Critical Race Theory Megathread

Bill Maher had Ben and a literal CIA Nigger on his show last night about this.

I have a feeling CIA Nigger was instructed to start drama for the lulz since he agrees with Ben's definition of CRT fully. And then goes into how his great grand pappy got pwned by the KKK or some shit. And then at the end, tried to redefine CRT into like teaching slavery more and more in history class.

Imagine being such a smug cunt that he made Ben look sympathetic and better. And many liberals were turned off by him in the comments section. And Bill's audience is filled with NPC fags.

"The system bulit for white people benefits white people...
No shit. It's their fucking country!
Does whitey get benefits in Africa? Do asians get benefits in Mexico? Do nords get benefits in the middle east?

...and that must change.
It shouldn't, but it will.
White people got so bored of kicking everyone's ass they decided to have a mirror match and kill themselves now.
 
CRT claiming to tell you the 'real story' of American history is akin to teaching that the Holocaust was the only relevant cause of WW2 and the only thing of note that even happened during it. And even then, only focusing on Anne Frank and Auschwitz.
That's what they've taught since the 80s.
You had to go out of your way and into a library and read old books with no pictures and small text as a kid to get an actual understanding of these human conflicts, and you better learn to keep your mouth shut and not ask the teacher what and why things happened that inspired a man to turn into a monster and salt the earth.
I still remember the shit I got for being a yankee in a yankee state and making a presentation for history class about why the civil war wasn't about slavery and the mistakes the Union made.
 
When I first heard about the "Critical race theory" I assumed it was something from /pol/ about "all niggers are criminals", and was quite surprised to hear that it was, in fact, another side of the coin. Man, American politics are kinda crazy.
That would be 'race realism' which has virtually no mainstream pull yet. Both of them come to the conclusion that race is real but get there through completely different ways, race realists think that race is real and Europeans were naturally going to dominate because they're just adapted better and sub-Saharan Africans are doomed to be low-IQ criminals because of their genes while critical race theorists instead insist that race isn't real but society makes it real and any disparities are because of oppression that society is constructed around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmarettoPie
I still remember the shit I got for being a yankee in a yankee state and making a presentation for history class about why the civil war wasn't about slavery and the mistakes the Union made.
That sucks. The left has successfully pitched fits often enough that you can't even suggest in the South that slavery was not the ONLY point of the war. It's a thought-terminating argument. Like we can't even acknowledge why the infantry decided to fight, when none of them owned slaves. The South meant something to them, and the questions of whether secession was allowed and the limits of federalism were just as important as how slavery can exist in a country where freedom is seen as paramount. It was an identity crisis for America and absolutely everything was up for debate. I shouldn't have to rank all the factors in the correct order to talk about them.
 
That would be 'race realism' which has virtually no mainstream pull yet. Both of them come to the conclusion that race is real but get there through completely different ways, race realists think that race is real and Europeans were naturally going to dominate because they're just adapted better and sub-Saharan Africans are doomed to be low-IQ criminals because of their genes

Yes and no. Race realism is the idea that genes matter and the brain isn't the only part of the human body that's magically exempt from the evolutionary pressures of natural selection. That doesn't necessarily follow to the conclusion "blacks are doomed to be criminals, whites are naturally superior." Everybody knows there are exceptions to general patterns.

Also a pretty common argument you'll see lots of race realists make is that Northern Europeans may be doomed to decline because of their own unique flaws (natural pathological altruism, which they may have evolved to possess due to spending so long living in cold environments that emphasized cooperation and high community trust to survive). I don't think you'll see many race realists arguing that whites beat East Asians or Ashkenazis in the intelligence department, ether.

Race realism is certainly illiberal and collectivist, like CRT is, but it's not exactly the white equivalent of "melanin magic" black leftist ethnonarcissism.
 
CRT is just an evolved version of the desperate struggle to justify why blacks don't perform as well as other races. At one point it was "standardized testing favors whites (and er... practically every race except black...)", and poor education, and too few black role models. But their limitations became difficult to deny when after decades, after every effort, in every circumstance and social stratum black people still failed to perform while other races did fine, including immigrants who barely knew the language.

But we can't admit that black people are less intelligent, and therefor have an innately poorer chance of success in society. If we admitted that we would have to offer them help, like we do with the mentally disabled. We would have to pay them all a living wage and they would quit their jobs and celebrate and reproduce, so we have even more of this race of mentally disabled people. "But why can't we just murder them all?" is a retarded question.

This would destroy the country, so polite society is forced to come up with increasingly bizarre ways to explain it, to rival the explanations from the Hotep crowd. You would think whites put out a literal anti-black force field. Whites, mind you, not every single other race except blacks, because that would get people thinking about the nature of it all. The damage done to white people would be nothing compared to the damage done to society if we openly admitted black people's limitations, even as they stare us more intensely in the face with each passing year. It doesn't have to be this way. We could just ignore it, but what started as a simple denial of facts has grown into outright mania.

(not all black people etc. i imagine it's a small number of genetic groups that bring the entire "black" race down)
I always thought it was more the fact that African Americans have a pretty shitty culture.*
I mean African immigrants preform far better then afromericans, mostly because from what I gather is b/c they have strong family values and a good cultural "package".

*Unless that's what you're implying.
 
It's probably a good idea to acknowledge that slavery and jim crow fucked people up and still has an impact on the world now, right? I mean half the damn government has been in government since blacks couldn't vote. When people say "race isn't real" it's a dumb as fuck way of saying that race doesn't have any inherent impact on how people function and a lot of that has to do with history. Africans are going to have a completely different life from african americans nowadays, and they're going to think and act differently as a result. Just in the same way that most sane white people don't think about living in a "white country" because they didn't spend much time around psychos who believe the solution to their nations problems is kicking out the brown people.
 
CRT is just a glownigger move in order to divide the public and therefore protect the upper class interests from a peasant revolt. Imagine living in a corrupt and hyper-capitalist society and believing racism is the cause of all your problems.

Controlversial topics like transgender rights are also on your front-page for the same reason. Only roughly 0.7% of Americans identify as gender fluid. It has no real impact on you average life but it's a great breading ground for hostility and divide if it's always in your news feed.

That's why every corporation sails under the rainbow flag and won't stop talking about white privilege. It's used as as shield for criticism and it makes the workers hostile toward eachother and not towards the company.

Perfect ideology for rich people who want to get more rich.
 
Last edited:
honestly curious: what would the treatment of icelandic people be, officially?

they look white, yes, but they colonized literally nobody but arctic foxes and enslaved only fellow whites. they are functionally blameless for any modern racism or effect of it.

🤔 really confronts the question of how "looking white" and "crimes of whiteness" would intersect.
 
honestly curious: what would the treatment of icelandic people be, officially?

they look white, yes, but they colonized literally nobody but arctic foxes and enslaved only fellow whites. they are functionally blameless for any modern racism or effect of it.

🤔 really confronts the question of how "looking white" and "crimes of whiteness" would intersect.
According to retard rules, not committing a crime doesn't make you not guilty of it.
 
I always thought it was more the fact that African Americans have a pretty shitty culture.*
I mean African immigrants preform far better then afromericans, mostly because from what I gather is b/c they have strong family values and a good cultural "package".

*Unless that's what you're implying.
A cultural problem did develop, and the US has failed to produce a black population where people are generally able to perform the best they can perform. This is probably a consequence of a) innate limitations in some genetic groups and b) the idea that we are all the same and should expect the same outcomes in Western systems. It's clear to everyone that this isn't the case, especially African Americans themselves. And it leads to disillusionment and the proliferation of weird conspiracy theories.

It's a feedback loop and African Americans pull each other down to a lowest common denominator. New arrivals from Africa aren't part of this. They only expect to have a better life than they did in their country of origin, not necessarily better or even equivalent to other groups in the country, so ironically they do better than the local black population. From what I understand they are often resented for it: African Americans sometimes say "they're not like us, they're the people who sold us into slavery" (the only time you'll catch them admitting the slave trade was blacks selling blacks).

But we know now there are genetic components to the issue that are simple and undeniable, like the diplomatically named "warrior gene" which is much more prevalent in Africans. It's the gene where you're more likely to respond to perceived provocation with violence, and it's directly correlated with "shooting and stabbing behaviors". This sort of thing might work out on the Savannah, but it doesn't work out in Western systems and it's why prisons are full of black people. It's not a conspiracy, they're just eg. more likely to beat the shit out of their boss if they get reprimanded. All of this winds up feeding back into culture which negatively affects individual circumstance which feeds back into culture, so the new arrivals had better try hard to impose their values on their children.

Anyway I guess my point is you're right, but genetics plays a huge role in determining culture.
 
Wasn't CRT originally just some sort of thought experiment?
Also, who the fucks MLK? pretty sure he's a nobody...

1. Critical <x> theory is a set of weapons designed to be deployed in response to a thought experiment. That experiment is, “everything wrong is x (or anti-x) and therefore it must be eradicated.” Thus, critical lasagne theory would mean everything bad is lasagne and lasagne must be eradicated, or it could also mean everything anti-lasagne must be eradicated. All you need to know is that everything has to do with x, and the tool you use is to make that assumption, refuse to waver from it no matter what happens, and continue to dig and excavate and dismantle functional systems looking for it. And if you don’t find it, well, the x is probably inside *you*, blinding you to it.

Rather hilariously, Rufo’s entire schtick is really “critical ‘critical theory’ theory.” He says, “everything wrong is critical <x> theory and whenever you see these seemingly disconnected ideas, you’re seeing critical theory.”

2. He’s the guy who designed the MLKUltra brainwashing program.
 
Last edited:
That sucks. The left has successfully pitched fits often enough that you can't even suggest in the South that slavery was not the ONLY point of the war. It's a thought-terminating argument. Like we can't even acknowledge why the infantry decided to fight, when none of them owned slaves. The South meant something to them, and the questions of whether secession was allowed and the limits of federalism were just as important as how slavery can exist in a country where freedom is seen as paramount. It was an identity crisis for America and absolutely everything was up for debate. I shouldn't have to rank all the factors in the correct order to talk about them.
> 30% of all families in the South own slaves, but no one in the infantry owns slaves
> Everybody “chose” to fight, no mass conscription
> Nobody ever fights for somebody else’s rights because they think it’s right
 
It's probably a good idea to acknowledge that slavery and jim crow fucked people up and still has an impact on the world now, right?
It's probably a good idea to acknowledge that white people invented everything that has moving parts as well as all concepts of personal freedom, so that my entourage of Black people who throw rose petals at my feet and sing songs of my glory understand the significance of their duties.
 
Back