Blake Howard Hobbs / Laura Hobbs / CommieDickGurl / laurizza / LAURAZILLA100s / EndGCTP / CaliPizzaGirli520 / CrazeDawg - It's ma'am the sequel, incel-to-troon pipeline exhibit A, threatens TERFs and blames them for him being sexually assaulted

[Angry Canadian]

Massive irrelevant textwall

Blake. The crux of the matter is the legal right of "trans-people" to use the facilities associated with the delusional identity they claim to hold. IE; men with male anatomy, claiming to be women, being allowed to use female only spaces. There are many stories of men like yourself, "trans men" who have used women's only spaces, like spas, change rooms, fitness clubs, etc; exposing their penises to women, and girls.

It's a simple question. Do you think men who take hormones, like yourself, should be allowed to expose their male genitalia in those spaces.

Do you agree with this legislation? Or do you disavow the legislation which allows "male to female transsexuals" like yourself to utilize female only spaces with legal impunity? Do you agree with "male to female transsexuals" who are 'in-tact" being placed in female prisons? Do you agree with "in-tact" males having access to women's spas, women's fitness clubs, and other women only spaces where there is a presumption of nudity, RE; changing rooms, showers, locker rooms, etc.

It's not complicated. Do you think you should be allowed to swing your dick around a woman's locker room, a woman's shower room, a woman's change room, etc. Do you think women should be forced to tolerate this by law? Do you think women should be called bigots for not wanting to tolerate this?

These are very simple questions. And until you can provide a simple answer to them, I will consider you a predator, and a predator enabler.

At no point did I mention rape. Don't project your own thoughts and feelings onto me. I am simply and exclusively trying to establish whether or not you believe that men such as yourself, who present themselves as women, but have a penis, should be allowed in women's only spaces where there is a presumption of nudity, RE; a shower room, a locker room, a change room, a spa, etc.
There's an entire subforum for a Canadian tranny who abuses the human right's tribunal when women's spas refuse to wax his balls. Do you agree with using the legal system in this way to abuse businesses who do not want to touch your balls?

 

[CammieDoxGirl]

It's a simple question. Do you think men who take hormones, like yourself, should be allowed to expose their male genitalia in those spaces.

I think nobody should be exposing their genitals to anyone ever. Stop trying to look at people's weiners in the bathroom you fucking perv.

You won't even read what I post so I'm not going to take the time to go thru your convoluted bullshit either.

See my previous post and respond to the bulletpoints or shut the fuck up.

There's an entire subforum for a Canadian tranny who abuses the human right's tribunal when women's spas refuse to wax his balls. Do you agree with using the legal system in this way to abuse businesses who do not want to touch your balls?

I dont agree with that being the law and Yaniv is a peice of shit predator who needs to be isolated by whatever means necessary.

 

[Angry Canadian]

I think nobody should be exposing their genitals to anyone ever. Stop trying to look at people's weiners in the bathroom you fucking perv.

You won't even read what I post so I'm not going to take the time to go thru your convoluted bullshit either.

See my previous post and respond to the bulletpoints or shut the fuck up.

I did read your post, your response has nothing to do with my question. You keep giving your person position, and that's fine, I acknowledge you think it's gross and scary. I'm asking you about the legislation that allows men like you to do what you claim to be gross.

You could, if you were so inclined, go to California and walk around a female only spa totally naked. You could do this. Do you think "innocent trans people" who are not "bathroom creeps" should be legally empowered to expose their male genitalia in a woman's only space, irrespective of your desire or lack thereof to utilize those legal rights yourself. Do you have a problem with spas refusing to wax a tranny's testicles, for example? Do you think a woman's only spa should be legally compelled to wax a man's balls?

The extent that you're going to to avoid answering the question is proof enough to me that you're a predator enabler at a minimum. You're famous here for a "pronoun" sperg out at popeyes. You obviously want to be recognized as a woman, why should I assume that your desire for recognition stops at personal pronoun usage? Don't you feel "discriminated against" or "oppressed" by the "cis-het-white-male patriarchy" for not being allowed into certain places pertinent to the identity you assert (very loudly, at fast food workers) to be legitimate and real?

I find it very hard to believe that you do not think that "trans-woman", which you use as your identifier, do not "deserve" to be included in the spaces which I am talking about. You dance around the subject, giving me your personal opinions and you have very adequately explained that you personally, as an individual, feel "scared and gross" about using a woman's shower at a fitness club, or using a woman's locker room/change room/spa etc. That's well and fine. But the legislation which allows trannies like yourself to utilize those spaces isn't exclusive to you. The legislation doesn't name you; it's not the Blake Initiative. Do you think trannies like you, who are in-tact males, with the genitals of a man, should be allowed to use the facilities I'm talking about, even if you personally do not want to.

I don't want to hear about "individual spaces", that's retarded. There's no such thing as an "individual swimming pool"; lady's swim nights exist, should you be able to have your balls popping out of a bikini in front of biological women? Should you be allowed to use the shower room with biological women? Should any tranny, irrespective of your personal views, be allowed to do this?

Yes or no.

 

[Thomas Highway]

Canadian Nazis fighting Commie Dick Girls truly embodies the spirit of The Farms.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

Trans women should be allowed to use the women's restroom for the purpose of releasing waste from behind a stall and it is hateful and wrong(imo) the way you try to conflate pissing from inside a stall with full blown rape falsely. You accuse the mundane act of using a toilet to being an inherently predatorial act. Turn that effort towards confronting actual fucking predators if you even care but I don't think you really care about busting actual restroom creeps. I think you just want to see trans women in the men's room. I can only speculate why. You can freak out and use gross terminology about dicks and rape all you want. I'm not impressed by your sick mind.

You're a fucking dude. I don't trust men who take nude photos and post them on the internet and who take photos of themselves in the women's restroom to do anything inside the ladie's room. You're a bald man in drag, and if you really cared anything about women's rights, you wouldn't be pushing this sick agenda to let perverts inside a women's restroom.

I dont agree with that being the law and Yaniv is a peice of shit predator who needs to be isolated by whatever means necessary.

Says the man who tried to foist his male, button penis on Steven Crowder. You think you're somehow more virtuous and immune to criticism because you try to pull this shit on straight white people, think again.

I think nobody should be exposing their genitals to anyone ever. Stop trying to look at people's weiners in the bathroom you fucking perv.

You did it over twitter to a man who called you a fucking white male on Youtube. Get over yourself. I really thought Blaire White was a sanctimonious tranny, but at least he admits that he's a fucking white man.

Canadian Nazis fighting Commie Dick Girls truly embodies the spirit of The Farms.

Yes, being an insane, pretentious cock gobbler, who should only be seen in darkness or indirect light.

 

[CammieDoxGirl]

I'm asking you about the legislation that allows men like you to do what you claim to be gross.

I dont agree with laws that would effectively "force" anyone to be exposed to anyone else's genitals period. I agree with laws punishing people for being lude in restrooms and I dont think open changing areas should exist.

You could, if you were so inclined, go to California and walk around a female only spa totally naked. You could do this.

But I wouldn't. I have no desire to walk into that minefield and if I was cis I don't think I would want to either. I wouldn't go to an all trans one or unisex one either.

Do you think "innocent trans people" who are not "bathroom creeps" should be legally empowered to expose their male genitalia in a woman's only space, irrespective of your desire or lack thereof to utilize those legal rights yourself.

no and furthermore I don't see the purpose in having this as a business model.

If businesses want to have open nudity it should be 18+. As for gender or sex segregated or unisex I suppose that would both be both the liability and choice of the corporation so they should make it clear their intentions.

Do you have a problem with spas refusing to wax a tranny's testicles, for example?

no.

Do you think a woman's only spa should be legally compelled to wax a man's balls?

absolutely not.

I guess since you think my answers are "dumb" then you must disagree with me @Angry Canadian

 

[Angry Canadian]

I dont agree with laws that would effectively "force" anyone to be exposed to anyone else's genitals period. I agree with laws punishing people for being lude in restrooms and I dont think open changing areas should exist.

But I wouldn't. I have no desire to walk into that minefield and if I was cis I don't think I would want to either. I wouldn't go to an all trans one or unisex one either.

no and furthermore I don't see the purpose in having this as a business model.



no.

absolutely not.

Again. I don't really give a shit about your personal opinions other than your personal opinions regarding legislation that allows people like you to expose yourselves in women's only spaces.
-Women's only swimming nights
-Women's only fitness clubs
-Women's only health spas
-Women's only locker rooms
-Women's only washrooms
-women's only shower rooms.
And I'm sure many other examples that some of the Ladies in this thread can name.

I, at best, appreciate your views that "places should be private completely", but that's not reality; maybe change rooms can be private stalls, but you can't turn a fitness center, or a swimming pool, or any other such space into an individual/private space.
Legislation exists that enables trannies LIKE YOU to use those spaces regardless of their genitals. As I said before, a man, in a bikini, with his dick and balls, can go to the women's only swim nights if he claims he is a woman. There is law that allows this. Women and girls utilize those spaces who would be forced to tolerate a man's penis being on display. Do you support this? Or are you against legislation that would open up women's only spaces to people like you.

I acknowledge that you claim you would not utilize those facilities, and I'll take you at your word because I don't really care what you would do as an individual. I'm asking you whether or not you cosign men like you being legally allowed to do what I have described.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Changing rooms and spas where people change and get naked in front of each other sounds dangerous and gross to me, especially when you bring kids into this.

Ladies and gentlemen (and everybody in-between), words of wisdom from our defender of children:

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

I acknowledge that you claim you would not utilize those facilities, and I'll take you at your word because I don't really care what you would do as an individual. I'm asking you whether or not you cosign men like you being legally allowed to do what I have described.

First, you know he's lying. Second, you know he cosigns on this stuff. Anyone who attacks some dude at Popeyes cosigns on this shit.

Ladies and gentlemen (and everybody in-between), words of wisdom from our defender of children:
View attachment 2470578

Corpooral punishment is a long leap away from a grown bald man exposing his dick in front of children. Black people spank their kids, and I know several parents across Europe who do the same. No matter what liberals tell you, spankings are a good thing. If Chris would have been beaten, he wouldn't have raped his mother.

 

[Thomas Highway]

I would bet fiat currency that @Angry Canadian has an archive of vile pornography that puts Blake's work to shame.

 

[CammieDoxGirl]

personal opinions regarding legislation that allows people like you to expose yourselves in women's only spaces.

So you give me a list of multiple scenarios and expect me to give you a yes/no answer encompassing all of them in one.

-Women's only swimming nights

As for gender or sex segregated or unisex I suppose that would both be both the liability and choice of the corporation so they should make it clear their intentions.

-Women's only fitness clubs

I dont see why it matters, a person's birthsex when people are wearing full clothing. People being lewd or pestering others while they are exercising should probably get arrested but immediately removed at the very least.

-Women's only health spas

I'm assuming you are talking about open nude spas and waxing yanivs balls.

If businesses want to have open nudity it should be 18+. As for gender or sex segregated or unisex I suppose that would both be both the liability and choice of the corporation so they should make it clear their intentions.

I would even go a step farther with the ball waxing part and say it isn't the liability so much if a company decides on the spot to refuse. Nobody should be compelled to look at or handle another person's junk by the state.. just no. Yaniv is a disgusting person.

-Women's only locker rooms

If businesses want to have open nudity it should be 18+. As for gender or sex segregated or unisex I suppose that would both be both the liability and choice of the corporation so they should make it clear their intentions.

-Women's only washrooms

People should not be exposing themselves or bothering people in restrooms and people who do should be arrested. I know that would ruin your guys' fun in the men's room but hence one more reason I don't feel safe going in there.

-women's only shower rooms.

If businesses want to have open nudity it should be 18+. As for gender or sex segregated or unisex I suppose that would both be both the liability and choice of the corporation so they should make it clear their intentions.

 

[Angry Canadian]

Ladies and gentlemen (and everybody in-between), words of wisdom from our defender of children:
View attachment 2470578

I said that parents who punish their children frivolously should be proscribed roman style. You might not be aware of what that means. It means their names should be put on a list and that list should be hung up at town hall, and those people should be hunted down like dogs, dead or alive.
But yeah, I have no problem with children being spanked, I also have no problem with teenagers getting a conservative beating. I've seen kids call their parents cunts and have public meltdowns. Those teens need to be put int their place. My greatest fear is that I won't teach my children properly, and they'll mouth off someone or do something extreme and get killed over it. An ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure.

I would bet fiat currency that @Angry Canadian has an archive of vile pornography that puts Blake's work to shame.

I do not consume pornography at all. For the obvious reasons.
#1 I'm married and consider it cheating
#2 it's jewish propaganda.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

I said that parents who punish their children frivolously should be proscribed roman style. You might not be aware of what that means. It means their names should be put on a list and that list should be hung up at town hall, and those people should be hunted down like dogs, dead or alive.
But yeah, I have no problem with children being spanked, I also have no problem with teenagers getting a conservative beating. I've seen kids call their parents cunts and have public meltdowns. Those teens need to be put int their place. My greatest fear is that I won't teach my children properly, and they'll mouth off someone or do something extreme and get killed over it. An ounce of prevention beats a pound of cure.

Or worse, they’ll turn into Blake

 

[CammieDoxGirl]

exposing his dick in front of children.

who?

 

[Thomas Highway]

I do not consume pornography at all. For the obvious reasons.
#1 I'm married and consider it cheating
#2 it's jewish propaganda.

You are also an insane Nazi.

So why should I believe you?

 

[Angry Canadian]

I dont see why it matters, a person's birthsex when people are wearing full clothing. People being lewd or pestering others while they are exercising should probably get arrested but immediately removed at the very least.

So.. yeah, you have no problem with men like yourself in women's areas as long as they're not "being lewd" that's all I had to know.
Thanks for admitting to it.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

who?

You and your ilk

So.. yeah, you have no problem with men like yourself in women's areas as long as they're not "being lewd" that's all I had to know.
Thanks for admitting to it.

The presence of a tranny in any space apart from Folsom Street Fair or Rupaul's drag race is inherently lewd and an afront to God.

 

[CammieDoxGirl]

So.. yeah, you have no problem with men like yourself in women's areas as long as they're not "being lewd" that's all I had to know.
Thanks for admitting to it.

You're so dumb. You have no ability to actualize context between all the different facilities you listed.. You conflate a fully clothed environment with ball waxing like a fucking dipshit. Stop being a bathroom creep and trying to stick your face in people's schlongs in the mensrooms sicko. I bet you don't count your dicksucking as cheating or gay because you are that kind of an insecure dipshit. You are a prime example of why men's facilities are not safe for trans women and they never will be.

 

[StrawberryDouche]

They shouldn't. They shouldn't be forced to look at cis women's vaginas either.

I would think that a man who is pretending to be a woman would be more educated on female anatomy. In order to see a woman's vagina - forced or consensually - then said woman would have to be opened wide goaste style. You honestly make some of the worst arguments I have ever seen on the Internet.

Why is everyone hyperfocused on muh bathrooms? It diverts from the primary issue which is a biological woman's right to private spaces that disallow intact males, such as: domestic violence shelters. If you are unfortunate enough to find yourself taking refuge in one, it is 99% certain you got there at the hands of a male.

This guy, this guy's thread we're on, this guy who is a lolcow, cannot even say "yes, biological women who have been brutalized by men should have a safe space free from men, and that includes trannies." He can't say it because he doesn't believe it. If he can't even grant victims that, then he is a misogynist and a shitbag of the most extreme order.

If he does believe it, then he should say it publicly. He should say it clearly and without equivocation or qualification.

Think about it, Blake. Think about all the views you would get crying about being a victim of the Tranny Takedown Mob because you dared to stand for the right of biological women to have a space free from them.

 

[Angry Canadian]

You are also an insane Nazi.

So why should I believe you?

Dunno. I guess you have no reason to believe me, but I would really appreciate it if you didn't make those kinds of accusations about me. I've also proven that I'm not the Nazi. I don't have to be that guy to also be critical of jewish people. This is Canada, the next time we all meet by the big tree in Edmonton, I'll take a selfie with the Nazi to prove it to you in particular.