Corissa Enneking / fatgirlflow and Juliana "J" Aprileo / comfyfattravels - Delusional fat-acceptance lesbian couple, junk-food addicts with expensive taste, denied a mortgage due to excessive Doordash ordering

When will Juliana become bedbound? As of January 2022

  • Within 3 months

    Votes: 33 4.3%

  • Within 6 months

    Votes: 118 15.4%

  • Within a year

    Votes: 206 26.9%

  • Within 3 years

    Votes: 140 18.3%

  • Never

    Votes: 21 2.7%

  • Shes already there

    Votes: 247 32.3%
  • Total voters
    765
Tumbo said:
Just a thought I had the vast majority of morbidly obese women tend to be short obviously being short makes it easier for you to be classified by the BMI as overweight but aside from that do tall fat women simply not exist?
Click to expand...
I'm late to this, but just so you know, BMI takes height into account. There's no "being short makes it easier for you to be classified...as overweight". For some reason, this is a pretty common misconception, and several of the deathfats have suggested the same.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Pina Colada, The Lychee Queen, Sneaky khajiit and 9 others
GenociderSyo said:
View attachment 2363323
View attachment 2363324

You can see her fat popping out the sides of the "chair"
Click to expand...

I'm glad somebody cared enough to put that kiddo in a life vest, given that she's only now "getting stable enough" on that kayak. I'm still amazed at how high she's sitting, and it's all on a cushion of fat. It wouldn't take much to tip that cow over, and there's no way she could right herself or get back on the kayak if she tips.

She still can't hold the fucking paddle correctly, LOL.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Pina Colada, Atomic Age Animal, Tesshollidaysflupaknees and 7 others
Thomas Eugene Paris said:
I'm late to this, but just so you know, BMI takes height into account. There's no "being short makes it easier for you to be classified...as overweight". For some reason, this is a pretty common misconception, and several of the deathfats have suggested the same.
Click to expand...
I think they mean being short makes it easier to get fat because shorter means you burn fewer calories so eating ""normal"" portions is too much for someone who's short, and thus you're more likely to be overweight/obese despite eating ""normally""
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Holiday of no return, Oracle, Pina Colada and 12 others
Ol Dirty Fatso said:
I think they mean being short makes it easier to get fat because shorter means you burn fewer calories so eating ""normal"" portions is too much for someone who's short, and thus you're more likely to be overweight/obese despite eating ""normally""
Click to expand...
Being short or tall has nothing to do calorie burning capacity.

Ten extra pounds on a 5’1 body will show up a lot more than ten pounds on a 6’1 body.

I think people get confused because a 150 lb woman that’s 5’1 looks really chunky but a 5’10 woman who is 150 lb looks very slim. Your ideal weight is just directly tied to how tall you are, it’s proportional and why BMI requires height and weight.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Shiksa Siren, Tesshollidaysflupaknees, assforheroin and 13 others
MirnaMinkoff said:
Being short or tall has nothing to do calorie burning capacity.

Ten extra pounds on a 5’1 body will show up a lot more than ten pounds on a 6’1 body.

I think people get confused because a 150 lb woman that’s 5’1 looks really chunky but a 5’10 woman who is 150 lb looks very slim. Your ideal weight is just directly tied to how tall you are, it’s proportional and why BMI requires height and weight.
Click to expand...
What? Being short or tall 100% affects calorie burning capacity. A tall person has a naturally higher basal metabolic rate because larger person = more calories required to operate. All other things equal, a 5'0 woman absolutely cannot eat the same amount of maintenance calories as a 6'0 woman without gaining weight. The other stuff you said is correct.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Peace Or Love, janekop, Holiday of no return and 27 others
Missanthrope101 said:
What? Being short or tall 100% affects calorie burning capacity. A tall person has a naturally higher basal metabolic rate because larger person = more calories required to operate. All other things equal, a 5'0 woman absolutely cannot eat the same amount of maintenance calories as a 6'0 woman without gaining weight. The other stuff you said is correct.
Click to expand...
Yeah, a sedentary 30-year-old 5'0" woman with a BMI of 23.4 has a BMR of 1180 to 1315 (depending on the formula per Sailrabbit) while a sedentary 30-year-old 6'0" woman with a BMI of 23.4 has a BMR of 1600 to 1615. That's an entire extra sizable snack or smaller meal per day. It also seems that many shorter people still have large appetites or want to eat mindlessly, and that's where the complaining about portions and calories while being short comes into play. (And I really have no idea if short people are naturally supposed to have smaller stomachs, less desire to eat as much, more leptin production, etc., though I'd be curious to know that.)

And of course the above scenario changes if we're comparing a short woman and a tall woman not by BMI but by weight. However, a 6'0" woman who weighs 120 pounds (that's what a BMI of 23.4 is for a 5'0" woman) would have an anorexic BMI of 16.3 while 120 pounds is healthy and normal, sometimes even chubby if someone has a very small build, for a shorty.

🧩

Edit: Here's J from behind. She can only just slightly bend forward to roast a marshmallow, and I can still see the gunt hanging out in front.
Screen Shot 2021-07-22 at 12.12.06 PM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: •~•, janekop, fat vegan jesus and 40 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back