Crossover Ethan Ralph vs. Nick Rekieta & Elijah Schaffer - Current status: Nick Rekieta exposed for having a more attractive wife, big L.

Thank you for your service.

View attachment 2488107
shalomlawyer.gif


So this thread is a hurt feelings hugbox. Got it.

OP has the perfect name to go with this shit thread.
No OP didn't make it, I jannied the guntguarding ethics spergery into its own and it just happened to start from the OP and the OP had the perfect post. OP didn't start it either, just to make it clear.

Each time the gunt runs into the law which is like a farmer having to feed his cows or care for his corn, threads at some point devolve into "Nick, why didn't he do this?"

It's all so tiring. So have fun.
 
Yall are really mad all of Ralph friends wont unperson him arent ya? Yall really want him cancelled so hard youre actively brigading him.

Ill admit I think Ralph a piece of shit human being and I would love to see Ralph cancelled for the entertainment value alone. But that has to be done organically and calling on someone to cancel Ralph is lefty cancel culture bullshit.
Nick could marry Ralph and join his polycule for all I care, I'm just saying that he's a hypocritical faggot for being friends with a gaggle of turbodegenerates, Ralph in primis, but this includes pretty much all of Masteron's teenager trafficking ring gang.
 
Yall are really mad all of Ralph friends wont unperson him arent ya? Yall really want him cancelled so hard youre actively brigading him.

Ill admit I think Ralph a piece of shit human being and I would love to see Ralph cancelled for the entertainment value alone. But that has to be done organically and calling on someone to cancel Ralph is lefty cancel culture bullshit.
What do you call Ralphs crusade to cancel Null and kiwi farms?

You know how I can tell you are one of Nicks ballwashers? You think us posting on a gossip forum in a thread about Nick is some how us brigading him.

And news flash, Nick doesnt have the power to cancel Ethan, nor would we want him to. Its much funnier to us (me at least but I know I'm not alone on this opinion) to watch Ethan cancel himself.
 
Yall really want him cancelled so hard youre actively brigading him.
"Yall" "Brigading" "cancel"
Fucking cmon. Cancel is a word only retarded faggot redditors, Twitter trash, and lefty cunts would use. And don't pretend the right never cancels, the whole video games cause violence and Satanic panic is exactly that and just as dimwitted.

Nobody wants to deperson anyone, that's faggot behaviour. We want these cunts to have a dumpster fire trashy but prosperous life so we can point and laugh. This kind of parasocial stuff is retarded and cancerous. I personally don't even want the gunt to go to jail, although that's a selfish tranny janny take and he's better off getting Tyroned there for his crimes.
 
And don't pretend the right never cancels, the whole video games cause violence and Satanic panic is exactly that and just as dimwitted.
theyre pretending that comics gate and gamer gate werent massive attempts to cancel people for their incestuous associations, you dont even have to go back to older panics the right still does it even the same people bitching about cancel culture, how many times has a lefty made an offensive joke or statement about whites that the right wanted cancelled? how many times has the right said person x is a pedo to tell people to distance from them including ralph himself? nick has used the exact same social tactic with toye and the spousal abuse accusations getting all up and angry on his high horse while bitching at frankly more polite and less aggressive or obsessive posters. you have a career off cancelling parts of the left nick all anyone wants from you is to cause a funny sperg out with someone who frankly is ten times worse than toye and has done everything and far more that hes done.

edit actually i dont even remember anyone here directly attacking ethan financially, just informing his paypigs he fucked them over and telling him the awful shit he does often to his own supposed friends for fun or out of petty often mistaken spite or laziness or cowardice
 
Nick is a faggot but he has small children and we know where he lives. He probably just doesn't want Ralph showing up and acting like drunken white trash on his front lawn where his kids might see it.
I don't know how things work over there in the land of the fat and home of the burger, but can't Nick in such a situation simply call animal control and tell them there is some fat hog on his lawn trying to start shit?
 
I never really got the hype around Nick when he started blowing up around early 2019ish. The only streams of his I listened to were ones with Jim and Josh. From what little I've seen, he's a good host; but Nick seems to encourage a weird parasocial dynamic with his audience. I distinctly remember him getting a superberry in a stream with Null where a paypig asked for Nick to pray for his troubles or something and Nick said he would, in a fairly sincere tone.

I can understand wanting to be good to your audience, but I think setting boundaries with them is equally if not more important. Him placating that kind of weird internet daddy persona is why he has people sperg on him for guntguarding when their e-daddy/online best friend who they know super well because he prays for them when they give him money (CHRAHST IS KANG!), and him not living up to their built-in expectations is probably why Nick is where he's at with his audience.

Remember kids, every e-celeb is a mentally ill faggot. No sane person would want to willingly put themselves out there on the Internet for attention like a modern day Vaudevillian sideshow.
 
I never really got the hype around Nick when he started blowing up around early 2019ish. The only streams of his I listened to were ones with Jim and Josh. From what little I've seen, he's a good host; but Nick seems to encourage a weird parasocial dynamic with his audience. I distinctly remember him getting a superberry in a stream with Null where a paypig asked for Nick to pray for his troubles or something and Nick said he would, in a fairly sincere tone.

I can understand wanting to be good to your audience, but I think setting boundaries with them is equally if not more important. Him placating that kind of weird internet daddy persona is why he has people sperg on him for guntguarding when their e-daddy/online best friend who they know super well because he prays for them when they give him money (CHRAHST IS KANG!), and him not living up to their built-in expectations is probably why Nick is where he's at with his audience.

Remember kids, every e-celeb is a mentally ill faggot. No sane person would want to willingly put themselves out there on the Internet for attention like a modern day Vaudevillian sideshow.
Say what you will about RedLetterMedia but they go out of the way to specifically call you a loser with too much investment if you consider them your friends or imagine they even know who the fuck you are.
 
Rakket's wife was P E N E T R A T E D whilst attending a road rage, rakkets was asleep. If you asked Lady Rakkets about the roof story you'll get an interesting reaction... Not that you should.
Can you talk more about this story? Are y'all just fucking around of is their evidence of this?
 
Say what you will about RedLetterMedia but they go out of the way to specifically call you a loser with too much investment if you consider them your friends or imagine they even know who the fuck you are.

Because they can afford to. If Nick told all the people telling him about how their dad has liver cancer to stfu he'd have no viewers left and wouldn't be able to feed his 9 children.
 
So this thread is a hurt feelings hugbox. Got it.
I mean, Nick put preference over hearing how blind people had sex and a continuation of a conversation from another podcast over hearing his viewers, so I wouldn't be shocked if some people were genuinely assmad over him. I'm totally not assmad over him, Ken Jennings, and his stupid MGTOW diversity friend were more eager to hear about blind people fuck then an actual intellectual conversation.

In all seriousness and feelings set aside however, Nick has stated a few times that he's not one to take sides, and while I am someone who tries to see the truth to both sides, there reaches a point where you have to question weather or not it's worth keeping certain people around you, and Ralph absolutely falls under this. Ralph is not someone Nick should be keeping around as a lawyer because Ralph in the past two years has done nothing that a law abiding citizen would do under normal circumstances, between the revenge porn and the constant harassment of the Vickers Family. As a person, there's arguement over many things, and if he wants to be that guy who conveniently ignores the fact that Ralph had sex with someone who was just barely of age, there's the fact that Ralph has tried to slap Nick with the friendship/unity card over shit Nick has tweeted to Ralph over Ralph's spegantics. If Nick wants to ignore the possibility Ralph jacked it to Soph, a minor on TikTok, there's the fact that Ralph, rather then listening to someone's concerns over events that have gone on, decided to chew on bars claiming it was aspirin on a livestream to which he's now partly infamous over.

But then again this is also Nick Rekieta, a lawyer in the middle of nowhere Minessota in a situation he dislikes that was not of his choosing, so he's probably used to being in positions he dislikes.
 
This. Anyone who disagrees should welcome themselves to reality.

I don't know. Maybe he's doing that. But are you seriously defending Nick's gunt-guarding? Because that shit is embarrassing.
Are you surprised that Spectre is nut hanging from Nick? Rackets is the only bloke in town either too nice or blind to how retarded he is to distance himself from a serial failure. Spectre has a habit of blowing whoever he thinks will give him attention at the time trying to suck his way to the top. The day Rackets gives him the boot will give us some kino to laugh at though when Spectre leaks DM’s.
 
Back