Artcow Michael John Kricfalusi / John Kricfalusi / John K. / John K. Stuff / Raymond Spum - scammer animator who pissed away his own career, salty blogger, CONFIRMED predator and child rapist

[ClydePAnderson]

Race with Carbon Monoxide in your garage you fucking nonce.

Thanks for the tip, but I prefer suffocating myself with Nitris Oxcide like Dennis Hopper in Blue Velvet. "Mommy"!

 

[Tragi-Chan]

but since everyone including her parents and studio members knew about it, then why no cops? Why no report?

Bill Cosby. Harvey Weinstein. Jimmy Savile. Kevin Spacey. Predators operating in plain sight are hardly rare in the entertainment industry.

Im only debating that there's a difference legally and culturally when you consider the decade and thats important when using a term like Child Rapist which is the worst crime a human can commit. Your right, but that term should not be devalued because it does devalue real child victims.

The fact that there are worse crimes or more reprehensible acts is irrelevant. Each act must be judged on its own terms.

What I dont get is how Rock stars have done shit like this for years, but I dont see the media calling out David Bowie for what he did or Bryan Singer either and those were one night flings (in singers case rape) and not a long term relationship like John and Robyn.

For the record, I agree that those people should suffer consequences too. But again, that doesn’t exonerate John.

 

[ClydePAnderson]

Hey pedo if I were you I would leave now before you also become part fo the thread like in the Dollieguts thread. You know it's funny since un both of these threads one person defends a know and proven pedophile.

Thanks for the advice, but I don't defend "Proven pedophiles" in fact, I've helped the police send them to prison before.
So unless there's a court case where he was convicted for that crime, It sounds like a few folks in this thread are engaging in false accusations to smear an individuals name which IS a cybercrime and is considered in some states to be a terrorist threat.
I appreciate the warning, but Ive got a concealed carry permit so my family and I will be ok.

 

[WINWORLDPEECEE]

Thanks for the advice, but I don't defend "Proven pedophiles" in fact, I've helped the police send them to prison before.
So unless there's a court case where he was convicted for that crime, It sounds like a few folks in this thread are engaging in false accusations to smear an individuals name which IS a cybercrime and is considered in some states to be a terrorist threat.
I appreciate the warning, but Ive got a concealed carry permit so my family and I will be ok.

cybercrime detected, Send in the seals

 

[ClydePAnderson]

Bill Cosby. Harvey Weinstein. Jimmy Savile. Kevin Spacey. Predators operating in plain sight are hardly rare in the entertainment industry.

The fact that there are worse crimes or more reprehensible acts is irrelevant. Each act must be judged on its own terms.

For the record, I agree that those people should suffer consequences too. But again, that doesn’t exonerate John.

Im not saying it does exhonerate him.
All Im saying is there's a lot more to the story that convinced me this was a hit job by a scorned ex and that hes never been arrested or charged and that crimes like statutory rape or sexual harassment are not in the same category as child rape or pedophillia and for good reason.
There's a difference, and I think people can change and mistakes from 30 years ago shouldn't destroy someone for a lifetime when they have ao much to offer to the world of art.
Ives been in the industry since I was 9 and I know what behavior a real pedo exhibits and the types they surround themselves with how evil they are because I helped get a few arrested in my time.
Hollywood unfortunately is filled with some sick fucks, but John is not one of them.
Yeah they operate in plain sight amd they go after lots of young people, but tend not to have long term relationships or parental consent to date which changes the entire situation, especially when its motivated but politics and money.
Fact of the matter is, John didn't break any laws in the 90s or commit a crime. Whatever we may think of that morally now is irrelevant.

 

[redbarchetta]

Yeah they operate in plain sight amd they go after lots of young people, but tend not to have long term relationships or parental consent to date which changes the entire situation

Kind of exposing that you don't actually know jack shit about child predators, lots of famous cases of pedophilia and ephebophilia where the parents were easily bought by the wealthy, impressive pervert. Whether or not Katie Rice/Robyn Bird's parents are shitty people is entirely irrelevant to John K being a well-known creep in ye olde ancient times of the 1990s, when apparently men could be real men and hold hands with teenage girls and absolutely nothing else, if I'm following your claims correctly.

 

[AnOminous]

Nope. Im not John K or Tom or Mike or Vincent or Eddie or Ralph, Thad.
Im just one of several people whose been working with John on numerous projects, including three indie film companies, a streaming network on Roku is licensing George Liquor, a trading card company hired him recently, a company making vinyl pinbacks (John already finished the three stooges one and its for sale on their website) and 4 diff bands have hired John for animating/designing music videos for them.

Your anal anguish is out the roof. It's fucking hilarious. How much pain are you feeling in your absolutely devastated asshole that is causing you to emit these levels of pure pain? Lmao, your butthurt is so fucking hilarious.

 

[ClydePAnderson]

Kind of exposing that you don't actually know jack shit about child predators, lots of famous cases of pedophilia and ephebophilia where the parents were easily bought by the wealthy, impressive pervert. Whether or not Katie Rice/Robyn Bird's parents are shitty people is entirely irrelevant to John K being a well-known creep in ye olde ancient times of the 1990s, when apparently men could be real men and hold hands with teenage girls and absolutely nothing else, if I'm following your claims correctly.

That's true in regard to the parents.
Cue the two coreys.
Im only saying up until the late 90s in most states and even federal law, 16 was the agenof consent for dating and marriage with parental knowledge.
Also, an adult dating a 16 year old ,even if the adult is 60 and the person is 16, is legal in the US. Legally there is no limit on age for dating in the US. So a 16 year old dating a 40 year old is perfectly legal. They can even get married in the US legally with parental consent.
Per current US Law:
A common misperception about statutory rape is that state codes define a single age at which an individual can legally consent to sex. Only 12 states have a single age of consent, below which an individual cannot consent to sexual intercourse under any circumstances, and above which it is legal to engage in sexual intercourse with another person above the age of consent. For example, in Massachusetts, the age of consent is 16.

In the remaining 39 states, other factors come into play: age differentials, minimum age of the victim, and minimum age of the defendant. Each is described below.

Minimum age requirement. In 27 states that do not have a single age of consent, statutes specify the age below which an individual cannot legally engage in sexual intercourse regardless of the age of the defendant (see the second column in Table 1). The minimum age requirements in these states range from 10 to 16 years of age. The legality of sexual intercourse with an individual who is above the minimum age requirement and below the age of consent is dependent on the difference in ages between the two parties and/or the age of the defendant.

• In New Jersey, the age of consent is 16, but individuals who are at least 13 years of age can legally engage in sexual activities if the defendant is less than 4 years older than the victim.

Bill Cosby. Harvey Weinstein. Jimmy Savile. Kevin Spacey. Predators operating in plain sight are hardly rare in the entertainment industry.

The fact that there are worse crimes or more reprehensible acts is irrelevant. Each act must be judged on its own terms.

For the record, I agree that those people should suffer consequences too. But again, that doesn’t exonerate John.

Legally there is no limit on age for dating in the US. So a 16 year old dating a 40 year old is perfectly legal. They can even get married in the US legally.

cybercrime detected, Send in the seals

Kiwi farms is probably the last bastion of free speech online which is why Im so confused by the John K bashing.
The John K thing was such a set up by SJW PC feminazis and its so obvious that ID think people would be defending him here because he didn't break any laws - not even any current ones.
However, any serious death threats are not free speech, its in the the same field as yelling fire in a crowded theater and therefore not covered by the first amendment.

Your anal anguish is out the roof. It's fucking hilarious. How much pain are you feeling in your absolutely devastated asshole that is causing you to emit these levels of pure pain? Lmao, your butthurt is so fucking hilarious.

Hey, its fine you dojt believe me. But when the music videos come out, you'll see.

Your anal anguish is out the roof. It's fucking hilarious. How much pain are you feeling in your absolutely devastated asshole that is causing you to emit these levels of pure pain? Lmao, your butthurt is so fucking hilarious.

Heres a link to one company hes working with

The Three Stooges - Cartoon Accessories Bundle Pack

Bundle comes with enamel pins, embroidered patches and vinyl decals! Pins are 1.5” Patches are 3.5” Decals are 3” ®/© 2020 C3 Ent., Inc.

www.rockinpins.com

Your anal anguish is out the roof. It's fucking hilarious. How much pain are you feeling in your absolutely devastated asshole that is causing you to emit these levels of pure pain? Lmao, your butthurt is so fucking hilarious.

Hey, its fine you dojt believe me. But when the music videos come out, you'll see.

Sorry, I only lurk here. But I was irked and prompted to post by who I suspect is Tom because it reads similar (both in cadence and typing style) to diatribes he wrote on mutuals' Facebook walls. I wanted to get Tom shitting in his pants. (If it's not Tom, it's at least someone who knows John pretty well.)

From Google, it seems like the dude's a cuckservative, no shit he'd know jack about pedophilia. Now seethe moar pedobaiter

What law did he break?

 

[Tragi-Chan]

Legally there is no limit on age for dating in the US. So a 16 year old dating a 40 year old is perfectly legal. They can even get married in the US legally.

John was corresponding with Robyn from the age of 13. The book Sick Little Monkeys states that they were dating when she was 15, apparently with no objections from John. There’s also a much-repeated clip from Howard Stern in which Stern drools over a sketch of a very sexualised character and John adds, “She’s underage, too.”

Kiwi farms is probably the last bastion of free speech online which is why Im so confused by the John K bashing.

We’re free to bash John K. You are free to defend him. We are free to react to that. and so on. What we are all doing now is speaking freely. Nobody’s being censored, but free speech doesn’t mean freedom from judgement.

The John K thing was such a set up by SJW PC feminazis and its so obvious

What makes it obvious? What’s the evidence you have that this was a set-up? I don’t see any denials from John that the events took place.

 

[ClydePAnderson]

Hey Clyde if you are being honest and you're indeed a close friend of John K please tell John that I found the apology letter he sent publicly to Katie Rice and Robyn Bird to be one of the most disgusting non-apologies I've ever read.

You can think of us however you want, but just remember that John K burned bridges with everyone in the industry. So when he fucks you over too please come back here and tell us all the ugly details.

Also please don't leave any teenaged girls around the creepy bastard.

Yes, Im being honest.
He has burned many bridges and that article wrecked him for a bit but that's changing now and hes getting a lot of work.
John hasn't screwed me over or done anything creepy around me or my crew. Hes treated women and men in my cast and crew respectfully and has been very professional and my family and friends all like him.
I came on here to defend my buddy, because it sickens me to see him labeled as a child rapist and pedo when he isn't and just because he dated and had along term relationship with a 16 year old nearly 30 years ago, he broke no laws or committed any crimes. That's still legal in almost every state.
Now, if Im wrong, ill report it like no tomorrow.

Sorry, I only lurk here. But I was irked and prompted to post by who I suspect is Tom because it reads similar (both in cadence and typing style) to diatribes he wrote on mutuals' Facebook walls. I wanted to get Tom shitting in his pants. (If it's not Tom, it's at least someone who knows John pretty well.)

If this is Thad can I ask why you joined the Rebecca Sugar parade?
Were you mad about the restraining order or what?
And where's all the Bob Camp blowing up stories that were left out of your "book"?
Yes I know John well. Saw him this afternoon and we watched 3 stooges in the den and ate salami drinking diet coke in his cartoon character glasses.
Hes one of my best friends.

 

[Natsuki]

Is this the start of a new lolcow? also cope harder buddy because apart from those commissions no one knows who the fuck you are.

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

@ClydePAnderson in a nutshell:

"Who are you going to believe? Me or your own lying eyes?"

(And what the hell "joining the Rebecca Sugar parade"? He doesn't even like Steven Universe.)

 

[thadwell]

OK, whatever you say, dude!

It actually may not be Tom, and if it isn't, sorry to the real Tom out there - the list of people with that kind of insider knowledge and deranged logic is very miniscule. It is someone who does know John, though, and someone who needs to take a fucking typing class. Although apparently not well enough to know that Ralph Bakshi would never go online to stan for John the way the other sycophants he listed (Mike, Vincent, Eddie) would in the past. Also someone who clearly did not read my book - there are several critical accounts of Bob Camp therein. Enjoy your friendship: I've never known anyone who had a friendship with John that wasn't on the verge of exploding at any given time, especially those who work with him.

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

I probably should have replied with some of the stuff you mentioned.

Thad, do you know what the hell this guy's talking about with the "Rebecca Sugar parade" and the restraining order shit? And does John really have all that work in the pipeline?

 

[thadwell]

Dunno. Seems more than likely, but there will always be stupid people to give horrible people work. At least it's stuff nobody will ever actually see.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

I came on here to defend my buddy, because it sickens me to see him labeled as a child rapist and pedo when he isn't and just because he dated and had along term relationship with a 16 year old nearly 30 years ago, he broke no laws or committed any crimes. That's still legal in almost every state.

No, it’s not just because he dated a 16-year-old (or 15-year-old). It’s because he groomed a 13-year-old. If you genuinely think he did nothing wrong, then you need to acknowledge the whole thing. Or at least, you need a better explanation for the suspect parts than “it’s a conspiracy by feminists.”

IDK, I just think you’re being a bit disingenuous here.

@ClydePAnderson in a nutshell:

"Who are you going to believe? Me or your own lying eyes?"

(And what the hell "joining the Rebecca Sugar parade"? He doesn't even like Steven Universe.)

This is the problem. We have a very consistent story from many different people, one that has gone largely unchallenged by John himself for several years now. It’s backed up by a lot of written and video evidence from John himself, and is consistent with other things we know about him.

As a counter to that, we have some guy whose identity is unknown, who may be who he says he is, may be John himself or may be a crazy person. And the only reason he has for all these people turning against John is some SJW conspiracy.

I find it ironic that John is so obsessed with manliness, yet is seemingly incapable of manning up.

 

[Adamska]

*Actually retarded enough to try and lie that pedophilia is not a crime and that fucking a girl a third your age and who is 15 is magically alright*

Kill yourself.

No matter how hard you try and gibber it's a fake and gay op, no one will believe it because Johnny openly admits he wants to fuck teenagers and did not try at all to clear his name like a person who's actually innocent does. People who are innocent get shocked and then very angry usually because they KNOW they did nothing wrong. They'd fight tooth and nail to disprove the charges with insistent and consistent alibis, not let them slide and do a "sorry not sorry" apology post.

Seethe harder pedo.

 

[Giovanni]

It sounds like a few folks in this thread are engaging in false accusations to smear an individuals name which IS a cybercrime and is considered in some states to be a terrorist threat.

Michael John Kricfalusi is a pedophile. You are a pedophile defender. And considering the sick shit that you're trying to defend as acceptable behavior, you seem to be a pedophile, too.

Come at me, bro.

 

[AnOminous]

That's true in regard to the parents.

kill yourself pedo.

 

[The Cunting Death]

Oh my god Clyde shut the fuck up