Blake Howard Hobbs / Laura Hobbs / CommieDickGurl / laurizza / LAURAZILLA100s / EndGCTP / CaliPizzaGirli520 / CrazeDawg - It's ma'am the sequel, incel-to-troon pipeline exhibit A, threatens TERFs and blames them for him being sexually assaulted

People who desire privacy now usually use the handicap bathroom or stall anyway
That's fine also because it's basically proof they're juicing, we just can't allow it to become the standard or we won't have any way of feeling better about our own bodies in the presence of beautiful, perfectly-formed sex hunks.
 
Laura has been very forthcoming about her opinions and willing to discuss her viewpoints.
Blake hasn't been forthcoming. Blake can't give a simple answer to a simple question. He won't even answer IF he believes intact males should be allowed in rape shelters, and until he corrects me, I will assume he does, because he is incapable of giving a straight answer and a troon by any other name is still a troon.
So take it somewhere else.
You're not a mod. Don't tell me what to do.
You're fucking sick in the head.
Hi. You're a MAN pretending to be a WOMAN.

Anyway. Here's Blake using KF as a base for gayops and trying to raise a personal army to dox people being mean to him in YouTube comments. By the way, there are no pedos, he's just being trolled on YT. Please dox the meanies for the children.
1629553698590.png

1629553756047.png

1629553773267.png
 
Dear @CammieDoxGirl
I have noticed a few comments which have gone unanswered.
1629559807662.png

Could you please, once and for all, provide everyone with your official stance on whether or not little girls should be exposed to naked male genitalia in changing rooms/bathrooms/other female-only spaces.
I noticed that @StrawberryDouche reiterated the question to you, and you must have missed it. I'd really like to know your position on flashing children. Are you pro or anti exposure to children?

*edit*
Follow up question. Given that there's an "18+" disclaimer on your online glamour horror shots, does this not imply that you are aware that children shouldn't be able to see your, or a similarly arranged adult's, genitals?
Are you just following internet protocol/adhering to terms of service agreements and do you actually think children online should be allowed to view your nudity since you appear to, until you definitively state one way or the other, believe that children (and women) should be forced to view and/or tolerate your, or a similarly assembled person's, male genitalia in a female only space?

Does that make you a predator? Given that you clearly understand that people under the age of 18 should not be able to view your nakedness online, but you have at least implied by refusing to answer simple questions on the subject that you believe that children in real life should have no choice BUT to view your male genitals in female-only spaces?
 
Last edited:
If you went into the restroom & saw a visibly nervous tween girl would you leave? If not, why not?
I dont pay attention to other people in the bathroom. I go in there to do my business. If anybody started trying to get my attention or interact with me in a bathroom, which they would have to go out of their way to do, I would walk out. Sounds sketchy and I'd be more concerned with my safety than anything. Nothing like this has ever happened btw.

I think I've made it pretty clear that I don't think adults should be changing on front of kids period. Supposedly these individuals know me so well from reading this thread. We've gone over this. I don't think that's really the issue here though.

I find it sus that @StrawberryDouche is trying to start a personal fight with me because I mildly encouraged somebody to continue to investigate a group of men simping for ILJ on Roblox who are obviously interacting with children. Now another suspect has come to join them.

I believe feds should probably look into at least two people here who are trying to interact with me now and won't respond to any more of their posts for that reason.

I will take questions from other people but not the two in particular who I think have made themselves a person of interest in a potential federal investigation.
 
I will take questions from other people but not the two in particular who I think have made themselves a person of interest in a potential federal investigation.
I wouldn't go this way. Sure, it's OK to ignore comments and users but claiming posters make themselves targets of federal investigation with their impolite forum comments is not far from claims of legal or divine punishment for Kiwis made by more... unhinged people of interest like Russ or Mel.
 
I wouldn't go this way. Sure, it's OK to ignore comments and users but claiming posters make themselves targets of federal investigation with their impolite forum comments is not far from claims of legal or divine punishment for Kiwis made by more... unhinged people of interest like Russ or Mel.
It's to do with the timing and other specific context I mentioned. I won't say anything else about it to avoid muddying things or giving too much away but I am suspicious of these particular users targeting me over this and if there is something serious that needs to be looked at I don't want to interfere.
 
I dont pay attention to other people in the bathroom. I go in there to do my business.
Then the men's room should be perfectly functional for you, just like it is for every other man.

I believe feds should probably look into at least two people here who are trying to interact with me now and won't respond to any more of their posts for that reason.
Helpful reminder that every "anarchist" communist is an authoritarian lowlife.
 
Then the men's room should be perfectly functional for you, just like it is for every other man.
It would not be a safe place for me to use the bathroom which it is my human right to go to the bathroom in a safe and sanitary way. If I started using the men's room it would be a matter of days before somebody harasses or assaults me in there. I'm trying to not die here.
 
It's to do with the timing and other specific context I mentioned. I won't say anything else about it to avoid muddying things or giving too much away but I am suspicious of these particular users targeting me over this and if there is something serious that needs to be looked at I don't want to interfere.
Well, @Angry Canadian is in my opinion much more of a lolcow than you (to have one's containment thread moved to spergatory is an achievement) but @StrawberryDouche voices general concerns related to trans issues - just using language that wouldn't be acceptable in most places on the Internet. There is an interesting discussion here, if there was less hostility.

Also @TamarYaelBatYah do you have any legal advice for a woman who is being defamed and harassed by these Kiwi Farms incels because they're threatened and hateful towards healthy female sexuality?
I think Mel's been MIA for like a month.
 
It's to do with the timing and other specific context I mentioned. I won't say anything else about it to avoid muddying things or giving too much away but I am suspicious of these particular users targeting me over this and if there is something serious that needs to be looked at I don't want to interfere.
You're being "targeted" because you say things like
"These mean people on the internet need to be investigated by the FBI"
Because even broken clocks are right twice a day, the fact that you latched onto the ILJ/Chris-Chan situation and stood on the graves of hamsters to achieve your goal of being a social media influencer doesn't nullify the fact that you're a delusional faggot in a dress, which you've proven by suggesting that mean people on the internet are worthy of a federal investigation. You're nuts, bro.
 
There's a high cow level in this thread lol.
It already happened a few days ago. But the mods deleted it because it was devolving into legal threats from someone who eats out of an dumpster.
Wait I missed this!? Damnit, I knew I shouldn't have gone out to enjoy the weather and good food with my friends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Emperor Skeksis
Back