Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Oh, look at this: women could sex traffic OTHER women.

I am sure that there are psychopathic women that would take pleasure or pride into luring vulnerable women to be slaves. But no, women can do no wrong whatsoever.

On a lesser note, I've seen how vicious catfights can be.
It's not like the latest chapter in the Chris-Chan saga was started because of the actions of a psychopathic autist with a vagina, right?
 
1628718434121.png
 
White privilege and *shuffles cards* bathing.

They "naturally clean themselves?" What are they, cats?

Wait, what?


It's real.
 
I brought up the clip before and it makes the best comparison those types are like Louis CK's daughter, see he had a comedy bit about how fucked up little girls are psychologically compared to boys. One of his daughters broke a toy she had I believe it was a doll and she was offered a replacement but she didn't want it rather she wanted to see one of her sisters dolls broken just so said sister would know how it felt even though she had nothing to do with the situation.
Weirdly that one might be understandable. I remember vaguely some documentary about a psychological study Lego commissioned into children to work out the differences between the play habits of boys and girls because despite multiple efforts they could not crack the girl market.

If I recall correctly the study apparently showed that when boys play they pretend they are the character. So if they play with a Spiderman toy they are Spiderman. But girls apparently project themselves onto the character so they are not playing a character, they are themselves.

By that logic a replacement toy does not work because the damage its destruction caused was to the girl. What they want is someone else to experience the same. In contrast a boy is supposed to be able to transfer their emotions to the new toy more easily.

Of course that logic kind of died at the same point Optimus Prime did and a mob of boys went "fuck the new toy, you killed Optimus!" But I'm sure that was an anomaly and not psychology being an inexact science.
 
Im sorry maybe i just don't see this. I don't want to be keep this sperging up but no, she was not trans. She was allowed to be finally a women/girl in a charge of the magic. It was called EQUAL RITES for a reason. Why the fuck you want so hard them to be a trans? She was a girl denied of her skills... She was not a man?

My point is not that the character is literally trans (though there are no doubt a few troons who have that headcanon). If anything, it's more likely that FTMs found the story to be hashtag-#Relatable and the author relatively inoffensive, so they decided to protecc him at all costs.

Whether for this reason or not, there are a lot of trannies who are into his books. (Trans people just seem to like fantasy in general. Insert joke here about them living a fantasy.) And as Pink News likes to claim, Pratchett is known to have interacted with some openly trans fans in his lifetime, and quietly acknowledged their genders when he did.

It's possible (likely, even) that Pratchett also harboured the occasional anti-trans belief, which I suppose he could have put into words if he'd lived to see what transgenderism has become. But would he really do that? He presumably valued the trans people in his audience, to the point where he was happy to indulge their need for identity.

Whereas on the other hand, he'd have so much to lose and really very little to gain if he ever rocked the boat like Rowling did.
 
Imagine female dwarves having a huge revolution where they started dressing like women, with it being treated openly like the dwarven women coming out as transsexual because of Dwarvish gender norms. (Multiple books involving the city watch, starting with Feet of Clay I believe.)
A dwarf shaving off her beard? Blasphemy! Is she trying to look like an elf?
Now that I think about it, men should take a day off, no make that a week off, eh better make that a month to really drive the point home for them to stop taking shit for granted and kick them off their high horses.
A day wouldn't do it. The first day would be like Home Alone and would seem marvelous. Only when things really started to break down or they needed a jar opened or something would it start looking grim.
Oh come on, everything about Batman and the Bat-family is fucking gay. It's why making Tim Drake bi is a mistake, because bisexuals don't read Batman titles, because they're a complete sausage-fest and the only femmes in there look like drag-queens.
Riddler has always come across as bi, but he's an unfortunately underutilized character. I think they usually just don't know what to do with him and think he's just some knockoff Joker.
Fuck this scroungy little cocksucker. No shit something that mainly appeals to neckbeard males has mostly neckbeard males seeking jobs there. Fuck "muh representation." Avon ladies are usually ladies, too. Some things appeal to one sex more than another. The offense isn't in failing to impose some kind of arbitrary quota system, but in excluding those who actually want to be there. When that happens, that is a problem, but not insisting on 50/50 representation when 90% of the people applying for the job are men. To force equality in that situation means hiring incompetents and refusing to hire people who can actually do the job.

Seriously fuck that.
 
Last edited:
Remember when no one bought that shitty tranny batman book and it was canceled for low sales?

No, not that time. The other time. No, the OTHER time. No the other other time.

The end of the industry can't come fast enough.

Also:
1628731263761.png

If I still had a twitter account, I'd reply every single time these trannies tried to nut up with "You know you don't, and will never, pass as a real woman, right?"

A dwarf shaving off her beard? Blasphemy! Is she trying to look like an elf?
Indeed! Female Dwarves in Discworld actually... still look just like men. They just wear high heeled boots and chainmail dresses under their leather armor.
 
A dwarf shaving off her beard? Blasphemy! Is she trying to look like an elf?

A day wouldn't do it. The first day would be like Home Alone and would seem marvelous. Only when things really started to break down or they needed a jar opened or something would it start looking grim.

Riddler has always come across as bi, but he's an unfortunately underutilized character. I think they usually just don't know what to do with him and think he's just some knockoff Joker.

Fuck this scroungy little cocksucker. No shit something that mainly appeals to neckbeard males has mostly neckbeard males seeking jobs there. Fuck "muh representation." Avon ladies are usually ladies, too. Some things appeal to one sex more than another. The offense isn't in failing to impose some kind of arbitrary quota system, but in excluding those who actually want to be there. When that happens, that is a problem, but not insisting on 50/50 representation when 90% of the people applying for the job are men. To force equality in that situation means hiring incompetents and refusing to hire people who can actually do the job.

Seriously fuck that.
Screenshot_20210811-212818_Chrome.jpg
We do a little trolling
Screenshot_20210811-214640_Chrome.jpg

E8jOUUMXoAEqvlp.png

I forgot a gryph cameo
 
Last edited:
Imagine Nanny Ogg or Granny Weatherwax literally supporting troons into female places instead of beating the shit out of them!
Not saying Pterry would include random troonery in his books, and no, all of those examples you mention make perfect sense as to being the kind of insane bullshit the wokies would want him to cover in the way they'd want him to cover. After all, Terry Pratchett never won a Hugo, the official woke-left literary badge of honor, because he was too busy writing good books instead of writing tranny coomer propaganda to bludgeon people over the head with.
It was always made clear this group was to be pointed to and laughed at and those they claimed to fight for often disliked them more than anyone else. They were the SJWs of the Discworld and the books laughed at them.
Untitled.png
 
Actually, Gryphoneer is even more full of shit than usual -- Jason COVERED UP the shit going on at Blizzard, for years, because his friends worked there and he didn't want to risk losing his ~~industry access~~.

1628733443358.png

He even admitted this when trying to dunk on GamerGate for calling him out on it.

But wait, there's more:

1628733050755.png

This is the same thing he pulled when he helped cover up the MeToo allegations against the NeoGAF admin, this time because the wrong people told him about them. And again, because NeoGAF (now ResetERA) was wokie NDA-violation central.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!

1628733125926.png

1628733239028.png

But he didn't wait a single fucking week before joining in on the (later proven to be 100% lies, and a lawsuit has been filed) MeToo allegation against Chris Avellone.

1628733408382.png

KiA has been pulling out receipts for a while about this clown.
 
I feel like I need a break from this shit. It's just everywhere. None of the crazies see the hypocrisy in their constant virtue signalling, or feel bad about telling outright lies if it means they can ruin someone they don't like. Are things ever going to swing back to before everyone went insane? I just want people to be normal. No insane leftists using Twitter clout to destroy everything I love, no psychotic Trump lovers spreading crazy conspiracy theories and making the country look like a circus.
 
Oh no the new game studio doesn't represent a perfect demographic % of the shit-hole city you live in? NAME THEM, SHAME THEM, BLACKLIST THEM, DOX AND BOX THEM! You people are MONSTERS for just wanting to make some video games! IT'S 2021 if your company doesn't look like a bowl of mixed M&Ms then you need to be shamed by your self appointed betters!

The main difference between Pratchett and 90% of what is being cranked out at the moment is he was not quite so overt with his real world comparisons. While there are obvious one equivalents there are much less clear ones.

Dwarf women for example are encourage to keep their feminine identity concealed, only exposed between a dwarven partner and it very clearly calls out dwarf identity attitudes as akin to religion. So a religion where women are encouraged towards attire that completely conceals their feminine qualities, only revealed between them and their chosen partner. What real world religion could possibly have anything you could compare to it? He never overtly made that comparison because there are many other things it can be compared to too but it's one of the ones you could make. As you say, he would be unlikely to deny the trans metaphor because that is a possible interpretation as with Equal Rites.

However as was posted earlier in the thread he is not overly simple with what makes a character one of the villains. For example he does not make those who chose to embrace that part of dwarvern culture as evil either. His villains are those who strip the opportunity to be able to choose.

For a more directly SJW equivalent there's "The Campaign For Equal Heights" a bunch of busybody humans who campaign for the rights of the more diminutive citizens such as dwarves. While I might need to double check to make sure I neither hallucinated these nor am remembering them incorrectly their demands over the course of the books have included;
Only dwarves be allowed to investigate dwarf crimes
1.5 x the number of dwarves should be in the city watch than humans to make up the height disparity
That dwarves should not be allowed to move to the city and send money home because that perpetuated a sterotype, irrespective of the dwarves themselves being fine with it

They also branch out to fight for the rights of gnomes in other books which goes worse. "The [Campaign for Equal Heights] was always ready to fight for the rights of the differently tall, and was not put off by the fact that most pixies and gnomes weren’t the least interest in dressing up in little pointy hats with bells on when there were other far more interesting things to do. All that tinkly-wee stuff was for the old folks back home in the forest - when a tiny man hit Ankh-Morpork he preferred to get drunk, kick some serious ankle and search for tiny women. In fact the CEH now had to spend so much time explaining to people that they hadn’t got enough rights that they barely had any time left to fight for them."

It was always made clear this group was to be pointed to and laughed at and those they claimed to fight for often disliked them more than anyone else. They were the SJWs of the Discworld and the books laughed at them.

Also Pratchett was, while critical of corrupt police forces, fairly pro-police given the major focus on the Watch across a lot of the books. And very contemptuous of people interfering with the police with zero practical experience but a desire to interfere on the grounds of "we know what the people we have no interaction with want from a police force we have no understanding of."
I know a guy who is a "starbucks leftist" (who funny enough was a staunch conservative during the Obama years but have since change because he chases liberal pussy) argue with me that Moist von Lipwig (an by extension Pratchett himself) is a anti-capitalist if not communist because he read Making Money and "the bad guys are rich bankers while moist represents the underclass". No he didn't bring up any plot points or themes from the book, just that the bad guys are rich upper societydicks that means they represent capitalism being bad. The dude didn't even realize that Moist was a god damn con-artist despite the book OUTRIGHT TELLING YOU SO.
Holy hell dude It makes me wonder how many people actually read the damn books v.s. those that just skim a wiki or something.
 
Back