Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Latest USA Today has a front page article on women in the Olympics. It speaks of "sexualized" outfits being changed to "unisex" ones, claims that focusing on sexuality is "overshadowing womens' humanity", and cites "gender studies" professors.

So I suppose focusing on a singer's voice "overshadows their humanity"? And they really don't like male sexuality, or that women are different from men, do they? This tripe is something that was only in feminist studies in academia before Current Year. Now it's in MSM.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Elim Garak, madethistocomment, Martys_not_smarty and 2 others
Alessonincrippliningdepre said:
We did it boys, rapes no more
Click to expand...
So how could ending rape culture involve losing a lot of friends? I mean, unless your friends are rapists. And in that case, aren't you basically just admitting you're a rapist, too? This has to be the creepiest male feminist thing I've ever seen.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cilleystring, UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore and 10 others
AnOminous said:
So how could ending rape culture involve losing a lot of friends? I mean, unless your friends are rapists. And in that case, aren't you basically just admitting you're a rapist, too? This has to be the creepiest male feminist thing I've ever seen.
Click to expand...
No, because "rape culture" doesn't mean "rapists." It means unrepentant heterosexuality, capitalism, conservatism, individuality, allowing white people to breed with other whites, etc etc.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Cilleystring, UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore and 12 others
6F131506-6EAF-448F-B36D-E430E21C3CC5.jpeg7027D2E7-A0E1-45B0-B91B-A69C1863A96D.jpeg6217A99A-54CF-4570-A618-6420FF0EDC78.jpegFD9CC1AB-943E-4250-A5DA-65E4448D6177.jpeg
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore and 4 others
albert chan said:
View attachment 2390755
I’m not sure that’s how that works Lil Nas X. You can’t play the “no u *spider-man points at you*” game with people who trying to understand why you think it’s cool to randomly get naked with other men in a prison music video, but then try to conflate it with people having an issue with gay, naked black men.

View attachment 2390761
Click to expand...
It's crazy that Tariq Nasheed was right, the media does feminize men and hate masculinity.

Just sad that he has to put that in a coating of race. It's clearly not just black men. But still, Nasheed isn't wrong.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore, Elim Garak and 11 others
ToroidalBoat said:
Latest USA Today has a front page article on women in the Olympics. It speaks of "sexualized" outfits being changed to "unisex" ones, claims that focusing on sexuality is "overshadowing womens' humanity", and cites "gender studies" professors.
Click to expand...

I hope these gender studies academics can help women athletes find sponsors.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore, Elim Garak and 5 others
Alessonincrippliningdepre said:
View attachment 2391287
Gaming gateView attachment 2391288
Click to expand...
Meanwhile, this was posted to Kotaku In Action, the GamerGate reddit, reminding us that he knew about the allegations against the NeoGAF founder for a long time but refused to do anything because the wrong type of people were talking about it.

1627637047636.png

1627637080569.png




Edit:

1627639745564.png

According to his own timeline, Jason knew about Blizzard being a rape den of disgusting white male heterosexuality when he posted the above. 3 years ago.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: AveraDiane, UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore and 7 others
ToroidalBoat said:
Latest USA Today has a front page article on women in the Olympics. It speaks of "sexualized" outfits being changed to "unisex" ones, claims that focusing on sexuality is "overshadowing womens' humanity", and cites "gender studies" professors.

So I suppose focusing on a singer's voice "overshadows their humanity"? And they really don't like male sexuality, or that women are different from men, do they? This tripe is something that was only in feminist studies in academia before Current Year. Now it's in MSM.
Click to expand...

A singer's voice is what you're supposed to focus on. It's what makes them singers. It's not unreasonable to argue that for athletes the focus should be on their athletic ability.

I like looking at nice butts as much as the next guy, but it IS pretty fucking weird to have a rule that basically says 'if you want to compete in this sport, you gotta show at least this much of your ass , and we'll be checking with a ruler'. It's not like wearing shorts would give beach volleyballers a competitive advantage or anything else to do with the athletic aspect of it. The rules are really just making them compete in small bikini bottoms so spectators can get a better look at their asses.

That makes about as much sense as making female singers perform in their bras so they can...uh...breathe properly or something.

Let's thank the horny bastards who came up with that rule for their service and the views it provided, but the female athletes who object to it have a point.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: wedgehog, The Sacred Chao, UnsufficentBoobage and 9 others
Tridgeridoo said:
'if you want to compete in this sport, you gotta show at least this much of your ass , and we'll be checking with a ruler'
Click to expand...

wat really

I don't think focusing on sexuality is "dehumanizing", but there can be times where it's best not to.

(haven't really watched olympics and I'm used to woke seeing problems where none exist)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak and NoReturn
ToroidalBoat said:
wat really

I don't think focusing on sexuality is "dehumanizing", but there can be times where it's best not to.

(haven't really watched olympics and I'm used to woke seeing problems where none exist)
Click to expand...

From the rule book for beach volleyball: “female athletes must wear bikini bottoms… with a close fit and cut on an upward angle toward the top of the leg. The side width must be of a maximum of 10 centimeters.”

Meanwhile men can just wear baggy shorts.

I mean it's obviously just an eye-candy rule, and you don't need to be a gender studies nutjob to see that. In this case it actually is a double standard, and I'm surprised to see that it has stood for so long. I believe in being intellectually consistent, and if they're not making the men wear speedos, it seems pretty difficult to defend a rule like that. I can respect a woman who just wants to compete in a sport without being forced to put her ass on display, especially when there's no good reason for it that has anything to do with the sport.

If a team takes the stance that they're serious athletes and that it shouldn't be a requirement to wear sexy clothes to compete, then yeah, they have a point.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: wedgehog, The Sacred Chao, UnsufficentBoobage and 14 others
I don't think the volleyball shorts about titillation. I think it's a benefit but the real reason is mainly that rigid overly specific rules about clothes in sports avoid alot drama and fuckery on long run. Some clothes in some sports give competive edge or can be used cover cheating. To avoid fights if this or that falls under something nefarious all serious spots have rules that give very straightforward explanation of what is allowed and that nothing else is. It's honestly simpler that way than general principles that allow highly compative and driven people to argue on and on about if those pants are being used to confuse the opponent or whatever. I think the skimpy bikini bottom was just in fasion at time of when the rules were written and so became the choice of pants for ladies in a beach sport. I wouldn't be surprised if the ladies of the time fought to have sexy clothes rather having comform to purity standards.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Sacred Chao, UnsufficentBoobage, Elim Garak and 7 others
Amber the Hedgehog said:
Some clothes in some sports give competive edge or can be used cover cheating.
Click to expand...

What if they went back to the original Greek Olympics style: no clothes?

:thinking:

(the reaction by everyone around the world - woke or not - could be entertaining)

(also it was men only in the original games)
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Sacred Chao, UnsufficentBoobage, LurkNoMore and 10 others
While I think some good points were made about the future economic viability of volleyball and why the rule even exists in the first place, I think everybody is just going to have to take the L on this one. This rule is objectively shit and doesn't withstand any social norms we have nowadays.

I kinda wonder why we even had to come to this. I imagine there are people who get paid to go over those rules at least every year. Thats the last 10 years at least where someone could have noticed: "This rule will get us trouble at some point, we should talk about it before it happens". At the very least at the point in [current_year] where a team actually gets financially punished for this rule it should have clicked and a emergency-meeting to not have them pay should have been arranged.

Although I could also imagine that they did notice and just let it run through because I sure as shit forgot volleyball even existed until I heard about this. Its PR for the sport and gets it some renewed attention for a while.

Men watch sports. 70-80% of sport viewership comes from men iirc. If men are actually noticably less interested in volleyball because of pants instead of bikini-bottoms, volleyball as an industry will feel it. Assuming the rule will get changed and most female teams will switch to less revealing, I'd be very interested to see in a few years if the viewer-numbers have changed.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Elim Garak, NoReturn and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back