StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I always find it funny when speds start freaking out over everyone not shitting on intertnet tards they don't like enough
Polish_20210722_170604670.png
Heh yeah
 

This is a bot that randomly mashes two images together to form a low-effort meme. It doesn't even make sense nine times out of ten. Today, it used a Stonetoss comic as one of the images, and people get furious anyway.


1627070183842.png

Thankfully, some good samaritans were on the scene to laugh at them.


1627070207495.png 1627070227984.png 1627070325134.png
 
Tranny jew attempts to get Stonetoss and Ben Garrison in a gotcha

Fucking comment section man
View attachment 2376176View attachment 2376178
Her instagram
Stonetoss begins at 7 minutes

Just to be sure, I skimmed through the video. He does mention Stonetoss at around 4 minutes.

3:57 - This is when he mentions Stonetoss. He doesn't really say anything, though, and just explains how the comic depicts those who engaged in the capitol riots as actually attacking the establishment over the Antifa rioters who just destroyed random stores.

5:20 - Stonetoss apparently "completely 180'd" on what happened during the capitol riots. He won't bring Stonetoss up again until 7 minutes in, so I just skip to there.

7:10 - So Stonetoss completely going back on his belief is the depiction of the FBI instigating the capitol riots. The person in this video chooses to interpret this as the FBI personally composing the entirety of those who participated in the capitol riots. While this understanding of the comic does support the idea Stonetoss contradicted himself, it is also the dumbest understanding of the comic imaginable and falls apart to the gentlest of scrutiny.

7:30 - "This is completely incompatible with his original comic." This is the meat of his video's point and it's just wrong. A good analogy I can use is imagine Steve tells John that Mark stole John's wallet. John goes over and confronts Mark. Continuing this analogy, a fourth person depicts John as being brave for confronting Mark. It is not hypocrisy to blame Steve for instigating the encounter, nor does it contradict the positive depiction of John. If you struggle to comprehend this, your brain might not work. Looking back, Ben Garrison also depicts the FBI as instigators rather than participants, so there's no excuse for this guy misinterpreting this. He's either doing this intentionally or is genuinely stupid.

7:35 - I now realize that this idiotic interpretation is literally the entire foundation for his argument. He proceeds to act smug for failing to understand the comics for the rest of the video.

9:10 - "[Stonetoss and Ben Garrison] are people with terrible[...]critical thinking skills."

Final score:
1627165741148.png
out of 10, only made me mildly want to die. Good job, Rose Wrist.
 
Fucking comment section man
Captura.PNG
unnamed.jpg

Her instagram
There's a photo of them together talking about their relationship of 9 months "eventually be 9 years instead" uttered with the folly of youth.

I archived it just in case.

Don't think he is a tranny. Men have been painting their nails as rockstars and pickup artists for attention for decades.

IMG_20210725_003541.pngIMG_20210725_003557.png

Ps I promised some stats about gays a couple of pages back, but I never got around to it and doesn't look like I'll have the time soon. I have not forgotten, but I might not get around to it soon.
 
Last edited:
There's a photo of them together talking about their relationship of 9 months "eventually be 9 years instead" uttered with the folly of youth.

I archived it just in case.

Don't think he is a tranny. Men have been painting their nails as rockstars and pickup artists for attention for decades.

View attachment 2376831View attachment 2376832

Ps I promised some stats about gays a couple of pages back, but I never got around to it and doesn't look like I'll have the time soon. I have not forgotten, but I might not get around to it soon.
So the final verdict is that they're just the modern incarnation of scene kids, or theatre kids, or something. And that [girl] has a large forehead and jawline. I suppose I'd believe it.
 
Back