they are trying to do when they communicate on the internet. If elsewhere were better for doing that, they wouldn't be online much. However, it is the internet we're talking about.

Is it because having an interest like that leaves your mind open to more fucked up shit?
They hate normalcy because they can't have it, it mocks them. So they reject all forms of it in a childish immediacy which is a confusing mindset to relate to.

It has a lot more coding and careful wording in order to maintain the lies then you think. Which causes them to want to branch out and communicate with non-queer, but as their defense mechanisms immediately stand out socially, it instead causes them to have to form queer versions of everything. The queer versions of everything then in turn make queer become everything openmindedly.

Escapism/Disgust-chasing/Arrested Development all become very intermixed socially in gay circles.
 
Last edited:
I’ve always had kind of a pet theory that fetishists tend to fall into two categories: There are “true” fetishists who will have an almost autistic fixation with one particular thing or scenario and are content to repeat it ad nauseam. And then there are the people who are primarily drawn to the concept of taboo or perversion itself and will pursue things mainly because they’re weird or extreme, rather than any sort of innate attraction to the thing itself. The latter is one reason you get people with laundry lists of fetishes: they’re into anything as long as it’s extreme enough.

But when it comes to furries and trannies in particular, I think there’s a definite social element to it, as well. Both of these communities have this problem where there are a lot of people who treat their fetish like it’s a hobby: The don’t just jerk off to people with wolf heads and fantasize about being turned into a slutty bimbo, they spend an inordinate amount of time drawing pictures about it and making websites and games and chat rooms devoted to it and creating whole little economies around it. And instead of socializing and bonding with others over normal stuff like enjoying movies or kayaking, these people have whole social circles based around their shared sexual proclivities.

These communities are also both heavily obsessed with "acceptance" and reluctant to do any "gatekeeping", which means that they're havens for people with all sorts of other bizarre fetishes, too. So as soon as you start making friends and socializing within one of these groups, you're pretty much guaranteed to be hanging out with somebody who's into other weird sexual shit like inflation or hypnosis or getting forcibly impregnated with alien lizard eggs. And if there's one thing we know from the tranny community especially, it's that a lot of these people also get a major kick out of goading other people into their fetish.

In other words, these communities are places where you're actually going to have a rough time if you're only into one thing and have firm boundaries about it, because people are going to see that sexual limitation as being a form of personal rejection. If you want to participate with the other fetishists/hobbyists in any way and be accepted into their social circle, you have to be pretty much open to anything.

TL;DR - Making friends based on cooming is a terrible idea.
 
Back