Culture Americans’ Most Popular Sexual Fantasies May Surprise You

Link (Archive)

Americans’ Most Popular Sexual Fantasies May Surprise You​

Few fantasize about their regular partners. Many dream of unconventional sex.

KEY POINTS
  • Many people feel guilt and shame about their sexual fantasies.
  • But sexual fantasies are universal, normal, and harmless—even if they depict activities you'd never do in real life.
  • The three most common sexual fantasies involve: multiple partners, BDSM, and novelty and adventure.
Erotic fantasies often provoke feelings of guilt, shame, and self-loathing. That’s hardly surprising. Many people grow up harangued by religious leaders and self-styled guardians of morality who teach that among the many sexualpossibilities, only a small fraction are acceptable—sex that’s adult, married, heterosexual, monogamous, for procreation, in wedlock, and with partners the same race/ethnicity and close in age. When people from such backgrounds fantasize about anything else, many fearsomething must be wrong with them.

In addition, 120 years ago, Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, said, “Happy people don’t fantasize, just the unhappy.” And today, some psychologists look askance at “paraphilias,” any sex—or fantasies about any sex—that’s unconventional.

Actually, a substantial amount of research literature shows that sexual fantasies, whatever they may involve, are normal.

Americans’ Sexual Fantasies: The Largest Study Ever

Americans’ Sexual Fantasies: The Largest Study Ever​

Justin J. Lemiller, Ph.D., is on staff at Indiana University’s Kinsey Institute, a major center of sex research. For his book, Tell Me What You Want, he conducted the largest survey ever of sexual fantasies.

Using social media, Lehmiller recruited a reasonably representative sample of 4,175 Americans—age range 18 to 87, from all 50 states, all incomes, races, political, and religious affiliations, and sexual and gender identities, who were involved in all imaginable relationships: single, dating, cohabitating, married, swingers, and polyamorous.

The Seven Top Fantasies

Lehmiller discovered that Americans’ top erotic reveries fall into seven broad categories—three very popular, and four less so but still quite prevalent. The top three included:

  • Multiple partners. This is Americans’ top erotic daydream. Almost everyone reported having it—87 percent of the women, 95 percent of the men. The top multi-partner fantasy involved threesomes, with moresomes not far behind. Many people fantasized of many men and women playing together (swinging, orgies), while others focused on one person having sex with many others (gangbangs).
  • Bondage, discipline, and sado-masochism (BDSM). No wonder the BDSM romance trilogy, Fifty Shades of Grey, has become the most popular fiction of all time. Almost everyone in Lehmiller’s survey reported BDSM daydreams—96 percent of the women, 93 percent of the men. More than three-quarters reported bondage fantasies—being tied up or restraining another. One-third reported frequent bondage fantasies. Half fantasized about discipline, i.e, erotic domination or submission (D/s), with 20 percent saying they had D/s fantasies often. More people fantasized about submission than domination. More than half of Lehmiller’s sample fantasized about receiving or administering intense sensation, the BDSM term for consensual pain, with most preferring to receive it. Fantasies of being forced into sex were also very popular—reported by almost two-thirds of the women and half the men.
  • Sexual novelty and adventure. Top sexual novelty fantasies involved oral and anal play, particularly among those who rarely or never experienced them in real life. Sixty percent said they dreamed of giving or receiving fellatio or cunnilingus. More than one-third of men fantasized insertive anal intercourse, with 20 percent of both men and women reporting fantasies of receptive anal. And more than half of study participants fantasized about sex in unconventional settings: in public, particularly on beaches and at work, in bars, elevators, hot tubs, parks, and forests.
The following four fantasies were somewhat less popular but still quite prevalent:

  • Taboo/forbidden sex. These fantasies involved voyeurism, exhibitionism, fetishes, and incest. Voyeurism, watching people have sex without their knowledge, was the most prevalent, reported by 60 percent of study participants. Almost half of Lehmiller’s sample (45 percent) reported fetish fantasies, the sexualizing of nonsexual things, notably feet and women’s underwear. And almost half (42 percent) enjoyed reveries of exhibitionism, putting on a sexual show, for example, in cars with people watching.
  • Non-monogamy, partner sharing. These fantasies involve consensual non-monogamy: mate swapping, watching one’s partner with someone else, and polyamory, emotional as well as sexual relationships with more than one partner. More than two-thirds of Lehmiller’s participants reported such fantasies at least occasionally.
  • Passion and romance. Most sexual fantasies involve unrestrained sexual exuberance, but these focus on loving and feeling loved. Passion/romance fantasies tended to be tied to particular individuals, though often not the fantasizer’s regular partner, but former, distant, or deceased partners. More than half of study participants reported these fantasies.
  • Flexibility, homoeroticism, gender-bending.These reveries replaced heterosexuality with every other possibility: lesbian/gay/bisexualliaisons, sex with transgendered individuals, or becoming transgendered. Flexibility fantasies were much more common among women (59 percent) than among men (26 percent).

What Do Sexual Fantasies Mean?​

Many people who feel fine about their financial circumstances daydream of winning the lottery. Why not? It’s fun to fantasize about what you’d do if suddenly released from all financial constraints. It doesn’t mean you hate your life.

Similarly, almost everyone daydreams of being released from all sexual constraints. For those who feel generally fine about their relationships and sex lives, sexual fantasies allow expanded horizons. And for those who have serious complaints about their sex lives—no sex, too little sex, or boring sex—fantasies can, to some extent, substitute for what’s missing.

But many people fear their fantasies signal immorality, perversion, or mental illness. Here it’s vital to distinguish between sexual thoughts and actions. Some sexual actions are illegal, but all sexual thoughts—even if they’re disturbing—are normal, healthy, and fine. Your fantasies are no reflection on your morality, mental health, or ability to maintain loving relationships. Sexual fantasies simply exercise the erotic imagination—with all constraints removed.

“Am I Normal?”​

Over the past four decades, I’ve answered more than 12,000 sex questions. Many people ask if they’re sexually normal. Now, “normal” has two meanings—prevalent and healthy. Sexual fantasies are both.

As Lehmiller’s study shows, even wild erotic reveries are very common. In fact, fantasies about multi-partner play, BDSM, and sexual adventure are so normal, i.e. common, one might argue that it’s “abnormal.” i.e. uncommon, not to have them.


In addition, no matter what their content, sexual fantasies are normal, i.e healthy and sex-enhancing. Solo or partnered, sexual pleasure depends on deep relaxation, which opens (dilates) the arteries in the central body, ushering extra blood into the genitals. This extra blood produces penile and clitoral erection, vaginal self-lubrication, sensitivity to erotic touch, and pleasure. But those who fear or revile sexual fantasies don’t relax. Instead of dilating, their arteries constrict, which reduces blood to the genitals and impairs sexual function and pleasure.

If you want to be all you can be sexually, fantasize more often and more vividly. Instead of feeling guilt, shame, and self-loathing, understand that everyone has sexual fantasies, that many are wild and beyond anything people would do in real life, and that whatever your fantasies, they’re normal, healthy, and fine.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: JosephStalin
How much you wanna bet that the "taboo" category and "passionate" are just euphemisms for "getting raped being surprised with sex you needed but didn't know you wanted. by a hot guy"?
I fixed it for accuracy. Women don't like rape, but when the hot, handyman/secret billionaire carries them off to bed over their objections, it's okay, because then it's just a shit test to push through.
 
Retarded take on what I said.
It was more an escalating joke than an earnest take.

I fixed it for accuracy. Women don't like rape, but when the hot, handyman/secret billionaire carries them off to bed over their objections, it's okay, because then it's just a shit test to push through.
That's the thing, yeah? Women don't like rape... but there are women who ask for things that are functionally sexual assault, as in they could turn and #metoo the guy afterwards if they wanted and they'd actually have a good case if nobody knew that she indeed welcomed it after it started. Yes, they enjoy "surprise sex" by hot guys, and the don't enjoy being left bleeding, bruised and teetering on the edge of death, but we know sexual assault and rape are a bit broader than direct genital violence.

Apparently it's in bad form to actually tell them that what they're asking for is literally sexual assault/rape-- at least at contact shot range. You have to talk around it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: sasanian
That's the thing, yeah? Women don't like rape... but there are women who ask for things that are functionally sexual assault, as in they could turn and #metoo the guy afterwards if they wanted and they'd actually have a good case if nobody knew that she indeed welcomed it after it started. Yes, they enjoy "surprise sex" by hot guys, and the don't enjoy being left bleeding, bruised and teetering on the edge of death, but we know sexual assault and rape are a bit broader than direct genital violence.

Apparently it's in bad form to actually tell them that what they're asking for is literally sexual assault/rape-- at least at contact shot range. You have to talk around it.
That's actually part of the kink, if you will. There's a lot of women that simply want to absolve themselves of any personal responsibility when it comes to sex, as social and reputational protection. It's like the "Baby, it's cold outside" song, she wasn't there to fuck, she just stopped by and the weather got bad, so she had to stay the night. If she's not the one coming on to the hot handyman/secret billionaire/former Navy SEAL, then she can't be held responsible for it, socially speaking. In other words, she can't be a slut, he's the one that ravished her. It's also a low key humble brag, she's so hot he couldn't resist. There's a lot to unpack there, but most of it is just psychological, social, and status signaling to other women. A lot of things women do that mystify men are simply because they're not actually aimed at men.
 
That's actually part of the kink, if you will. There's a lot of women that simply want to absolve themselves of any personal responsibility when it comes to sex, as social and reputational protection. It's like the "Baby, it's cold outside" song, she wasn't there to fuck, she just stopped by and the weather got bad, so she had to stay the night. If she's not the one coming on to the hot handyman/secret billionaire/former Navy SEAL, then she can't be held responsible for it, socially speaking. In other words, she can't be a slut, he's the one that ravished her. It's also a low key humble brag, she's so hot he couldn't resist. There's a lot to unpack there, but most of it is just psychological, social, and status signaling to other women.
You're on the money, there-- though, I don't think I have to tell you that.
A lot of things women do that mystify men are simply because they're not actually aimed at men.
...huh, I've never quite connected the dots there.
 
You're on the money, there-- though, I don't think I have to tell you that.
I'm just a guy who likes women and understanding them, or seriously trying to anyways, is part of that.
...huh, I've never quite connected the dots there.
People don't really think about it. It works the other way too, one of the biggest issues in communications between sexes is that we signal things like we would for the same sex when we're dealing with the opposite sex and wonder why they don't get it. It's so subconscious, we never really think about it. It's also why you can spot a troon a mile awhile if you know what you're looking for. They don't behave right and you pick up on that on a subconscious level.
 
People don't really think about it. It works the other way too, one of the biggest issues in communications between sexes is that we signal things like we would for the same sex when we're dealing with the opposite sex and wonder why they don't get it.
I maintain that the issue is with women running their social interactions like they're playing six-dimensional backgammon while their desires have as many dimensions as men's. We created language so we didn't have to communicate with arrays of 52 pitches of grunts and nuanced skull-splitting rock strike patterns, but-- suffice to say-- women largely want to dress up their desires (e.g. resources, validation, attention) to be more highbrow than they are. So you get women ending relationships days after saying that they wanted to have the man's babies for recycled/irrelevant/no reason when they really just got everything that they wanted out of the guy in terms of resources and lavish attention, or women saying that they "loved" the abusive partner that allegedly raped them when really they just wanted to feel grown and living with that guy was helping her feel that way.

Men do this, too, but normally they do it when they've inculcated enough (modern, at least) female mindset and dating strategies, and even then, they probably have their male friend groups being able to spot bullshit pretenses. Outside of that, a guy can tell you point-blank that they're dating crazy women because they like how they are in bed, even if they know they're being morons for pursuing the fulfillment of their shallow desires in the way they're doing it. Or maybe they're doing it because they know they're "easy". But you're not doing nearly as much beating around the bush, and a man's understanding of his partner being genuinely incongruous with actual reality is more often because he's naïve about the intentions of his partner rather than himself. I dunno, maybe it's because they've long since evolved to finagle social interactions to get resources since being head on would usually result in Gruk telling her "I don't appreciate your tone, good lady" in SkullShatter.

Oh, well-- the only thing for a man to do is to adapt or starve.

It's actually amusing how someone who reportedly "likes women" (and I assume that's distinguished from your implied heterosexuality), and someone who never processed "liking women" beyond his heterosexuality but had his retinas cooked some by Plato's sun and is closer to just wanting his ribs back, are able to come to similar conclusions but still dovetail when it comes to blame apportionment. You might have just gotten used to it, whereas I have yet to and I'm still learning to begin with.

It's also why you can spot a troon a mile awhile if you know what you're looking for. They don't behave right and you pick up on that on a subconscious level.
That's a funny way of saying "their bone structures are dead giveaways".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
These are all absurdly broad categories that just about any fetish can fit under. "Sexual novelty and adventure?" Seriously?
BDSM can encompass like 90% of "weird shit" people can be into.
"Taboo" can be literally anything unconventional.
"Passion/romance" LMAO!

Is there literally one single kind of sexual fantasy that can't be lumped into a category on this dumb ass list?
 
I maintain that the issue is with women running their social interactions like they're playing six-dimensional backgammon while their desires have as many dimensions as men's. We created language so we didn't have to communicate with arrays of 52 pitches of grunts and nuanced skull-splitting rock strike patterns, but-- suffice to say-- women largely want to dress up their desires (e.g. resources, validation, attention) to be more highbrow than they are. So you get women ending relationships days after saying that they wanted to have the man's babies for recycled/irrelevant/no reason when they really just got everything that they wanted out of the guy in terms of resources and lavish attention, or women saying that they "loved" the abusive partner that allegedly raped them when really they just wanted to feel grown and living with that guy was helping her feel that way.
Some do, but most don't really think that strategically about it. Sometimes all you have to do to lose a woman's attention is violate her expectations. Generally, be unattractive. Sometimes they're just fickle, especially if they're young. Abusive guys, some women like the control on some level, some like the violence, since it means he'll be violent for them as well. Most of this is all subconscious and most people aren't aware of it.
Men do this, too, but normally they do it when they've inculcated enough (modern, at least) female mindset and dating strategies, and even then, they probably have their male friend groups being able to spot bullshit pretenses. Outside of that, a guy can tell you point-blank that they're dating crazy women because they like how they are in bed, even if they know they're being morons for pursuing the fulfillment of their shallow desires in the way they're doing it. Or maybe they're doing it because they know they're "easy". But you're not doing nearly as much beating around the bush, and a man's understanding of his partner being genuinely incongruous with actual reality is more often because he's naïve about the intentions of his partner rather than himself. I dunno, maybe it's because they've long since evolved to finagle social interactions to get resources since being head on would usually result in Gruk telling her "I don't appreciate your tone, good lady" in SkullShatter.
If you really want to go deep, some of the being pulled towards legit crazy is because when two people have damage that fits together is the best way to put it, the pull towards each other is kinda stupid. Crazy is intense and it's easy to get pulled in. But yeah, generally woman approach things sideways from a man's point of view because going head on is less likely to get what they want, unless the man is a bit whipped.
It's actually amusing how someone who reportedly "likes women" (and I assume that's distinguished from your implied heterosexuality), and someone who never processed "liking women" beyond his heterosexuality but had his retinas cooked some by Plato's sun and is closer to just wanting his ribs back, are able to come to similar conclusions but still dovetail when it comes to blame apportionment. You might have just gotten used to it, whereas I have yet to and I'm still learning to begin with.
Yes, I do generally enjoy women beyond my desire to bang them. Experience with bad relationships can either bring you to the MGTOW level of dislike of women or you can accept them for what they are and learn about them so you can navigate around the bad ones. The second is harder, but usually a better experience. You can enjoy the company of women without being a simp for them. It is, however, a shitty time for relationships between the sexes, I will grant that.

That's a funny way of saying "their bone structures are dead giveaways".
There's that, most of them aren't going to dress like women or act like women. It's all about the fantasy women in their head, which usually comes from porn. Even the ones that legitimately make the attempt to pass. Tight, yellow pencil skirts where that's not appropriate, etc.
 
Back