Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

Should a diabetic be eating pancakes? That's at least 2 servings, maybe 3. Seems like a really bad idea.

Those old pics are kind of sad. That Kelly version was still huge, but it looks like she at least showered. Plus, she looks happy in that photo. Contrast it to the miserableness you see in every photo she posts today. It must be hell for her family to be locked in that house with her since the coof began.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: niente, Freetimbit, blue gopher snakes and 21 others
Mealy Mouth Spittle said:
Should a diabetic be eating pancakes? That's at least 2 servings, maybe 3. Seems like a really bad idea.

Those old pics are kind of sad. That Kelly version was still huge, but it looks like she at least showered. Plus, she looks happy in that photo. Contrast it to the miserableness you see in every photo she posts today. It must be hell for her family to be locked in that house with her since the coof began.
Click to expand...
She wasn't happy because she was smaller; she was happy because she had baybee and got all the attention mother of an infant can get
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Clotso Coof, Freetimbit, blue gopher snakes and 17 others
Reepicheep said:
View attachment 2469140View attachment 2469141View attachment 2469142
Click to expand...
That is an unbelievable amount of food. With very little actual nutritional value.

Mealy Mouth Spittle said:
Should a diabetic be eating pancakes? That's at least 2 servings, maybe 3. Seems like a really bad idea.

Those old pics are kind of sad. That Kelly version was still huge, but it looks like she at least showered. Plus, she looks happy in that photo. Contrast it to the miserableness you see in every photo she posts today. It must be hell for her family to be locked in that house with her since the coof began.
Click to expand...

No, 100% absolutely not.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: blue gopher snakes, chickenbutt, peetz cum sock and 5 others
I can see why Kelly is mad at the school’s lackluster special needs programme.

Look, they didn’t even put a bib on this kid before snack time. Lazy.

5515F9D4-1A02-4D06-8EA5-D8938F76E979.jpeg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: On a Journey, Clotso Coof, GrumbleBum2 and 29 others
AbraCadaver said:
I can see why Kelly is mad at the school’s lackluster special needs programme.

Look, they didn’t even put a bib on this kid before snack time. Lazy.

View attachment 2470752
Click to expand...
God, she's only halfway through that massive stack and she's already got that dazed, carb-coma look on her face. And you can't tell me she's used any of the lower-carb pancake mixes or sugar- free syrup, because that's diet food, and not how Kelly rolls.

Good news for you, Kells—you won't have to worry about whether your photography is any good once diabetic retinopathy has caught up with you.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Clotso Coof, blue gopher snakes, TomboyGF and 11 others
It's not even like you can't ever have pancakes again in your life as a diabetic. It's that a meal that large of strictly pancakes is very much AGAINST what any doctor would recommend. Kelly would have been better off with a three egg omelet with cheese, bacon and sausage.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista, chickenbutt, AbraCadaver and 5 others
LonesomeDud said:
Jeez. She was almost pretty.

Rate me sad on the internet.
Click to expand...
Let’s not get crazy, she was never going to be pretty. Even at a normal weight, her bone structure is rubbish. No cheekbones, eyes close together, creepy super-long philtrum…she was never going to be a looker. We tend to look at large people and overestimate how good they would look with less weight, because we’re mentally removing the right amount of weight from exactly the right places. But even at a healthy weight, I’ll bet Kelly would carry her remaining weight in her midsection and slung under her jaw in a wide rounded chin.

However, she’d still be so far ahead of what she looks like now that it would boggle the mind. Kelly Now is what you get when you deliberately try to look as offensive, agender and shapeless as possible.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Skitty, Pina Colada, Sneaky khajiit and 14 others
AbraCadaver said:
Let’s not get crazy, she was never going to be pretty. Even at a normal weight, her bone structure is rubbish. No cheekbones, eyes close together, creepy super-long philtrum…she was never going to be a looker. We tend to look at large people and overestimate how good they would look with less weight, because we’re mentally removing the right amount of weight from exactly the right places. But even at a healthy weight, I’ll bet Kelly would carry her remaining weight in her midsection and slung under her jaw in a wide rounded chin.

However, she’d still be so far ahead of what she looks like now that it would boggle the mind. Kelly Now is what you get when you deliberately try to look as offensive, agender and shapeless as possible.
Click to expand...
She wasn't ever going to be model material, but her hair was clean, and she could have been a solid 6/10. And the difference between a 6 and a 9 is a kind personality and genuine warmth. No one says, "My wife is a good mother and wife and genuinely cares for others and makes great contributions to the world, but her cheekbones are rubbish and her eyes are a little too close together." That's not how human brains work.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: rusty shackleford 1, niente, Cygnetik and 21 others
LonesomeDud said:
She wasn't ever going to be model material, but her hair was clean, and she could have been a solid 6/10. And the difference between a 6 and a 9 is a kind personality and genuine warmth. No one says, "My wife is a good mother and wife and genuinely cares for others and makes great contributions to the world, but her cheekbones are rubbish and her eyes are a little too close together." That's not how human brains work.
Click to expand...
Except she’s a horrifically rotten person inside so no, she still would not have been pretty. If a wonderful personality makes a 6 into a 9, Kelly’s personality must drive a 6 deep underground into purely negative numbers.

But i still love u
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Cygnetik, Clotso Coof, GrumbleBum2 and 16 others
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: blue gopher snakes, TomboyGF, Skitty and 8 others
AbraCadaver said:
Except she’s a horrifically rotten person inside so no, she still would not have been pretty. If a wonderful personality makes a 6 into a 9, Kelly’s personality must drive a 6 deep underground into purely negative numbers.

But i still love u
Click to expand...
Oh yeah. Even if Kelly was a physically beautiful person, her awful personality makes her a 3 off the bat.

I don't say this about many people, but I think Kelly's kind of a bitch.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Clotso Coof, blue gopher snakes, Actually Christian Bale and 20 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back