ILJ Forum Thunderdome / Slapfighting Hall of Shame - Take useless infighting here and keep regular threads clean

[anionfarflung]

Boiled a hamster alive? Isn’t that one of the early signs for a serial killer

True, but I think that torturing a defenseless animal to death per se is as horrible or more horrible than killing humans, especially when it comes to man's best friend.

 

[Drkinferno72]

True, but I think that torturing a defenseless animal to death per se is as horrible or more horrible than killing humans, especially when it comes to man's best friend.

More so, animals can't tell your intentions

 

[Lurk Moar Fag]

At the very end of the wrestling clip you can see the other girl kind of laughing and wrestling back
View attachment 2458583
It reminds me of something you'd see on Jackass, being annoying and all that. I think it's important to take all of this stuff with a grain of salt. It's really easy to project the worst possible context onto content based on preconceived notions about a person and without sound it's really hard to say.
Remember that association is voluntary. If a person is friends with, or hangs out with, someone like this, then that's a voluntary thing.

Just trying to be a voice of reason. Don't shoot the messenger.

*edit*
Alright, based on all the dumb votes I've gotten, it's pretty clear that people like hot HOT HOTTT are not interested in impartial, objective, unbiased documentation of this particular cow. I've seen conjecture, and projection, and speculation in this subforum for the last week and a half. Have fun muddying the waters to outside observers who google this subject in 6 months. If you can't separate your emotions from a subject, and let your feelings based on hearsay influence the way you document this cow, you're only doing the cow favours. But that's none of my business.

Have you read every log? If that’s not damning enough, you should probably check the confirmed leaks. This story is just tragic.

i made a thing. behold jewber
View attachment 2470953

EDIT: This is wholesome.
EDIT 2: On mobile, fucked up post, I apologize

 

[Thomas Highway]

I'm just not interested in this section of the forums anymore.

Cool. Quit posting and fuck off then.

Edit: You crave the revenge madrating, but I'm better than you.

 

[Jew Lover 1488]

Yeah, I've read every log up to the Allen leaks. I got bored of this subject, and bored of the hysteria. I'm in the minority of people who thinks 99% of the stuff in the logs is zoomer edge posting.
I also don't believe Allen's testimony regarding the hamster boiling considering there were people posting "letters" to him in threads here demanding he confess to things prior to that. I'm not unwilling to believe the story, but as it stands right now, unless the video surfaces with audio, I'm reserving my judgements on that.
The only thing I believe is that Isabella and the Fungal Force were involved with certain Chris groups like The Watchmen and WCT and Praetor and had a plot to do terrible things to him up to and including suicide or a murder/suicide.

There are posts by other people here who share my skepticism about things like Max's feet rotting off, and the poop eating/pants shitting (the original picture is from a reddit post from 8 years ago, which is linked in the logs)

I'm just not interested in this section of the forums anymore. I don't think Fiona was an innocent bystander, I think she was involved with the Chris plot, I think Louis is an autistic retard, I think Allen is a slow witted negro, and I think they're all disgusting people.
But I don't believe the majority of the logs to be true. That's just my opinion, and everyone else is entitled to their views too.

Great he's back

 

[Internet Explorer]

and the poop eating/pants shitting (the original picture is from a reddit post from 8 years ago, which is linked in the logs

That is literally the only thing you've said we can agree on.

I'm just not interested in this section of the forums anymore.

And you know where the exit is. See you in five minutes after you announce another week long hiatus or whatever.

We're posting here now? While he's posting there?

Good. Nobody fucking tell him.

 

[Weapon of Durgasoft]

More so, animals can't tell your intentions

You're a fucking retard.

True, but I think that torturing a defenseless animal to death per se is as horrible or more horrible than killing humans, especially when it comes to man's best friend.

You're especially retarded.

 

[anionfarflung]

You're a fucking retard.

You're especially retarded.

I guess I touched a nerve because you're one of those "humans" whose worth is far below that of a hamster.

 

[Weapon of Durgasoft]

I guess I touched a nerve because you're one of those "humans" whose worth is far below that of a hamster.

To kill a human being is to kill something capable of sapience. No animal is capable of sapience. The fact that an animal can't comprehend evil and never will be able to is precisely why killing a human is far worse than killing an animal. Even your retarded ass has more value than an animal.

This isn't even a point that I need to argue. Every jurisdiction on earth places a greater value on human life than animal life.

 

[anionfarflung]

To kill a human being is to kill something capable of sapience. No animal is capable of sapience. The fact that an animal can't comprehend evil and never will be able to is precisely why killing a human is far worse than killing an animal. Even your retarded ass has more value than an animal.

This isn't even a point that I need to argue. Every jurisdiction on earth places a greater value on human life than animal life.

It's amusing to witness a community-college dropout trying to philosophize.

First of all, it's debatable that sapience is unique to humans. Are you some kind of god-bothering moron? Do you think Yahweh singularly blessed/cursed the human race with it? In that case even the Bible suggests that having "knowledge of good and evil" makes us worthy of death. Humans having sapience just makes us more responsible for our actions.

I'm not some animal-rights activist or vegan, but needlessly causing pain to another creature with sentience (the quality far more pertinent here) is abhorrent. The fact that they can't reason why they are suffering fear and pain is the very reason why it's worse.

I won't apologize for considering the mangiest mutt to be more deserving of life, comfort, and happiness than most of the human race. Humans are garbage, generally speaking.

If I had your child's hand in one hand, and a dog's paw in the other, both dangling over a cliff and having the strength to save only one, I'd drop your shit-gened brat in a hot second.

This isn't even a point that I need to argue. Every jurisdiction on earth places a greater value on human life than animal life.

And what kind of mental-midget faggot appeals to law? Have you ever heard of Shari'a, dumbass? A law system founded by inbred savages with an average IQ of around 80? Fuck what laws say. People study law when their IQs aren't high enough for STEM.

 

[Internet Explorer]

stf u fgt

lol no u

nigger

double niggur

Keep going guys, you're winning.

 

[TheRetardKing]

From now on, I'm gonna call her LJN intsead of ILJ.

 

[Snack Cracker]

It's amusing to witness a community-college dropout trying to philosophize.

First of all, it's debatable that sapience is unique to humans. Are you some kind of god-bothering moron? Do you think Yahweh singularly blessed/cursed the human race with it? In that case even the Bible suggests that having "knowledge of good and evil" makes us worthy of death. Humans having sapience just makes us more responsible for our actions.

I'm not some animal-rights activist or vegan, but needlessly causing pain to another creature with sentience (the quality far more pertinent here) is abhorrent. The fact that they can't reason why they are suffering fear and pain is the very reason why it's worse.

I won't apologize for considering the mangiest mutt to be more deserving of life, comfort, and happiness than most of the human race. Humans are garbage, generally speaking.

If I had your child's hand in one hand, and a dog's paw in the other, both dangling over a cliff and having the strength to save only one, I'd drop your shit-gened brat in a hot second.


And what kind of mental-midget faggot appeals to law? Have you ever heard of Shari'a, dumbass? A law system founded by inbred savages with an average IQ of around 80? Fuck what laws say. People study law when their IQs aren't high enough for STEM.

Lol this is autism. Killing a human is absolutely worse than killing an animal, that’s why murder is illegal and animals are meat.
Not the cute fluffy hamsters of course, but other animals that are gross and stupid. Is that an issue for you too?

It’s personally funny that I’m discussing this because I’m not powerleveling all over the farms, but the “animals are more important than people guys!” thing is annoying.

People are animals too soooo don’t drop that kid you animal abuser.

 

[Poppavalyim Andropoff]

having the strength

Oh fuck off gaylord you couldn’t bench press a Twinkie

 

[anionfarflung]

Not the cute fluffy hamsters of course, but other animals that are gross and stupid. Is that an issue for you too?

Nature is cruel. Animals kill other animals for food every day, and not always quickly.

I don't have a problem with killing animals for food, as long as it's done humanely, but I know that's optimistic and doesn't reflect actual practice despite a supposed effort to implement humane procedures. Cows, pigs, etc., exist only because they were domesticated for food.

No animal should be tortured to death intentionally, however, which is why I find many Asian cultures despicable on this point, and halal and kosher slaughter aren't great either.

Dogs and humans co-evolved as companion species to each other. This is a bond that precedes backward cultures. When it comes to dogs, in particular, I would choose one over most humans, and certainly over "humans" like Bella.

 

[Snack Cracker]

Nature is cruel. Animals kill other animals for food every day, and not always quickly.

I don't have a problem with killing animals for food, as long as it's done humanely, but I know that's optimistic and doesn't reflect actual practice despite a supposed effort to implement humane procedures. Cows, pigs, etc., exist only because they were domesticated for food.

No animal should be tortured to death intentionally, however, which is why I find many Asian cultures despicable on this point, and halal and kosher slaughter aren't great either.

Dogs and humans co-evolved as companion species to each other. This is a bond that precedes backward cultures. When it comes to dogs, in particular, I would chose one over most humans, and certainly over "humans" like Bella.

I don’t know where you live, but where and how animals are killed for meat is anything but humane in the US.

I’m sure it’s easier for you to think “o no don’t eat doge” because culturally in the US they aren’t meat.

In other countries they are, same as guinea pigs and cats.

The moral grandstanding is embarrassing, just say torturing an animal period is awful and go.

 

[anionfarflung]

I’m sure it’s easier for you to think “o no don’t eat doge” because culturally in the US they aren’t meat.

I see what have another community-college dropout. You can parrot other people's thoughts; have you ever had an original idea?

No, it's not just a cultural point of view. Dogs were not domesticated to be food. They evolved along with us to be companion animals.

That cooperative bond formed between our species long before the teeming peasants of backward Asian societies like China ever hit the scene.

Dogs are well tuned to read our emotions. They understand pointing, which is beyond even chimps. The relationship between dogs and man is unique in many ways.

Sure, racially inferior chinks don't recognize this unique circumstance, but those worthless filthy peasants think torturing an animal to death makes the meat taste better and ground-up rhino horn gives them bigger erections. If they didn't engineer the Great Leap Fluward then it came about from those hellish wet markets where they bring together all manner of wild animals and torture them to death. Disgusting people. Morally superior? Hell yeah we are, and objectively so.

So-called "moral grandstanding" is not embarrassing. The reluctance of Westerners to assert our superiority why subhumans like Afghanis have humiliated us.

I laughed when those savages plummeted from planes. Good riddance to useless foul-smelling 70-IQ rubbish.

 

[Weapon of Durgasoft]

I see what have another community-college dropout. You can parrot other people's thoughts; have you ever had an original idea?

No, it's not just a cultural point of view. Dogs were not domesticated to be food. They evolved along with us to be companion animals.

That cooperative bond formed between our species long before the teeming peasants of backward Asian societies like China ever hit the scene.

Dogs are well tuned to read our emotions. They understand pointing, which is beyond even chimps. The relationship between dogs and man is unique in many ways.

Sure, racially inferior chinks don't recognize this unique circumstance, but those worthless filthy peasants think torturing an animal to death makes the meat taste better and ground-up rhino horn gives them bigger erections. If they didn't engineer the Great Leap Fluward then it came about from those hellish wet markets where they bring together all manner of wild animals and torture them to death. Disgusting people. Morally superior? Hell yeah we are, and objectively so.

So-called "moral grandstanding" is not embarrassing. The reluctance of Westerners to assert our superiority why subhumans like Afghanis have humiliated us.

I laughed when those savages plummeted from planes. Good riddance to useless foul-smelling 70-IQ rubbish.

Koreans domesticated dogs for food. Moreover, humans did not evolve alongside dogs. Anatomically modern humans have existed far longer than the domestication of dogs. Your suggestion that killing animals is worse than killing killing humans and killing dogs is worst of all is retarded in that context. It's also retarded because your argument to support it is the dogs inherent value to humans. Those same humans you just put below animals.

 

[Snack Cracker]

I see what have another community-college dropout. You can parrot other people's thoughts; have you ever had an original idea?

No, it's not just a cultural point of view. Dogs were not domesticated to be food. They evolved along with us to be companion animals.

That cooperative bond formed between our species long before the teeming peasants of backward Asian societies like China ever hit the scene.

Dogs are well tuned to read our emotions. They understand pointing, which is beyond even chimps. The relationship between dogs and man is unique in many ways.

Sure, racially inferior chinks don't recognize this unique circumstance, but those worthless filthy peasants think torturing an animal to death makes the meat taste better and ground-up rhino horn gives them bigger erections. If they didn't engineer the Great Leap Fluward then it came about from those hellish wet markets where they bring together all manner of wild animals and torture them to death. Disgusting people. Morally superior? Hell yeah we are, and objectively so.

So-called "moral grandstanding" is not embarrassing. The reluctance of Westerners to assert our superiority why subhumans like Afghanis have humiliated us.

I laughed when those savages plummeted from planes. Good riddance to useless foul-smelling 70-IQ rubbish.

It’s hysterical because you don’t even need to be a community college dropout to realize that you’re firmly ingrained in your world view and nothing will be accomplished here.

I just have one question: do you fuck your dog before or after you eat a hamburger? Just curious.

 

[Matt Damon]

So-called "moral grandstanding" is not embarrassing.

It very much is. No matter how firm the footing of your principles, moral grandstanding is always embarrassing.

And you are doing an awful lot of it.