Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

MBP doesn't understand the arguments Brook makes and straw-mans him plenty.
Is there anyone that Vaush disagrees with that he doesn't strawman and purposefully lies about? I seriously can't think of a single group that Vaush hates that he doesn't do that shit against. From Marxist-Leninists, Revolutionary Anarchists, Fascists, Libertarians, Conservatives etc. All he knows how to do is just use rhetoric rather than facts and doesn't seem to understand or at least purposefully lies about his enemy's actual beliefs. Though a lot of the time he just calls people he doesn't like, especially those on the Far Right or those who are further Left than him as "mentally ill" too as to completely disregard them.

I've said this before and I'll say it again, Vaush has more in common with the Soviet Union's Communist Party than any Anarchist movement I could think of. Since he engages in the same exact tactics of lying, deception and strawmans rather than facts and convincing arguments based in truth. Oh wait I forgot, Vaush doesn't believe in truth and that everything is subjective. lmao. Again Vaush would have made a damn good fit in Stalin's Soviet Union as a propagandist.
 
Is there anyone that Vaush disagrees with that he doesn't strawman and purposefully lies about? I seriously can't think of a single group that Vaush hates that he doesn't do that shit against. From Marxist-Leninists, Revolutionary Anarchists, Fascists, Libertarians, Conservatives etc. All he knows how to do is just use rhetoric rather than facts and doesn't seem to understand or at least purposefully lies about his enemy's actual beliefs. Though a lot of the time he just calls people he doesn't like, especially those on the Far Right or those who are further Left than him as "mentally ill" too as to completely disregard them.

I've said this before and I'll say it again, Vaush has more in common with the Soviet Union's Communist Party than any Anarchist movement I could think of. Since he engages in the same exact tactics of lying, deception and strawmans rather than facts and convincing arguments based in truth. Oh wait I forgot, Vaush doesn't believe in truth and that everything is subjective. lmao. Again Vaush would have made a damn good fit in Stalin's Soviet Union as a propagandist.
I would love a struggle session with Vaush. Use his own rhetoric framework against him with no time limit.
 
Apparently, Manbunpig is going to debate Charlie Kirk on Tim Pool's show early next month.

Charlie Kirk is an idiot, but he should have no problem at all wiping his ass with a hydrocephalic imbecile like Vaush.
Eh I hate Charlie Kirk and his weird face but hopefully he watches Vaush a bunch prior to that debate so he can understand Vaush's points on things and understand how he argues. There was a neocon streamer who did that and Vaush was asshurt because the guy knew all of Vaush's actual beliefs on things and how he argues and kept being called out for it.
 
What could you even put in a Demonmama thread? Their spiteful mutant origin story? A summary of their YouTube career? The various tardfights they've gotten in? Hardly any of that is interesting, and the little that is can go in the breadtube thread. Same with any other breadtube troon or troon in general. Being a troon isn't enough to be interesting and neither is having dumb political views. Writing an OP takes a decent amount of work, and very few politispergs warrant that work. Especially not ones as vehemently unbearable as Demonmama.
I'd generally agree, though I will say it's less a matter of if, but when something they do becomes thread worthy. Relegate them to the Breadtube thread in community watch and wait for a meltdown. The only political sperg that deserves their own thread that doesn't have one is Cenk's nephew.
 
Apparently, Manbunpig is going to debate Charlie Kirk on Tim Pool's show early next month.

Charlie Kirk is an idiot, but he should have no problem at all wiping his ass with a hydrocephalic imbecile like Vaush.
Two psuedo-intellectual faggots who enter a debate despite having massive financial incentives that prevent them from being persuaded is junk for the informed public.
 
Apparently, Manbunpig is going to debate Charlie Kirk on Tim Pool's show early next month.

Charlie Kirk is an idiot, but he should have no problem at all wiping his ass with a hydrocephalic imbecile like Vaush.
This is just speculation but Tim Pool seems really committed to making Vaush more popular. Out of all of the people you choose to debate Charlie Kirk, you choose Vaush? There are way more high-profile and frankly more entertaining people that Tim can get on the show to debate Charlie. Why him? This is all really weird.
 
Two psuedo-intellectual faggots who enter a debate despite having massive financial incentives that prevent them from being persuaded is junk for the informed public.
Vaush v. Kirk is useless and won't prove anything, but you could say the same about Mayweather v. McGregor, Tyson v. Jones, or literally any internet debate. Something people don't really give Vaush enough credit for is that he does, basically, understand the appeal of IBS style debates. Sure he tones it down a tad, sure he tries to frame it as activism, but deep down he knows he's an organ grinder's monkey dancing to a crowd of mongoloids. I'm not saying this debate will be entertaining, Kirk is mostly boring and Pool has a hard time of shutting the fuck up (a skill that's essential for an IBS moderator), but the point of this debate is just to put on a show.
 
This is just speculation but Tim Pool seems really committed to making Vaush more popular. Out of all of the people you choose to debate Charlie Kirk, you choose Vaush? There are way more high-profile and frankly more entertaining people that Tim can get on the show to debate Charlie. Why him? This is all really weird.
Vaush just came away looking like a ragequiting cuck in a debate and he needs a comeback to regain his leftards reputation of being the leftist intellectual master.

That and Dim Fool needs to uphold the bullshit that he's a centrist liberal or whatever
Vaush v. Kirk is useless and won't prove anything, but you could say the same about Mayweather v. McGregor, Tyson v. Jones, or literally any internet debate. Something people don't really give Vaush enough credit for is that he does, basically, understand the appeal of IBS style debates. Sure he tones it down a tad, sure he tries to frame it as activism, but deep down he knows he's an organ grinder's monkey dancing to a crowd of mongoloids. I'm not saying this debate will be entertaining, Kirk is mostly boring and Pool has a hard time of shutting the fuck up (a skill that's essential for an IBS moderator), but the point of this debate is just to put on a show.
Internet Bloodsports was always worthlessly retarded outside of entertainment from sperging. Even the very name gives away the insecure poser beta shit all these debatefags have.
 
Eh I hate Charlie Kirk and his weird face but hopefully he watches Vaush a bunch prior to that debate so he can understand Vaush's points on things and understand how he argues. There was a neocon streamer who did that and Vaush was asshurt because the guy knew all of Vaush's actual beliefs on things and how he argues and kept being called out for it.
Which streamer was it? Jackson Hinkle did that too apparently and wiped the floor with Vaush.
 
Vaush is a grifter, plain and simple. He does debates to keep the money flowing, because he knows dumb idiots will watch and clap him for "owning the right/tankies/libs/whatever" and give him donations. He obviously doesn't give a shit about actual political activism, otherwise he wouldn't spend so much time streaming and would do shit for leftism in America.
 
Vaush reacting to Yaron Brook v. Sam Seder


Manbunpig needing to heal his bruised ego through Seder, even though Seder didn't mop the floor with Yaron Brook. Lamenting the fact that he didn't use the coconut analogy against Brook. Doesn't understand objectivism, then after lamenting how Brook isn't about the freedom of workers he calls for more income taxes. MBP doesn't understand the arguments Brook makes and straw-mans him plenty.
why doesn't he react to this performance of Seder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCGv1KtuA8A :story:
 
For anyone interested on Vaush opinion of our dear departed cow Totalbiscuit, yep, he actually thinks Totalbiscuit was a gamergater and would have ended up becoming a nazi eventually :story:

 
For anyone interested on Vaush opinion of our dear departed cow Totalbiscuit, yep, he actually thinks Totalbiscuit was a gamergater and would have ended up becoming a nazi eventually :story:

2020 and they were still mad about Gamergate.
 
Autism, that's why.

Wasn't Vaush the one who said that if a mob starts chasing you you should surrender? I think he said that after Kyle "the purifier" Rittenhouse did his thing.
So by Vaush's logic, all those black men who were lynched shouldn't have resisted but just meekly accepted that it just wasn't their day or something? I know it's a waste of time picking apart Vaush's arguments, but this one seems to be especially retarded.
 
Back