Kevin Gibes / Kathryn Gibes / TransSalamander / RageTreb / The Green Salamander - "Am hole:" The epitomized Twitter MtF you thought was just a myth! Donate to his Transformers toy fund today!

Wedge Is Mad Part 12 (or 13/14? i've lost the count)
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-16-43 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-16-56 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-17-08 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-17-14 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Tweet | Archive
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-18-20 Tweets with replies by DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams ( HaileyAdam...png

Tweet | Archive
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-19-06 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-19-15 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-19-36 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Tweet | Archive
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-20-30 Tweets with replies by DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams ( HaileyAdam...png

Tweet | Archive
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-21-13 Tweets with replies by DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams ( HaileyAdam...png

Tweet | Archive
Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-22-03 Tweets with replies by DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams ( HaileyAdam...png

Screenshot 2021-07-18 at 20-23-14 DenFur 🦦 Harlequin Adams on Twitter.png

Tweet | Archive
 
Whatever truth exists in any of these identities, there is absolutely no reason why we must abide by them. The only reason they're even discussed is because there are people who don't want to live by the designations of male and female. And they want the rest of society to abide by that decision, regardless of how sound it is. And regardless of the consequences (whether toward normal men and women or even children).
It's actually kind of worse; people who are following a lot of these identities as things like feminism (not Feminism, which is part of the problem) spread to the cultures they come from have noted something interesting.

Third genders aren't a product of a liberal society. They're an 'out' that societies that make 1950s America look liberal provide to people who don't fit into the narrowly-defined gender roles they're offered--or who can't take them. One of the groups commonly left out is left out because they're literally women who are cross-dressing as men for survival--they're living in places where women aren't allowed to travel without a male relative's escort, or work outside the home...and, well, when you don't have a male relative left alive anymore...

As these societies become more...willing to let people not be wedged into these highly restrictive roles, and more okay with the whole idea some people aren't straight? The population of people identifying as these roles drops.

And, well, remember that Feminism and the trooncult have, on the whole, been pushing narrower concepts of what it is to be a man or a woman.

On a certain level? I think society here does have to live with the results of its choices, but I think we're generally better off with the least restrictive gender roles as possible.

After years of observing hippies in their own environment, I am qualified to say that it's a very parasitic community. Not 100% in the way the right thinks it is, but in its own way.

I have gotten to know some of them pretty damn well and there are some hippies who are the nicest, most genuine people you ever met, some of them are real dumb, some of them are not all there in the head, and some of them are complete sociopaths. Determining which is which is a real challenge to the point where I can't handle any of them any more.

And in addition to the 5 Geek Fallacies, the worst things you can do are be uptight, judge anyone, or have standards.

My roommate comes home with some homeless dude she met downtown who needed a place to stay and he's going to sleep on the couch?

Clearly I am the asshole for objecting to a strange man sleeping in my house.

Now you might be thinking, "Which of the four aforementioned hippie types was this one, Friend KiwiFuzz? Was she real genuine, real dumb, or real kooky? Surely we can rule out her being a completely remorseless assassin!"

To which I say that after several months of living with her, I concluded that she was one of the most soulless, calculating bitches I have ever met.

It wasn't any one thing in particular, it was just a pattern of shit like that where she was this free spirit going where the wind took her and the wind, more often than not, took her to a place where she did not give one single fuck about other people.

And part of what made her particularly malicious was a pattern of what one might call grooming or pushing the Overton window. I don't feel comfortable saying much more but she was really good at using her "free-spirited" sexuality as a weapon, and I don't mean just flirtatiousness, I mean she pulled multiple moves with men and woman where if she had been a 250-lb linebacker, other people would have seen it as sexual harassment at best and rape-adjacent at worst.

Troons and "queers" have the same vibe.

Like I wonder what kind of person is thick on social media with the tranchers and at what exact point in the getting-to-know-you process they'd realize "Oh shit, I am in a clown-themed rape dungeon and eight furries are about to do the locomotion." And if some of the people looking at this are additionally thinking, "And I shall make myself ringmaster."
"Free spirit going where the wind takes me!" is usually just a pretty layer of paint applied to "I do what I want, fuck everybody else!" In communities where it's not acceptable to do anything but smile and nod and accept the abuse like a good little doormat? You end up with with anybody with a spine who isn't a predator bailing on the entire community.

After all, the community has made it clear that if you're not there to be a predator? You will be subjected to a lynch mob for not being obediently passive prey. That's judging people and having standards, and how dare you suggest that maybe, for example, raping people is not okay?

I've never quite gotten to the point where the morbid curiosity was still around to ask them if they realize that is the kind of thing they are doing.

Sometimes I ask my non-hetero friends for help with the words and concepts like these. Makes me feel pretty justified in making fun of these Twitter weirdos when my friends who are experienced in this stuff have no idea what mspec or bisexual lesbian mean. Also, something something "golly, for people who hate labels they sure do invent a lot of new ones"
More importantly, 'mspec lesbian' is a lot of words to use to avoid admitting that what you are is heterosexual.

They're like Humpty Dumpty in Through the Looking Glass, when it comes to words having meaning.

On the topic of the new speak thing that was brought up. I think that Wedge really believes that by stretching the definitions of words that he can somehow change reality. Lesbians are women who are attracted to other women, but they can also exclusively love only people who were nataly born as women too. This twisting of definitions is what lead to the rise of super straight. People like Wedge love labels so much, but he can't stand when people use labels to state their preferences in a way that make him feel like he's excluded from some sort of secret club. Like the sex pest he is, he thinks he can worm his way in by playing around with words to find some sort of loophole, so they'll have to say "Oh well, I guess you got me there. Looks like I have no choice but to suck the girldick now because you used all those fancy words to tell me what I'm supposed to be attracted to".

Wedge, you have to get it through your thick skull that there are people out there that aren't attracted to you and never will be, no matter how you keep rewording things. Just leave them alone.
Wedge is basically the most prison gay of sexual options: Probably nobody is attracted to him, and most people never will be desperate enough to get laid to not go "...Masturbation it is!" instead.

Wedge is projecting like he is a projector.

Probably one at one of those amazingly sleezy small porno theaters, that plays stuff that is definitely haram and dubiously legal. We're talking dubiously legal in the "The actress in the 'gang rape' scene looks a lot younger than 18 and if she's acting that is Oscar-quality skills" sense, too.
 
Has Kevin even mentioned exercise lately? I remember the vile tweet about the treadmill making him "open up". is he too lazy to even do something that apparently helps the thing he constantly complains about? Or did he realise it never helped in the first place and he was being delusional as usual.

I'm surprise wedge wants a amhole though, especially after being so close to Kevin's but he seems narcissistic enough to think his will turn out perfect. I bet he goes for the colon option just cause he's extra gross
 
I wish we had an 'ugly' rating. Because that's one ugly customer, right down to the bone.
And he's barely anything but bone. Pro tip for troons,if you have the physique of an emaciated nerd who's never gone outside in his life, it makes it even easier for everyone around you to pick up on the obviously male bone structure. Maybe that's why so many others go the route of becoming tubs of lard? Oh well, they are all clockable in the end anyway.
 
On a certain level? I think society here does have to live with the results of its choices, but I think we're generally better off with the least restrictive gender roles as possible.
I disagree to an extent. While some leeway is fine, in terms of gender roles, I think it's better to have a defined sense of what makes a man a man and a woman a woman. In a non-biological sense, that is. Having restrictions in regard to dress or behavior aren't a problem, per se. As, in my mind, it helps to make men and women unique, and even emphasize their better qualities. Like beauty, caregiving, industriousness, self-sacrifice, &c. If you remove those roles then you lessen one's reason to strive toward that ideal of womanhood or manhood. I understand that the obverse of that removal results in fewer negative consequences for failing to live up to that ideal, and that can be called a good thing. But that comes at the expense of whatever virtue is engendered through these roles. Thus, while it is unwise to restrict everything in a "male" or "female" box, it's not ideal to have things meld together, to where men and women are only unique individually, rather than as a gender.
 
1626647787600.png


How can anybody be this fucking stupid? It's amazing to me. What, Wedge, you think everyone should just change how we all do everything.. to make things more ideal for you? lol, No..

Am I joking, half joking, serious or sarcastic? The world may never know.
 
Am I joking, half joking, serious or sarcastic? The world may never know.

I have a tiny bit of sympathy for this. I've made the claim before that sarcasm doesn't work on the Internet because it relies on "I know I am saying something so stupid nobody could believe it." And people will assume you're an idiot if you use sarcasm before they know you.

See Puddin'head Wilson.
 
Back