[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
For shits and giggles I dug around and tried looking up info on the Ariel Trinity Lassa that died almost certainly by Isabella Janke's hands and there's pretty much nothing out there; a few hits about Texas Tech lowering its flag to honor her death (which occured March 11 2021) on April 29. Found her LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ariel-lassa-378ab71ab/ to find she was a psych major and a waitress at a local place that also had a little memorial thing for her cached a while back, as well as what I'm pretty sure is her Instagram (the name is the same and the face looks pretty damn close) here: https://www.instagram.com/ariellassa/?hl=en I scanned through her followers and following to see if anyone looked familiar but no luck on my end. She follows an Avery Powers but that's a false lead, it seems (wrong Avery if Spooky Bones is right).

Sorry if I'm shitting up the thread, but there's something weird on this one. A young student dies, the school/family/community gives a lip service memorial then goes hush hush about it? Then 2 weeks later, the school 'conveniently' wants to research their chess discord? I'm not saying Isabella Janke had a hand in the death of Ariel Lassa, but I'm not NOT saying that about the ultimate troll Isabella Janke, either.

I also did a little digging on the Roman Konopa that showed up in a letter about some kind of confrontation between him and Louis. He seems to be a gay kid who earned a scholarship for gay kids at TTU for the 2020-21 year: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/lgbtqia/scholarship.php Again, I'm not saying that Isabella "you're all a bunch of nigger faggots LULZ" Janke is known to associate with hate criminals, but I'm not NOT saying that about Isabella Janke.
Screenshot_20210805-234749_Brave(1).jpg

Given all of the misdirection that Isbaella directed (and are evidenced in the log) I am immediately suspicious that there may be omitted posts, and maybe fabricated posts. Mostly I'm surprised by what's missing here. Mostly I'm suspicious of the end of the "general" channel log. Why is she denying to them her parents identities? And the general lack of concern about her name being posted just feels off. Why the denial about the accounts?

There's a whole lot missing here, and I think that it's worth considering that this is again some kind of attempt at disinfo by Isabella. That's all. The best way to tell a lie is to take the truth, erase a bit, and fill in a lie.
View attachment 2417258
Hmm, I wondered if that's how she got to be the way she is. I wonder what her diagnoses are?
I'm serious, stop with the FUD. Or are you trying to get added to the party?

Finally,

Knock it the fuck off with the trolling plans you fucking subnormals.

Just report these queers and let's stay on track.
Love y'all niggas, this is great shit.

ETA: STOP WITH THE FUCKING THIRST POSTING. You're not edgy or funny, go watch some porn you coomers.
 
Given all of the misdirection that Isbaella directed (and are evidenced in the log) I am immediately suspicious that there may be omitted posts, and maybe fabricated posts. Mostly I'm surprised by what's missing here. Mostly I'm suspicious of the end of the "general" channel log. Why is she denying to them her parents identities? And the general lack of concern about her name being posted just feels off. Why the denial about the accounts?

There's a whole lot missing here, and I think that it's worth considering that this is again some kind of attempt at disinfo by Isabella. That's all. The best way to tell a lie is to take the truth, erase a bit, and fill in a lie.
Its assumed that these people were also talking in person and vc. At times they pick up conversations through text that they were having elsewhere or to talk to each other about what they were seeing in person (ie they're at a party and they're criticizing a girl who getting too drunk). Shes most likely denying their identities, because shes covering face and lying.
The logs are too detailed to simply be disinformation.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2417258
Hmm, I wondered if that's how she got to be the way she is. I wonder what her diagnoses are?
Even though her Dad has the career path for that, I would take most thing she says about other people with a grain of salt. She's clearly a compulsory liar, saying whatever just to gain some kind of respect or reputation, as well as allegedly being a psychopath (I know, as claimed by her).
Psychopaths typically have smaller frontal lobes making them more impulsive and quick to act on emotion and rarely the cold calculating geniuses that TV makes them out to be. Which would explain how she could think she's history's greatest troll while being dumb enough to get caught so easily.
 
View attachment 2417260

In a certain way she is not wrong. But the "pointless garbage" is going to be the detritus of her life. Honestly she is 19. I have kids. Some sliver of me feels bad for her. But a person like this can't be allowed to operate like she does. The whole situation is tragic.
The whole analogy of "if you play with fire you will get burnt runs true here"

Chris being the fire and Isabella the one playing with it.
 
I do hate that the lies make it hard to believe 100% that Isabella Janke has stinky and ugly feet, since maybe she took pictures from people with actual stinky and ugly feet and used them to fake her identity.

That said, I don't know why Isabella Janke wants people to think she has stinky and ugly feet, because nobody should want to have stinky and ugly feet, and this feels like something quite natural.

So I will repeat:

Texas Tech student Isabella Janke has stinky and ugly feet.
 
So in a number of threads people have asked me about legal liability for Isabella Janke. After reading this thread, specifically the parts about Isabella Janke, I think this is a good place to address potential legal liability for Isabella Janke.

Regarding the potential legal liability of Isabella Janke, I still don't really think there is any despite her role in this mess. I think the primary liability for Isabella Janke is going to be social liability and employment liability, because anybody who looks into Isabella Janke is going to learn what a terrible person she is.

But while I'm discussing legal liability as it pertains to Isabella Janke, it would be remiss of me not to mention that Isabella Janke draws shotacon/lolicon pictures. When Isabella Janke does this she is violating Federal law, specifically

18 U.S. Code § 1466A​

Notably, the Federal law that Isabella Janke is violating when she draws her nasty cartoon kiddie porn specifically addresses the fact that it is not a required element of the law that the minor being depicted actually exist, meaning that Isabella Janke cannot use the fact that the cartoon kiddie porn which Isabella Janke draws features only fictional children as any kind of defense.

While it is unlikely that Isabella Janke will be federally prosecuted for drawing child pornography, I cannot rule out the federal prosecution of Isabella Janke for drawing child pornography. Should this occur I presume we will be informed by a news article, the headline of which will most likely read:

Texas Tech University Student, and Texas Tech University Chess Club member, Isabella Janke arrested and facing federal charges for drawing child pornography.
What about for stealing from Chris? Theft should be easy to prove.
 
Wait wait I thought Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition struck down that provision of the law?

So yes, Ashcroft struck down several provisions of the law not because you couldn't do it but because the law was written so badly and broadly that it covered all sorts of stuff that wasn't child porn or even obscene.

Then in 2003, in response to Ashcroft, they fixed it by adding this language:

1)
(A)
depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)
is obscene; or
(2)
(A)
depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B)
lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;

Which limits it enough for it be constitutional.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back