Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
I see you're having a lot of fun with this.

You know, my face and body is kind of like Pimp My Ride. I have Xzibit putting in upgrades and implants here there and everywhere. New chin, new jaw, you name it. I might get a spoiler implanted onto my back to complete the whole look. Perhaps a nitrous oxide injection engine.
 
I see you're having a lot of fun with this.

You know, my face and body is kind of like Pimp My Ride. I have Xzibit putting in upgrades and implants here there and everywhere. New chin, new jaw, you name it. I might get a spoiler implanted onto my back to complete the whole look. Perhaps a nitrous oxide injection engine.

no. the files you share are photoshop files. you are ugly
 
That's not a very nice thing to say to somebody. Also pretty random and unrelated to the post you quoted.

Which implants do you guys recommend I get first?
Do you use layers? I hear you're supposed to use lots of layers so you can work on every little change until you get it perfect.
 
anything real. stop photoshopping, ugly

Serious question. If you woke up one night and found this man in your bed, what would you do?

AMnToei.jpg
 
The answer is, where I'm from saying Chinaman is the standard for all east asians, and no one, especially not asians, gets offended. The only people who get offended are aryan females on the internet.

Besides, I usually use the scientific terms, though most people find science offensive. I know that I would probably be stabbed in real life for using the term, "Hamitic" but it's the scientific term, who cares if it comes from a biblical story of why blacks were meant to be slaves.
wow

It takes some profound, profound effort to sound as dumb as you do.

Alright, let's start with the whole bit on "Hamitic" as the scientific term. Well, for starters, you're still implying that there's some correlation between race and the overall worth of a human being, which is inaccurate and has been debunked several times. The whole implication of there being "racial" superiority is inaccurate and based on a scientific community that was, more or less:

1) Trying to establish a narrative that painted their viewpoint as accurate in the first place (see: Aryan Master Race)
2) Still had a cursory knowledge of DNA and the idea the difference between a "variation" of peoples and entirely different subspecies within a species.
3) Kinda fucking racist and imperialist.

You wanna talk about races in its purest form? Fine. There is Homo sapiens, the last surviving species of the Homo genus, which is better defined as humanity. Everyone is a fucking human. We all have the same DNA. A black man from Africa may not look like you or sound like you or be as smart as you or as good looking as you, but he is still the same species as you.

There are plenty of studies out there that supposedly give this "claim" that there is evidence that Caucasians are consistently smarter or more intelligent or have contributed more to human civilization than others. And yes, if you just look at the raw statistics, you'll fine that, on average, there are plenty of achievements in human history that have been tied to people who claim descent from Caucasians. I mean, if you ignore:

1) Socioeconomic classes that drive minorities into poverty and thus deny them a proper education or stable upbringing, which can correlate with "lower IQ's" and "higher crime rate" for a given race.

2) The underlying history of many different ancient civilizations that caused highly advanced civilizations for the time, like the Chinese or the Islamic empires, to grow insular and reject interaction with the outside world while the European continent was beginning to promote travel and discovery, which, along with the discovery and widespread use of gunpowder and primitive firearms, allowed them to be the first group of peoples to promote global colonization, which led to their prosperity and growth beyond the other nations at the time.

3) The lack of consistent sources from separate groups that can all collaborate the same findings and show that any distinction of higher intelligence, athleticism, or attractiveness between other races based on race alone and not any underlying factors.

then yeah, you could make that claim. However, you would be a disingenuous little fuckwit and laughed out of any scientific discussion.

Second, Hamitic, in its broadest scientific term, refers to northern African people, such as the Berbers and the Egyptians. Granted, I'm citing all of this shit off Wikipedia because I'm far, far too lazy to dig through more links to show you how dumb you look, but while there were claims from scientists back then that the Hamitic people were "superior" than the Negroid populations of Africa, this does not imply that you could use Hamitic to refer to the entire fucking black race as a whole. This gets equally laughable when you get into the whole discussions about racial superiority and whatnot that defined the early 20th century, ignoring, again, how that entire sect of science is considered outdated and laughable by any reputable scientist that studies this field in greater detail.

Third, I'm personally from an area that you could consider fairly liberal in a pretty damn good university, and I can assure you that if you tried to say "chinaman" to refer to all east asians in general, especially in front of the many, many clubs here like MASA, the Multi Asian Student Association, you are just fucking asking to get your ass kicked. Either you are lying out of your ass or you live in the most backwards ass redneck part of the woods that you probably don't even know what an Asian looks like outside of your gigantic porno collection.

tl;dr You are the champion of scientific bullshit. Please consider being a Young Earth Creationist, because your claims are as insulting to known science as "humans and dinosaurs walked the earth together until a mystical sky daddy flooded the Earth."
 
Back