Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
1626044340944.png

1626044791517.png

1626044797218.png
 
Last edited:
How much safer is the vaccine? There are deaths caused by the vaccine that the general public, and those subject to this experimental medication, should be made 100% aware of. They aren't being told of the dangers and that is the problem.

You need to get over yourself, as you seem to be hung up on this bias, which you are guilty of.



Those numbers are incorrect. 180 million+ people have caught the virus. 9500 known deaths and a lot more side effects that aren't being openly explained to the public.

What have you brought to the table? Your own numbers to prove your own point are incorrect. You can't even defend your own position with evidence.
I gave you sources for my numbers in the US here. So either show how these are wrong, or shut the fuck up.

The data you're referring to was collected from October 2020 to July 2021, it's not a snapshot over a week or even a month. We can be sure that "91% of the over 50's" were not vaccinated over that time as there was no vaccinations in October last year and mass vaccination in the UK only really got going in the second quarter of 2021. I personally can't be assed trawling through data to come up with a weighted average but safe to say you're talking utter shit.
Well then why even speak?
 
Not only that Pfizer and Moderna literally got the Spike Sequence to make the mRNA jabs from China 2 days after the outbreak was declared.

You know what's funny? China and Russia do not even use the Spike on their vaccines. I think there is some major fuckery with this.

China literally suggested inoculating against the Spike Proteins was a solution and then did not use that solution. This has been forgotten about.

If we are waiting on Scientists to admit their mistakes forget it.



Mycarditis, like blood clots is happening in everyone...you do not always feel it but it is happening.

Its a permanent condition that causes irreparable damage and can take decades off your life. Some people get it severe enough to require hospitalization immediately, others wont noticed for another 20 years but by then it can be chalked up as old age.

(They knew)

What I am going to post now might answer some of your questions:

I don't know if this link was already posted in this thread, but I just finished a video with Dr. Martin.

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Sitzung-60-Die-Zeit-ist-kein-flacher-Kreis-5-Martin:f

The video is mostly in English, at some points Germans translate to each other. I vaguely remember that I saw somewhere his Fauci dossier posted, I am not sure if I saw it here or on 4chan.

Long story short: according to Dr. Martin who studied patents related to COVID three main points emerge from this study:

1. there is no novel coronavirus, all the sequences that are supposedly novel in COVID-19 were part of several patents dating to 2008
2. "the vaccines" themselves are bioweapons and according to patent office response failing Fauci patents, they are not vaccines, because a vaccine should prevent infection
3. the ACE-2 binding spike protein that is part of mRNA vaccines was patented long time before the pandemics. It was also well-known for years that it's a harmful protein.

In essence millions of people right now are being injected with a bioweapon under pretense of "vaccination" for virus that doesn't exist.

I recommend watching the entire video, because I bring up only the most important things that are stuck in my mind right now. Most likely I skipped some other important things.

Also there is no real delta variant or any other variant. It all depends what part of virus or protein they focus on at a given moment.
 
I am in the very real situation of having a household member getting vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. So I've been doing some reading on the shedding of the spike proteins. There is not a lot out there, besides off shoots of Bret Weinstein video.

I was led to the Pfizer protocol document though.

It clearly states that men who agree to participate in the study have to refrain, for 28 days, from having sex with any woman of childbearing age.
It also states that women of childbearing age are to be excluded from the study.

Not only that there is a section on 'occupational exposure' pgs 67-68, that states:
'A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.'

There is also specific mention of fatty liver disease, and how people with that need to been 'watched' (my word not theirs).

pfizervax_page132.png


working on the archive
 
What I am going to post now might answer some of your questions:

I don't know if this link was already posted in this thread, but I just finished a video with Dr. Martin.

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Sitzung-60-Die-Zeit-ist-kein-flacher-Kreis-5-Martin:f

The video is mostly in English, at some points Germans translate to each other. I vaguely remember that I saw somewhere his Fauci dossier posted, I am not sure if I saw it here or on 4chan.

Long story short: according to Dr. Martin who studied patents related to COVID three main points emerge from this study:

1. there is no novel coronavirus, all the sequences that are supposedly novel in COVID-19 were part of several patents dating to 2008
2. "the vaccines" themselves are bioweapons and according to patent office response failing Fauci patents, they are not vaccines, because a vaccine should prevent infection
3. the ACE-2 binding spike protein that is part of mRNA vaccines was patented long time before the pandemics. It was also well-known for years that it's a harmful protein.

In essence millions of people right now are being injected with a bioweapon under pretense of "vaccination" for virus that doesn't exist.

I recommend watching the entire video, because I bring up only the most important things that are stuck in my mind right now. Most likely I skipped some other important things.

Also there is no real delta variant or any other variant. It all depends what part of virus or protein they focus on at a given moment.
That was a good and revealing watch. Makes the whole covid situation even more questionable and uncertain.

For reference, here are the archives of the patents mentioned in the video:

CDC's Coronavirus isolated from humans pt1
Patent #: 7220852 (patent code 35 section 101 violation - can't patent naturally occurring substance)
Filed: April 25, 2003
Archive

CDC's Coronavirus isolated from humans and detecting via RT-PCR pt2
Patent #: 7776521
Filed: April 25, 2003
Archive

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals (defunt now part of Pfizer) treatment and control of infections by coronaviruses
Patent #: 7151163
Filed: April 28, 2003
Archive

Ablynx's target of polybasic cleavage site of SARS Cov
Patent #: 9193780
Filed: June 5, 2008
Archive

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's recombinant coronavirus production
Patent #: 7279327
Filed: April 20, 2001
Archive
 
There's been some discussion about the vaccine itself being transmissible. What's the risk exactly? I know "vaccines being transmissible like viruses" is one of the theorized capabilities of mRNA research and part of why it's so promising (since it would save governments a ton of money in controlling pandemics and quickly eradicate a lot of third world diseases), but I don't believe the technology is there yet given the way the vaccine would need to interact with your immune system. From what I hear, this seems like a rare side effect most likely to occur from being around certain vaccinated individuals who for whatever reason can transmit the spike proteins of the vaccine. Is this correct?

What are the actual effects of "contracting" the vaccine? Someone earlier in this thread was posting what sounded like typical vaccine side effects after being around her vaxxed boyfriend, but wouldn't we be hearing a lot more about this from "antivaxxers?" Do these cases of vaccine transmission produce positive results on a COVID-19 test and the government is recording these cases as the actual virus? That wouldn't surprise me given the idea of a vaccine in most people's head is something near-totally effective like measles or tetanus shots or at least not total garbage like your average flu shot and not the COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines" which aren't vaccines at all. Does contracting the vaccine produce the same effect as getting the jab and thus give you some immunity against the virus, making it harder to spread the virus, and reducing symptoms if you do catch the virus? I believe this should only occur with the mRNA vaccines as well, so presumably this is not happening with anyone who took the J&J vax or received the Chinese or (IIRC) Russian vax.
That was a good and revealing watch. Makes the whole covid situation even more questionable and uncertain.

For reference, here are the archives of the patents mentioned in the video:

CDC's Coronavirus isolated from humans pt1
Patent #: 7220852 (patent code 35 section 101 violation - can't patent naturally occurring substance)
Filed: April 25, 2003
Archive

CDC's Coronavirus isolated from humans and detecting via RT-PCR pt2
Patent #: 7776521
Filed: April 25, 2003
Archive

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals (defunt now part of Pfizer) treatment and control of infections by coronaviruses
Patent #: 7151163
Filed: April 28, 2003
Archive

Ablynx's target of polybasic cleavage site of SARS Cov
Patent #: 9193780
Filed: June 5, 2008
Archive

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's recombinant coronavirus production
Patent #: 7279327
Filed: April 20, 2001
Archive
I'm not sure I buy this as being part of a sinister conspiracy. These look like they were all attempts at making a SARS vaccine after the SARS epidemic of 2003. That would've got a ton of research grants because it attracted so much attention at the time. Aside from the last one of course, which looks like it might've been for a hypothetical coronavirus pandemic (even before SARS it was speculated it could happen) that might double as helping against common colds. Seems like the outcome of a bunch of research over the years that would've been known to the people working at the Wuhan lab.
 
I'm not sure I buy this as being part of a sinister conspiracy. These look like they were all attempts at making a SARS vaccine after the SARS epidemic of 2003. That would've got a ton of research grants because it attracted so much attention at the time. Aside from the last one of course, which looks like it might've been for a hypothetical coronavirus pandemic (even before SARS it was speculated it could happen) that might double as helping against common colds. Seems like the outcome of a bunch of research over the years that would've been known to the people working at the Wuhan lab.

I recommend you watch the video. He states in the plain words: "We made SARS". There was no accidental SARS pandemics. SARS was the first attempt of what we are dealing with now. That's why current virus is called SARS-Cov2

I have a question: what do you think is the reason they push the vaccinations so hard?

The simplest explanation seems to be greed. Someone on 4chan mentioned yesterday that using "vaccination" as a pretext for some new kind of ID/passport makes no sense, because they would be more likely to get compliance without a questionable jab, and they already track all of us with smartphones and what not.

However, the greed is not a sufficient explanation in my opinion, because people die from vaccine. If it was only motivated by greed they would give us some bogus shot with tiny side effects just to make you feel "it is working", but not something that gives people bad reactions including disability and death. It would be much easier to sell to the public "a vaccine" with zero to no side effects.

So greed yes, but there must be some other motive.
 
Australia put out a vaccine PSA a few days ago, which is very weird as I was under the impression they had a very small supply of the AZ vax. It also features what appears to be a 20 - 30 year old woman, even though that age group isn't even eligible for vaccination yet. I'm not Australian so if any of this is wrong, feel free to correct me. Regardless, this PSA is bullshit. It's been 30+ years of these "graphic" PSAs and they are massively ineffective, to the point where society at large mocks them.


Sorry about the Twitter link but I couldn't find another source
 
I have a question: what do you think is the reason they push the vaccinations so hard?

The simplest explanation seems to be greed. Someone on 4chan mentioned yesterday that using "vaccination" as a pretext for some new kind of ID/passport makes no sense, because they would be more likely to get compliance without a questionable jab, and they already track all of us with smartphones and what not.

However, the greed is not a sufficient explanation in my opinion, because people die from vaccine. If it was only motivated by greed they would give us some bogus shot with tiny side effects just to make you feel "it is working", but not something that gives people bad reactions including disability and death. It would be much easier to sell to the public "a vaccine" with zero to no side effects.

So greed yes, but there must be some other motive.
These are the people that buy into global warming hype(whether you think its real or not is unimportant}, so the idea that this could be a depopulation scheme is most plausible. Cook up a fake virus, profit off of the ensuing panic, profit off the vaccine, then use the vaccine to either reduce fertilely or outright kill people. "but I got the shot and didn't die immediately" no shit if 1/10 people were dying immediately after vaccination not even branch covidians would take the jab. I know I sound like a schizo but this whole pandemic is the perfect scenario to exploit peoples trust in authorities and their instinct to follow what others do. If even 10% of the population took that jab and later passed on it would have a noticeable impact on the environment. To do the inverse of this and unleash an actually deadly virus unto the public could be an alternative option, but that obviously leaves those who orchestrated the whole scenario in danger of contracting it unless they had a perfect vaccine.
 
Australia put out a vaccine PSA a few days ago, which is very weird as I was under the impression they had a very small supply of the AZ vax. It also features what appears to be a 20 - 30 year old woman, even though that age group isn't even eligible for vaccination yet. I'm not Australian so if any of this is wrong, feel free to correct me. Regardless, this PSA is bullshit. It's been 30+ years of these "graphic" PSAs and they are massively ineffective, to the point where society at large mocks them.


Sorry about the Twitter link but I couldn't find another source
That remind me of one of these PSAs from the UK about driving and texting, once someone edit it to put Benny Hill's Yakety Sax....
 
lol, internet tough guy over here. cry moar faggot
No need to be a faggot, just show me reasonable evidence.
These are the people that buy into global warming hype(whether you think its real or not is unimportant}, so the idea that this could be a depopulation scheme is most plausible. Cook up a fake virus, profit off of the ensuing panic, profit off the vaccine, then use the vaccine to either reduce fertilely or outright kill people. "but I got the shot and didn't die immediately" no shit if 1/10 people were dying immediately after vaccination not even branch covidians would take the jab. I know I sound like a schizo but this whole pandemic is the perfect scenario to exploit peoples trust in authorities and their instinct to follow what others do. If even 10% of the population took that jab and later passed on it would have a noticeable impact on the environment. To do the inverse of this and unleash an actually deadly virus unto the public could be an alternative option, but that obviously leaves those who orchestrated the whole scenario in danger of contracting it unless they had a perfect vaccine.
If that was the case, why would the entire world be reacting to the virus and developing vaccines? A larger population is more man-power and labour to both exploit and expand to create a stronger country. Why would the rich/powerful be getting them as well?

The "vaccines are deadly" argument hinges on the basis that there are no real independent players when it comes to countries, which really isn't true. (Russia, China, USA, UK, the EU, South American countries all aren't working together, and the minor players would all be happy to see the playing field leveled out a bit.) That's not even mentioning the fact that very few people even trust their government when it comes to most things,
 
I recommend you watch the video. He states in the plain words: "We made SARS". There was no accidental SARS pandemics. SARS was the first attempt of what we are dealing with now. That's why current virus is called SARS-Cov2

I have a question: what do you think is the reason they push the vaccinations so hard?

The simplest explanation seems to be greed. Someone on 4chan mentioned yesterday that using "vaccination" as a pretext for some new kind of ID/passport makes no sense, because they would be more likely to get compliance without a questionable jab, and they already track all of us with smartphones and what not.

However, the greed is not a sufficient explanation in my opinion, because people die from vaccine. If it was only motivated by greed they would give us some bogus shot with tiny side effects just to make you feel "it is working", but not something that gives people bad reactions including disability and death. It would be much easier to sell to the public "a vaccine" with zero to no side effects.

So greed yes, but there must be some other motive.
To my knowledge, SARS has all the traits of a natural virus unlike the "let's fuck around with genes" SARS 2: Electric Boogaloo. Coronavirus pandemics have happened before like in 1890 (where it was mistaken for the flu), so that was another viral evolution. This also doesn't explain MERS, another dangerous coronavirus which doesn't transmit very well.

Why do they push vaccination? First and foremost, it's a part of the mass hysteria, a vicious cycle of paranoia and panic and cultlike fervor from the people receiving appropriate responses from scummy politicians and the media which in turn amplifies the panic. But the reason behind the scenes? It's to establish control. Because think of it, a lot of people don't carry their phone everywhere, a few boomers don't have one, and phones can run out of battery. And your biometrics and data on your phone right now is mostly between you and the glow-in-the-darks. But with a vaccine passport, you now present that everywhere, making sure you're even more careful about keeping a phone or a backup on you. The data is easier to harvest by corporations, resold, and kept up to date.

And best of all, they make lots of money doing so. A 2-3 times a year "vaccine" that is required for participation in society is basically one step above putting a tax on breathing. It's an incredible corporate welfare scheme where the world governments (most of them at least) pay megacorporations fucktons of money. If the government isn't paying, then the people are which is just as nice. That money goes into Pharma's investors (like George Soros to name a prominent example) and into other pet causes of the elite.

Why is the vaccine garbage then? Because they didn't need it to be a good vaccine. All they needed is proof that it did something against the virus (which it does, alleviates symptoms in some infected and has some effect in preventing transmission--far less than an actual vaccine, but it does do something) and proof it wasn't dropping people like flies. All of the Pharma vaccines pass this test, so their rushed-out the door product is suitable to be consoomed by the masses. It's basically the Disney Star Wars of vaccines, a rushed out the door product with gaping errors that has enough Star Wars in it to achieve audience recognizability and still makes a billion dollars (in part through corporate fraud).

I'm skeptical of any and all easy answers, since even the mad scientists in real life don't operate in a vacuum.
These are the people that buy into global warming hype(whether you think its real or not is unimportant}, so the idea that this could be a depopulation scheme is most plausible. Cook up a fake virus, profit off of the ensuing panic, profit off the vaccine, then use the vaccine to either reduce fertilely or outright kill people. "but I got the shot and didn't die immediately" no shit if 1/10 people were dying immediately after vaccination not even branch covidians would take the jab. I know I sound like a schizo but this whole pandemic is the perfect scenario to exploit peoples trust in authorities and their instinct to follow what others do. If even 10% of the population took that jab and later passed on it would have a noticeable impact on the environment. To do the inverse of this and unleash an actually deadly virus unto the public could be an alternative option, but that obviously leaves those who orchestrated the whole scenario in danger of contracting it unless they had a perfect vaccine.
The global elite does not believe climate change is an immediate threat, or else they'd do something about it that doesn't involve flying around the world to meetings to eat flown-in steak and drink flown-in wine. They believe in it no more than they believe COVID-19 is a deadly virus. That's for the globalist foot soldiers like the progressive activists to believe. Depopulation schemes are overrated, because this reduces the amount of potential consoomers and raises the value of labor (this is why they love immigration). You can assume it's some sort of Great Replacement thing but I doubt it since they're pushing it in the Middle East and shipping the vaxx to African shitholes.
 
The vaccine is a control test on human subjects and covid is an excuse to skip straight to human trials.

Why? Because a repeat vaccine for aids and cancer is the biggest gold mine in history. If you have cancer and you want to live another six months, pay £10k. Who wouldn't if they could?

Why are the vaccines shit? Simply put, in a trial, you need placebos and some shitty versions to prove that one is more effective than the rest.

All of the world's governments are working together on this and it can be proved because at some basic level, all covid vaccines use the same ingredients, with some slight variations. Think about it. The AZ vaccine and the Pfizer vaccine must share some commonality, otherwise one would be a covid jab and the other could be liquid chocolate.
 
That remind me of one of these PSAs from the UK about driving and texting, once someone edit it to put Benny Hill's Yakety Sax....

I found a tweet with this in the replies to that one. It's the ad being used in Singapore to encourage people to be vaccinated. It's bloody gross,plus the flat out fucking lie in it about how the vaccines prevent spread are right there and completely blatant.
 
To my knowledge, SARS has all the traits of a natural virus unlike the "let's fuck around with genes" SARS 2: Electric Boogaloo. Coronavirus pandemics have happened before like in 1890 (where it was mistaken for the flu), so that was another viral evolution. This also doesn't explain MERS, another dangerous coronavirus which doesn't transmit very well.

Why do they push vaccination? First and foremost, it's a part of the mass hysteria, a vicious cycle of paranoia and panic and cultlike fervor from the people receiving appropriate responses from scummy politicians and the media which in turn amplifies the panic. But the reason behind the scenes? It's to establish control. Because think of it, a lot of people don't carry their phone everywhere, a few boomers don't have one, and phones can run out of battery. And your biometrics and data on your phone right now is mostly between you and the glow-in-the-darks. But with a vaccine passport, you now present that everywhere, making sure you're even more careful about keeping a phone or a backup on you. The data is easier to harvest by corporations, resold, and kept up to date.

And best of all, they make lots of money doing so. A 2-3 times a year "vaccine" that is required for participation in society is basically one step above putting a tax on breathing. It's an incredible corporate welfare scheme where the world governments (most of them at least) pay megacorporations fucktons of money. If the government isn't paying, then the people are which is just as nice. That money goes into Pharma's investors (like George Soros to name a prominent example) and into other pet causes of the elite.

Why is the vaccine garbage then? Because they didn't need it to be a good vaccine. All they needed is proof that it did something against the virus (which it does, alleviates symptoms in some infected and has some effect in preventing transmission--far less than an actual vaccine, but it does do something) and proof it wasn't dropping people like flies. All of the Pharma vaccines pass this test, so their rushed-out the door product is suitable to be consoomed by the masses. It's basically the Disney Star Wars of vaccines, a rushed out the door product with gaping errors that has enough Star Wars in it to achieve audience recognizability and still makes a billion dollars (in part through corporate fraud).

I'm skeptical of any and all easy answers, since even the mad scientists in real life don't operate in a vacuum.

The global elite does not believe climate change is an immediate threat, or else they'd do something about it that doesn't involve flying around the world to meetings to eat flown-in steak and drink flown-in wine. They believe in it no more than they believe COVID-19 is a deadly virus. That's for the globalist foot soldiers like the progressive activists to believe. Depopulation schemes are overrated, because this reduces the amount of potential consoomers and raises the value of labor (this is why they love immigration). You can assume it's some sort of Great Replacement thing but I doubt it since they're pushing it in the Middle East and shipping the vaxx to African shitholes.
Lets say you are right about full control of the population (that they see as cattle), lets also say that in order to have full control they need not only to make everyone trackable but also put them in restricted areas that are full connected (connect the whole planet with 5G or other technology would be too expensive and time consuming, also considering people can destroy those, you cannot control the whole planet as of today).

Now you can see a pattern that justifies the population reduction, places in cities would be freed from people and at the same time the survivors out of cities can be rallied up and sent to the free space on the cities. People will be told it is an emergency solution but the truth is once in the city people we be in the city as a giant prison, unless you have some special pass that basically only very rich people will have.
This way the people on top will be able to enjoy nature and free space, there might probably be smaller cities in order to have spots for the rich moving around, mini prisons.

In case this is part of the plan depopulation is needed, either way fast with mass deaths or slow with mass sterilization.
 
The number of deaths from the vaccine are approaching the number of deaths *from covid* (not with covid, yuuuuge difference).

Oh well, most people in my free and open state aren't getting the vaccine and we won't be shutting back down anytime soon either. :biggrin:
I give it six months before the lawsuits start rolling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back