Chris has been arrested

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
stakenifes said:
He probz knows more than he goes into on his show, but he's too much of a pussy to give his opinion on anything that could even be mildly controversial. Def made it a point not to mention the kiwis because it could be looked at as him approving the forum in some way (ie. they exposed the bad dude)
Click to expand...
I always find that shit funny. Dude you are talking about some white trash hick fucking his mom and he's in jail and somehow, being on Kiwi Farms is the shameful part. Cowards like this should just kill themselves.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: stakenifes and Pocket Dragoon
It kinda makes me speculate that Chris Duckworth and Siana Duckworth are now trembling in terror that this being that they trolled with was not just a harmless retard in any neighborhood.

Just when you realize that what you have been doing for the span of several months some years ago was something dangerous enough to kill you.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HexBawxUno and TrippinKahlua
Rakoon said:
Aren't you able to just use "Chris" as a gender-neutral name for both "Christian" and "Christine"? I feel like it's possible but the journos are pushing for the sole purpose of emphasizing that whole trans BS.
Click to expand...
"Chris Chan" is the name he's commonly known by; "Christine Weston Chandler," for better or worse, is his legal name. In a news article, it's not conventional to refer to an adult by their first name alone, and certainly not by a diminutive of their first name alone. (Imagine if Newsweek's news coverage of Joe Biden referred to him only as "Joey" in the article text -- I'm sure you'd recognize that as unusual.) When discussing people accused or convicted of crimes, there are also legal incentives to favor using the person's legal name in its entirety, plus other identifying info like age and place of residence.
 
Andrew Neiman said:
"Chris Chan" is the name he's commonly known by; "Christine Weston Chandler," for better or worse, is his legal name. In a news article, it's not conventional to refer to an adult by their first name alone. When discussing people accused or convicted of crimes, there are also legal incentives to favor using the person's legal name in its entirety, plus other identifying info like age and place of residence.
Click to expand...
You get to be known by all three names when you commit a heinous enough act. Think John Wilkes Booth. James Earl Ray. That kind of dude. If you kill some president nobody even remembers you just get an initial, like Charles J. Guiteau.

Now Chris hasn't actually killed anyone, but his spectacular act of motherfuckery guarantees he will be remembered as Christian Weston Chandler. He has earned his middle name.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus, Day Of The Sword, Pocket Dragoon and 1 other person
AnOminous said:
You get to be known by all three names when you commit a heinous enough act. Think John Wilkes Booth. James Earl Ray. That kind of dude. If you kill some president nobody even remembers you just get an initial, like Charles J. Guiteau.

Now Chris hasn't actually killed anyone, but his spectacular act of motherfuckery guarantees he will be remembered as Christian Weston Chandler. He has earned his middle name.
Click to expand...
The news writing convention of using full names when identifying crime suspects is part of the reason people like Lee Harvey Oswald are known by all three names. By saying, "Lee Harvey Oswald, 24, of Dallas is accused of shooting the president," rather than, "Lee Oswald of Dallas is accused of shooting the president," you protect yourself against a libel suit by 40-year-old Lee James Oswald of Dallas who was fired because his boss thought he was the crime suspect the article was referring to.

Obviously, this probably wouldn't have happened in that particular case, but you see the principle.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Informative
Reactions: Day Of The Sword, weens4sleep, Hellion and 4 others
May Prince said:
It kinda makes me speculate that Chris Duckworth and Siana Duckworth are now trembling in terror that this being that they trolled with was not just a harmless retard in any neighborhood.

Just when you realize that what you have been doing for the span of several months some years ago was something dangerous enough to kill you.
Click to expand...

@The Dude has claimed to be personal friends of the Duckworth’s.

Last I heard though, they broke up.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus and Alex Krycek
Andrew Neiman said:
I don't really fault the journalists
Click to expand...
You should always fault the journalists. They're incompetent at best and malicious at worst.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole said:
Sick to death of people sperging out about newspapers calling Chris Chan, Chris Chan.
Click to expand...
Why? This is absolutely trivial information to find. Type "chris chan's real name" into Google or Bing (lol) and his correct, full legal name is literally the first fucking result on both. Hell, it's still mentioned in the first result when you just search for "chris chan" ferchrissake. This is grade school-level "research." A fifth grader today would get docked a few points for not doing this token bit of investigation when writing a report about "Chris Chan."

Adults who want to insist that "journalist" is a legitimate profession and hold themselves up as competent examples should have been able (and willing) to do this. It's the first thing they should have done before they started banging out their garbage articles. It takes 5 seconds. They deserve vicious mockery for not doing it.

ch4ngethech4nnel said:
To be fair to the retarded journos, Chris is a subject that takes months, if not years, to properly research every major detail and write a proper article.
Click to expand...
You don't need to be writing an in-depth article to google his name.
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: Giovanni, Ἡλιος, Pocket Dragoon and 3 others
Andrew Neiman said:
By saying, "Lee Harvey Oswald, 24, of Dallas is accused of shooting the president," rather than, "Lee Oswald of Dallas is accused of shooting the president," you protect yourself against a libel suit by 40-year-old Lee James Oswald of Dallas who was fired because his boss thought he was the crime suspect the article was referring to.
Click to expand...
John Hinckley, Jr. just got a junior though, and he shot Ronald Wilson Reagan, who was really popular. Nobody even remembers his middle name is "Warnock." Or maybe that's just a really stupid middle name and nobody even wants to say it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
Desparagus said:
I can't wait for the trial when Chris announces Phoenix Wright is defending him and just holds up his DS in court.
Click to expand...
Bro I would honestly want to see Chris represent himself instead and not have a lawyer. Hearing him reason his way through fucking his mother to enact a interdimensional merge to a judge would be hilarious.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Grog, Cosmic_Schizo, TiggerNits and 2 others
BananaHammock69 said:
Oh, shit, really? That's amazing.
Click to expand...
If Bob had never met Barb his life would have been so much better. I think he still would have been remembered for his own merits, at the very least in certain engineering circles. Now he is remembered first and foremost as Christian Weston Chandler's dad, and that's a damn shame
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Parthenos, white label and 39 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back