Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

1629939038215.png

1629939051624.png
 
As the “fuck me or you’re a bigot” debate is about to hit mainstream. Today a woke 50 year old Heterosexual male lets the gays know they are bigoted, hateful and misogynistic for not wanting to fuck women.
F0943C01-A2DF-4436-AF1E-BE54FF998D53.jpeg

43C0DBCC-9490-401E-9A72-B3B54AD656AB.jpeg



Gay men:
E5FE64A6-43EE-4C26-8D47-5041DB95319F.jpeg


Lesbians: (The Cassandra’s who screamed warnings into a void)

5DC94100-A2F9-49D4-96FC-90E8C9F2D6C9.gif
 
Last edited:
As the “fuck me or your bigoted” debate is about to hit mainstream. Today a woke 50 year old Heterosexual male lets the gays know they are bigots and misogynistic for not wanting to fuck women.View attachment 2480446View attachment 2480447
Gay men:View attachment 2480455
The mental gymnastics here are incredible. Let me get this straight: So because "gays are misogynist" when they announce they hate women, therefore, somehow "lesbians are transphobic" for not wanting to date men in dresses? :story: Is that the logic we're going with?

This is all an effort to justify men putting their dicks in women who don't want dick. And it's homophobic. What the actual fuck?
 
As the “fuck me or your bigoted” debate is about to hit mainstream. Today a woke 50 year old Heterosexual male lets the gays know they are bigots and misogynistic for not wanting to fuck women.
View attachment 2480446
View attachment 2480447


Gay men:
View attachment 2480455

Lesbians: (The Cassandra’s who screamed warnings into a void)

View attachment 2480456
I still don't understand the logic of "you must want to fuck me!! If you don't want to fuck me, you're a bigot. But also because you're a bigot, you shouldn't try to fuck me!!"

Probably because there's precisely none involved. Just ignore them and move on
 
As the “fuck me or your bigoted” debate is about to hit mainstream. Today a woke 50 year old Heterosexual male lets the gays know they are bigots and misogynistic for not wanting to fuck women.
View attachment 2480446
View attachment 2480447


Gay men:
View attachment 2480455

Lesbians: (The Cassandra’s who screamed warnings into a void)

View attachment 2480456
People just won't LOUDLY state their preferences then. I think most people probably already do that, because they don't want to be publicly chastised or dogpiled. I would never date a fat person, but I don't have to say that publicly -- I just simply don't date fatties.
 
As the “fuck me or your bigoted” debate is about to hit mainstream. Today a woke 50 year old Heterosexual male lets the gays know they are bigots and misogynistic for not wanting to fuck women.
View attachment 2480446
View attachment 2480447


Gay men:
View attachment 2480455

Lesbians: (The Cassandra’s who screamed warnings into a void)

View attachment 2480456
I've been trying to wrap my head around this for a few minutes. Especially his claim in the center about bigotry if you proclaim someone unattractive. There are so many unspoken assumptions doing most of the heavy lifting here like especially whether or not you can consider someone outside of their sexual attractiveness. If you're not a coomer who can view people as people outside of their sexual attractiveness to you then it starts to blur.

To make an example and not show my hand about my specific tastes, I'll take someone off the first news story I click on. I can understand why certain people are attracted to Amy Comey Barrett (and I wouldn't describe her as ugly or anything like that) yet I'm not sexually attracted to her. His claim is basically that I'm now being bigoted, namely misogynistic, towards one of the most powerful women in the world because I publicly said I don't have sexual thoughts about her. It also seems to undermine his point if I were to claim that I could hypothetically find a trans person attractive, just that I have yet to find one. His central claim seems to be that if you don't find ALL people sexual attractive, it's solely in the purview of bigotry. But that claim is so broad as to be useless as analysis. Are these really the types of claims he's trying to make? It seems rationally impossible, but then again... He may actually believe that people are little more than their sexual mores. But that would be a highly regressive view of people, certainly not a very progressive one and I'm not sure he's examined it to its rational end point much more than putting the claims onto Twitter for claps from generally white male coomers.

edit: Actually, to transpose one of his examples. Are transbians heterophobic? (Or homophobic?) They're proclaiming that they find men to be unattractive! Or do these power relationships only travel in one direction? Is disclaiming your bigoted views on the attractiveness of men easily done if you first make claims as to your "actual" gender? See how quickly this descends into a morass of unchecked bigotry if you even slightly examine the propositions?

I think it may make no sense BECAUSE it makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
I've been trying to wrap my head around this for a few minutes. Especially his claim in the center about bigotry if you proclaim someone unattractive. There are so many unspoken assumptions doing most of the heavy lifting here like especially whether or not you can consider someone outside of their sexual attractiveness. If you're not a coomer who can view people as people outside of their sexual attractiveness to you then it starts to blur.

To make an example and not show my hand about my specific tastes, I'll take someone off the first news story I click on. I can understand why certain people are attracted to Amy Comey Barrett (and I wouldn't describe her as ugly or anything like that) yet I'm not sexually attracted to her. His claim is basically that I'm now being bigoted, namely misogynistic, towards one of the most powerful women in the world because I publicly said I don't have sexual thoughts about her. It also seems to undermine his point if I were to claim that I could hypothetically find a trans person attractive, just that I have yet to find one. His central claim seems to be that if you don't find ALL people sexual attractive, it's solely in the purview of bigotry. But that claim is so broad as to be useless as analysis. Are these really the types of claims he's trying to make? It seems rationally impossible, but then again... He may actually believe that people are little more than their sexual mores. But that would be a highly regressive view of people, certainly not a very progressive one and I'm not sure he's examined it to its rational end point much more than putting the claims onto Twitter for claps from generally white male coomers.
I think this starts getting into issues of how virtue singling kind of shit just doesn't make sense once you get into the brass tacks of it.

If I were to say that a heterosexual woman for example wouldn't be attracted to women it would only make sense to someone. It should also only make sense that homosexual men wouldn't be attracted to women as well. Then, we have claims that transmen are men going on but since homosexual men deny attraction to them on the basis of their biological sex and won't budge on it nor retreat from their own spaces the way lesbians will they're trying the misogyny angle.

That creates another issue though which is that according to them transmen aren't women at all. So logically the statement he makes there doesn't make sense from their own PoV.

TLDR: Trans-attraction policing doesn't work on gay men so they're trying to move goalposts around in a way that isn't internally consistent.

EDIT: Reading it again, I think he may of meant women were marginalized I guess in which case my issue with his statement isn't accurate. I'm still leaving it though.

The idea that women's attractiveness not being there for you is misogynistic implies their value/worth as humans would be related to how fuckable you find them and thats pretty sexist.
 
Last edited:
That creates another issue though which is that according to them transmen aren't women at all. So logically the statement he makes there doesn't make sense from their own PoV.
This is a good point, a lot of these arguments are so self-serving and just assume the premises that they fail by their own standards. It's not some TERF logic going TRANSMEN AREN'T MEN or whatever, that's being accepted for arguments sake and then the logic is just breaking apart. Then they try to patch it all up by simply screaming about bigotry or TRANS RIGHTS. It seems to be actively harmful to their movement rather than convincing anybody.
 
but christ, 26K likes on that shit? THAT is horrifying. who is liking these rapist arguments?

Its funny though, the more likes, the less actual sex they seem to have.

they don't want the dregs of twitter who are giving them the thousands of likes, they want cis normies.

not allowed to disagree with the sacred trans ppl on twitter or you'll get banned, so the cis normies who are the actual targets of all these 'educational' posts, just ignore them.

i think that makes them angrier than anything.
Fellow rapists and people that aren't aware of the fact that these are carbon copies of arguments rapists would use and have used before, just with an "I'm oppressed" coat of paint.
They absolutely want normal ordinary people to kowtow and accept their bullshit more and more, so social media sites jumping to defend their honor is great for them. And if it's getting into classrooms with no way to take younger kids out or avoid it entirely, as other posters showcased? Even better. Anything for more validation, or sex, or both at once.
 
The mental gymnastics here are incredible. Let me get this straight: So because "gays are misogynist" when they announce they hate women, therefore, somehow "lesbians are transphobic" for not wanting to date men in dresses? :story: Is that the logic we're going with?

This is all an effort to justify men putting their dicks in women who don't want dick. And it's homophobic. What the actual fuck?
Seriously,,,,

But at the same time gay men don’t hate women. You were there when we came out in high school and in college. You were there when we needed you to go the clubs with us and meet other gays. Women will always be an invaluable part of a gay man’s life.

As for lesbians: Anyone who just assumed they have been sitting around doing nothing. Feel free to pass this article to them about G&L history:

 
Last edited:
View attachment 2479129

Oh sweetie he's doing way more than just looking.... Imagine trying to turn a troon into a proper lady lol
Found this comment to be interesting.
(archive)
while sending each other nudes isn’t normal for cis girls.. as a trans girl (who’s married to a cis girl), i would confess that seeing and sending other trans friends nudes does seem kinda normal..
Screenshot_20210826-044122_Chrome.jpgA tif enters the fray and comments that it isn't normal for them either. The dainty bedicked troon then surmises that it's because it's "probably mostly a trans femme thing" and that he's experienced it in multiple mtf groups.

To that I ask, what woman sends nudes of herself to her friends? Or has a group chat where they're all swapping nudes? Even tifs, who can be pretty sexually deranged, don't do this. It's so blatantly sexual, and yet...

I've been in group discords for troon stuff and it is shocking how narcissistic and sexual mtfs are. Unfortunately don't have any screenshots but nude sharing is rampant amongst mtfs. There's often a channel (for those who don't know what discord channels are, it's like a "chat room" within the larger server) specifically for it, and usually another one for selfies. I've known some servers to get in trouble for not age verifying these channels and inadvertently allowing minors to post suggestive pictures and selfies (mind you, to a chat of grown men). Ftm channels literally never had this problem, interestingly, and the closest I remember seeing was drama re: a fujo posting r18 fanart with shota content (ftms and yaoi, and to some extent shota, is its own thing that is way too much to get into tbh).

To get back on topic, mtf degeneracy and selfieposting is so rampant that when one server I was in had to ban selfies (and nudes by extension) because of underage posters/drama with nudes getting leaked, only the mtfs revolted or even cared. They made passive aggressive snide comments at the admins for months up until I left and probably still are lol. The admins didn't even ban members DMing or making their own group chats for it, it was literally only the public sharing of this stuff in the server that was banned and you'd think the admins were Stalin with how people bemoaned the "censorship".

As a then tif, I was also the target for a lot of not-so-subtle attempts to share/swap nudes, including a troon once sending a Google drive folder with, I shit you not, dozens of his awful nudes "on accident" instead of a (sfw) YouTube meme video link. Who has a Google drive folder of what has to have been upwards of 30+ of their nudes ready for sharing?! Even when specifically saying I didn't want that and wasn't interested, tims would "accidentally" send a few nudes (of course conveniently never deleting them even if I asked). This combined with unprovoked creepy sexual comments was enough to make me leave those servers and join tif exclusive ones (obvs as I've detransed I don't have access to any of these anymore. Unfortunate because tif servers have their own brand of milk, albeit usually with slightly less overt sexual degeneracy). It's probably a surprise to no one that other tifs I knew at the time had experienced similar treatment by tims regardless of their relationship status, sexuality, age, etc. and it's truly baffling because this aggressive sexual coming-on (often with dick pics) is so alien for a woman to do (even presuming women could have dicks, which they can't) that many of us didn't know how to call it out. If we called it creepy they'd accuse us of weaponizing transmisogyny, if we said it was harassment they'd claim we were oppressors and thus couldn't be targets of their sexual harassment. Moreover they're all butt ugly so I don't know what the obsession is with posting their horrid nudes for all to see, it's not like posting their nudes is going to suddenly make someone go gaga for girldique if they weren't already a sexual degenerate into men. And yet they not only do so of their own volition, but insist on doing so even if they are asked (or told by mods) not to.

Ironically for once a tranny is telling the truth: this is a purely mtf thing to do. But that's but because mtfs are some special brand of deviant, it's because it's a thing (typically only) men do, and they're men.

You can kind of see this behavior in a sfw light with the tranny takeover of r/twox where one mtf posted a selfie, got good reception, and opened the floodgates for tranny selfieposting for a whole day. Actual women in the sub were noting that their selfies would have gotten removed because of the sub's stance on selfies, but were effectively silenced.

I'm sure there's some psychology at play here (maybe something to do with power dynamics and NPD? Who the fuck knows) and AGP (and/or GAMP) almost certainly has something to do with it, but at any rate, it is hilarious how troons are so distinctly of their sex in these ways. They can get all the surgery they want, they still act and think like the sex they are vs. the gender they wish they were.

Sorry for the super long sperg, that reddit comment just sent me.

He claims it's not sexual but "validating"...odd then how only mtfs are doing it then, despite arguably what should be equal motivation for both sexes if we follow his logic. Totally not a fetish though amirite :tomgirl:

That whole thread is a disaster with mtfs defending the troon (of course) or even blaming OP's communication skills. This is in spite of the OP mentioning the mtf has a history of infidelity. Really feel for the poor woman, essentially getting gaslit by a whole subreddit and told that sharing nudes with "friends" is a totally normal and platonic (even positive and healthy) thing to do, for mtfs specifically. Imagine if the tables were turned.
 
The TiMs are treating their new-grown tits like dudes treat their dicks. I never got the appeal of sending images of your genitals to someone or looking at them. Probably something about the male brain reacting stronger to visual inputs.

Someone introduced this minor cow a few pages ago: archived tweet Video not included, but he's jiggling his man-tits around😑
I don't think many women would do this with their breasts and then post it on social media.
 
Even when specifically saying I didn't want that and wasn't interested, tims would "accidentally" send a few nudes (of course conveniently never deleting them even if I asked).
Ironically for once a tranny is telling the truth: this is a purely mtf thing to do. But that's but because mtfs are some special brand of deviant, it's because it's a thing (typically only) men do, and they're men.
Sending unsolicited dick pics is the digital version of the exhibitionist in the trenchcoat. Making others uncomfortable and forcing them to look at it is part of the thrill. „If only I could come out like my gay and lesbian friends. no chance, the world cannot accept exhibitionists in the same way and that sucks“ Just come out as trans and everyone will cater to you. It will be oppreshun to deny you to force others to participate in your fetish. Little girls will be called perverts if they happen to be in the changing room with you.

Yup, transwomen are men.
705D320D-F478-4D58-A8F5-E6A4F2EDA429.jpeg
F70DBB17-CCDC-46D6-A966-9DDA633E0544.jpeg
89B0BBA4-5CAE-4C10-B52D-726457D9BC4F.jpeg
 
Back