Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

If Kelly is indeed this susceptible to the power of advertising, why doesn't she just eat a truckload of Happy Meals and get the fuck off of social media? 🤔
This here brings up another point. Skinnypop is just called skinnypop or whatever it’s called. It’s not called “diet popcorn” or “popcorn for fatties to lose their fatty fat” or “if you’re a fatty you can’t eat it!” It just chooses to use the term “skinny” for marketing but it’s literally just a word on a box. Kelly cannot handle living in a world where she has to be reminded that there are people who are thinner than her and happy about it, to the point that a fucking word on a popcorn box is a trigger.
 
This here brings up another point. Skinnypop is just called skinnypop or whatever it’s called. It’s not called “diet popcorn” or “popcorn for fatties to lose their fatty fat” or “if you’re a fatty you can’t eat it!” It just chooses to use the term “skinny” for marketing but it’s literally just a word on a box. Kelly cannot handle living in a world where she has to be reminded that there are people who are thinner than her and happy about it, to the point that a fucking word on a popcorn box is a trigger.
Lol I actually decided to look at the boxes and yeah “SkinnyPop” is just a name. It has MORE calories than the “Act II Extra butter”. It’s absolutely insane how much fart sniffing she manages since she’s so fucking round she puts a melting cake to shame. (First attachment is skinny, second act 2)
08470F6F-9C05-4A17-8263-FFB22E8655C8.png096CCF1D-22BA-48D1-B936-A7C5573F4DE8.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1) I don't know, Kelly. Can people take joy in some small thing without someone being awful on the interet about it? You tell me.
2) I'll listen to Kelly when she volunteers her time in Afghanistan, Africa, or some other country with people in need who would benefit from her skills. Not like she's enjoying herself at home with her young family.
 
Like, the diet industry is not beyond reproach and there are certainly many with ED because of media exposure and shit the diet industry has put out. But Kelly legit just wants to eat until she's bedbound but also wants to live without the shame attached to it. You wanna be fat and happy, go for it! But the whole damn world is not going to change for you. So if you want to buy that cute top but they don't make your size, either nut up and don't buy it or lose weight to fit it. Nowhere is "whine at the maker until they agree to make it in your size" an option.

Meanwhile, as Kelly cries about Skinnypop, black and trans people die in the streets but SKINNY POP YOU GUYS! So woke.
 
Has it been discussed yet how Kelly turned out so fucking fat when her parents aren't hambeasts? Like holy shit those are some unfortunate genetics.
It isn't genetics. There are photos of a very normal looking Kelly in this thread. Being a deathfat was a choice she made.

You wanna be fat and happy, go for it!
But Kelly also wants everyone else to be just as fat as her. We must normalize obesity for her mentalz and shame people that dare to post about their weight loss.
 
Yes, Kelly is absolutely happy to let people have little things that bring them joy, for example:

1. Cute clothes that don’t come in tent sizes.
2. Books and films featuring ‘problematic’ people.
3. Celebrating their weight loss.
4. Popcorn, for fuck’s sake.

I don’t understand how one person can be so sanctimonious but so lacking in the ability to critically reflect on herself.
 
Wait. I think I might not know what a curator is. I thought curating BIPOC art was good and an act of inclusivity. Wouldn't only curating white art be wrong?
Yes. See, you’re wrong if you do what they want and you’re wrong if you don’t do what they want. Don’t write stories featuring people of races not your own, but how dare your story only have white people in it.

Fun, right?

People like Kelly get off on trapping people in “moral” pickles like this - that way they can easily make people feel bad and force people to kiss their asses.

The discussion of racial bias in art curation is an interesting one and probably only meaningfully explored in some obscure jstor article. From anyone on twitter, especially Kelly, it’s nonsense.
 
Has it been discussed yet how Kelly turned out so fucking fat when her parents aren't hambeasts? Like holy shit those are some unfortunate genetics.
I know this is out there, but I think if we get into deathfat comparisons, Kelly and Chantal are two enormous factory farmed birds of a feather. They are both so pointlessly rebellious and will do things simply because they've been told they shouldn't. Both of them continue to gain weight partly as a way of rebelling against doctors, family members, and people on the internet who suggest that being supermorbidly obese is unhealthy. Every bite they take is ike a big "fuck you" to all of us who are able to find contentment in our own lives. I believe Kelly's mother probably stressed the importance of appearance when Kelly was a child. Because her brain is broken like Chinny's, Kelly is compelled to do exactly the opposite of what she is told, especially if the authority figure suggesting it can provide evidence.

They are willing to destroy themselves just to reject authority.

(I'm also pretty sure that Kelly, particularly, had a major traumatic event of some sort that helped catalyze...whatever the fuck this is.)
 
Wait. I think I might not know what a curator is. I thought curating BIPOC art was good and an act of inclusivity. Wouldn't only curating white art be wrong?
What they are really saying is that white curators should quit and let BIPOC people have their jobs. That's really what they want . In their world, all white people should step aside and let them have the success they are "owed".

I wonder if it would be wrong to have BIPOC tell the stories of white people and curate their art? Should we just have curators of every type so that everyone's stories are told correctly? Straight white male curators, gay black female curators, disabled Puerto Rican non-binary trans pansexual curators? That's one way to create jobs in the art world, I guess.

Also, "SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEGAN", lol.
 
But Kelly also wants everyone else to be just as fat as her. We must normalize obesity for her mentalz and shame people that dare to post about their weight loss.
No she doesn’t, not really. If everyone in the world was Kelly-sized, Kelly couldn’t claim disability and oppression and speshulness and lecture you on your fatphobia and screech that viciously non-inclusive online retailers don’t carry pantaloons ginormous enough for her. Being obese comes with all sorts of traumatic slights she can pretend to cry about. People sloth-shame her because of her size. Her doctor keeps insisting that her weight-related problems are weight-related. Popcorn is so mean to her.

If the world was a fatcentric utopia where the world “calorie” was outlawed and 20X cute affordable clothes grew on trees, Kelly would be in hell. She’d have to go back to yelling at you about the native Americans, and that’s no fun because she’s not native American.

Kelly would have to come up with some other thing to be The Biggest Victim of…what would it be? Her terrible ptsd that rears its head whenever she is confronted by chores? Being a massively overprivileged suburbun upper middle class white woman whose husband works all day to support her, she doesn't have a tonne of options for crying oppression.

Kelly is the one and only deathfat cow that I truly think, if offered a magic pill to make her slender and petite overnight, would actually refuse it. She enjoys her victimhood far too much. She enjoys her grotesque body selfies far too much. She enjoys the power trip of forcing her husband to stay with a woman he hates far too much. She enjoys lecturing everyone around her far, far too much to ever give it up.
 

This is a ridiculous small-minded and ignorant thing to post. Holy crap. Imagine being so much of a idiot as to not only judge a global political problem on the basis of your limited world view and your limited personal experience while also using it for own agenda against the evil wypipo.
 
I wonder if it would be wrong to have BIPOC tell the stories of white people and curate their art? Should we just have curators of every type so that everyone's stories are told correctly? Straight white male curators, gay black female curators, disabled Puerto Rican non-binary trans pansexual curators? That's one way to create jobs in the art world, I guess.
You've hit the nail on the head regarding the thing that gets me about this particular line of reasoning. I'm a big believer in the idea of "write what you know", but I think this attitude that there is no shared experience among humans and you must be part of a given group to be able to relate to or interact with its members is far more destructive that it is empowering.

Obviously, our differing LiVeD eXpERiEnCe does impact the way we interact with the world, but if there is no common ground for us to find, what is the point of even listening to the stories shared by others? It seems to me that this line of reasoning will serve only to further divide society.

Why can't everyone tell a given story if they want to, and allow listeners to pick and choose from every available telling? It's valuable to get a glimpse into how other people see the world, and the more perspectives we are able to hear, the closer we get to the actual truth.

This kind of microlabel pigeonholing is so fucking autistic; I can't. When did liberalism become about insularity and keeping people separated by physical traits? It reeks of "separate but equal".
 
Back