- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
there's your answer. Not women. Troons.What woman ....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there's your answer. Not women. Troons.What woman ....
I think we just need a throw up sticker. It would cover a lot of bases.I wish we had an 'ugly' rating. Because that's one ugly customer, right down to the bone.
Can it be considered a superpower to be this fucking entitled and bitchy?Wedge Is Mad Part 12 (or 13/14? i've lost the count)
View attachment 2358327
View attachment 2358329
View attachment 2358330
View attachment 2358331
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 2358336
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 2358342
View attachment 2358343
View attachment 2358344
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 2358347
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 2358349
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 2358350
View attachment 2358352
Tweet | Archive
Holy shit. If reddit ever became sentient and got put into a sack of skin, it would be Wedge. Autistic people should need to pass some kind of social intelligence test to get online. I mean the bad, reddit autistic, not the good, kiwi autistic.
A quick image search for Ultimate Surrender confirmed it's exactly what I expected, and the sort of thing that I'm not surprised troons are into.
It's actually kind of worse; people who are following a lot of these identities as things like feminism (not Feminism, which is part of the problem) spread to the cultures they come from have noted something interesting.Whatever truth exists in any of these identities, there is absolutely no reason why we must abide by them. The only reason they're even discussed is because there are people who don't want to live by the designations of male and female. And they want the rest of society to abide by that decision, regardless of how sound it is. And regardless of the consequences (whether toward normal men and women or even children).
"Free spirit going where the wind takes me!" is usually just a pretty layer of paint applied to "I do what I want, fuck everybody else!" In communities where it's not acceptable to do anything but smile and nod and accept the abuse like a good little doormat? You end up with with anybody with a spine who isn't a predator bailing on the entire community.After years of observing hippies in their own environment, I am qualified to say that it's a very parasitic community. Not 100% in the way the right thinks it is, but in its own way.
I have gotten to know some of them pretty damn well and there are some hippies who are the nicest, most genuine people you ever met, some of them are real dumb, some of them are not all there in the head, and some of them are complete sociopaths. Determining which is which is a real challenge to the point where I can't handle any of them any more.
And in addition to the 5 Geek Fallacies, the worst things you can do are be uptight, judge anyone, or have standards.
My roommate comes home with some homeless dude she met downtown who needed a place to stay and he's going to sleep on the couch?
Clearly I am the asshole for objecting to a strange man sleeping in my house.
Now you might be thinking, "Which of the four aforementioned hippie types was this one, Friend KiwiFuzz? Was she real genuine, real dumb, or real kooky? Surely we can rule out her being a completely remorseless assassin!"
To which I say that after several months of living with her, I concluded that she was one of the most soulless, calculating bitches I have ever met.
It wasn't any one thing in particular, it was just a pattern of shit like that where she was this free spirit going where the wind took her and the wind, more often than not, took her to a place where she did not give one single fuck about other people.
And part of what made her particularly malicious was a pattern of what one might call grooming or pushing the Overton window. I don't feel comfortable saying much more but she was really good at using her "free-spirited" sexuality as a weapon, and I don't mean just flirtatiousness, I mean she pulled multiple moves with men and woman where if she had been a 250-lb linebacker, other people would have seen it as sexual harassment at best and rape-adjacent at worst.
Troons and "queers" have the same vibe.
Like I wonder what kind of person is thick on social media with the tranchers and at what exact point in the getting-to-know-you process they'd realize "Oh shit, I am in a clown-themed rape dungeon and eight furries are about to do the locomotion." And if some of the people looking at this are additionally thinking, "And I shall make myself ringmaster."
More importantly, 'mspec lesbian' is a lot of words to use to avoid admitting that what you are is heterosexual.Sometimes I ask my non-hetero friends for help with the words and concepts like these. Makes me feel pretty justified in making fun of these Twitter weirdos when my friends who are experienced in this stuff have no idea what mspec or bisexual lesbian mean. Also, something something "golly, for people who hate labels they sure do invent a lot of new ones"
Wedge is basically the most prison gay of sexual options: Probably nobody is attracted to him, and most people never will be desperate enough to get laid to not go "...Masturbation it is!" instead.On the topic of the new speak thing that was brought up. I think that Wedge really believes that by stretching the definitions of words that he can somehow change reality. Lesbians are women who are attracted to other women, but they can also exclusively love only people who were nataly born as women too. This twisting of definitions is what lead to the rise of super straight. People like Wedge love labels so much, but he can't stand when people use labels to state their preferences in a way that make him feel like he's excluded from some sort of secret club. Like the sex pest he is, he thinks he can worm his way in by playing around with words to find some sort of loophole, so they'll have to say "Oh well, I guess you got me there. Looks like I have no choice but to suck the girldick now because you used all those fancy words to tell me what I'm supposed to be attracted to".
Wedge, you have to get it through your thick skull that there are people out there that aren't attracted to you and never will be, no matter how you keep rewording things. Just leave them alone.
Wedge is projecting like he is a projector.Wedge Is Mad Part 12 (or 13/14? i've lost the count)
View attachment 2358327
View attachment 2358329
View attachment 2358330
View attachment 2358331
Tweet | Archive
SoonHappy 1,400 pages you fucking maniacs. Here’s to another 1.4k
Wedge lacks discipline confirmed.Wedge Is Mad Part 12 (or 13/14? i've lost the count)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And he's barely anything but bone. Pro tip for troons,if you have the physique of an emaciated nerd who's never gone outside in his life, it makes it even easier for everyone around you to pick up on the obviously male bone structure. Maybe that's why so many others go the route of becoming tubs of lard? Oh well, they are all clockable in the end anyway.I wish we had an 'ugly' rating. Because that's one ugly customer, right down to the bone.
SSSSSHHHH! YOU'LL UNCOVER EARL'S GREATEST AGENT NULL K. FARMS!Null?![]()
I disagree to an extent. While some leeway is fine, in terms of gender roles, I think it's better to have a defined sense of what makes a man a man and a woman a woman. In a non-biological sense, that is. Having restrictions in regard to dress or behavior aren't a problem, per se. As, in my mind, it helps to make men and women unique, and even emphasize their better qualities. Like beauty, caregiving, industriousness, self-sacrifice, &c. If you remove those roles then you lessen one's reason to strive toward that ideal of womanhood or manhood. I understand that the obverse of that removal results in fewer negative consequences for failing to live up to that ideal, and that can be called a good thing. But that comes at the expense of whatever virtue is engendered through these roles. Thus, while it is unwise to restrict everything in a "male" or "female" box, it's not ideal to have things meld together, to where men and women are only unique individually, rather than as a gender.On a certain level? I think society here does have to live with the results of its choices, but I think we're generally better off with the least restrictive gender roles as possible.
Am I joking, half joking, serious or sarcastic? The world may never know.