Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

[Peace and Harmony]

America is on fire, and only this consoomer summer movie will put out the flames.

 

[Water-T]

View attachment 2373954

You're not making videogames 'again' because you can't. No one will work for you and you have no idea how to animate, light, texture or program. As the media likes to say, 'and this is a good thing.'

I'm sure John's former employees that got fucked over by him made sure to warn everyone that Bri-bri will make them slave away, fire them, pay them only $1, then hog all the credit.

 

[King Dead]

I'm sure John's former employees that got fucked over by him made sure to warn everyone that Bri-bri will make them slave away, fire them, pay them only $1, then hog all the credit.

So I know we like to poke fun at the whole "John paid his slaves only $1" thing, but I decided to do some digging.

I'm pretty sure he mentioned this before this date, but the only time I found the contract story on his Twitter was as part of a chain reply to a now-deleted tweet back in 2017, so if he did tweet about it before, it was purged some time ago:


So the story, as John tells it, is that John's lawyer wrote up all the GSK employment contracts with the "$1 and other valuable consideration" line in place of the salary, implying that the rest of the salary was the "other valuable consideration." He says that this was done to protect them if they were ever sued (gee, I can't imagine why anyone would want to sue John).

Now, I'm not the most well-versed on contract law, but I did a brief search for the line. "$1 and other (good and) valuable consideration" is a fairly standard line in contracts from what I can see. However, pretty much all the references that I found involved things like real estate or vehicle sales, and it doesn't mean that the property changed hands for a buck. The actual purchase price is recorded on a separate document.

I did try out a couple online employment contract generators to see what sort of language is typically used in them. One didn't even mention the line at all, while the other had the line "IN CONSIDERATION of promises and other good and valuable consideration the parties agree to the following:" before the terms were laid out. It specifically listed the salary, however, nothing ambiguous about that. If someone's more knowledgeable about employment contracts and their language, I'd greatly appreciate any additional clarity.

So, what's the takeaway? Well, John and John's lawyer are both pieces of shit if they deliberately stuck that line in there and didn't actually specify their employees' salaries as some form of gotcha to get away with scamming GSK's employees. I don't buy the anti-lawsuit reasoning either. Again, IANAL, but I don't think that line would hold up in court if you really did just pay someone a buck and told them to hit the road after they built an entire game for you.

Alternatively, John found some random legal definition and fabricated another bizarre story in an Ambien-induced haze. Take your pick.

 

[Ghostse]

So I know we like to poke fun at the whole "John paid his slaves only $1" thing, but I decided to do some digging.

I'm pretty sure he mentioned this before this date, but the only time I found the contract story on his Twitter was as part of a chain reply to a now-deleted tweet back in 2017, so if he did tweet about it before, it was purged some time ago:
View attachment 2374741View attachment 2374742

So the story, as John tells it, is that John's lawyer wrote up all the GSK employment contracts with the "$1 and other valuable consideration" line in place of the salary, implying that the rest of the salary was the "other valuable consideration." He says that this was done to protect them if they were ever sued (gee, I can't imagine why anyone would want to sue John).

Now, I'm not the most well-versed on contract law, but I did a brief search for the line. "$1 and other (good and) valuable consideration" is a fairly standard line in contracts from what I can see. However, pretty much all the references that I found involved things like real estate or vehicle sales, and it doesn't mean that the property changed hands for a buck. The actual purchase price is recorded on a separate document.

I did try out a couple online employment contract generators to see what sort of language is typically used in them. One didn't even mention the line at all, while the other had the line "IN CONSIDERATION of promises and other good and valuable consideration the parties agree to the following:" before the terms were laid out. It specifically listed the salary, however, nothing ambiguous about that. If someone's more knowledgeable about employment contracts and their language, I'd greatly appreciate any additional clarity.

So, what's the takeaway? Well, John and John's lawyer are both pieces of shit if they deliberately stuck that line in there and didn't actually specify their employees' salaries as some form of gotcha to get away with scamming GSK's employees. I don't buy the anti-lawsuit reasoning either. Again, IANAL, but I don't think that line would hold up in court if you really did just pay someone a buck and told them to hit the road after they built an entire game for you.

Alternatively, John found some random legal definition and fabricated another bizarre story in an Ambien-induced haze. Take your pick.

John is a big enough shit heel heel I'll believe he asked his Lawyer about how he could minimize the ammount he pays to people who "don't hold up their of the agreement" or some shit, and then use it punish people he felt he needed to punished because they disagreed with him or just felt terrible and needed to be a dick to someone to feel better.

At the same time.... nigga your employment contract says $1 and we pinky swear we will pay more. If you got duped in with that.... man, you DESERVED to have John Flynnt steal your work.

Or maybe the "other valuable consideration" was a percentage from money made by Bratz in Space, and well... I don't think he's reached the point where its made enough to give everyone a dollar.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

America saved from the clutches of evil thanks to John sperging about summer action movies.

John rubbing his phantom dick to luxury cars means that America is utopia forever. Thank you John Walker Flynt.

 

[Water-T]

So I know we like to poke fun at the whole "John paid his slaves only $1" thing, but I decided to do some digging.

I'm pretty sure he mentioned this before this date, but the only time I found the contract story on his Twitter was as part of a chain reply to a now-deleted tweet back in 2017, so if he did tweet about it before, it was purged some time ago:
View attachment 2374741View attachment 2374742

So the story, as John tells it, is that John's lawyer wrote up all the GSK employment contracts with the "$1 and other valuable consideration" line in place of the salary, implying that the rest of the salary was the "other valuable consideration." He says that this was done to protect them if they were ever sued (gee, I can't imagine why anyone would want to sue John).

Now, I'm not the most well-versed on contract law, but I did a brief search for the line. "$1 and other (good and) valuable consideration" is a fairly standard line in contracts from what I can see. However, pretty much all the references that I found involved things like real estate or vehicle sales, and it doesn't mean that the property changed hands for a buck. The actual purchase price is recorded on a separate document.

I did try out a couple online employment contract generators to see what sort of language is typically used in them. One didn't even mention the line at all, while the other had the line "IN CONSIDERATION of promises and other good and valuable consideration the parties agree to the following:" before the terms were laid out. It specifically listed the salary, however, nothing ambiguous about that. If someone's more knowledgeable about employment contracts and their language, I'd greatly appreciate any additional clarity.

So, what's the takeaway? Well, John and John's lawyer are both pieces of shit if they deliberately stuck that line in there and didn't actually specify their employees' salaries as some form of gotcha to get away with scamming GSK's employees. I don't buy the anti-lawsuit reasoning either. Again, IANAL, but I don't think that line would hold up in court if you really did just pay someone a buck and told them to hit the road after they built an entire game for you.

Alternatively, John found some random legal definition and fabricated another bizarre story in an Ambien-induced haze. Take your pick.

IIRC, didn't one of John's former slaves go on Twitter and state that the second the "game" was done, John gave them all each a dollar and told them to fuck off? I know at least one of them flat out said that John worked them all to death, treated them like shit, and then took all of the credit despite doing jack shit himself.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Yes John, it should also be mandatory that able-bodied, working-aged men be required to hold a job, earn their keep, and give back to the country, or else be thrown in prison. It's time for us to act like adults.

 

[stupid moron]

Yes John, it should also be mandatory that able-bodied, working-aged men be required to hold a job, earn their keep, and give back to the country, or else be thrown in prison. It's time for us to act like adults.

View attachment 2375791

Don’t say that John, you would be required to act like an adult too! No more 80 hour video game weeks!

 

[King Dead]

Yes John, it should also be mandatory that able-bodied, working-aged men be required to hold a job, earn their keep, and give back to the country, or else be thrown in prison. It's time for us to act like adults.

View attachment 2375791

Not once will the Branch Covidians ever take a few seconds to think about their statements like these. If the vaccines were truly effective, then they'd have nothing to fear from the virus regardless of future spread. The only logical answer is that the vaccines don't actually work, at least not in the traditional sterilizing immunity sense, which is what Big Pharma has been saying all along if they would have been paying attention. It's a pretty shit vaccine if you can still catch the disease in question and then pass it on to others.

Party of Science, once again.

IIRC, didn't one of John's former slaves go on Twitter and state that the second the "game" was done, John gave them all each a dollar and told them to fuck off? I know at least one of them flat out said that John worked them all to death, treated them like shit, and then took all of the credit despite doing jack shit himself.

I only remember seeing these tweet screeds from Emma Clarkson complaining about her time working for John (had to go digging around in the wiki archives to track down some of these):




Talks about being overworked, John's shit management skills, and taking the credit for all his employees' hard work, but nothing about being paid only a buck, though there is the scummy "claim you fired someone when they left because the contract was up" thing. Unless there's proof that John literally got away with paying someone a dollar, I think it's a case of the farms taking a joke and running with it to the point we forgot it was a joke in the first place, just because it's believable that John would try to do such a thing.

Also her tweets are protected now, so no chance on asking for further info. To my knowledge, she's the only one of John's former devs that actually came forward publicly.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

I would say that it was actually @RepStephenLynch who took out the trash, except that taking out the trash requires (1) effort and (2) acknowledging that the trash exists.

 

[Ghostse]

I would say that it was actually @RepStephenLynch who took out the trash, except that taking out the trash requires (1) effort and (2) acknowledging that the trash exists.

View attachment 2376142
View attachment 2376143

You can't primary out the "trash dems" because after 2018 and Pelosi's heir apparent getting wrecked by a retarded bartender from the bronx, the DNC made it impossible for any sitting Dem to get primaried by black-balling for three years any political consultants who work with someone who primaries out a sitting Dem congress critter.
But all the voter suppression folks never scream about that for some reason.

I'm not saying the republicans are perfect or even all the much better, but the RNC ran with he populist candidate their members selected even if the upper levels clearly detested him.

 

[Norvic]

LOL

Oh Brianna. I don't think you're evil but, lets face it, you are deeply mentally unwell. Every single day you demonstrate you've got a serious inferiority complex brewing inside you. You consistently tell lies about who you are. You're a software engineer, you're an investigative reporter, you're a hotshot political fundraiser, you're an expert car mechanic. Yet the lightest investigation reveals you are none of these things. You're compelled to tell everyone around you how hard you're working every day, yet the results of your work are mediocre to say the least. Even if we didn't know you spend the majority of your days goofing off playing games, and you do, your "hard work" is no better than pounding sand.

What we know, and what you work so hard to conceal, is that you're a mid-40s house wife who has never achieved a single thing in life. You've never had a thing that wasn't paid for by someone else's sweat. You've failed at everything from college onwards. I hope people do read that about you, because the world would be a whole lot better if people like you were always exposed as the preening assholes they are.

ETA:

I wondered if there were anything funny that caused this lament, a quick google turned up nothing for that, but I did find this thing that Wu appeared in a couple of days ago:

I didn't watch the thing, but I did click through to see what the gist of the conversation was and I immediately landed on that timestamp I've started the video at. Speaking of Wu lying, that's my absolute favourite because the person who "went to my college and impersonated me to get my transcript and released those on reddit" was me! Only I didn't go to her college, I requested a degree verification online, I didn't get her transcript I just got verification that she'd never earned a degree, and I didn't release it on reddit, I did that here.

I treasure the absolute freakout Wu did when she was rumbled. Lets not forget that Wu had told everyone, including her husband, that she had a degree. Indeed, she was telling everyone online that she was a gradate student up until about 2012, and she may have even told Frank that's what she was doing. She keeps telling that lie about her transcript over and over, and she knows it's bullshit. Being so intimately involved with one of her lies definitely makes me sceptical about anything else she says about her gamergate era harrassment.

 

[Sonichu-choo trainwreck]

I treasure the absolute freakout Wu did when she was rumbled. Lets not forget that Wu had told everyone, including her husband, that she had a degree. Indeed, she was telling everyone online that she was a gradate student up until about 2012, and she may have even told Frank that's what she was doing.

(it's ben brought up before, but just in case you weren't aware of it)

She lied about Frank's credentials 5-6 months ago

Frank's not a lawyer, he's a patent AGENT

Patent Agent vs Patent Attorney | UpCounsel 2022

A patent agent is someone who has passed the Patent Bar through the US Patent and Trademark Office.

www.upcounsel.com

Patent Agent vs Patent Attorney ⚖ - Inventors 101: What You Need To Know

Unlike a patent attorney, a patent agent has not gone through the proper training to give legal advice. Understand what defines a patent attorney vs. a patent agent and follow this link to unlock your IP potential.

patentlawyer.io

Carr & Ferrell - What is the difference between a patent attorney and a patent agent?

the crappy part is, it's not just a aggrandizing lie for image sake, John said he hired frank to do contract review...which isn't within the scope of what a patent agent can do.

 

[fuckidunno]

Brianna's narrative really falls apart here.
Really it's Brianna that's created the mirror monster through her twitter antics.

I'm a Democrat and find Brianna to be a detriment to the party (as well as the country and the political process as a whole)
1) she radicalizes both left and right by doing exactly as she accuses...characterizing the opposition (calling them "enemies" no less) as monsters
2) her unreasonable and obvious fictions weaken the credibility of the party
3) she distracts from legitimate candidates and party projects thereby wasting resources

the above, among other things, can serve to alienate potential swing voters, undermining main (not primary) campaign effectiveness

I would like to remind everyone that her failure as a candidate was at the party primary level. She was never in the position of 'battling the right' - she was vainly (in both senses of the word) interfering with far far more qualified members of the left. Thankfully, the Democrat at large in that district could recognize it or, at least, not be swayed by Brianna's bullshit.

Norvic* described it aptly -- Brianna isn't some terrible monster She doesn't have that power. She's a ridiculous, dishonest person that, while not a major destructive force, is a negative and destructive actor that will sacrifice both personal and systemic integrity for personal aggrandizement -- in short, Brianna Wu is an asshole


*while I do not agree with impersonation techniques if they were used.

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

the crappy part is, it's not just a aggrandizing lie for image sake, John said he hired frank to do contract review...which isn't within the scope of what a patent agent can do.

View attachment 2377659

So Frank is practicing law without a license. And Idiot John is bragging about Frank's criminal activity.

In Massachusetts, Frank "shall be punished for a first offence by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, and for a subsequent offence by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than one year."

 

[Norvic]

*while I do not agree with impersonation techniques if they were used.

Just to be clear, nobody has ever impersonated Wu to get personal information. None of the information we have on Wu has ever been obtained by illegal or even morally dubious means. Wu just made that up for victim points. Everything we've ever learned about Wu has been from public domain sources, often shit she's posted herself.

In this case you can read what really happened starting in the old thread here. Then this is what Wu said happened:

The story has shifted a little since then as you can see.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

I disagree John, I think anti-vaxers should be sent to concentration camps to be worked to death. Think creatively here.

 

[fuckidunno]

Just to be clear, nobody has ever impersonated Wu to get personal information. None of the information we have on Wu has ever been obtained by illegal or even morally dubious means. Wu just made that up for victim points. Everything we've ever learned about Wu has been from public domain sources, often shit she's posted herself.

In this case you can read what really happened starting in the old thread here. Then this is what Wu said happened:

View attachment 2378043

The story has shifted a little since then as you can see.

fair enough, as long as there wasn't misrepresentation in obtaining the information

 

[Grand Fucktard]

John is a monster in the same way that little gremlin guy that's like a pet to Jabba the Hutt is : morally bankrupt,annoying, occasionally an inconvenience to the good guys trying to bring justice to the galaxy.

 

[White Devil]

John is a monster in the same way that little gremlin guy that's like a pet to Jabba the Hutt is : morally bankrupt,annoying, occasionally an inconvenience to the good guys trying to bring justice to the galaxy.

Salacious Crumb did nothing wrong and I resent that comparison to John Flynt.