Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Roughly men have evolved to compete over and protect women, women evolved to survive birth and give the child best chance at driving. These different mating strategies give the two genders some different attributes and many times one or other turns to be the looser on average.
[...]
Individuals don't tend stand a chance to groups. Becoming as strong as ten men is achievement but finding twenty men is easy. It's fairly clear that most people are at their best when they are connected to multiple different people with mix all sorts of basic attributes young, old, sensitive, stoic, curious, steady, men and women.
Hell, the fact that humans even have built-in biological protections for non-reproducing females is evidence we straight-up evolved to do this. It's only humans and a handful of whales who experience menopause, and every last animal that has it also naturally lives in a "pod".
For orcas natural group size is ~40, for narwhals it's ~20, and for belugas even though they travel in groups of hundreds, within them there are "cliques" and tend to pair up with mates. For humans natural group size is ~150, with our "tribe" size sitting somewhere between 10 and 50.
All this to say that things like globalism and identity poltics are all attempts to trick a troupe species into being a herd species and it should be no surprise it doesn't work.
 
1627342782752.png


Did your country have a genocide in the past? That means you can never have a democratic election ever again.
 
View attachment 2382551

Did your country have a genocide in the past? That means you can never have a democratic election ever again.
actually it did. I still remember parts of my extended party disappearing as the communists...oh...oh, you mean fascists only? pffft nawww, happy democrats over here, yessirree! no way do we still have red nostalgia fuckheads here, that would repeat said genocide in a second under the guise of anti-fascism! nnnnnope!
 
This tweet makes no sense. What's "woke shit" about sacrificing yourself to save others? Both films arguably setup entire plotlines about how certain characters never seem to truly face death, they instead cheat it. Then the films force them into a no-win scenario where a sacrifice is required. Han sacrifices himself to save the others. (He also doesn't die.) Wrath of Khan twists this by having Spock realize and make the sacrifice. It fits entirely into the films themes about getting older and facing the death you cannot escape, not some strange nebulous "friendship." (That's Star Trek III you dope.)

Meanwhile, the recent Star Trek Into Darkness did briefly kill Kirk for stupid shit like that. The Kirk death scene was at the time, and still is, considered one of the worst parts even by the Blue Checks/similar that praised the shitty film to the heavens. Similarly, the classic character deaths in the new Star Wars films were trite and hackneyed.
The Harrison Ford example is weird since he doesn't die in the movie?

With the spock one. It's different like you said it fit with the theme of the movie about aging. If the movie was made today their would probably be a female lesbian Vulcan giving spock a pointless "the reason you suck speech" and before dieing he would tell her that she was right because female shit.

People are upsit in recent years not because our childhood heroes get killed off but because they have to be treated as shit, so a new woke character can take their place and be better
 
Last edited:
Back