Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Actually, the number is 4 in every 10. This means that rather than 25% of trans women having HIV, 40% fucking have it.

The percentage varies depending on race but Black and Hispanic trans women are more likely to have HIV (who would've guessed?).

Damn, do people want to stuff their cocks into trannies that badly? Who the hell is even fucking them? Stuff your penis into a femboy if you like anal that much; it's the same exact thing.
It's probably easier to contract HIV with a neovag. With all the stitches and how easily those things must tear it must be real easy to get into the bloodstream.

That and LGBTQ types are more likely to be into the poly and hookup scene and I doubt people who eagerly chop off their junk are going to suddenly be sensible enough to use protection.
 
British actress Emma Corrin (from The Crown) has changed her Insta pronouns to she/they and has posted about how she’s exploring wearing a binder.

The photo shoot isn’t the binder in question, since it doesn’t actually flatten her breasts, but apparently it was inspired by binders…

As a fellow TERF on another forum pointed out, if a young and attractive celebrity posted self harm cuts, or a photo of themselves post bulimia vomit, would people be posting with hearts and asspats? Why is a breast binder any different? We all know that the young women coming out as queer/enby/trans are the same girls who would have had rampant eating disorders 15 years ago.

The photo even looks like thinspo.
She plays Princess Diana in The Crown, and during the 1980s Freddie Mercury famously disguised her as a man and snuck her into the Royal Vauxhall Tavern (famous London gay bar). It would be nice if she was just burying the lede for the next season of The Crown. I know she isn't though.

Also the picture is boxing wrap rather than a binder. This is actually dangerous for women to do, as binding with elastic bandages or similar can compress breasts to the point where they're permanently deformed, scarred and have muscle damage (along with constricting the lungs). Admittedly she's not really binding with the DIY binder, but it's dodgy to post out there.
 
All this talk of "defining" man and woman but you don't need to have a list of criteria. (stealing this from someone who posted it a while ago) I see a dog, I point at the dog, I say "this is a dog." I see a man, I say "that's a man." Easy as pie, guys.
 
Went from a Tomboy to passing as a MtF. Kikomi-chan is real!

All this talk of "defining" man and woman but you don't need to have a list of criteria. (stealing this from someone who posted it a while ago) I see a dog, I point at the dog, I say "this is a dog." I see a man, I say "that's a man." Easy as pie, guys.
I made a similar point in the David Muscato thread. Reasonable people can disagree about exactly what is and isn't a dog. Are wolves dogs? Are coyotes dogs? What about the inbred abominations that are no longer capable of natural reproduction? There's legitimate disagreement and real debate to be had about the exact boundary of what fits into the category of "dog". But one thing I do know, a cat is not a dog. I can't tell you the single criteria that all cats have and no dogs have, but there's no way a reasonable person engaging in good-faith actually needs me to explain why a cat is different than a dog.
 
Last edited:
It's probably easier to contract HIV with a neovag. With all the stitches and how easily those things must tear it must be real easy to get into the bloodstream.

That and LGBTQ types are more likely to be into the poly and hookup scene and I doubt people who eagerly chop off their junk are going to suddenly be sensible enough to use protection.
We are probably talking about HSTS sex workers who have not even had SRS and are getting HIV through good old-fashioned anal.

As for 'who the hell is fucking them', a lot of HSTS physically pass reasonably well, and are willing to offer a back hole for a low price, and that is enough for a lot of men. Unfortunately it is the same type of men who are likely to be riddled with STDs and not very careful about condom usage.
 
A bunch of troons on Twitter indulge in a before-after game

Exhibit A
E5pHRRlWQAI6lIl.jpg E5pHRRnXMAQWPIW.jpg
The very high res of the "before" picture suggests it is very recent. Also nice Hitler's stache nose ring.

Exhibit B
E5nfC3IWYAEbSfC.jpg E5nfEHqXEAgW7YK.jpg

Exhibit C
E5jjgdNWYAQE_Pn.jpg E5jjgdMXIAEisiI.jpg

Exhibit D
E5n2zG1WEAArTeY.jpg E5n2zGsWYAcqaVk.jpg

Exhibit E
E5jimVWWUA41VvG.jpg E5jimVaWEAYnb3_.jpg

Exhibit F
E5jLPnMXwAUUOlN.jpg E5jLP4gWYAEIAh9.jpg

Exhibit G
E5jEQ96VIAUVVK_.jpg E5jEQ96VgAM5NdM.jpg
 
I feel the argument between goldstar and non goldstar is only furthering the idea that our value as women depends upon our relationships with men.
This is an excellent point - I had never thought of it this way before.
UFC title
Male MMA fighter Fallon Fox broke a woman's orbital bone during a match, the only people who seemed to care were online Terf bloggers and Joe Rogan.
The thing is that even a bunch of wealthy tech troons with cash to burn wouldn't flock to the place to support it either anyway.
Troons not buying things, just waltzing around taking validating selfies and going to the wrong bathroom, is a problem for businesses.
British actress Emma Corrin (from The Crown) has changed her Insta pronouns to she/they and has posted about how she’s exploring wearing a binder.
I also occasionally think about wearing clothing that's different from the clothing I normally wear - where's my money, praise, and TV time?
 
I have some amazing information to present to you about what the 'B' in 'LGBT' stands for.



Some women with CAIS don't even realize they are XY until they go to the doctor at 16 or so to find out why they are not getting periods, so it would not really make sense to suddenly push them into the 'male' category.

If I had to make a definition of 'woman' it would be this:

'A category consisting of adult humans without a Y chromosome and adult humans with XY chromosomes who were born with external female genitalia due to an androgen insensitivity syndrome.'
I think socially we can continue consider males with CAIS intersex condition women do practical reasons but they are still males even if the sex discovery happens later in life. They actually have working male hormone production do having testes, those hormones just can't masculine them do wrong cell response. Because that testosterone doesn't get used the hormone eventually aromatases into estrogen witch explains why they get some but not all female puberty signs. By the way those testes still produce spermcells, they just don't mature past first stage. They really are male, with messed up hormones and this reality affects them especially medical sense.
 
When I am pressed to ‘name the trait’, I stick to gonads. Sexes exist to facilitate reproduction through the production of different gametes, so it only makes sense to me that primary reproductive organs — reproductive glands that produce reproductive cells — determine what sex a person is.
To expound on why I pay no attention to the karyotype.

Say, there is a person with XY chromosomes and functional ovaries which are producing ova. Producing female reproductive cells is female reproductive function, so I see no sense in categorising such a person as male, regardless of their chromosomes, since they fulfil no male reproductive function. If their ovaries are non-functional, at least they possess glands made to produce female reproductive cells and no glands to produce male reproductive cells, much like an infertile woman.

For this reason, I would consider XY people with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome male because they have testes but no ovaries: they possess organs made to fulfil male reproductive function and no organs to fulfil female reproductive function, even if they do not look like it.

In the case of Swyer syndrome, these people have no gonads whatsoever, so they are truly sexless, just how people with ovotesticular disorder are true hermaphrodites.
Interestingly enough, since people with Swyer syndrome have no functional gonads, they never experience puberty unless exogenous hormones are introduced.

This is literally the best most concise argument I've ever seen for btfoing this troon logic.

AND it fits within the characters needed to make a Tweet. Absolutely brilliant
You are welcome. I have spent too much time thinking about pro-trans arguments and why they fail to convince me, so it is gratifying to finally be able to formulate objections concisely.
 
Last edited:
British actress Emma Corrin (from The Crown) has changed her Insta pronouns to she/they and has posted about how she’s exploring wearing a binder.

The photo shoot isn’t the binder in question, since it doesn’t actually flatten her breasts, but apparently it was inspired by binders…

As a fellow TERF on another forum pointed out, if a young and attractive celebrity posted self harm cuts, or a photo of themselves post bulimia vomit, would people be posting with hearts and asspats? Why is a breast binder any different? We all know that the young women coming out as queer/enby/trans are the same girls who would have had rampant eating disorders 15 years ago.

The photo even looks like thinspo.
She'll be having a double mastectomy any day now.
 
The discussion on CAIS is interesting. I think something to keep in mind is that even if you do make an exception for an individual with CAIS, loony troons like Stefonknee Wolscht, Kevin Gibes, ADF, Blaire White, and Jonathan Yaniv are NOT individuals with CAIS. Some people having CAIS doesn't make wierd men women.
 
The discussion on CAIS is interesting. I think something to keep in mind is that even if you do make an exception for an individual with CAIS, loony troons like Stefonknee Wolscht, Kevin Gibes, ADF, Blaire White, and Jonathan Yaniv are NOT individuals with CAIS. Some people having CAIS doesn't make wierd men women.
When it comes to intersex conditions that make somebody male appear female and vice versa, I think people with them should be able to move through life as the sex they appear as. For some reason, pro-trans people behave as if GCs or TERFs think individuals with CAIS should wear ‘I AM MALE’ badges at all times lest somebody mistakes them for females.
 
We are probably talking about HSTS sex workers who have not even had SRS and are getting HIV through good old-fashioned anal.

As for 'who the hell is fucking them', a lot of HSTS physically pass reasonably well, and are willing to offer a back hole for a low price, and that is enough for a lot of men. Unfortunately it is the same type of men who are likely to be riddled with STDs and not very careful about condom usage.
funny you say this. on youtube i started gettng commercials for Biktarvy, one of those HIV drugs. i never used to get this shit, prob comes from watching Benjamin Boyce and other 'gender bloggers' mentioned here, clicking on the Wi Spa riot footage, etc.
next thing you know, my old metal videos have gay commercials. trans women (not men) are in all of them, so i figured that is who they are marketing it to.

notice how the big Latina troon (D'Eva) just steals the karaoke mic away from the cis girls at 14 seconds.
my wife is the one who pointed that out to me, now i can't -not- see it.
 
All this talk of "defining" man and woman but you don't need to have a list of criteria. (stealing this from someone who posted it a while ago) I see a dog, I point at the dog, I say "this is a dog." I see a man, I say "that's a man." Easy as pie, guys.
The reason many of us are caught up with this is because it is a common MtF talking point to say "I bet you can't even define 'woman' in a way that excludes trans women without also excluding infertile women!" and it is good to have an answer to that.


I think socially we can continue consider males with CAIS intersex condition women do practical reasons but they are still males even if the sex discovery happens later in life. They actually have working male hormone production do having testes, those hormones just can't masculine them do wrong cell response. Because that testosterone doesn't get used the hormone eventually aromatases into estrogen witch explains why they get some but not all female puberty signs. By the way those testes still produce spermcells, they just don't mature past first stage. They really are male, with messed up hormones and this reality affects them especially medical sense.
I think a layperson (not medical textbook) definition that excludes people raised as girls who have vulvas and who often go through female puberty (just without periods) and often have vaginas of normal depth is getting a little pedantic.

I mentioned it earlier in the thread but there is at least one woman with CAIS who has given birth to children with her own womb (although it required hormones and donor eggs)
 
Trousers eh, and you cease to be a woman. The Oli London timeline is a goldmine of contradictory bullshit.
Archive photo of two masculine men, shortly before entering the men's only section of a Korean jjimjilbang:

trousers.png


Oli London is hitting every single note a troll transracial post would make, right down to making a special trans-Korean pride flag, but yet his commitment to it means he can't be dismissed as a troll. I wonder if he thinks if being trans-Korean is valid, he seems too self aware for that. It's great to see though, because it's once again short-circuiting that "Well that would never happen" defence.
 
I was just hit with the realization that there are going to be a metric fuckton of very embarrassed middle-aged men on the horizon. Instead of shameful haircuts or outfits of the past, it will literally be shameful identities. Hahahaha

True, but probably :optimistic: to assume half of these retards will ever see middle age.
 
Troons not buying things, just waltzing around taking validating selfies and going to the wrong bathroom, is a problem for businesses.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but this seems to imply that I'm saying it's a business problem first and a problem for us (women) second. Obviously the issues of the latter (again, a group I belong to) are more important than the raw profit of these asshole woke businesses. What I'm pointing out with that comment is that even the most cutthroat capitalist is sure to lose in the "who cares, troons will pay" strategy.
 
It's all fun, games, and 'acceptance and diversity' until it's your hobby. It's fun to defend what you view as an oppressed minority until they're the one pushing oppression on you. Trannies aren't interested in ending any kind of oppression, they're just interested on flipping it around.

A lot of these people don't remember what the internet was like before all this kicked off. And the parts of the internet that go 'uncolonized', they're too afraid of. There's no real frame of reference.

I strongly agree with this; trannies are a virus, once they infect a community, a hobby, etc, they have this uncanny ability to make it about themselves, part of the exhibitionism common to all of them - I maintain there is no such thing as a troon that 'just wants to live their life'.
 
Back