Ethan Ralph's December 16th, 2020 Revenge Porn Arrest & Trial - Trial outcome: Ralph pled No Contest, was found guilty and has a 1yr suspended sentence (not probation).

What will happen?

  • Plea deal with no jail time

    Votes: 56 25.0%
  • Plea deal with jail time

    Votes: 44 19.6%
  • Guilty with no jail time

    Votes: 31 13.8%
  • Guilty with jail time

    Votes: 37 16.5%
  • Not guilty, alawgs btfo'd, Can't Abort the Retort!

    Votes: 33 14.7%
  • Ralph aborts himself

    Votes: 19 8.5%
  • Other (explain in post)

    Votes: 4 1.8%

  • Total voters
    224
  • Poll closed .
My guess is he enters a plea, too, but I wouldn't be too sure of no jailtime. The fact they even brought this back at all makes me think they want at least a bit of blood.
Past criminal convictions (felonies, no less) don't sit too well with prosecutors and judges too. Both would absolutely be within their right to take his past into account if we were to get as far as sentencing.

He's a dumb shit for not keeping his nose clean, but we all knew he was gonna be back in the criminal justice system eventually.
 
Last edited:
Out of curiosity - couldn't his defense claim it wasn't "revenge" since from what I recall he released it to some buddies to brag about scoring with a young woman?
Given the more recent inroads courts and the judicial system have made into dealing with intimate partner violence and coercive relationships, absolutely not.

There are two statutes, one is dissemination of nude images without consent, another is dissemination of the images with the intent to harass or coerce someone - he ran afoul of both of these statutes. Relationship status is irrelevant in either case, in fact I would personally see being in a relationship as an aggrevating factor.

Unless he gets a good plea, or the jury is rigged, he's cornered.
 
"ᴴᴵ ᴵ'ᵐ ˡᵒᵒᵏᶦⁿᵍ ᶠᵒʳ ᶦⁿᶠᵒʳᵐᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵒⁿ ᵃ ᵖᵒˢˢᶦᵇˡᵉ ᶜᵃˢᵉ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ᵐᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵇᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᶦⁿᵍ ᵗʰʳᵒᵘᵍʰ" OOOKAY
Yes, my microphone was fucking up. I had to restart my computer to fix it. :(
Not sure if late, but i fixed the audio
 
Ralph is one of those small percentage idiots in that 5% who will go to trial just on the chance the judge or jury sees it in his favor. He's dumb enough to do this, just need to sit and wait.
He pled guilty in his last serious criminal case.
Past criminal convictions (felonies, no less) don't sit too well with prosecutors and judges too. Both would absolutely be within their right to take his past into account if we get were to get as far as sentencing.
They're actually obligated to. Virginia uses a grid system where (unless the statute requires a specific sentence) the severity of the crime determines a general range of sentences, and then prior criminal history bumps it up depending on its severity, giving a modified range, and then the court generally chooses a sentence within that range. Although the judge can choose to deviate from that range within the statutory range, the judge must provide factual reasoning (if there is a jury based on facts before the jury) in order to sentence outside the range.

And there's a bunch of other arcane bullshit. I'm not sure if this is the correct worksheet, but there are worksheets for most crimes and types of crime.


This is a class 1 misdemeanor, which would have a statutory penalty of "confinement in jail for not more than twelve months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both."

As ugly as that worksheet is, they also have an online system called SWIFT but you need an account, and you need to be an attorney or other court personnel to qualify for one, and I don't have it in me to create a fake account just to guess what kind of sentence Gunt gets.
There are two statutes, one is dissemination of nude images without consent, another is dissemination of the images with the intent to harass or coerce someone - he ran afoul of both of these statutes.
There are two statutes, but the first is creating such images without consent, and the second is disseminating them without consent when they were created with the expectation of privacy. Apparently, Faith consented to the video being made, but not to it being disseminated, so he's only charged with that.
 
A reinstated revenge porn charge against a fat retarded pedophile felon who can't keep his maw shut. Hahahahahahaha, this could turn out to be one hell of a ride.
Jeez. Between Ethan Ralph and Pantsu, what were the fuckin chances that Ethan would be the first registered sex offender in that relationship?
 
Well ladies and guntlemen, I bring great news. Despite Ralph claiming there were "no special circumstances" listed on page 1 of like 3 of the dispensation paperwork, and despite claiming the case wasn't nolle prosequi'd but rather was dismissed outright, I can now confirm to you lovely people that indieed, Ethan Ralph's charges for revenge porn for releasing the sex tape of Faith have been reinstated. His arraignment was held 13 August 2021, his next court date is 10 September.

>Tries to sue kiwifarms
>Law jannies decide to sue Ralph instead

And people say that there's no justice in the word
 
Back