The "Party Switch" is simply the Republican Party transitioning from a regional party to a national party by competing in the south with racism. This was allowed to happen because the Democrats had gained popularity with their New Dealism, and embrace of civil rights policies. The Republicans were traditionally the party of civil rights, and had a sizable progressive faction, but they had dropped the ball and allowed the Dems to undercut them. They were adapting and naturally embraced the the white southerners upset with the Dems. The worst part about it is that the Dems abandoned their New Dealism and embraced neolibralism once they got the black vote hammered down.
For one thing, the actual civil rights vote was dem: 153/91, rep: 136/35 yay/nay. In other words only 26% of Republicans opposed it while 59% of democrats did. (Present & not voting left out but dems were equal or higher in those numbers too.) Even the Senate was d: 46/21 and r:27/6 (46% & 22% opposed).
Exactly how dems got the credit for "embracing" civil rights is more proof of how effective the media propaganda has been for several decades now. Republicans didn't really "embrace" the southern white either. Just looking at historical presidential maps, George Wallace took the south from Nixon & Humphrey both. Nixon only took the South in 72 when he took the ENTIRE united States (save MA & DC) then Carter took the south again in '76. '92 and '96 actually had the south split over Clinton and his competitors.
Taking this copypasta to a logical conclusion:
> Left-wingers who wan to star their own autonomous zones and right-wingers who wan to secede split... literally.
> They actually form a wall.
> California, New York, Oregon, Nevada, Vermont, and other 'woke' states become 'The Democratic People's Republic of America'.
> The Bible Belt, Appalachia, Utah, and the rest o 'flyover country' become 'Gilead'.
> Bo The Democratic People's Republic of America and Gilead have programmes that move someone 'stuck in the wrong side'.
> Canada stays out of this th entire time.
Democratic People's Republic of America:
> government sponsors moving programme, emphasising women, the disabled, 'queer folx', and especially 'BIPOC'
> celebrates booting ou 'the fascists'
> Democrats take over everything
> very quickly passes entire woke shopping list
> things go great a while
> becom envy of the world
> woke conomics kick in
> blame 'systemic Truzits' (Trump-Nazi-fascist) again
> social justice warriors infight a lot
> some split into their own countries: Wakanda, Rompehielos ('ice-breakers'), Little China, Themyscira (which is itself split into the radically-feminist 'New Themyscira', the trans-exclusive 'True Themyscira', and the trans-inclusive 'Okama'), Fairyland, and s on
> others decide t 'Occupy the Government'
> a lot just riot
> lots of property and bodily damage ruin economy and ecrease safety even further
> rioters take control of government either through the government yielding or they actually managing to murder the governors... probably both
> take something that doesn't work and simply do it harder
> get stuck in the 'cope, seethe, dilate' cycle
> a few actually try to get 'Moralton' to 'pay repatriations'
> repatriations never come
> what was once The Democratic People's Republic of America ends up making Mad Max look safe
Gilead:
> n official government moving programme, but plenty of private services
> only requirement is that you adhere to the old values of life, liberty, and property while valuing tradition and hard work
> government adheres to the old Constitution
> government actually shrinks a lot, essentially going back to pre-Wilson government
> upsurge of individua liberty and free markets kyrockets economy
> actually becomes one of the safest and most productive countries in the world to women, minorities, the disabled, and even BGLT+
> actually manages to pay off national debt
> Null does not have to rely on cryptocurrency anymore
> All of Gilead laughs a The Democratic People's Republic of America mak endless fools of themselves
Puerto Rico:
> conflicted between th economic liberalism in The Democratic People's Republic of America, the social conservatism of Gilead, and the many Puerto Ricans i New York and Florida
> goes independent
Canada would never go for it. They're not ready to take on the massive amount of medical debt that comes with the homelessness in all the blue states. They don't need anymore Vancouvers.
Anyone else surprised, that people in South Africa are starving because they kicked out all of the white farmers from their homes and no one is planting crops? Just asking cause I'm not. And of course what is the people of South Africa solution for this problem? Start planting crops? Bring back the white farmers who were working on the farms? No. Why it is to riot. This is Critical Race Theory at its finest.
For one thing, the actual civil rights vote was dem: 153/91, rep: 136/35 yay/nay. In other words only 26% of Republicans opposed it while 59% of democrats did. (Present & not voting left out but dems were equal or higher in those numbers too.) Even the Senate was d: 46/21 and r:27/6 (46% & 22% opposed).
Exactly how dems got the credit for "embracing" civil rights is more proof of how effective the media propaganda has been for several decades now. Republicans didn't really "embrace" the southern white either. Just looking at historical presidential maps, George Wallace took the south from Nixon & Humphrey both. Nixon only took the South in 72 when he took the ENTIRE united States (save MA & DC) then Carter took the south again in '76. '92 and '96 actually had the south split over Clinton and his competitors.
From what I understand a few of those Canadian providences would like to join Gilead...
Anyone else surprised, that people in South Africa are starving because they kicked out all of the white farmers from their homes and no one is planting crops? Just asking cause I'm not. And of course what is the people of South Africa solution for this problem? Start planting crops? Bring back the white farmers who were working on the farms? No. Why it is to riot. This is Critical Race Theory at its finest.
That is why people involved in Jan. 6th are labeled terrorists despite that the true terrorist are ANTIFA, BLM and any other organization that uses violence to get what they want.
This is the definition of a terrorist; a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Its not even the use of violence that defines terrorism, its the use of terror as a bargaining tool. Not even in a "oh people fear you, therefore you must be a terrorist", no; or using a fearsome reputation to dupe your enemies into fleeing/retreat.
Its the explicit use of terror to get what you want; e.g. "Give us what we want, or X happens/continues".
That's what makes the Summer of Love protests terroristic, because the situation where we must abolish the police lest the burnings and lootings continue.
This is what made 9/11 an act of terrorism, because the presented situation where the US must withdrawl its forces from all "muslim lands" or else we can expect more bombings.
Most leftoids hold that Jan 6 was terrorism because "against the law + i don't like them"; yet cannot point to what ultimatum or goal they sought, or even what threat of future action they posed.
Even if you give them full benefit of the doubt and assume that Jan 6 was both illegal and treasonous (which it wasn't), then it's still not terrorism because the objective wasn't to use fear to reach a political goal.
Anyone else surprised, that people in South Africa are starving because they kicked out all of the white farmers from their homes and no one is planting crops? Just asking cause I'm not. And of course what is the people of South Africa solution for this problem? Start planting crops? Bring back the white farmers who were working on the farms? No. Why it is to riot. This is Critical Race Theory at its finest.
Small quibble:
South Africa is starving because Zimbabwe kicked out the white farmers in the 90s and gave their farms to political friends & family, who were completely incompetent.
Normally the implosion of another country shouldn't cause too much trouble, you should just be able to import food from somewhere else. But SA can't, becuse their economy is in complete shambles.
South Africa is economically fucked because they gave the governmental reigns to grifting niggers. Things were okish under Nelson Mandela because Mandela understood that he was a nigger, and if there weren't prosperous whites, there wouldn't be anything for niggers like him to steal. He got it.
His wife, good ol' Necklace Winnie*, was completely unhinged and once her husband stole his last oxygen, used Muh Widow to control the party and generally stock it full of crazies who literally murdered anyone who opposed them or wasn't sufficiently loyal.
So now the leading party has niggered themselves in to a real humdinger of a situation. See the old way to rally the people was "Blame the Boer, Demonstrations, get paid off by whitey, back to status quo, leave whitey to clean up.". But the problem is that there is less and less whitey to milk, and as they continue to run the country right into the ground there is less and less money for gibs. You can't scale back the handouts, or you are out of office (and very possibly killed very nastily by your semiferal nigger followers). You can't be seen giving anything to Whitey, or the same will happen but at a smaller scale. A lot of the "new" party also don't understand the situation, which is you only give LIPSERVICE to throwing out the Boer to extort the Boer for more money. They actually blame whitey for their situation, which becomes more and more ridiculous as the country has been under 100% ANC control for decades now.
But they have no way to stop, and lack the political intellegence at the top to figure out an alternative way.
*Winnie Mandela was a fan of the Capetown Necklace; tie your victims hands behind their back, put an old tire around their neck & shoulders, fill the tire with petrol, and light on fire. Winnie Mandela was an evil piece of shit.
US President Donald Trump (right) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' summit in the central Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017 (AFP Photo/JORGE SILVA) Leaked documents confirm that Russian president Vladimir Putin...
US President Donald Trump (right) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' summit in the central Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017 (AFP Photo/JORGE SILVA) Leaked documents confirm that Russian president Vladimir Putin...
US President Donald Trump (right) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' summit in the central Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017 (AFP Photo/JORGE SILVA) Leaked documents confirm that Russian president Vladimir Putin...
at this point I actually am willing to believe Putin had his cronies leak such "totes real document" just to fuck with USA
btw those guys nevver bother to mention what exactly Trump did that was so beneficial to Russia, I mean as a russian puppet he must have done heaps of such things