Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

Lel.
They are so horny to exaggerate everything. Rowling with her shelters for penisless women lidurly KILLING trans folxxx, online paper BANKROLLING the MURDER of sex workers.

While srs surgeons cutting snowflake festoon out of troons bodies. Oy fucking vey :story:
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Bunny at Law, TomboyGF, Oracle and 8 others
Crepidodera fulvicornis said:
Lel.
They are so horny to exaggerate everything. Rowling with her shelters for penisless women lidurly KILLING trans folxxx, online paper BANKROLLING the MURDER of sex workers.

While srs surgeons cutting snowflake festoon out of troons bodies. Oy fucking vey :story:
Click to expand...
She's not a glutton, you fucking shitlord. She LISTENS TO HER BODY!

(Except when it screams for mercy.)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Yellow Sink Disease, Oracle, glass_houses and 6 others
AbraCadaver said:
Personal responsibility is so out, friend. Saying “I like totally ADULTED today!” for applause on instagram, just for doing normal human chores and acting like a competent person, is the new way to be. Embrace every stupid thing you liked as a kid, from nostalgic cereals to toys to cartoon aesthetic. Wear footie pajamas. Colour in colouring books instead of cleaning your flat, because personal discipline is hard and for adults and you’ve thoroughly regressed to a baby that merely consumes and cries for attention. Avoid reality by repeating online mantras about how nothing is your fault and you can’t make an effort to change your life for the better. Start gofundmes for your rent because you’re queer and non-binary and have anxiety and that means you don’t have to work.

Always take the easy downhill route, with little to no resistance, right up until you someday slam facefirst into a brick wall of your own making and then cry that it’s not fair. You AM BABY all day, buddy.

Wrap yourself in a soft fluffy cocoon of 24/7 “self-care” and treats and excuses and endless empty social validation. Never address problems with hard work, only avoid them with consumerist distractions. Consequences will never happen to you.
Click to expand...
The movement of "all children are special" and "everyone should get a winner's badge" begin in the late '80s early '90s. For those who adopted that mentality, they didn't inspire their children to strive be their personal best. And it spawned an entire generation of Kellys. As grown adults in their their thirties and forties they are still focused on themselves and MY NEEDS instead of on their children, who are woefully neglected. When this batch of sprogs comes of age, it should be interesting.

Oh, and social media doesn't help. It allows the Kellys of the world to validate each other.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Bunny at Law, TomboyGF, Skitty and 14 others
TrainWreckSpotter said:
The movement of "all children are special" and "everyone should get a winner's badge" begin in the late '80s early '90s. For those who adopted that mentality, they didn't inspire their children to strive be their personal best. And it spawned an entire generation of Kellys. As grown adults in their their thirties and forties they are still focused on themselves and MY NEEDS instead of on their children, who are woefully neglected. When this batch of sprogs comes of age, it should be interesting.

Oh, and social media doesn't help. It allows the Kellys of the world to validate each other.
Click to expand...
That and the fact that psychologists have noticed a disturbing trend in kids born in the 90’s and very early 2000’s…they are more apt to believe that being good at something comes down to being lucky or born talented at it, and that you can’t improve with hard work or practice.

Basically, it’s the idea that succeeding at something only happens if you were already good at it to start or were lucky, not because you worked very hard to get better at it. The theory right now is that by telling kids, “everyone is special and equal and gets top prize”…by totally severing the connection between kids who worked much harder and them earning a prize for it…parents have instilled the idea that being successful at something is because you were just born extra-talented or innately good at it, or it’s the luck of the draw. When everyone gets a prize even if only some of them worked hard for it, and everyone gets praised and told they’re special and great even if they didn’t do anything to earn it, children don’t learn the value of working hard at something to succeed.

They don’t see the logical conclusion of hard work: mediocre at something —> work very hard to get better —> get rewarded for being good at it.

Now they only see: be mediocre at something —> get rewarded just for showing up.

You should always praise a child for how hard they worked at something or how much effort they put in, instead of just telling them that they’re very good at it or talented.

And yeah, some kids inevitably do feel left out if they don’t win something. That’s the point: it’s a damn good motivator to try harder and strive to be your best. Whinging that the slow kid in the class will never win a prize because he’s slow and it’s not fair is no excuse to devalue everything the other children do, in order to lower the playing field down to his level and make it “fair.” Saying that it has to be this way because disadvantaged children from poorer families can’t compete with the better-off children in their class is rubbish: most of this “everyone is a winner and gets a prize” rot started in, and continues to flourish around, middle to upper middle class white areas, where Karens like Kelly have all the time in the world to lumber into the school and scream at the teacher that little Sienna didn’t get a prize for her art contest entry and was terribly terribly hurt and probably has PTSD.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: kartana, Yellow Sink Disease, GrumbleBum2 and 29 others
46F9CBBC-5A89-4AFD-AC57-F63549C21303.png
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: forgotten corn, TomboyGF, Wish a nigga would and 5 others
AbraCadaver said:
That and the fact that psychologists have noticed a disturbing trend in kids born in the 90’s and very early 2000’s…they are more apt to believe that being good at something comes down to being lucky or born talented at it, and that you can’t improve with hard work or practice.

Basically, it’s the idea that succeeding at something only happens if you were already good at it to start or were lucky, not because you worked very hard to get better at it. The theory right now is that by telling kids, “everyone is special and equal and gets top prize”…by totally severing the connection between kids who worked much harder and them earning a prize for it…parents have instilled the idea that being successful at something is because you were just born extra-talented or innately good at it, or it’s the luck of the draw. When everyone gets a prize even if only some of them worked hard for it, and everyone gets praised and told they’re special and great even if they didn’t do anything to earn it, children don’t learn the value of working hard at something to succeed.

They don’t see the logical conclusion of hard work: mediocre at something —> work very hard to get better —> get rewarded for being good at it.

Now they only see: be mediocre at something —> get rewarded just for showing up.

You should always praise a child for how hard they worked at something or how much effort they put in, instead of just telling them that they’re very good at it or talented.

And yeah, some kids inevitably do feel left out if they don’t win something. That’s the point: it’s a damn good motivator to try harder and strive to be your best. Whinging that the slow kid in the class will never win a prize because he’s slow and it’s not fair is no excuse to devalue everything the other children do, in order to lower the playing field down to his level and make it “fair.” Saying that it has to be this way because disadvantaged children from poorer families can’t compete with the better-off children in their class is rubbish: most of this “everyone is a winner and gets a prize” rot started in, and continues to flourish around, middle to upper middle class white areas, where Karens like Kelly have all the time in the world to lumber into the school and scream at the teacher that little Sienna didn’t get a prize for her art contest entry and was terribly terribly hurt and probably has PTSD.
Click to expand...

It's more than just that. Kids aren't retards, they're insulted by participation trophies as soon as they're old enough to conceptualize what it is. It's also the "no child left behind" idea becoming less about trying to offer extra help to kids who need it and more about slowing the whole class down to the pace of the dumbest kid. I clearly remember being really fucking perturbed by this myself in the younger grades and that was decades ago. It's nearly impossible to hold kids back a grade if their parents don't insist on it and failing a course in high school takes honest-to-God effort because they let you scrape the grade if you turn in something, anything (my province calls it "credit recovery" and describes it as an "individualized" program to avoid failing a course which is one way to put it, I guess). Kids learn early on that exceptions will be made to prevent them from failure regardless even when someone tells them they "have" to put in work, so the chronically lazy just get worse and the ones who did have a work ethic start half assing it because it obviously doesn't matter.

The only thing I see that helps kids learn the value of hard work is extracurricular activities, like music or sports, but parents just let them quit if the kid bitches and moans about practicing or when they're not great at it starting out, not wanting to spend the cash if the kid hates it. Even if it's a team that doesn't cut people or lessons as opposed to hard competition, teaching them they can get out of work by whining instead of making them stick with something they chose is a mistake IMO. Cheaper and easier to just buy the kid a smartphone, and you can't really be bad at dicking around on the internet. We laugh about reddit but those niggers really are pathologically allergic to personal responsibility and normalizes being a lazy, perverted fuck.

Kelly is so terminally lazy that she can't put clothes on her fucking kids or comb their hair, wants to hire a nanny/maid, and gets fast food regularly all while not even fucking working. Her kids are going to be just like her if the husband doesn't grow a fucking pair and teach them some kind of work ethic or personal responsibility, Kelly is the type to just chimp out on any teachers who have expectations until they give up and there is no fucking way she's getting kids appropriately prepared and on time for any type of practice. Kelly's family might be ok though so maybe lolcow skips a generation... *sigh*
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: On a Journey, Thylacinee, Pina Colada and 18 others
AbraCadaver said:
That and the fact that psychologists have noticed a disturbing trend in kids born in the 90’s and very early 2000’s…they are more apt to believe that being good at something comes down to being lucky or born talented at it, and that you can’t improve with hard work or practice.
Click to expand...

AbraCadaver said:
Saying that it has to be this way because disadvantaged children from poorer families can’t compete with the better-off children in their class is rubbish: most of this “everyone is a winner and gets a prize” rot started in, and continues to flourish around, middle to upper middle class white areas, where Karens like Kelly have all the time in the world to lumber into the school and scream at the teacher that little Sienna didn’t get a prize for her art contest entry and was terribly terribly hurt and probably has PTSD.
Click to expand...
You're exactly correct. Incidentally, it's a very Western thing. Studies have consistently shown that Asian parents praise their children for how hard they work at a task, not for simply attempting it. I'll leave the observable ramifications of that to ones imagination except to say that there is a reason educational attainment in (developed) Asian nations usually far surpasses that of the Western world.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Diet Coke 4 Life, hydrochloric gunt wash, MicrowavedApple and 15 others
Akashic Retard said:
Why is she wearing a flesh colored bib?
Click to expand...
I'm too drunk to tell if you're referring to the chin or the massive expanse of exposed chest. Please help
AbraCadaver said:
That and the fact that psychologists have noticed a disturbing trend in kids born in the 90’s and very early 2000’s…they are more apt to believe that being good at something comes down to being lucky or born talented at it, and that you can’t improve with hard work or practice.

Basically, it’s the idea that succeeding at something only happens if you were already good at it to start or were lucky, not because you worked very hard to get better at it. The theory right now is that by telling kids, “everyone is special and equal and gets top prize”…by totally severing the connection between kids who worked much harder and them earning a prize for it…parents have instilled the idea that being successful at something is because you were just born extra-talented or innately good at it, or it’s the luck of the draw. When everyone gets a prize even if only some of them worked hard for it, and everyone gets praised and told they’re special and great even if they didn’t do anything to earn it, children don’t learn the value of working hard at something to succeed.

They don’t see the logical conclusion of hard work: mediocre at something —> work very hard to get better —> get rewarded for being good at it.

Now they only see: be mediocre at something —> get rewarded just for showing up.

You should always praise a child for how hard they worked at something or how much effort they put in, instead of just telling them that they’re very good at it or talented.

And yeah, some kids inevitably do feel left out if they don’t win something. That’s the point: it’s a damn good motivator to try harder and strive to be your best. Whinging that the slow kid in the class will never win a prize because he’s slow and it’s not fair is no excuse to devalue everything the other children do, in order to lower the playing field down to his level and make it “fair.” Saying that it has to be this way because disadvantaged children from poorer families can’t compete with the better-off children in their class is rubbish: most of this “everyone is a winner and gets a prize” rot started in, and continues to flourish around, middle to upper middle class white areas, where Karens like Kelly have all the time in the world to lumber into the school and scream at the teacher that little Sienna didn’t get a prize for her art contest entry and was terribly terribly hurt and probably has PTSD.
Click to expand...
I posted about this in another thread but it explains why so many hobby/craft/art subreddits are full of garbage made by beginners who expect asspats for merely starting to learn a skill. There's a big difference between sharing your first project with friends and family and sharing it with a community of people who actually practice the craft and have seen a billion shitty first projects already.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Diet Coke 4 Life, Stuff, Pudgy Bear Claws and 15 others
TrainWreckSpotter said:
McDonalds recently got rid of their salads because they just plain weren't selling so keeping them on the menu wasn't worth the cost and waste.
Click to expand...
It seems that it's only the case in the US (?). I'm from europe & salad is still on their menu that includes their website (but not the US website).
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
Reactions: Diet Coke 4 Life, Thomas Eugene Paris, behavioral swamp thang and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back