TGWTG Nostalgia Chick / Lindsay Ellis / TheDudette - aka Hotdogs in face girl

I think the main reason why one is going to happen is mainly because the Trump is out of office so there goes most of the Wind from the arguments Left Wings have been making.
Everything that progressives have been saying were reinforced by whatever the hell the media claimed Trump was doing
However now that Biden is in office the media is not going to paint anything but a Rosy picture of him and Leftist have lost their zinger.
2016 through 2020 was the Golden Age of breadtube but now we're going to start to see a sharp decline in my opinion.
 
About the little mermaid video, I had no idea people were criticizing Ariel for not being a “good feminist“ why? because she was in love and made sacrifices just so she could be right next to her love? Something that everybody has done at least once for someone they have strong affection towards? I bet if Ariel did all that just so she could marry the prince for his money and escape her boring underwater life people would label her as a “good feminist“ and go: “yass queen slay get that bag gurrrl“

I don’t understand what is it with feminists trying to dictate whats “good feminism” or “bad feminism“ fucking let women interact with men however the hell they want I feel like this is just a stupid excuse feminist use to feel like they have this fake a sense of control over other women.

The one thing I agree is it’s bad to sacrifice your personality and values just to impress someone regardless of gender however it’s obvious that’s not what they are criticizing, watching a fictional female character try to be romantic towards a guy gets under their skin for some reason.
 
About the little mermaid video, I had no idea people were criticizing Ariel for not being a “good feminist“ why? because she was in love and made sacrifices just so she could be right next to her love? Something that everybody has done at least once for someone they have strong affection towards? I bet if Ariel did all that just so she could marry the prince for his money and escape her boring underwater life people would label her as a “good feminist“ and go: “yass queen slay get that bag gurrrl“

I don’t understand what is it with feminists trying to dictate whats “good feminism” or “bad feminism“ fucking let women interact with men however the hell they want I feel like this is just a stupid excuse feminist use to feel like they have this fake a sense of control over other women.

The one thing I agree is it’s bad to sacrifice your personality and values just to impress someone regardless of gender however it’s obvious that’s not what they are criticizing, watching a fictional female character try to be romantic towards a guy gets under their skin for some reason.
A lot of shade was thrown at Ariel for abandoning her family just to be with a guy she met and feminist drove that into the ground.
Never mind that men in films tend to do this all the time where they go against their families to be with the girl that they have feelings for.
This argument went on for so long that Disney now actively avoids putting its Cash Cow princesses like Elsa or Moana in relationships
 
Ariel did something reckless and stupid and only survived by luck, getting a happy ending the original writer didn't give her.

I'm not clear on what anyone's objecting to. Are we only allowed to have characters make good choices?
Yes, if they're women/LGBT/POC. To do otherwise would be offensive because the only reason to write someone from that group being human is because you're a terrible bigot nazi.
 
Yes, if they're women/LGBT/POC. To do otherwise would be offensive because the only reason to write someone from that group being human is because you're a terrible bigot nazi.
This is exactly why a lot of leftist will pressure writers to create black characters that are effectively stereotypes that they brainwash themselves into believing.
We can't just let characters exist without drawing differences to their skin or background
 
About the little mermaid video, I had no idea people were criticizing Ariel for not being a “good feminist“ why? because she was in love and made sacrifices just so she could be right next to her love? Something that everybody has done at least once for someone they have strong affection towards? I bet if Ariel did all that just so she could marry the prince for his money and escape her boring underwater life people would label her as a “good feminist“ and go: “yass queen slay get that bag gurrrl“

I don’t understand what is it with feminists trying to dictate whats “good feminism” or “bad feminism“ fucking let women interact with men however the hell they want I feel like this is just a stupid excuse feminist use to feel like they have this fake a sense of control over other women.

The one thing I agree is it’s bad to sacrifice your personality and values just to impress someone regardless of gender however it’s obvious that’s not what they are criticizing, watching a fictional female character try to be romantic towards a guy gets under their skin for some reason.
They take the whole going on land and getting legs thing as Ariel "changing herself for a man."
Not a peep about the Beast changing from a water buffalo to Fabio for Belle though.
 
They take the whole going on land and getting legs thing as Ariel "changing herself for a man."
Not a peep about the Beast changing from a water buffalo to Fabio for Belle though.
I don't know if that was necessarily for Belle, she was just the person who happened to lift the curse. The Beast was human to begin with, it wasn't like he was a Beast who got plastic surgery to look like a man.

Honestly, I'm sick of social justice discourse on Disney and Barbie. It's fascinating to watch Lindsay constantly try to keep up with the libfem arms race, though. You see, according to retards on the internet ten years ago, Ariel was Bad because she supposedly "changed for a man," but recently retards deemed Ariel to be Good because trannies decided that the Little Mermaid was ackshually a metaphor for being a tranny. However, the fact of the matter is that neither of those things are even remotely true. It's just about a fucking mermaid that wants to be human, which makes the tranny interpretation counterintuitive because the point of the original fairytale was that trying to be human was a fool's errand.

I'm not sure why the alphabet coalition decided to shill Disney so hard when the company clearly only cares about their money. No retards, Disney making all the villains coded-gay isn't woke, it's indicative of the fact that they associate "gay" behavior with villainy and depravity. Selling rainbow Mickey Mouse trash and making unnamed background characters gay is not activism, it's Disney doing the bare minimum possible to maintain you as customers. If Lindsay's so fucking enlightened, she should do a video about how Disney tacitly ignored Chinese concentration camps while they were working to shit out their Mulan remake, but she never will because that involves being critical of a communist country, god forbid.
 
I don't know if that was necessarily for Belle, she was just the person who happened to lift the curse. The Beast was human to begin with, it wasn't like he was a Beast who got plastic surgery to look like a man.

Honestly, I'm sick of social justice discourse on Disney and Barbie. It's fascinating to watch Lindsay constantly try to keep up with the libfem arms race, though. You see, according to retards on the internet ten years ago, Ariel was Bad because she supposedly "changed for a man," but recently retards deemed Ariel to be Good because trannies decided that the Little Mermaid was ackshually a metaphor for being a tranny. However, the fact of the matter is that neither of those things are even remotely true. It's just about a fucking mermaid that wants to be human, which makes the tranny interpretation counterintuitive because the point of the original fairytale was that trying to be human was a fool's errand.

I'm not sure why the alphabet coalition decided to shill Disney so hard when the company clearly only cares about their money. No retards, Disney making all the villains coded-gay isn't woke, it's indicative of the fact that they associate "gay" behavior with villainy and depravity. Selling rainbow Mickey Mouse trash and making unnamed background characters gay is not activism, it's Disney doing the bare minimum possible to maintain you as customers. If Lindsay's so fucking enlightened, she should do a video about how Disney tacitly ignored Chinese concentration camps while they were working to shit out their Mulan remake, but she never will because that involves being critical of a communist country, god forbid.
Lindsay did mention that she was working on a video for the Mulan Remake in her mask video so she'll probably bring it up in her video, but it wont be a main focus of it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Bani
Since we're talking about Disney movies, I find it so ironic that Raya has largely been forgotten after the debacle and based on what I've seen isn't actually like all that much by Asian people.
It really just seems like Lindsey's leftist antis just use that against her to seize whatever position they thought they were going to get from taking her down.
 
Pretty fucking depressing really, I recently rewatched a review she was in and she was the only tolerable part about it, especially since doug is just that god damn annoying I mean look at his review on the wall if you want proof of that.

Shame she went down such an SJW-route, especially considering she was genuinely talented but now she's just some pretentious prick on the internet who ignores everything she said in the past while simultaneously talking shit about people cause of things they did in their past.

Honestly though on my views on Social Justice: I think that shit's over now that every millennial has to go outside and god forbid get a job so they don't have time to whine on the internet about how everyone is such a terrible person and if it doesn't just fully die down it'll be mostly on twitter which to be fair has basically been sjw since the beginning of time and will never stop being one until the end of time.
 
Honestly, I'm sick of social justice discourse on Disney and Barbie.
The only way Disney can get it "wrong" is if they deviate from two century-old, Hans Christian Andersen fairy tales. (Pocahontas notstanding.)

All they see is the corporate logo, so it's pretty much Marxism for the unsophisticated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koby_Fish
I'm not sure why the alphabet coalition decided to shill Disney so hard when the company clearly only cares about their money. No retards, Disney making all the villains coded-gay isn't woke, it's indicative of the fact that they associate "gay" behavior with villainy and depravity. Selling rainbow Mickey Mouse trash and making unnamed background characters gay is not activism, it's Disney doing the bare minimum possible to maintain you as customers. If Lindsay's so fucking enlightened, she should do a video about how Disney tacitly ignored Chinese concentration camps while they were working to shit out their Mulan remake, but she never will because that involves being critical of a communist country, god forbid.
The reason so many of these woketards love Disney is because most of them are millennial manchildren who were kids when Disney was going through its Renaissance period in the 90s. Same with Harry Potter, except Rowling actually had a shred of decency (just a shred, mind you) and didn't kowtow to the tranny shit her increasingly leftist fanbase love so much so they threw her under the bus. They'll only turn on Disney if somebody like Iger says that he thought Trump was alright in an interview or something. Genocide is ok though.
 
Huh, so that's what the husband looks like. About what I expected. Did not know his name was Nick though. It's fitting. And I guess he's related to Paw or Elisa, because after scrolling down past where her comment cut off, she says Elisa is now her sister in law.

View attachment 2254347
congratulations Lindsay for 3 happy years of preserving the hoo-yt race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koby_Fish
To be fair, a channel called "Cynical reviews" with a dog fur/rantsona is not really attractive to anyone to watch, it' 2013 cringe concentrate
So our choices are between 2013 "furry rantsona" cringe and 2021 "washed-up white lady" cringe. Talk about going between a rock and a hard place.
 
The reason so many of these woketards love Disney is because most of them are millennial manchildren who were kids when Disney was going through its Renaissance period in the 90s. Same with Harry Potter, except Rowling actually had a shred of decency (just a shred, mind you) and didn't kowtow to the tranny shit her increasingly leftist fanbase love so much so they threw her under the bus. They'll only turn on Disney if somebody like Iger says that he thought Trump was alright in an interview or something. Genocide is ok though.
No many woketards love disney because it lets them feel like they can be the absolute biggest, most whiny manchildren autists alive and still get laid unfortunately in reality that isn't true.
People just liked harry potter because they liked the idea that an absolute fucking cunt like harry could find a special place in the world but much like the woketards of disney that isn't true at all in reality.
 
Back