Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter mindlessobserver
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
I recommend you read the Anime Matsuri thread for more info:
I wasn't talking about defamation.
Obviously, if we're talking about public defamation, I would guess the system would simply assume the defamation is known from the day it is made.
But don't forget, we're not talking here about defamation only, we're also talking about a bunch of assholes working together to stop a man from working.
If it is found out that someone coordinated all that, trust me, that person won't be off the hook just because the CoA took its time reviewing the case.
I'm no law expert, but each law has a specific intent, and the intent of the statute of limitation is not to protect people who are good at stalling.
PS: By the way...
I don't think that "the day the cause of action accrues" can't mean anything but "the day the defamation was made".
It is no less likely that "the day the cause of action accrues" could mean instead "the day the defamation is known".
I read it as "the day since which you're allowed to bring a lawsuit", which doesn't really tell which one it is.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
And this video has a little bit of Friday then Saturday and Sunday's panels. So you get to see all 3 glorious pants. Honestly Friday was the best.
Doofenshitz
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2021
That was good, apart from using 8bitshinobi as an example. AM and Kaho had proven that was a lie, Sean hasn't.
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
To be fair, the accusations against AM were ridiculous on their face due to mis-spellings, dates several days after the event ended, rando Gmail account, and general oozing of autism. They had a bit of an easier time since the 'accusers' were orders of magnitude more ridiculous.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
You replied about a question about defamation with an answer that had nothing to do with it?
We are though, as that is what the poster you replied to talking about.
Intent of the legislator when passing the law is in the plain words of the statute. That is how courts usually view that as well, or by looking at the followup laws (see, for example, United States v. Cuellar, 478 F.3d 282 (5th Cir. 2007), Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U.S. 56)
How you managed to read "on the day defamation was made" as "the day defamation is known" is beyond me.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
They read it that way because it doesn't say "made", it says "accrued". A cause of action accrues when the plaintiff discovers the injury caused by the action, which isn't necessarily when the action occurred. If someone has been making defamatory statements in secret to other parties and is only later found out, then the cause of action accrues at the point in time it is found by the damaged party, not at the point the defamation occured.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
"An action for defamation accrues when the defamatory statement is published"
-San Antonio Credit Union v. O'CONNOR, 115 S.W.3d 82 (Tex. App. 2003)
Edit: In "rare cases" where the defamation is "inherently undiscoverable", the statute of limitations only start when plaintiff learns about the defamation. See Childs v. Haussecker, 974 S.W.2d 31 (Tex. 1998 ), San Antonio Credit Union v. O'CONNOR, 115 S.W.3d 82 (Tex. App. 2003), Velocity Databank, Inc. v. Shell Offshore, Inc., 456 S.W.3d 605 (Tex. App. 2014)
Last edited:
Son of Sparda 84
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
See this profile gets it
Kiwi Farms Posting Their L'S on Twitter: "Please don't spread misinfo…
archived 16 Jul 2021 18:51:26 UTC
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Except for his delusions that he posts our Ls or whatever.View attachment 2353162
See this profile gets it
Kiwi Farms Posting Their L'S on Twitter: "Please don't spread misinfo…
archived 16 Jul 2021 18:51:26 UTCarchive.vn
There is no winning or losing on the farms. Only laughter
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
Maybe that’s what they mean by Ls is laughs.
That literally proves that my interpretation is right:
Those two quotes are saying that the clock starts ticking when the statement is made, but only if the plaintiff knew (it says "published" for a reason).
However, in the "rare cases" the plaintiff can prove he couldn't possibly know, that it was "undiscoverable", then the clock starts ticking when he "learns".
So basically, in both situations the action accrues when the plaintiff knows. It's just that for the first one, immediate knowledge is assumed for it is public.
But yet again, I wasn't talking about the defamation, I was thinking more about the tortious interference.
PS: And sorry for the "we", it was a generic one, I understand the confusion, my bad. I meant to say that the lawsuit itself isn't about defamation only.
Nb: @teriyakiburns got my previous message right, I have no idea how you ended up reading it as "made = known".
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
The two quotes are extremely different. One shows how defamation is normally handled in Texas (i.e. clock starts running as soon as defamatory statement is made), and the other showcases a very rare (according to Texas Supreme Court and appeals courts) exception.
Published does not mean the other party knew of publication, and even if this interpretation was not insane, we know that this is wrong interpretation because the exception clearly makes/marks a difference between when the rare Discovery rule applies (i.e. when the clock start ticking from when the Plaintiff should have learned) and when it is normal (i.e. clock starts ticking as soon as defamatory publication is made). I encourage you to read an appeals court decision inVelocity Databank, Inc. v. Shell Offshore, Inc., 456 S.W.3d 605 (Tex. App. 2014).
No.
You can make anything sound truthful if you keep changing the facts.
Which is something I also pointed out. To a question about defamation, you thought that a good answer was to talk about TI without making it clear that you are talking about TI. Which, by the way, you were wrong about TI too. It follows exactly the same rules as Defamation, except instead of one year it's two. See First Nat. Bank of Eagle Pass v. Levine, 721 S.W.2d 287 (Tex. 1986), Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises Inc., 930 S.W.2d 157 (Tex. App. 1996)
I read it as Texas courts do. Texas courts read "accrue", not as "when Plaintiff learns of it" as you do, but as I do. See Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises Inc., 930 S.W.2d 157 (Tex. App. 1996)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
The Fails of #IStandWithVic on Twitter: "What the actual fuck?… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:27 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "The @FBI should probably check in on t…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:18 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Was just made aware that @dev1_officia…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:55 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "I know the resident evil community som…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:46:05 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Dc Douglas is a plague on the resident…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:27 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Hey dc douglas, this you???? 😂😂… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:07 UTC
Some Scottish Lad on Twitter: "50 secs to read a 11,000 doc & your re…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:43:29 UTC
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Yeah, no problem. Sorry for posting in the wrong thread
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
Those bitches are mentally ill but at least they wanna lynch an actual degenerate like D.C. Dickless this time around.View attachment 2353623View attachment 2353625
The Fails of #IStandWithVic on Twitter: "What the actual fuck?… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:27 UTC
View attachment 2353628View attachment 2353629
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "The @FBI should probably check in on t…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:18 UTC
View attachment 2353633View attachment 2353636
View attachment 2353637View attachment 2353638
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Was just made aware that @dev1_officia…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:55 UTCView attachment 2353642View attachment 2353643Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "I know the resident evil community som…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:46:05 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Dc Douglas is a plague on the resident…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:27 UTCBeware Creepy VAs retweeted one of this spednaught faggot's tweetsBeware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Hey dc douglas, this you???? 😂😂… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:07 UTC
View attachment 2353645View attachment 2353646
View attachment 2353647
Some Scottish Lad on Twitter: "50 secs to read a 11,000 doc & your re…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:43:29 UTC
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
Are they going harder at DC Douglas?
Hm. Well, there's actual proof of that dude being a creep. Smallest violin if it gets rolling. It'll always come back to bite these actual creeps/abusers in the ass.
Hm. Well, there's actual proof of that dude being a creep. Smallest violin if it gets rolling. It'll always come back to bite these actual creeps/abusers in the ass.
HighwayStar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2019
No fucks will be given if DC Douglas gets the #MeToo treatment.View attachment 2353623View attachment 2353625
The Fails of #IStandWithVic on Twitter: "What the actual fuck?… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:27 UTC
View attachment 2353628View attachment 2353629
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "The @FBI should probably check in on t…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:45:18 UTC
View attachment 2353633View attachment 2353636
View attachment 2353637View attachment 2353638
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Was just made aware that @dev1_officia…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:55 UTCView attachment 2353642View attachment 2353643Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "I know the resident evil community som…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:46:05 UTC
Beware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Dc Douglas is a plague on the resident…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:27 UTCBeware Creepy VAs retweeted one of this spednaught faggot's tweetsBeware Creepy VAs on Twitter: "Hey dc douglas, this you???? 😂😂… "
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:41:07 UTC
View attachment 2353645View attachment 2353646
View attachment 2353647
Some Scottish Lad on Twitter: "50 secs to read a 11,000 doc & your re…
archived 16 Jul 2021 19:43:29 UTC