- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
Only sort of related, but why would she have criminal possession of a firearm??If it isn’t, that’s one hell of a fucking coincidence. Same year of birth and everything.
Edit: Attached an image of the charge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only sort of related, but why would she have criminal possession of a firearm??If it isn’t, that’s one hell of a fucking coincidence. Same year of birth and everything.
The Manson family trying to live in the desert is damn right rational compared to this.I'm trying to imagine a hockey arena filled to capacity with spergs watching two obese slobs shouting Manson Family-speak at each other across a cop car.
With the high testosterone bit, it's already been proven that she had ovarian cysts in October 2019, which I outlined here:I don't know if you guys have heard about this but she would commonly talk about wanting to be a man and transition but not in the usual transmasc way. Rather, she wanted to be a molesting wife beater type and was sad that she couldn't be that.
ALSO NEW INFO MAYBE:
Not sure if this has been shared but she roided when she wrestled back in high / middle school, can't remember when exactly. She said that she also just has a hormonal condition that causes her to have unusually high testosterone too tho.
Just googled the reasons for having naturally high test, among them are:She actually had an ovarian cyst explode around October 2019, just googling it tells me that people with diabetes are more likely to be at risk for this kind of thing. Pic related was posted on 4chan's /tv/ board in November 2019 after someone made a joke thread with her "I'm a 4chan hacker roast me" post, I posted it earlier in the thread too, you can see her talking about it at the bottom
Pretty grim that her body is so fucked at such a young age
You'd expect someone that knows how to dox others to be better at hiding their personal information
- Claims to have doxxed ~90+ people.
She can't even spell dox.You'd expect someone that knows how to dox others to be better at hiding their personal information
I remember a Ranger recruiting team hit up all the schools when I was at AIT trying to trick people in to going to RIP. They came around to us and some E-7 is like "What's y'alls fucking MOS? Mortuary Affairs? What the fuck? Hey Sarnt, why the fuck we here? I don't ever wanna see these motherfuckers again."I thought it took a year for Army to apply for shit like SOAR. Rangers and para are just specialized infantry, so being able to apply off the bat isn’t too surprising.
wtf is this - it goes deeperCould this be our specimen, under arrest mere days before leaking the tape?
View attachment 2420390
NY state courts, search Case # "CR-015233-21QN"
To be quite honest, there is nothing that Bella could do that would surprise me anymore.Only sort of related, but why would she have criminal possession of a firearm??
Only sort of related, but why would she have criminal possession of a firearm??
PL 265.01 01 **TOP CHARGE** | A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge DescriptionCrim Poss Weap-4th:firearm/wep |
A person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when:
- He or she possesses any firearm, electronic dart gun, electronic stun gun, gravity knife, switchblade knife, plum ballistic knife, metal knuckle knife, cane sword, billy, blackjack, bludgeon, plastic knuckles, metal knuckles, chukka stick, sand bag, sandclub, wrist-brace type slingshot or slungshot, shirked, or “Kung Fu star”; or
2 million views in five days, and half of them between yesterday and today.Thread just hit 2 million views - at this rate it will surpass the original "Chris Chan incest leaks" thread.
You linked a lawyer to a kiwi farms thread that has its information being updated multiple times each day. Your post has nothing to do with Isabella Loretta Janke other than the fact you sent it to a lawyer. Anyone interested in your post wouldn't be looking for it in this thread.So guys I sent an email to Chris's lawyer that linked to this thread and gave a brief description of Isabella Janke. I know that you guys wont like that I did that, but given the circumstances I wouldn't want his defense to never know about Janke and to not have a chance to consider her in their defense, especially if the only thing im risking is slightly annoying a busy man. Anyways I received a cookie cutter response:
View attachment 2420504
"Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry."
View attachment 2420511View attachment 2420514View attachment 2420528
Statement about the prosecution of Christine Chandler While I appreciate your interest in this case, please defer to my judgment about how to handle this case considering my 42 consecutive years practicing in this area of the law. This is not my first well publicized and difficult case. I was assigned off-list because my extensive experience will inform my representation. Under ordinary circumstances, people should not believe everything they learn on the internet. Everything you find there should always be filtered by skepticism that is not pursued enough. This applies even more to somebody who is legally disabled with mental health issues. Ms. Chandler’s frequent and sometimes over the top presence on the internet is partly a product of mental health issues causing misguided attention seeking and often provocative engagement with others. Like almost anything on the internet, it is difficult to determine what is true. These principles hold no matter if you are a supporter, a legitimate journalist, or a trolling hater. Handling difficult court appointed cases is a public service. Representing my client does not involve replying to every interested person contacting me. Legitimate inquiries from journalists, supporters and nuisance trollers will be handled the same way. I have a policy of not commenting about my clients or their cases outside of when court proceedings are conducted. Even then, my statements will be limited to discussing procedural concerns. The criminal justice system is a poor vehicle to help people with mental health issues. There is also a critical shortage of mental health treatment facilities in Virginia. Providing somebody with the help that they need is complicated and will take time. Since viral information spread on the Internet is inherently unreliable, no matter its source, the volume of misinformation about my client and this case makes this a poor place to learn the truth. Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry. However, these concerns impact behavior. Determining the truth is the job of our criminal justice system. There are few people with actual personal knowledge about what happened. Just because you heard or read something does not make it true. The Commonwealth is represented by a tough but fair prosecutor. I am the Court assigned counsel to represent Ms. Chandler. This case will only move forward and end within the ordinary confines of the legal process. Law enforcement is not limited to gathering evidence to support guilt. Only those few people with actual personal knowledge about the people involved and the facts of what happened should come forward. If you have reliable information or evidence that is helpful to the defense, the Greene County Sheriff’s Office has the duty to collect it and pass this along to me. They made this public statement: “Anyone with information is asked to contact Investigator Jason Tooley at (434) 531-0866.” Completing their ongoing investigation and the ethical implementation of the legal process are my only concerns as seasoned defense counsel.
And this shouldn't need to be stated, but do not contact Chris's lawyer. He doesn't care about you and will not comment on Chris's case. Please don't annoy him any more
Could this be our specimen, under arrest mere days before leaking the tape?
View attachment 2420390
NY state courts, search Case # "CR-015233-21QN"
die niggerwow what a coincidence...i'm in Queens rn hehe and I didn't know she would be
Are you retarded?So guys I sent an email to Chris's lawyer that linked to this thread and gave a brief description of Isabella Janke. I know that you guys wont like that I did that, but given the circumstances I wouldn't want his defense to never know about Janke and to not have a chance to consider her in their defense, especially if the only thing im risking is slightly annoying a busy man. Anyways I received a cookie cutter response:
View attachment 2420504
"Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry."
View attachment 2420511View attachment 2420514View attachment 2420528
Statement about the prosecution of Christine Chandler While I appreciate your interest in this case, please defer to my judgment about how to handle this case considering my 42 consecutive years practicing in this area of the law. This is not my first well publicized and difficult case. I was assigned off-list because my extensive experience will inform my representation. Under ordinary circumstances, people should not believe everything they learn on the internet. Everything you find there should always be filtered by skepticism that is not pursued enough. This applies even more to somebody who is legally disabled with mental health issues. Ms. Chandler’s frequent and sometimes over the top presence on the internet is partly a product of mental health issues causing misguided attention seeking and often provocative engagement with others. Like almost anything on the internet, it is difficult to determine what is true. These principles hold no matter if you are a supporter, a legitimate journalist, or a trolling hater. Handling difficult court appointed cases is a public service. Representing my client does not involve replying to every interested person contacting me. Legitimate inquiries from journalists, supporters and nuisance trollers will be handled the same way. I have a policy of not commenting about my clients or their cases outside of when court proceedings are conducted. Even then, my statements will be limited to discussing procedural concerns. The criminal justice system is a poor vehicle to help people with mental health issues. There is also a critical shortage of mental health treatment facilities in Virginia. Providing somebody with the help that they need is complicated and will take time. Since viral information spread on the Internet is inherently unreliable, no matter its source, the volume of misinformation about my client and this case makes this a poor place to learn the truth. Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry. However, these concerns impact behavior. Determining the truth is the job of our criminal justice system. There are few people with actual personal knowledge about what happened. Just because you heard or read something does not make it true. The Commonwealth is represented by a tough but fair prosecutor. I am the Court assigned counsel to represent Ms. Chandler. This case will only move forward and end within the ordinary confines of the legal process. Law enforcement is not limited to gathering evidence to support guilt. Only those few people with actual personal knowledge about the people involved and the facts of what happened should come forward. If you have reliable information or evidence that is helpful to the defense, the Greene County Sheriff’s Office has the duty to collect it and pass this along to me. They made this public statement: “Anyone with information is asked to contact Investigator Jason Tooley at (434) 531-0866.” Completing their ongoing investigation and the ethical implementation of the legal process are my only concerns as seasoned defense counsel.
And this shouldn't need to be stated, but do not contact Chris's lawyer. He doesn't care about you and will not comment on Chris's case. Please don't annoy him any more
Fiddling with a taser in an airport?
PL 265.01 01
**TOP CHARGE**A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionCrim Poss Weap-4th:firearm/wep
I was about to make the comparison because he killed kittens before killing his victim, I didn't realize how similar they actually look. I'm starting to believe being a psychopath just has a look to it.I can’t be the only person that sees similarities between Isabella Janke and Luka Magnotta, both behaviorally and, in this instance, physically.
View attachment 2420471
The only contact anyone should have with his lawyer is an anonymous gift basket because he has to deal with Chris and probably multiple retards from reddit and twitter.So guys I sent an email to Chris's lawyer that linked to this thread and gave a brief description of Isabella Janke. I know that you guys wont like that I did that, but given the circumstances I wouldn't want his defense to never know about Janke and to not have a chance to consider her in their defense, especially if the only thing im risking is slightly annoying a busy man. Anyways I received a cookie cutter response:
View attachment 2420504
"Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry."
View attachment 2420511View attachment 2420514View attachment 2420528
Statement about the prosecution of Christine Chandler While I appreciate your interest in this case, please defer to my judgment about how to handle this case considering my 42 consecutive years practicing in this area of the law. This is not my first well publicized and difficult case. I was assigned off-list because my extensive experience will inform my representation. Under ordinary circumstances, people should not believe everything they learn on the internet. Everything you find there should always be filtered by skepticism that is not pursued enough. This applies even more to somebody who is legally disabled with mental health issues. Ms. Chandler’s frequent and sometimes over the top presence on the internet is partly a product of mental health issues causing misguided attention seeking and often provocative engagement with others. Like almost anything on the internet, it is difficult to determine what is true. These principles hold no matter if you are a supporter, a legitimate journalist, or a trolling hater. Handling difficult court appointed cases is a public service. Representing my client does not involve replying to every interested person contacting me. Legitimate inquiries from journalists, supporters and nuisance trollers will be handled the same way. I have a policy of not commenting about my clients or their cases outside of when court proceedings are conducted. Even then, my statements will be limited to discussing procedural concerns. The criminal justice system is a poor vehicle to help people with mental health issues. There is also a critical shortage of mental health treatment facilities in Virginia. Providing somebody with the help that they need is complicated and will take time. Since viral information spread on the Internet is inherently unreliable, no matter its source, the volume of misinformation about my client and this case makes this a poor place to learn the truth. Mental health issues do not impair someone’s intelligence and artistry. However, these concerns impact behavior. Determining the truth is the job of our criminal justice system. There are few people with actual personal knowledge about what happened. Just because you heard or read something does not make it true. The Commonwealth is represented by a tough but fair prosecutor. I am the Court assigned counsel to represent Ms. Chandler. This case will only move forward and end within the ordinary confines of the legal process. Law enforcement is not limited to gathering evidence to support guilt. Only those few people with actual personal knowledge about the people involved and the facts of what happened should come forward. If you have reliable information or evidence that is helpful to the defense, the Greene County Sheriff’s Office has the duty to collect it and pass this along to me. They made this public statement: “Anyone with information is asked to contact Investigator Jason Tooley at (434) 531-0866.” Completing their ongoing investigation and the ethical implementation of the legal process are my only concerns as seasoned defense counsel.
And this shouldn't need to be stated, but do not contact Chris's lawyer. He doesn't care about you and will not comment on Chris's case. Please don't annoy him any more