US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
According to Twitter right now : "There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia, according to fact-checkers and journalists
Trending with Fulton County"
When it's all but explicitly stated that Blumpf won the damn state, Corporate Media/Press has to strike. And still with the same buzzwords: "Oh yes! There totally was fraud, but was it widespread fraud? No, losers!"

1 state down and these faggots are running all over the place. Where to next?
 
1626374096510.png
 
They aren't morons, they are somewhat willfully ignorant. The problem with the Laptop is that it isn't easily digestible, and the center generally doesn't care to look deeper. They also tend to not give two fucks about the media.

In the end, what catches the center's attention has to hit a few criteria.
1: It needs to be Easily Digestible.
2: It has to come from sources they like/trust.
3: It has to have a clear connection to someone or something in power.

The laptop failed all three.

Easy digestibility means they can wrap their heads around what it is and what it means on the face of it. "Hunter Biden had a laptop which had some weird business emails that don't totally confirm corruption but probably should be looked into immediately" is not an easily digestible thing. "The democrats stole the election" is, and easy digestibility is what interests them in looking to see if there is fire to the smoke. this leads to;

Sources. Nobody likes or trusts the media. Period. The numbers on that are so low that its an immovable fact. hence why the censorship has moved on to "Desperately try to make it not be seen at all". The center's primary source of info is word of mouth, what people they know are saying. The problem is that it only spreads if criteria 1 is met. So if you fail 1, you fail 2 in the current era. Same for if you succeed in 1.

Connections. This is where the laptop fails the hardest. "But Biden's son isn't Biden" is really the mindset here. And since there was so little properly connecting Biden himself to any of the alleged stuff it just pittered out with interest on the center. A proper investigation likely would have found something, but there wasn't one sooooo. But again, election fraud emphatically meets this. "Biden won because of fraud" is a -direct- connection to the center.
So complete morons.
 
This is off-topic, but I just had this lovely little ad being shown to me on youtube (on something that has nothing to do with this):

230891F5-F97C-4C56-B749-AEBCE239A216.png


Also there have been several ads asking "Is Luca Gay?" (he's not) from that Pixar movie.
Because that's what normal people do: obsess over whether a little boy is sexually attracted to other little boys. Creepy fucks.
 
View attachment 2349594
View attachment 2349595
View attachment 2349598
View attachment 2349600
View attachment 2349601
View attachment 2349603
View attachment 2349604
View attachment 2349605
View attachment 2349606
View attachment 2349607

Get raped RaffenSPERGer. Any criminal investigation into the 2020 election in Georgia should start right up your asshole and then work it's way down. I know I won't forget you leaking selectively edited phone call with Trump so monumental in it's deceptiveness, even the US media had to (quietly) post a retraction about it.
 
I do question how that one video of Biden bragging about getting that prosecutor sacked doesn't qualify as "easily digestible."
It did qualify, actually. Which is why around the same time you had several 'suddenly extra bad Trump news!" crop up at the same time. It worked somewhat, but not a lot and showed clear signs of hurting Biden at the polls.
 
I do question how that one video of Biden bragging about getting that prosecutor sacked doesn't qualify as "easily digestible."
that's the thing, if "son of a bitch, he got fired!" doesn't sell the idea to somebody then "hunter says his dad says his email says on a laptop with a hard drive and blahblahblah" won't either, even if it's right
12 people
hahahaha holy shit there's more people in every vax thread on this site alone
 
It did qualify, actually. Which is why around the same time you had several 'suddenly extra bad Trump news!" crop up at the same time. It worked somewhat, but not a lot and showed clear signs of hurting Biden at the polls.
Why did the Clinton emails work and not the Hunter laptop?

(The answer was all the suppression, but yeah.)
 
Why did the Clinton emails work and not the Hunter laptop?

(The answer was all the suppression, but yeah.)
No, there was more to it. The Clinton emails were directly linked to the candidate, where as the Hunter Laptop required a degree of separation for a person, and even more than that for content. Additionally, it was easier to sell and digest. "Clinton deleted potentially sketchy emails she had on a private server" is easier to digest than "Joe Biden's son had a laptop in which there is some evidence that he may have used a Ukrainian company to be able to launder money which may have gone to Joe Biden".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back