Taliban offensive of 2021 and collapse of Afghan government.

Dogs being more dangerous is natural considering they're related to wolves which is an apex predator. Their size and pack instincts naturally has them dominate environments abandoned by humans.

Had housecats been as big as dogs they could likely have competed.

I still don't see sound arguments for why dogs should be considered less clean than other pets. Historically dogs have likely protected far more people than they've harmed.
But the first is a quote from the Sahih Muslim - that's hadith, so it means it's not necessarily binding, or as binding as the Qur'an. It's more accurate to say that the killing of dogs was initially advocated and then repealed (Sahih Muslim 22 Book of Musaqah, Chapter 10).

Abu Zubair heard Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with him) saying:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ordered us to kill dogs, and we carried out this order so much so that we also kill the dog coming with a woman from the desert. Then Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) forbade their killing. He (the Prophet further) said: It is your duty the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes), for it is a devil.
Happily rolling in very smelly things is a favorite past time of about any dog that gets the chance. Horse shit is a favorite for farm dogs I’ve been around, same with road kill, rotting carcasses, trash, etc. etc.
The Koran goes into specifics on dogs and cleanliness, you are allowed to eat anything your pupper has brought back you in his mouth (as long as he didn't start nibbling it). Dogs are allowed to be kept as guards and for protection, they are just not allowed inside the home. That's it, the rest is just Arab cultural shit

The boys who fell asleep in the cave with their doggo are also mentioned in the Koran (they were Christians too).

Don't ask me to name the relevant sections, I don't have a Koran on me and I never memorized it. I just used it to point out Muslim hypocrisy.

Edit: Where is Sleepy Joe?
 
VP Harris is working hard to ensure a good faith diplomatic relationship with the Taliban. She hasn't faced the media lately but that's just because she's been really busy. In fact, she's usually the last person to leave the office.
1629481046783.png
 
forgive me for thinking (at least for a moment) that a username called 'dumbest_bitch' making a post like that on that subreddit might just be a creative troll.
You'd be right about that one. It would fit right in with the people who post their occult expertise though.
 
If any remnants of the Afghan army continued fighting against the taliban, would they be considered terrorist groups?
Ben and Jerry's was accused of terrorism for not selling ice cream to some Jews. All the term means now is anti-globalist. So no, their jaws will firmly be locked around American cock.
 
after watching this latest presser, I am certain of one thing now. the milisecond that something rapidly escalates/changes on the ground at Kabul airport, this dumbfuck will be asleep at the wheel and if it changes fast enough, the US troops on the ground will get hamstrung by their existing orders while the Taliban just blitzkrieg the whole place with their newfound american toys. mark my words on this - if they decide to attack that airport? 6,000 US troops...could be 10,000 for all I care...it won't matter. they will be completely ineffective and incapable of properly responding to a dynamic and aggressive enough attack that has a very limited area in its sights to destroy/capture.

they only need to say the word and Biden and the Dems are fucking done. they must be getting MASSIVE compensation/assurances to hold off on doing so...
 
But the first is a quote from the Sahih Muslim - that's hadith, so it means it's not necessarily binding, or as binding as the Qur'an.
It depends what you mean here. Hadiths can abrogate each other (which I assume is what you mean by them not necessarily being binding), but the Qur'an can also abrogate itself. If a hadith is authentic and hasn't been abrogated, it's binding. Note however that what 'binding' means can also vary since not everything is a hard halal or haram, some things can be simply recommended (mustahab) or disliked (makruh).

It's more accurate to say that the killing of dogs was initially advocated and then repealed (Sahih Muslim 22 Book of Musaqah, Chapter 10).

Abu Zubair heard Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with him) saying:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ordered us to kill dogs, and we carried out this order so much so that we also kill the dog coming with a woman from the desert. Then Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) forbade their killing. He (the Prophet further) said: It is your duty the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes), for it is a devil.
This is correct, I appreciate you bringing it up.
 
after watching this latest presser, I am certain of one thing now. the milisecond that something rapidly escalates/changes on the ground at Kabul airport, this dumbfuck will be asleep at the wheel and if it changes fast enough, the US troops on the ground will get hamstrung by their existing orders while the Taliban just blitzkrieg the whole place with their newfound american toys. mark my words on this - if they decide to attack that airport? 6,000 US troops...could be 10,000 for all I care...it won't matter. they will be completely ineffective and incapable of properly responding to a dynamic and aggressive enough attack that has a very limited area in its sights to destroy/capture.

they only need to say the word and Biden and the Dems are fucking done. they must be getting MASSIVE compensation/assurances to hold off on doing so...
no
the taliban do not have the capability of actually fighting against thousands of american soldiers at a time

US troops have orders to not start hostilities with taliban unless attacked, the taliban know this, that's what their entire offensive is based on. if they breach this mutual non aggression pact then kabul turns into fucking fallujah overnight, the US withdrawal probably gets reversed, and the taliban would lose everything they just gained in the past weeks.

they will NOT risk that. they will allow the burgers to conduct their evacuation and retreat unharmed. they have fought for 20 years for this, now finally the goal is in sight, burger troops are leaving afghanistan. attacking them now would be extreme self-sabotage and probably force them back into underground guerilla status for another decade or two, which they absolutely do not want.
 
Back