Leslie Eclaire, I'm a person who will answer your questions - Richard Jones' fantastic failure of an AMA

I don't know if Isabel is really latinx. I'm not going to question it. The important thing is that even if it is a delusion, it seems to be real to her. I was willing to just leave the question aside. I'd like her to get help, not necessarily a group home, I've looked in to them and they are more like prisons, but maybe a very very patient commune that can mentor her in hygiene and social skills.

Why did you think it was a good idea to (a) make sexual advances towards students at the school you worked at and (b) post about it online?
I have never made sexual advances towards a student at any school I worked at.

But if it makes you feel any better I have decided to leave teaching anyway and start over.

Why the sudden change in attitude?
Someone convinced me over PMs that you're not so bad.
 
I don't know if Isabel is really latinx. I'm not going to question it. The important thing is that even if it is a delusion, it seems to be real to her. I was willing to just leave the question aside. I'd like her to get help, not necessarily a group home, I've looked in to them and they are more like prisons, but maybe a very very patient commune that can mentor her in hygiene and social skills.

So in your perfect world there'd be a haven where Hooves is coddled and tended to, at presumably no cost. I imagine you'd be taking a primo spot in the fanning or grapes divisions?
 
So in your perfect world there'd be a haven where Hooves is coddled and tended to, at presumably no cost. I imagine you'd be taking a primo spot in the fanning or grapes divisions?

She is not going to be functional in society no matter what she does. But she is still a child of God and there should be some sort of place where she can grow and live in some kind of dignity, certainly not the streets.
 
She is not going to be functional in society no matter what she does. But she is still a child of God and there should be some sort of place where she can grow and live in some kind of dignity, certainly not the streets.

Believe it or not, it is possible to respect the dignity of a person without allowing them to persist with poisonous and self-destructive delusions.
 
I was 19 at the time of the post. I was not a teacher. I had no intention of becoming a teacher. I was a college liberal who wanted to be a professional protester or something. I could buy her alcohol because the place we went to was crooked. They were also 18 or older.
 
I was angry, I confused you with SASS, which you don't seem to be. Also someone convinced me that you are not as bad as you present yourselves. You're not exactly the most politically correct sort but your mission is more to look at interesting people on the internet. I still don't like what you do, but I do want to show you that I am human, I am normal, well kinda normal, and that I do have a sense of humor.

As I said on your initial thread, there are a lot of different motivations for being on this forum. I'm only here because Phil is a horrible, unrepentant monster who has caused real damage to people, some of it I was personally present for. Snide insults are cathartic, but my main goal for being here is to keep the stories about him grounded in truth (because making shit up just casts doubt on all of the true tales of horror he has spawned) and to do what I can to make sure he's not hurting anyone... and maybe a sense of closure, eventually.

You haven't acknowledged my rather long winded and angry rant on your initial thread... So my question to you, then, would be "Do you understand why reflexive approval of everything he says is detrimental to Phil's well-being?"
 
She is not going to be functional in society no matter what she does. But she is still a child of God and there should be some sort of place where she can grow and live in some kind of dignity, certainly not the streets.

What about everyone else's dignity? Just having a loathsome creature like that around would pretty much chuck everyone else's quality of life down the shitter.
 
As I said on your initial thread, there are a lot of different motivations for being on this forum. I'm only here because Phil is a horrible, unrepentant monster who has caused real damage to people, some of it I was personally present for. Snide insults are cathartic, but my main goal for being here is to keep the stories about him grounded in truth (because making shit up just casts doubt on all of the true tales of horror he has spawned) and to do what I can to make sure he's not hurting anyone... and maybe a sense of closure, eventually.

You haven't acknowledged my rather long winded and angry rant on your initial thread... So my question to you, then, would be "Do you understand why reflexive approval of everything he says is detrimental to Phil's well-being?"

I am no longer friends with her. I felt that I was causing more harm then good. Also I am not equipped to deal with the fallout.

I do however feel that reflexive mockery of everything she does is detrimental to her taking the good advice.
 
I was angry, I confused you with SASS, which you don't seem to be. Also someone convinced me that you are not as bad as you present yourselves. You're not exactly the most politically correct sort but your mission is more to look at interesting people on the internet. I still don't like what you do, but I do want to show you that I am human, I am normal, well kinda normal, and that I do have a sense of humor.
Normal is hilariously subjective here. You be meeted, greeted, berated and perforated with questions. 'We' is also as equally subjective because while some of us are pretty easy going others are going to expect you to do more than try and suck up some sympathy votes.

Someone convinced me over PMs that you're not so bad.
So did you actually lurk or did you just jump into the lions den because they were sleeping?
 
Back