Artcow Michael John Kricfalusi / John Kricfalusi / John K. / John K. Stuff / Raymond Spum - scammer animator who pissed away his own career, salty blogger, CONFIRMED predator and child rapist

I was saying the tonal opposite of what you're implying. Maybe I was being shitty with my words, but I was saying that Im glad there's a website that exists like this. I can talk freely about shit that would have been deleted or reported on Facefuck or Instagramho.

I originally was told Kiwifarms was a haven of SJW PC libtards leftists who spouted Commie propaganda and believed in infinite genders and would anal rape those who didnt believe in that agenda .
I honestly thought the minute I defended John, my comment would be deleted or Id be thrown off.
What I was confused about was how a non SJW site would agree or even listen to all the BS from a company like Buzzfeed that's run by lesbian Feminists that hate men and want to take down the so called "cis gender white male patriarchy" (hell Robyn Byrds a Marxist mushroom eating lunatic who's pissed off at John because shes still in love wth the guy (who texts someone at 3am on valentine's day to say they miss you whule they're wih someone else?)
Mock whoever you want, I don't give a shit.
I came on here to defend my friend from being called a child rapist pedophile because hes not one and I think its beyond irresponsible to do that to a person innocent of that crime who has no police record.
Mock who u want, Its a free country.
Go after real pedos who break our laws, cake they've given up their rights at that point anyway.
I was just curious, but you answered my question.
Thanks



A ton of stuff is weird AF - and yes, without consent your breaking the law.
However drawings aren't real and stating that a drawing (no matter WTF is is) could ever be in the same league as a Flesh and blood human is absurd and dangerous.
Whos going to decide what drawings are underage child porn?
Betty Boop is an underage character, she 14 or 16 yet shes a sex symbol. Is that child porn?
Actual living children are exploited daily by monsters, and those kids are scared for life of theu survive. How is a drawing, even a drawing of a homeless dude jerking off on severed baby heads in a glue factory, which isnt real and that someone made up with pen and paper or computer graphics, or clay, whatever, the same as an innocent kid being exploited or killed?


John corresponded with a lot of his young fans whom he felt had talent, male and female and would send those fans animation books or art supplies and give note and tell them to come work at spumco when they were graduating high school or thinking about college. Most of those fans ended up working for Spumco or with John on projects later in life and had careers in the industry because of him.
This was and still is pretty common in the industry, Especially in makeup FX (when I worked at a makeup lab, lots of people there were high school or college age students working as interns (lots of cute chicks too) because they were easier to teach and willing to learn and the ones that went to expensive makeup colleges but had no on set experience, thought they knew everything, were annoying to work with, or would fuck up alot and cost the company $ and had to unlearn bad habits.
Hell, John taught master classes back in 2006/2007ish.
A joke on a 30 year old radio show proves what exactly? If its not a joke, think about how Betty Boop is an underage character too? So what? I dont see a connection.
john took advantage of robyn and katie’s parents stupidity to get access to them. and the course of both of them being with john, he took advantage of them, sexually, physically, and forced them to drink/do whatever drugs that were around and giving them the thought that if they did this, it could jumpstart their animation careers (which it didn’t, because john is now a talentless, jobless hack who blacklisted himself from major networks like nickelodeon). john gave them a job, but in reality, he just gave them a job to keep them around to please his sexual urges and have an underage sweatshop worker he doesn’t have to worry about paying. how retarded can you possibly be if you really think teenagers and children can just “come on to you.” john will never pay attention to you, nor give you a job.
 
If its a drawing, I see no difference cause its not real. Its a drawing. Who cares? And yeah, drawing porn is drawing porn and alot of cartoon characters are at least inspired by real people, so thers no logic here.
What is this porn you speak of?
Sody pop? Is Betty Boop Porn too, casue shes an underage character.

No, I brought it up because Sugar wanted HER WOC SJW show to be produced instead of Ren and Stumpy or Beavis and Butthead reboots and this was a feminist plot to take down male animators in the industry so women could make feminist propaganda toons about trans activism and how evil men are cuz Frozen wasnt a big enough castration of the American male.

Betty Boops age was on a sliding timeline. In some shorts, like Minnie the Moocher, she was portrayed as younger, or at least still young enough to live with her parents. But there are other shorts where she has her own house, apartment, is married with kids, etc. Her earliest appearance was as a dog-human hybrid working as a singer at a restaurant. i forget the name of the short, perhaps I'll edit it in later.

EDIT: It was Dizzy Dishes, from 1930:

Animated by Grim Natwick, no less.


The point being that she was not specifically meant to be underaged in everything she was in. John K CLEARLY STATED in the Howard Stern interview that Sody Pop was UNDERAGED. So to draw porn of her is to admit to drawing porn of an underaged character.

Also, while I will not fully defend Steven Universe, as it went to shit after the Cluster Arc, I don't think Sugar was trying to undermine American male, as you are claiming. If you have observed any of her other work, e.g. Pug Davis and the like, she has a penchant for writing emotional characters and moments that can occasionally have a tongue and cheek approach to them, and I believe she was brought onto develop certain episodes of Adventure Time because she was known for that style of story/character development. Whether or not you like it or agree with it is your opinion.

Not to mention the glaring fact that Ren and Stimpy already had a reboot, which I have seen referred to constantly as one of the worst cartoons of all time, period. Beavis and Butthead is also currently being rebooted, and I fail to see how that show lionizes the American male.

You honestly come off as very tinfoil-hatted, and that's coming from someone, like myself, who has a vast interest in stuff like MK-Ultra, and the illuminati.
 
Last edited:
so did anything new pop up about the sexdrugs shady medical joint or whatever it was?
 
Imagine being so weak, such a pussy, you feel emasculated by a Disney princess movie. Seriously, dude, if that happened, you didn't have any balls to begin with.
I genuinely think he said that because Jordan Peterson said the same thing - that it was feminist propaganda.

(As was pointed out, of course, it's funnier that he cites Beavis and Butthead as a celebration of the American male. Mike Judge never liked how people didn't get the point of his show.)
 
Imagine being so weak, such a pussy, you feel emasculated by a Disney princess movie. Seriously, dude, if that happened, you didn't have any balls to begin with.
From what I remember, there was only one guy in it that was considered an asshole. The blonde dude was pretty likable, if disinteresting.
 
In the 90s a 15 year old wasnt considered a child.
From a UK perspective, age of consent for heterosexual acts has being 16 since the Sexual Offences Act 1967 (21 for homosexual, but that's dropped throughout the years). Legally, you are classified as an adult at 18. In the USA, all states but Georgia and Hawaii had the age of consent at 16 or 18 from 1920 onwards.

Considered an adult at 15? Bullshit only a child molester or an apologist of one would argue.
 
John K to me is kinda like the anti Ralph Bakshi



The more I learn about Ralph, I just seem to love him even more and respect him

The more I learn about John, the more I see him as sad horny talentless hack who used his influence and power to bully other artists by either shitting on any cartoon that didn't appeal to his "standards" or actively trying to ruin the lives of people like Lynn Nalyor or Bob Camp.

Fuck John K. He's truly the worst person i've ever seen in animation. And all I can hope for is that Ren and Stimpy and all the actually talented people that worked on it continue to inspire generations of artists, while John K himself will be forgotten.


also, as a sidenote, I actually heard the Toy Story Films is his favorite film franchise. I highly doubt it.
 
also, as a sidenote, I actually heard the Toy Story Films is his favorite film franchise. I highly doubt it.
That's definitely untrue.

I wonder where the guy who said he had evidence Robyn and Katie are lying is. It's been a week, he ain't shown up... guess he was chicken!
 
Bitch, what the fuck does Buzzfeed have to do with this?

View attachment 2364152

If you can look at this and still defend that fucker, you're a literal retard, or a pedo yourself.

Also quit multiposting like a goddamn retard. I'm not reading all that fucking barf.
This photo sends chills down my spine every time I look at it, knowing Robyn’s story.
 
also, as a sidenote, I actually heard the Toy Story Films is his favorite film franchise. I highly doubt it.
If you're curious, I actually found that interview where he talked about the first Toy Story.


I am skeptical about it myself, but he did surprise me before by actually praising a Friz Freleng cartoon on his blog once. So who knows?
 
If you're curious, I actually found that interview where he talked about the first Toy Story.


I am skeptical about it myself, but he did surprise me before by actually praising a Friz Freleng cartoon on his blog once. So who knows?
Last lines of the interview:

"Any message to America's youth?"

"Uh, just to the girls."
 
If you're curious, I actually found that interview where he talked about the first Toy Story.


I am skeptical about it myself, but he did surprise me before by actually praising a Friz Freleng cartoon on his blog once. So who knows?
and of course he had to take shots at both Aladdin and the 90s Warner toons
 
If you're curious, I actually found that interview where he talked about the first Toy Story.


I am skeptical about it myself, but he did surprise me before by actually praising a Friz Freleng cartoon on his blog once. So who knows?
Is this dude really going to lecture people on plot?

It's not like he's necessarily wrong, but at the same time, when was Ren and Stimpy known for its complex and thoughtful narratives? The whole show was a visual showcase at it's heart.
 
John K to me is kinda like the anti Ralph Bakshi



The more I learn about Ralph, I just seem to love him even more and respect him

The more I learn about John, the more I see him as sad horny talentless hack who used his influence and power to bully other artists by either shitting on any cartoon that didn't appeal to his "standards" or actively trying to ruin the lives of people like Lynn Nalyor or Bob Camp.

Fuck John K. He's truly the worst person i've ever seen in animation. And all I can hope for is that Ren and Stimpy and all the actually talented people that worked on it continue to inspire generations of artists, while John K himself will be forgotten.


also, as a sidenote, I actually heard the Toy Story Films is his favorite film franchise. I highly doubt it.
Ultimately, John is a one-trick pony. I’ll admit he led the way with creator-driven cartoons, but since then, what? His style hasn’t evolved. He’s still stuck on the same characters and concepts he was in the 90s.
 
Ultimately, John is a one-trick pony. I’ll admit he led the way with creator-driven cartoons, but since then, what? His style hasn’t evolved. He’s still stuck on the same characters and concepts he was in the 90s.
The 30th anniversary of R&S is coming up in two weeks so probably there'll be more people talking about this, but I always thought John was trying to fight battles that had long since been won.

He wanted to break away from the network censors and bean counters and push the boundaries - and he and the R&S crew did, and what they did became the standard and was copied and tinkered with by other people. The guys who came after him like Genndy Tartakovsky and Craig McCracken were always taking what they learned and using it to do something new, and that's why they're still creating new shows today.

But John never did that. He never evolved past what he had done in 1991. It's hard to position yourself as a rule-breaker when people are operating under the rules you helped create.
 
Back