[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember hearing a story a few years back about three girls being charged for coercing an autistic boy into having sex with his dog, so Kelly's fucked unless she miraculously gets acquitted.

I remember that case. I don’t remember how much time those girls got, but they both were charged with felonies among other things. One of the teens was charged as an adult, so she ended up being charged with soliciting child pornography because she filmed the autistic boy being sexual with animals.

So Kelly could be in trouble, if they decide to pursue any charged against her.
 
Someone wanted to directly call the school.
"Someone" stated a hypothetical, that one was unfunny and shat on immediately. You even highlighted the litany of dumbs and autistics they received for phrasing it in such a way. Again, it isn't a valid threat, it would not work and should not be humored.
This post:
In my personal view, it was wrong of Kelly Osborn of Texas Tech in Lubbock (a coder / cryptography major) to post this message on this forum:


It was extremely disparaging towards people of Jewish descent (antisemitic Nazi Kelly Osborn Texas Tech said "kike",) transfolk (transphobic Kelly Osborn Texas Tech said "tranny",) People of Color aka Black people (racist Kelly Osborn Texas Tech said "nigger",) and jointly lesbians and disabled people (homophobic ableist Kelly Osborn Texas Tech said "dyke" "tard")
is the one that I'm describing. It received a positive response, because it was more ambiguous and likely to make Kelly realize how dumb she was being. Perfect schadenfreude.

Edit:
I am not concerned about it, whatever happens, she deserves it. But Its frustrating when people declare KF doesn't have weens and get uber defensive when posts in the thread are saying to call the school.
Direct me to your favorite forum of choice. I can make a sockpuppet, post some stupid shit about flat earth, and declare that the website has a "sizeable flat earth population" while collecting almost all the actual userbase's dumb and LOL rating equivalents. Weens are mocked and banned. It's silly to pretend otherwise, you yourself shared more proof of that.
 
Someone wanted to directly call the school.

Like I said, the conversation was very early in the thread, which you neglected to go back and look at.
Directly calling their school to try and ruin their lives is fucking autistic and Reddit/K-pop shit. I understand that they're boosted faggots but there's a difference between making fun of them and embarrassing two 19-20yos and getting them kicked from a good university. I sincerely hope no sweaty redditor calls their school to report them for being racist and poking a 39yo autistic man (I say poking because we do not know their actual influence yet, because at this moment I personally believe Chris just willingly gave them the info and Kelly wanted to milk it for lulz. But who knows, they coulda had influence.)
 
I am not concerned about it, whatever happens, she deserves it. But Its frustrating when people declare KF doesn't have weens and get uber defensive when posts in the thread are saying to call the school.
I agree tbh, but keep in mind a lot of people posting right now are newfags and Redditors who just want to see epic lulz for the win bro, so that explains the surge in ween warcries.
 
I remember that case. I don’t remember how much time those girls got, but they both were charged with felonies among other things. One of the teens was charged as an adult, so she ended uo being charged with soliciting child pornography because she filmed the autistic boy being sexual with animals.

So Kelly could be in trouble, if they decide to pursue any charged against her.
i feel like the police are gonna start getting a bunch of annoying calls about kelly, which will get their eyes on her quickly. there’s most likely very little chance she can wriggle her way out of this unscathed in my opinion
 
Technically this is incorrect. Knowledge of a crime and not reporting it falls under obstruction.
Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, that person must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but that person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a connection between the endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the person must have knowledge of this connection.
So no, absolutely not obstruction.

As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
 
So no, absolutely not obstruction.

As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
Fair enough - my error then. My understanding was her being aware of the fact the crime was ongoing would qualify. Thank you for explaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Easterling
So no, absolutely not obstruction.

As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
i mean it’s been proven that chris is extremely malleable and easy to manipulate. i don’t know how that would hold in a court of law but i could definitely see it at least being brought up
 
  • Agree
Reactions: nekrataal and BSV
BlueSpike was just fortunate to be from a time in internet history when most people did not have huge internet footprints via social media profiles with their real name and pictures, and doxing was more difficult. We all did stupid things and had poor opsec as 13-year-olds. If he were to do that today, even if it were still considered good content like back then, we would be digging up his weeb sensibilities or furry porn collection or whatever.
100%

Thats the thing though, there's times where trolling is appropriate, times where it isn't. Theres also different historical periods where you can get away with certain things, and periods where you can't. Consider crank calling. Most people, sans boomers, have user ID now. You can trace calls, and voice boards are pretty well known now. When it comes to crank calling someone, you could likely do it in the 2000s, but its much more difficult now.

Its the same thing with internet footprints and social media now. There was a time in the 2000s when the internet was a lot more free, people had a lot less of an online footprint, and the trolling seemed more funny and there was much less risk that there would be any blowback. Convince CwC to dress up like Mr.Popo? Yeah, thats funny enough, and noone cares that you did that really, and it'd be hard to trace it back to yourself in real life.

Try and do some gayops involving incest porn for points on your subreddit, however, and you can see where thats going to come back to bite you on the arse, especially in 2021.

People should have stopped trolling or interacting with CwC other than maybe nostalgic art commissions well after the 2010s. Both based on the fact that there are some ethnical questions that go with trolling someone who really isn't all there mentally when the piñata has already been beat enough (whether trolling him in the 2010s was justified or not), and the fact that tracing things is more easy now than it was before, especially with social media.
 
i feel like the police are gonna start getting a bunch of annoying calls about kelly, which will get their eyes on her quickly. there’s most likely very little chance she can wriggle her way out of this unscathed in my opinion
Law enforcement is much less likely to take Kelly seriously than people think. Its incredibly hard to prove internet crimes especially in the age of IP spoofing and throw away accounts. All she has to say is that she never met CWC and it quickly becomes KF word against hers. Unless Null decides to start handing data from the farms to police it would be hard to do anything.
 
Law enforcement is much less likely to take Kelly seriously than people think. Its incredibly hard to prove internet crimes especially in the age of IP spoofing and throw away accounts. All she has to say is that she never met CWC and it quickly becomes KF word against hers. Unless Null decides to start handing data from the farms to police it would be hard to do anything.
Keep in mind CWC and her communicated on mobile phones, not just online.
 
Law enforcement is much less likely to take Kelly seriously than people think. Its incredibly hard to prove internet crimes especially in the age of IP spoofing and throw away accounts. All she has to say is that she never met CWC and it quickly becomes KF word against hers. Unless Null decides to start handing data from the farms to police it would be hard to do anything.
the only reason i think they’ll look into her is because i know a bunch of 12 year olds are gonna spam their phone lines thinking they’re giving the cops the “exclusive scoop” on shit they’ve probably heard dozens of times at that point. they’ll look into her to shut people up.
 
As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
Thank you for saying this.

Even if Kelly and Luis did somehow convince Chris that Sonichu would fucking die if he didn't rape his mom, there was no REAL threat of violence. I don't understand how a 19yo girl in Texas could make a 39 year old man-thing feel so scared that he had to willingly discuss raping his mother and buying a book about having sex with the disabled, as well as swooning to Null about having a girlfriend.
When he was under duress from the Idea Guys, it was sorta obvious in hind sight that he didn't want to do any of the shit they had him doing. Chris isn't that good at pretending to like things he doesn't like. The concept of Chris wanting to rape his mom outweighs the possibility that Kelly and Luis coerced him.

Also, the timeline that Grant gave us says that it was leaked pretty soon after it was given to them. I don't think them bringing this to light, even if it wasn't directly to law enforcement can be seen as them obstructing or hiding- but I'm not a law-knower.
 
As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
You are an armchair lawyer because you watch Nicky Rackets but I can assure you that you have little to no clue what you are spewing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back